Abstract
Background and aims
The economic evaluation of tobacco control policies requires the adoption of assumptions about the impact of changes in smoking status on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Estimates for such impacts are necessary for different populations. This paper aims to test whether smoking status has an independent effect on HRQoL over and above the effect derived from the increased likelihood of suffering a tobacco related disease, and to calculate utility values for the Spanish population.
Methods
Using data from the Spanish Encuesta Nacional de Salud of 2011–12, we estimate statistical models for HRQoL as measured by the EQ-5D-5L instrument as a function of smoking status. We include a comprehensive set of controls for biological, clinical, lifestyle and socioeconomic characteristics.
Results
Smoking status has an independent, statistically significant effect on HRQoL. However, the size of the effect is small. The typical smoking related diseases, such as lung cancer, are associated with a reduction in HRQoL about 5 times larger than the difference between current smokers and never smokers.
Conclusion
Attributing substantive HRQoL gains to quitting smoking as well as accounting for the concomitant HRQoL gain derived from a smaller likelihood of contracting tobacco related diseases might lead to an overestimation of the benefits of tobacco control policies. Nonetheless, the relatively large drops in HRQoL associated with being diagnosed with diseases that might be causally linked to tobacco suggest that such diseases should not be omitted from the economic evaluations of tobacco control policies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The estimation of the second part of the model uses a smaller number of observations than the estimation for the first part. As reflected in Table 1, the sample sizes are 2770 for men and 5117 for women. However, these samples contain variation in smoking status: among males there are 952 never smokers, 796 current smokers and 1022 former smokers and among women the corresponding figures are 3729, 845 and 543.
References
World Health Organization. WHO Global Report: Mortality attributable to tobacco. WHO. http://www.who.int/tobacco/publications/surveillance/rep_mortality_attributable/en/ (2012). Accessed 18 July 2016
World Health Organization. Tobacco. Fact sheet 339. WHO. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs339/en/ (2016). Accessed 18 July 2016
US Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequences of smoking—50 years of progress: a report of the Surgeon General. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health. Atlanta, GA (2014)
Atusingwize, E., Lewis, S., Langley, T.: Economic evaluations of tobacco control mass media campaigns: a systematic review. Tob. Control 24, 320–327 (2015). doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051579
Kahende, J.W., Loomis, B.R., Adhikari, B., Marshall, L.: A review of economic evaluations of tobacco control programs. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 6, 51–68 (2009). doi:10.3390/ijerph6010051
Weinstein, M.C., Torrance, G., McGuire, A.: QALYs: the basics. Value Health 12(1), S5–S9 (2009)
Vogl, M., Wenig, C.M., Leidl, R., Pokhrel, S.: Smoking and health-related quality of life in English general population: implications for economic evaluations. BMC Public Health 12, 203 (2012). doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-203
Ramos-Goni, J.M., Pinto-Prades, J.L., Oppe, M., Cabases, J.M., Serrano-Aguilar, P., Rivero-Arias, O.: Valuation and modeling of EQ-5D-5L health states using a hybrid approach. Med. Care (2014). doi:10.1097/MLR.0000000000000283
Augustovski, F., Rey-Ares, L., Irazola, V., Garay, O.U., Gianneo, O., Fernandez, G., et al.: An EQ-5D-5L value set based on Uruguayan population preferences. Qual. Life Res. 25, 323–333 (2016). doi:10.1007/s11136-015-1086-4
EuroQol Group.: EQ-5D nomenclature. http://www.euroqol.org/about-eq-5d/eq-5d-nomenclature.html (2017). Accessed on May 2017
Over, E.A., Feenstra, T.L., Hoogenveen, R.T., Droomers, M., Uiters, E., van Gelder, B.M.: Tobacco control policies specified according to socioeconomic status: health disparities and cost-effectiveness. Nicotine Tob. Res. 16, 725–732 (2014). doi:10.1093/ntr/ntt218
Howard, P., Knight, C., Boler, A., Baker, C.: Cost-utility analysis of varenicline versus existing smoking cessation strategies using the BENESCO simulation model: application to a population of US adult smokers. Pharmacoeconomics 26, 497–511 (2008)
Stanczyk, N.E., Smit, E.S., Schulz, D.N., de Vries, H., Bolman, C., Muris, J.W., et al.: An economic evaluation of a video- and text-based computer-tailored intervention for smoking cessation: a cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 9, e110117 (2014). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.011011
de Fernandez, B.O.J., Sanchez-Maestre, C., Brosa Riestra, M., Arroyo, O., Sanz de Burgoa, V., Wilson, K.: Cost effectiveness analysis of varenicline (Champix) for the treatment of smoking in Spain. Ann. Med. Intern. 25, 342–348 (2008). (in Spanish)
Becona, E., Vazquez, M.I., Miguez Mdel, C., Fernandez del Rio, E., Lopez-Duran, A., Martinez, U., et al.: Smoking habit profile and health-related quality of life. Psicothema 25, 421–426 (2013). doi:10.7334/psicothema2013.73
Cayuela, A., Rodriguez-Dominguez, S., Otero, R.: Deteriorated health-related quality of life in healthy male smokers. Arch. Bronconeumol. 43, 59–63 (2007). (in Spanish)
Guiterrez-Bedmar, M., Segui-Gomez, M., Gomez-Gracia, E., Bes-Rastrollo, M., Martinez-Gonzalez, M.A.: Smoking status, changes in smoking status and health-related quality of life: findings from the SUN (“Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra”) cohort. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 6, 310–320 (2009). doi:10.3390/ijerph6010310
de Lossada, A., Rejas, J.: Health-related quality-of-life in the smoking general population of Spain: an approach from the National Health Survey. Semergen (2015). doi:10.1016/j.semerg.2015.09.003. (in Spanish)
Ware Jr., J.E., Gandek, B.: Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 51, 903–912 (1998)
Instituto Nacional de Estadística. Encuesta Nacional de Salud 2011-12. INE. http://www.ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/es/operacion.htm?c=Estadistica_C&cid=1254736176783&menu=resultados&idp=1254735573175 (2013). Accessed 19 July 2016
Huang, I.C., Frangakis, C., Atkinson, M.J., Willke, R.J., Leite, W.L., Vogel, W.B., et al.: Addressing ceiling effects in health status measures: a comparison of techniques applied to measures for people with HIV disease. Health Serv. Res. 43, 327–339 (2008). doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00745.x
Brooks RG. 28 Years of the EuroQol Group: an overview. EuroQol Working Paper Series, 2015. EuroQol Group. file:///C:/Users/Marta%20Trapero/Downloads/EuroQol_Working_Paper_Series_Manuscript_15003_-_Richard_Brooks_02.pdf (2015). Accessed on May 2017
Acknowledgements
The authors are very grateful to Dr. Toni Mora for his invaluable help and support to finish this paper. This work was partially funded by the European Union’s FP7 programme (the EQUIPT Project; Grant agreement 602270) and partially by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) under the programme “Programa Estatal de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación Orientada a los Retos de la Sociedad, Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica Técnica y de Innovación 2013–2016”. Grant ECO2013-48217-C2-1 (http://invesfeps.ulpgc.es/en). The funders had no influence on the conduction of this study or the drafting of this manuscript. We are grateful for the comments and suggestions of the editor of this journal and two anonymous referees. The usual disclaimer applies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
López-Nicolás, Á., Trapero-Bertran, M. & Muñoz, C. Smoking, health-related quality of life and economic evaluation. Eur J Health Econ 19, 747–756 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-017-0919-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-017-0919-1