Skip to main content
Log in

Model predictive control for mobile manipulators considering the mobility range and accuracy of each mechanism

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Artificial Life and Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A mobile manipulator is a hybrid of a wheeled vehicle and a robotic arm realizing large locomotion and handling operations that cover many robotic applications, including housework, cleaning, and construction. A mobile base generally achieves large movement but coarse positioning accuracy, whereas a robotic arm only realizes high-precision manipulation within its reach. The present paper introduces a model predictive control (MPC) for mobile manipulators exploiting the advantages of a mobile base and a manipulator while their drawbacks are compensated. We take advantage of the high mobility of the mobile base and high accuracy of the manipulator by incorporating state-dependent velocity constraints into the MPC. If a mobile manipulator is far from the target, then the MPC drives the mobile base to the area where the manipulator can reach the target while suppressing the unnecessary motion of the manipulator. When a mobile manipulator arrives at the operation range, the motion of the mobile base is suppressed to prevent disturbing the manipulator by slippage or disruptive motion of the wheels. We evaluated the performance of the controller in the multi-body dynamics simulator for the two scenarios requiring locomotion and manipulation. The results were compared with a conventional MPC to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed controller.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smarr CA, Mitzner TL, Beer JM, Prakash A, Chen TL, Kemp CC, Rogers WA (2014) Domestic robots for older adults: attitudes, preferences, and potential. Int J Soc Robot 6:229–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beetz M, Klank U, Kresse I, Maldonado A, Lorenz M, Pangercic D, Thomas R, Tenorth M (2011) Robotic roommates making pancakes, humanoid robots (Hu-manoids) 2011 11th IEEE-RAS International Conference, pp 529–536

  3. Bormann R, Hampp J, Hagele M (2015) New Brooms Sweep Clean—an autonomous robotic cleaning assistant for professional office cleaning. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automat. (ICRA), pp 4470–4477

  4. Helm V, Ercan S, Gramazio F, Kohler M (2012) Mobile robotic fabrication on construction sites: DimRob. In: 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp 4335–4341

  5. Tsay TIJ et al (2018) Behavioristic image-based pose control of mobile manipulators using an uncalibrated eye-in-hand vision system. Artif Life Robot 23:94–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Matsuda Y et al (2021) Control system for automatic search and transportation of an object by a mobile robot using image processing. Artif Life Robot 26:465–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Berenson D, Kuffner J, Choset H (2008) An optimization approach to planning for mobile manipulation. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp 1187–1192

  8. Jia Y, Xi N, Nieves E (2014) Coordination of a nonholonomic mobile platform and an on-board manipulator. 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automat. (ICRA), pp 435–4361

  9. Dietrich A, Wimboeck T, Albu-Schaeffer A, Hirzinger G (2012) reactive whole-body control: dynamic mobile manipulation using a large number of actuated degrees of freedom. IEEE Robut Autom Mag 19(2):20–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ide S, et al., (2011) Real-time trajectory planning for mobile manipulator using model predictive control with constraints. In: 2011 8th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots and Ambient Intelligence (URAI), pp 244–249

  11. Colombo R, et al. (2019) Parameterized model predictive control of a nonholonomic mobile manipulator: a terminal constraint-free approach. In: 2019 IEEE 15th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), 2019, pp 1437–1442

  12. Avanzini GB, Zanchettin AM, Rocco P (2015) Constraint-based Model Predictive Control for holonomic mobile manipulators. In: 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and System (IROS), pp 1473–1479

  13. Avanzini GB, Zanchettin AM, Rocco P (2018) Constrained model predictive control for mobile robotic manipulators. Robotica’ 36(1):19–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li W, Xiong R (2019) Dynamical obstacle avoidance of task—constrained mobile manipulation using model predictive control. IEEE Access 7:88301–88311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gawel A, et al. (2019) A fully-integrated sensing and control system for high-accuracy mobile robotic building construction. In: 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp 2300–2307

  16. Varga B et al (2019) Model predictive control and trajectory optimization of large vehicle-manipulators. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics (ICM). 1: 60–66

  17. Pankert J, Hutter M (2020) Perceptive model predictive control for continuous mobile manipulation. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 5:6177–6184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Minniti MV, Farshidian F, Grandia R, Hutter M (2019) Whole-body MPC for a dynamically stable mobile manipulator. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 4(4):3687–3694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sleiman JP, Farshidian F, Minniti MV, Hutter M (2021) A unified MPC framework for whole-body dynamic locomotion and manipulation. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 6(3):4688–4695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lattanzi L, Angione G, Cristalli C, Weisshardt F, Arbeiter G, Graf B (2012) A mobile service robot for industrial applications. Int Conf Inform Control Autom Robot 2:298–303

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yamamoto T, Terada K, Ochiai A, Saito F, YA Murase K (2019) Development of human support robot as the research platform of a domestic mobile manipulator. ROBOMECH J 6(4)

  22. Rasouli A, Tsotsos JK (2017) The effect of color space selection on detectability and discriminability of colored objects. arXiv:1702.05421

  23. Wada M, Takagi A, Mori S (2000) Caster drive mechanisms for holonomic and omnidirectional mobile platforms with no over constraint. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp 1531–1538

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Prof. Daisuke Sato and Prof. Yoshikazu Kanamiya of Tokyo City University for their instruction on mobile manipulators and robotics.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenichiro Nonaka.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This work was presented in part at the joint symposium of the 27th International Symposium on Artificial Life and Robotics, the 7th International Symposium on BioComplexity, and the 5th International Symposium on Swarm Behavior and Bio-Inspired Robotics (Online, January 25–27, 2022).

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Misawa, K., Xu, F., Sekiguchi, K. et al. Model predictive control for mobile manipulators considering the mobility range and accuracy of each mechanism. Artif Life Robotics 27, 855–866 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-022-00799-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-022-00799-y

Keywords

Navigation