Abstract
This paper provides evidence of regulatory capture in China’s environmental regulation by exploring the relationship between subnational leaders’ tenure and local firms’ environmental protection behaviors. We find that firms discharge more exhaust and make less effort to abate air pollution when mayors’ tenure increases. The results are robust to alternative specifications and measures, but show heterogeneity across regions and ownerships. The intensity of regulatory capture depends on institutional factors and firm characteristics. This study enriches the literature by analyzing regulatory capture under a regionally decentralized authoritarian system and provides clear policy implications for preventing regulatory capture.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
There is another reason why we use tenure rather than native. To increase the transaction costs of collusion and corruption, officials are seldom appointed by upper-level governments as the core leaders of their hometown. So only a small number of leaders are native of the cities they serve.
Industrial sector includes mining industry, manufacture, and public utilities (production and supply of electric power, gas and water). In the National Industries Classification System (both GB/T 4754-94 and GB/T 4754-2002), industrial sector consists of two-digit industry ranging from 6 to 46. See Holz (2013) for detail of Chinese industrial classification systems.
See, for example, Brandt et al. (2012), for more information on the Annual Survey of Industrial Firms.
Xinhua.net is the official website of the Xinhua News Agency, the national news agency of China; people.cn is the website of People’s Daily, the official media of China. The governments release information on appointment and removal of officials through these two medias and provide curriculum vitae of officials as well.
Although we have longer time series for the Environmental Protection Database and the data of local leaders, the Annual Survey of Industrial Firms (ASIF) is only available from 1998–2013.
The industrial waste gas, or exhaust for short, is the most important source of air pollution. For example, the particulate waste gas is the direct source of PM10, PM2.5, and other kinds of air pollution; and the gaseous waste gas, especially those nitrogenous or sulfureted exhaust, results not only in air pollution, but also land and water pollution as well (Sher 1998).
We are indebted to one of the reviewers for this idea.
We thank one of the reviewers for pointing this possibility out.
Notice that coefficient in Column (4) is not statistically significant, but its counterpart in Column (1) is not significant either. Both Column (5) and Column (8) are significant, implying that the potential endogeneity is not severe enough to change our basic conclusion.
Among the 156 firms in our sample, 102 firms are in eastern China and the rest are in central and western China.
102 of the 156 sample firms are SOEs, and the rest are non-SOEs.
References
Ainsworth S (1993) Regulating lobbyists and interest group influence. J Polit 55(1):41–56
Antweiler W, Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2001) Is free trade good for the environment? Am Econ Rev 91(4):877–908
Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some Tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58(2):277–297
Becker GS (1983) A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. Q J Econ 98(3):371–400
Becker GS (1985) Public policies, pressure groups, and dead weight costs. J Public Econ 28(3):329–347
Bombardini M, Li B (2016) Trade, pollution and mortality in China. National Bureau of Economic Research working paper, No. w22804
Brandt L, Van Biesebroeck J, Zhang Y (2012) Creative accounting or creative destruction: firm level productivity growth in Chinese manufacturing. J Dev Econ 97(2):339–351
Buchanan JM, Robert D, Gordon T (1980) Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society. Texas A&M University Press, College Station
Chichilnisky G (1994) North-south trade and the global environment. Am Econ R 84(4):851–874
Copeland BR, Taylor MS (1994) North-south trade and the environment. Q J Econ 109(3):755–787
Dean JM, Lovely ME, Wang H (2009) Are Foreign investors attracted to weak environmental regulations? Evaluating the evidence from China. J Dev Econ 90(1):1–13
Fan G, Wang X, Zhu H (2011) The report on China marketization index-the relative process of regional marketization 2011. Economic Science Press, Beijing
Frankel JA, Rose AK (2005) Is trade good or bad for the environment? Sorting out the causality. Rev Econ Stat 87(1):85–91
Fredriksson PG, Millimet DL (2002) Strategic interaction and the determination of environmental policy across U.S. States. J Urban Econ 51(1):101–122
Gao N, Liang P (2016) Fresh cadres bring fresh air? Personnel turnover, institutions, and China’s water pollutions. Rev Dev Econ 20(1):48–61
Goodstein E (1995) The economic roots of environmental decline: Property rights or path dependence? J Econ Issues 29(4):1029–1043
Holz C (2013) Chinese statistics: classification systems and data sources. SSRN Electron J 54(5–6):532–571
Huang Z, Li L, Ma G, Xu C (2017) Hayek, local information, and commanding heights: decentralizing state-owned enterprises in China. Am Econ Rev 107(8):2455–2478
Jia R, Nie H (2017) Decentralization, collusion and coalmine deaths. Rev Econ Stat 99(1):105–118
Keen M, Marchand M (1997) Fiscal competition and the pattern of public spending. J Public Econ 66(1):33–53
Laffont JJ, Tirole J (1991) The politics of government decision-making: a theory of regulatory capture. Q J Econ 106(4):1089–1127
Lerner J, Tirole J (2004) Efficient patent pools. Am Econ Rev 94(3):691–711
Li Z, Lin Y (2008) Policy burden, privatization and soft budget constraint. J Comp Econ 36:90–102
Li H, Zhou L (2005) Political turnover and economic performance: The incentive role of personnel control in China. J Public Econ 89(9):1743–1762
Li T, Wang Y, Zhao D (2016) Environmental kuznets curve in China: new evidence from dynamic panel analysis. Energy Policy 138–147
Martimort D (1999) The life cycle of regulatory agencies: dynamic capture and transaction costs. Rev Econ Stud 66(4):929–947
Maskin E, Qian Y, Xu C (2000) Incentives, scale economies, and organization forms. Rev Econ Stud 67:359–378
Ogus AI (1994) Regulation legal form and economic theory. Clarendon Press, Cambridge
Qian Y, Weingast B (1997) Federalism as a commitment to preserving market incentives. J Econ Perspect 11:83–92
Sher E (1998) Environmental aspects of air pollution. In: Sher E (ed) Handbook of air pollution prevention and control. Academic Press, Boston
Song T, Zheng T, Tong L (2008) An empirical test of the environmental kuznets curve in China: a panel cointegration approach. China Econ Rev 19(3):381–392
Stigler GJ (1971) The theory of economic regulation. Bell J Econ 2(1):3–21
Xi T, Yao Y, Zhang M (2018) Capability and opportunism: evidence from city officials in China. J Comp Econ 46(4):1046–1061
Xu C (2011) The fundamental institutions of China’s reforms and development. J Econ Lit 49(4):1076–1151
Yao Y, Zhang M (2015) Subnational leaders and economic growth: evidence from Chinese cities. J Econ Growth 20(4):405–436
Yin J, Zheng M, Chen J (2015) The effects of environmental regulation and technical progress on CO2kuznets curve: an evidence from China. Energy Policy 77:97–108
Young A (2000) The razor’s edge: distortions and incremental reform in the People’s Republic of China. Q J Econ 115(4):1091–1135
Funding
The funding was provided by Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province (Grand No. 2019A101002016). The Key Project of National Social Science Fund (19AZD012).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ma, H., Shen, G. Do new mayors bring fresh air? Some evidence of regulatory capture in China. Rev Econ Design 25, 227–249 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10058-021-00248-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10058-021-00248-5