Skip to main content
Log in

Persistent posterior seroma after laparoscopic repair of ventral abdominal wall hernias with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh: prevalence, independent predictors and detached tacks

Retrospective review

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

A persistent seroma located posterior to a mesh (PPS) remains a little known complication after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR). The aim of this large case series was to analyse the prevalence and clinical course as well as identify related factors and independent predictors of PPS.

Methods

All 1288 adult patients who underwent a LVHR with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh (ePTFE) between January 2003 and July 2014 were reviewed. Those who underwent an abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan more than 3 months afterwards (n = 166) were included and their scans were analysed. The primary outcome measure was the prevalence of a PPS and its characteristics. The secondary outcome measures were identification of significantly related factors and independent predictors of PPS.

Results

A PPS was observed in 14 of 166 analysed CT scans (8.4%). Eleven patients were symptomatic; conservative treatment (wait-and-see policy) was successful in eight. Three underwent relaparoscopy with removal of a thick neoperitoneum. Several instances of tack and/or mesh detachment were identified on CT scans and during relaparoscopy. Independent predictors were: > 3 trocars (RR 5.0, 95% CI 1.6–15.8) and use of a mesh larger than > 300 cm2 (RR 9.9, 95% CI 1.9–51.2).

Conclusions

A PPS is a relatively common complication after LVHR with an ePTFE mesh of usually larger hernias. A “wait-and-see” approach seems justified in most cases. Some require laparoscopic excision of the thick neoperitoneum. A PPS can cause tack and mesh detachment but the clinical consequences are unclear. Recurrences have not been observed in this series.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heniford BT, Park A, Ramshaw BJ, Voeller G (2003) Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias nine years’ experience with 850 consecutive hernias. Trans. Meet Am Surg Assoc 121:85–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000086662.49499.ab

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tsereteli Z, Ramshaw B, Ramaswamy A (2008) Chronic posterior seroma with neoperitoneum following laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: treatment algorithm. Hernia 12:363–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-008-0350-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Scott PD, Harold KL, Craft RO, Roberts CC (2008) Radiology case reports postoperative seroma deep to mesh after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: computed tomography appearance and implications for treatment. Radiol Case Rep 3:1–4. https://doi.org/10.2484/rcr.v3i1.128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Morales-Conde S, Suarez-Artacho G, Socas-Macias M, Barranco-Moreno A (2015) Retroprosthetic seroma after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: incidence, risk factors and clinical significance. Hernia 19:943–947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1352-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wassenaar E, Schoenmaeckers E, Raymakers J et al (2010) Mesh-fixation method and pain and quality of life after laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair: a randomized trial of three fixation techniques. Surg Endosc 24:1296–1302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0763-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rakic S, Leblanc KA (2013) The radiologic appearance of prosthetic materials used in hernia repair and a recommended classification. AJR Am J Roentgenol. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.13.10703

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. O’Brien JA, Ignotz R, Montilla R et al (2011) Long-term histologic and mechanical results of a Permacol™ abdominal wall explant. Hernia 15:211–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-010-0628-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chelala E, Baraké H, Estievenart J et al (2016) Long-term outcomes of 1326 laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair with the routine suturing concept: a single institution experience. Hernia 20:101–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1397-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Müller M, Schumpelick V (1999) Foreign body reaction to meshes used for the repair of abdominal wall hernias. Eur J Surg 165:665–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/11024159950189726

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wassenaar EB, Schoenmaeckers EJP, Raymakers JTFJ, Rakic S (2010) Subsequent abdominal surgery after laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh: a single institution experience with 72 reoperations. Hernia 14:137–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0568-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schoenmaeckers EJP, van der Valk SBA, van den Hout HW et al (2009) Computed tomographic measurements of mesh shrinkage after laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh. Surg Endosc 23:1620–1623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0500-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Beldi G, Wagner M, Bruegger LE et al (2011) Mesh shrinkage and pain in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial comparing suture versus tack mesh fixation. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 25:749–755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1246-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Carter PR, LeBlanc KA, Hausmann MG et al (2012) Does expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh really shrink after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair? Hernia 16:321–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0898-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rogmark P, Ekberg O, Montgomery A (2017) Long-term retromuscular and intraperitoneal mesh size changes within a randomized controlled trial on incisional hernia repair, including a review of the literature. Hernia 21:687–696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1624-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No financial support has been accepted for this research and/or publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. M. A. Stirler.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

VS declares no conflict of interest. RH declares no conflict of interest. JR declares no conflict of interest. SR declares no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Approval from the institutional review board was not required for this study.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stirler, V.M.A., de Haas, R.J., Raymakers, J.T.F.J. et al. Persistent posterior seroma after laparoscopic repair of ventral abdominal wall hernias with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh: prevalence, independent predictors and detached tacks. Hernia 22, 285–291 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1722-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1722-8

Keywords

Navigation