Abstract
Photopigments that allow for ultraviolet (UV) vision occur in numerous fish species. In several species that also reflect short wavelengths, there is an indication that UV cues are important in forms of social signaling including mate choice. The sailfin molly, Poecilia latipinna, is closely related to species that use UV-reflective structures in mate selection, but it is unknown whether P. latipinna possess UV-reflective structures and whether the perceived presence or absence of these structures influences mating decisions. We detected prominent UV features on males and fewer, smaller reflective areas on females and then tested the role of these markings in mate preference. We focused on female preference, as male ornamentation and signals in the visible spectrum are known to influence female mating decisions. Using a two-choice paradigm, we exposed sexually receptive females to males whose visual appearance was manipulated by filters that either transmitted the full spectrum or blocked UV wavelengths. Female mollies significantly preferred males viewed under full spectrum, whereas male controls had no preference for females in UV-present or UV-absent light environments. While the ubiquity of these markings across both sexes may suggest additional roles for UV communication (i.e., shoaling), our results suggest that female P. latipinna take into account information transmitted in the UV markings when making visual mate choice decisions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arellano-Aguilar O, Garcia CM (2008) Exposure of pesticides impairs the expression of fish ornaments reducing the availability of attractive males. Proc R Soc Lond B 275:1345–1351
Bennett A, Cuthill I (1994) Ultraviolet vision in birds: what is its function? Vis Res 34:1471–1478
Boulcott P, Walton K, Braithwaite V (2005) The role of ultraviolet wavelengths in the mate-choice decisions of female three-spined sticklebacks. J Exp Biol 208:1453
Carvalho LS, Cowing JA, Wilkie SE, Bowmaker JK, Hunt DM (2007) The molecular evolution of avian ultraviolet- and violet-sensitive visual pigments. Mol Biol Evol 24(8):1843–1852
Church SC, Bennett ATD, Cuthill IC, Partridge JP (1998) Ultraviolet cues affect the foraging behaviour of bluetits. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:1509–1514
Cummings ME, Rosenthal GG, Ryan MJ (2003) A private ultraviolet channel in visual communication. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 270:897
Cummings ME, De León FJG, Mollaghan DM, Ryan MJ (2006) Is UV ornamentation an amplifier in swordtails? Zebrafish 3:91–100
Cuthill IC, Partridge JC, Bennett ATD, Church SC, Hart NS, Hunt S (2000) Ultraviolet vision in birds. In: Slater PJB, Rosenblatt JS, Snowdon CT, Roper TJ (eds) Advances in the study of behavior. Academic Press, Vol 29, pp 159–214
Ebrey T, Koutalos Y (2001) Vertebrate photoreceptors. Prog Retin Eye Res 20:49–94
Endler JA (1983) Natural and sexual selection on color patterns in poeciliid fishes. Environ Biol Fish 9:173–190
Farr JA, Travis J (1986) Fertility advertisement by female sailfin mollies, Poecilia latipinna (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Copeia 1986:467–472
Farr JA, Travis J, Trexler JC (1986) Behavioural allometry and interdemic variation in sexual behaviour of the sailfin molly, Poecilia latipinna (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Anim Behav 34:497–509
Fleishman LJ, Loew ER, Leal M (1993) Ultraviolet vision in lizards. Nature 365:397
Gabor C (1999) Association patterns of sailfin mollies (Poecilia latipinna): alternative hypotheses. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:333–340
Guilford T, Harvey PH (1998) Ornithology: the purple patch. Nature 392:867–869
Guillermo-Ferreira R, Therézio EM, Gehlen MH, Bispo, PC, Marletta A (2013) The role of wind pigmentation, UV and fluorescence as signals in a neotropical damselfly. Journal of Insect Behavior. Published online August
Hasson O (1991) Sexual displays as amplifiers: practical examples with an emphasis on feather decorations. Behav Ecol 2:189–197
Hawryshyn CW, McFarland WN (1987) Cone photoreceptor mechanisms and the detection of polarized light in fish. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethology Sens Neural Behav Physiol 160:459–465
Hrbek T, Seckinger J, Meyer A (2007) A phylogenetic and biogeographic perspective on the evolution of poeciliid fishes. Mol Phylogenet Evol 43:986–998
Hunt D, Wilkie S, Bowmaker J, Poopalasundaram S (2001) Vision in the ultraviolet. Cell Mol Life Sci 58:1583–1598
Jacobs GH (1992) Ultraviolet vision in vertebrates. Am Zool 32:544–554
Jeswiet SB, Godin J-GJ (2011) Validation of a method for quantifying male mating preferences in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Ethology 117:422–429
Kemp DJ, Reznick DN, Grether GF, Endler JA (2009) Predicting the direction of ornament evolution in Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 276:4335
Kodric-Brown A, Johnson SC (2002) Ultraviolet reflectance patterns of male guppies enhance their attractiveness to females. Anim Behav 63:391–396
Kodric-Brown A, Nicoletto PF (2001) Female choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata): the interaction between male color and display. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:346–351
Körner K, Schlupp I, Plath M, Loew E (2006) Spectral sensitivity of mollies: comparing surface and cave dwelling Atlantic mollies, Poecilia mexicana. J Fish Biol 69:54–65
Lim MLM, Li J, Li D (2008) Effect of UV-reflecting markings on female mate-choice decisions in Cosmophasis umbratica, a jumping spider from Singapore. Behav Ecol 19:61
Losey GS, Cronin TW, Goldsmith TH, Hyde D, Marshall NJ, McFarland WN (1999) The UV visual world of fishes: a review. J Fish Biol 54:921–943
Lythgoe JN (1979) The ecology of vision. Clarendon, Oxford
Macías Garcia C, de Perera T (2002) Ultraviolet-based female preferences in a viviparous fish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:1–6
MacLaren RD (2006) The effects of male proximity, apparent size, and absolute size on female preference in the sailfin molly, Poecilia latipinna. Behaviour 143:1457–1472
Marshall NJ (1996) Measuring colours around a coral reef. Biophoton Int 1996:52–56
Marshall NJ (2000) Communication and camouflage with the same ‘bright’ colours in reef fishes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 355:1243–1248
Modarressie R, Rick IP, Bakker T (2006) UV matters in shoaling decisions. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 273:849
Novales Flamarique I, Hawryshyn CW (1997) Is the use of underwater polarized light by fish restricted to crepuscular time periods? Vis Res 37:975–989
Odeen A, Hastad O (2003) Complex distributions of avian color vision systems revealed by sequencing the SWS1 opsin from total DNA. Mol Biol Evol 20(6):855–861
Ord TJ, Stamps JA, Losos JB (2013) Convergent evolution in the territorial communication of a classic adaptive radiation: Caribbean Anolis lizards. Anim Behav 85(6):1415–1426
Partridge JC, Cuthill IC (2010) Animal behaviour: ultraviolet fish faces. Curr Biol 20:R318–R320
Ptacek MB (2005) Mating signal divergence, sexual selection and species recognition in mollies (Poeciliidae: Poecilia: Mollienesia). In: Grier HJ, Uribe MC (eds) Proceedings from the second international symposium on livebearing fishes. New Life Publications, Homestead, FL, pp 71–87
Ptacek MB, Travis J (1997) Mate choice in the sailfin molly, Poecilia latipinna. Evolution 51:1217–1231
Rémy A, Grégoire A, Perret P, Doutrelant C (2010) Mediating male-male interactions: the role of UV crest coloration in blue tits. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:1839–1847
Rick IP, Bakker T (2008a) Color signaling in conspicuous red sticklebacks: do ultraviolet signals surpass others? BMC Evol Biol 8:189
Rick IP, Bakker TCM (2008b) UV wavelengths make female three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) more attractive for males. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:439–445
Rick IP, Modarressie R, Bakker T (2004) Male three-spined sticklebacks reflect in ultraviolet light. Behaviour 141(11):1531–1541
Rick IP, Modarressie R, Bakker T (2006) UV wavelengths affect female mate choice in three-spined sticklebacks. Anim Behav 71:307–313
Sheldon BC, Andersson S, Griffith SC, Örnborg J, Sendecka J (1999) Ultraviolet colour variation influences blue tit sex ratios. Nature 402:874–877
Siebeck UE (2014) Communication in the ultraviolet: unravelling the secret language of fish. In: Witzany G (ed) Biocommunication of animals. Springer, Netherlands, pp 299–320
Siebeck UW, Marshall NJ (2001) Ocular media transmission of coral reef fish - can coral reef fish see ultraviolet light? Vis Res 41:133–149
Siebeck UE, Parker AN, Sprenger D, Mäthger LM, Wallis G (2010) A species of reef fish that uses ultraviolet patterns for covert face recognition. Curr Biol 20:407–410
Sliney DH (2002) How light reaches the eye and its components. Int J Toxicol 21:501
Smith EJ, Partridge JC, Parsons KN, White EM, Cuthill IC, Bennett ATD, Church SC (2002) Ultraviolet vision and mate choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol 13:11–19
Sumner IT, Travis J, Johnson CD (1994) Methods of female fertility advertisement and variation among males in responsiveness in the sailfin molly (Poecilia latipinna). Copeia 1994:27–34
Tovee MJ (1995) Ultra-violet photoreceptors in the animal kingdom: their distribution and function. Trends Ecol Evol 10:455–460
Van Norren D, Schellekens P (1990) Blue light hazard in rat. Vis Res 30:1517–1520
Viitala J, Korpimaki E, Palokangas P, Koivula M (1995) Attraction of kestrels to vole scent marks visible in ultraviolet light. Nature 373:425–427
Walling CA, Royle NJ, Lindström J, Metcalf NB (2010) Do female association preferences predict the likelihood of reproduction? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:541–548
White EM, Partridge JC, Church SC (2003) Ultraviolet dermal reflexion and mate choice in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Anim Behav 65:693–700
Zigman S, Bagley S (1971) Near ultraviolet light effects on dogfish retinal rods. Exp Eye Res 12:155
Acknowledgments
We thank R. Bowes, R. Carreno, and T. Panhuis for assistance in collecting the fish. We also thank J. Lee for assistance with male preference trials, R. O’Brian for assistance with fish spectrometry, J. Nilan for assitance with photography, and T. Panhuis, H. Rhodes, and anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful suggestions that greatly improved this manuscript. The McGraw Lab at ASU offered helpful advice for running the spectroscopy software. We are grateful to the Ohio Wesleyan University Department of Zoology for advice and suggestions throughout this study.
Ethical standards
This work is in accordance with the laws governing research in the USA, and all research was conducted under approval from Ohio Wesleyan University’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(PDF 56 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Palmer, M.S., Hankison, S.J. Use of ultraviolet cues in female mate preference in the sailfin molly, Poecilia latipinna . acta ethol 18, 153–160 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-014-0195-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-014-0195-3