Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The debate on apraxia and the supplementary motor area in the twentieth century

  • Original Article - History of Neurosurgery
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hand function and apraxia are equally relevant to neurosurgeons: as a symptom, as well as through the functional anatomy of “praxis” which underlies the dexterity needed for neurosurgical practice. The supplementary motor area is crucial for its understanding. Historically, Hugo Liepmann dominated the apraxia debate at the beginning of the twentieth century, a debate that has remained influential until today. Kurt Goldstein, a contemporary of Liepmann, is regularly mentioned as the first to have described the alien hand syndrome in 1909. Wilder Penfield was a key figure in exploring the role of the fronto-mesial cortex in human motor control and coined the term “supplementary motor area”. It was Goldstein who not only contributed substantially to the apraxia debate more than 100 years ago; he also established the link between the dysfunction of the fronto-mesial cortex and abnormal higher motor control in humans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

SMA:

supplementary motor area

References

  1. Akelaitis A (1944) Studies on the corpus callosum, 4: diagonistic dyspraxia in the epileptic following partial and complete section of the corpus callosum. Am J Psychiatr 101:594–599

    Google Scholar 

  2. Biran I, Chatterjee A (2004) Alien hand syndrome. Arch Neurol 61(2):292

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bogen JE, Vogel PJ (1962) Cerebral commissurotomy in man. Bull Los Angel Neurol Soc 27:169–172

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bozkurt B, Yagmurlu K, Middlebrooks EH, Karadag A, Ovalioglu TC, Jagadeesan B, Sandhu G, Tanriover N, Grande AW (2016) Microsurgical and tractographic anatomy of the supplementary motor area complex in humans. World Neurosurg 95:99–107

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brion S, Jedynak CP (1972) Disorders of interhemispheric transfer (callosal disonnection). 3 cases of tumor of the corpus callosum. The strange hand sign. Rev Neurol (Paris) 126(4):257–266

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brugger F, Galovic M, Weder BJ, Kägi G (2015) Supplementary motor complex and disturbed motor control – a retrospective clinical and lesion analysis of patients after anterior cerebral artery stroke. Front Neurol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2015.00209

  7. Buckner RL, Krienen FM (2013) The evolution of distributed association networks in the human brain. Trends Cogn Sci 17(12):648–665

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Catani M, Ffytche DH (2005) The rises and falls of disconnection syndromes. Brain 128(10):2224–2239

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Eling P (2015) Kurt Goldstein’s test battery. Cortex 63:16–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Feinberg TE, Schindler RJ, Flanagan NG, Haber LD (1992) Two alien hand syndromes. Neurology 42(1):19–19

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fried I, Katz A, McCarthy G, Sass K, Williamson P, Spencer S, Spencer D (1991) Functional organization of human supplementary motor cortex studied by electrical stimulation. J Neurosci 11(11):3656–3666

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Gabarrós A, Martino J, Juncadella M et al (2011) Intraoperative identification of the supplementary motor area in neurooncological surgery. Neurocir Astur Spain 22(2):123–132

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gandhoke GS, Belykh E, Zhao X, Leblanc R, Preul MC (2019) Edwin Boldrey and Wilder Penfield’s homunculus: a life given by Mrs. Cantlie (in and out of realism). World Neurosurg 132:377–388

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gazzaniga MS (2000) Cerebral specialization and interhemispheric communication: does the corpus callosum enable the human condition? Brain 123(7):1293–1326

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gazzaniga MS (2005) Forty-five years of split-brain research and still going strong. Nat Rev Neurosci 6(8):653–659

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gazzaniga MS, Bogen JE, Sperry RW (1967) Dyspraxia following division of the cerebral commissures. Arch Neurol 16(6):606–612

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Geschwind N (1964) The paradoxical position of Kurt Goldstein in the history of aphasia. Cortex 1:214–224

    Google Scholar 

  18. Goldberg G (1985) Supplementary motor area structure and function: review and hypotheses. Behav Brain Sci 8:567–616

    Google Scholar 

  19. Goldenberg G (1995) Imitating gestures and manipulating a mannikin—the representation of the human body in ideomotor apraxia. Neuropsychologia 33(1):63–72

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Goldenberg G (2003) Apraxia and beyond: life and work of Hugo Liepmann. Cortex 39(3):509–524

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Goldstein K (1908) Zur Lehre von der motorischen Apraxie [On the doctrine of the motor apraxia] (in German). J Psychol Neurol 11:270–283

    Google Scholar 

  22. Goldstein K (1909) Der makroskopische Hirnbefund in meinem Falle von linksseitiger motorischer Apraxie. Neurol Centralbl 28:898–906

    Google Scholar 

  23. Goldstein K (1911) Ueber Apraxie. Beihefte zur Medizinischen Klinik 7:271–302

    Google Scholar 

  24. Goldstein K (1926) Das Symptom, seine Entstehung und die Bedeutung für unsere Auffassung vom Bau und von der Funktion des Nervensystems. Archiv für die Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten 76:84–108

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gross RG, Grossman M (2008) Update on apraxia. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 8(6):490–496

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hartmann F (1907) Beitraege zur Apraxielehre. Monatsschr Psychiat Neurol 21(97–118):248–270

    Google Scholar 

  27. Heilbronner K (1905) Zur Frage der motorischen Asymbolie (Apraxie). Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane 39:161–205

    Google Scholar 

  28. Johnson SH (1998) Cerebral organization of motor imagery: contralateral control of grip selection in mentally represented prehension. Psychol Sci 9:219–222

    Google Scholar 

  29. Johnson SH (1999) Roles of cerebral hemispheres in planning prehension: accuracy of movement selection following callosotomy. J Cogn Neurosci 11(Suppl):85

    Google Scholar 

  30. Joswig H, Hildebrandt G (2017) Kurt Goldstein and his nonlocationist thoughts on aphasia-a pioneer of early network theories at the beginning of the twentieth century? Acta Neurochir 159(7):1179–1185

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kloesel B, Czarnecki K, Muir JJ, Keller AS (2010) Sequelae of a left-sided parietal stroke: posterior alien hand syndrome. Neurocase 16(6):488–493

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Leiguarda RC, Marsden CD (2000) Limb apraxias: higher-order disorders of sensorimotor integration. Brain J Neurol 123(Pt 5):860–879

    Google Scholar 

  33. Liepmann H (1905) Der weitere Krankheitsverlauf bei dem einseitig Apraktischen und der Gehirnbefund auf Grund von Serienschnitten. Monatschr Psychiat Neurol 19(17):289–311 217–243

    Google Scholar 

  34. Liepmann H (1908) Drei Aufsätze aus dem Apraxiegebiet. Karger, Berlin

  35. Marchetti C, Della Sala S (1997) On crossed apraxia. Description of a right-handed apraxic patient with right supplementary motor area damage. Cortex J Devoted Study Nerv Syst Behav 33(2):341–354

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. McGonigle DJ, Hänninen R, Salenius S, Hari R, Frackowiak RSJ, Frith CD (2002) Whose arm is it anyway? An fMRI case study of supernumerary phantom limb. Brain 125(6):1265–1274

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Middlebrooks EH, Yagmurlu K, Szaflarski JP, Rahman M, Bozkurt B (2017) A contemporary framework of language processing in the human brain in the context of preoperative and intraoperative language mapping. Neuroradiology 59(1):69–87

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pearce JMS (2009) Hugo Karl Liepmann and apraxia. Clin Med Lond Engl 9(5):466–470

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Penfield W, Boldrey EB (1937) Somatic motor and sensory representation in the cerebral cortex of man as studied by electrical stimulation. Brain 60:389–443

    Google Scholar 

  40. Penfield W, Jasper H (1954) Epilepsy and the functional anatomy of the human brain. Little, Brown, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  41. Penfield W, Welch K (1949) The supplementary motor area in the cerebral cortex of man. Trans Am Neurol Assoc 74:179–184

    Google Scholar 

  42. Penfield W, Welch K (1951) The supplementary motor area of the cerebral cortex; a clinical and experimental study. AMA Arch Neurol Psychiatry 66(3):289–317

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Petreska B, Adriani M, Blanke O, Billard AG (2007) Apraxia: a review. Prog Brain Res 164:61–83

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Pick A (1902) Zur Psychologie der motorischen Apraxie. Neurol Centralbl 21:994–1000

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rizzolatti G, Luppino G, Matelli M (1998) The organization of the cortical motor system: new concepts. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 106(4):283–296

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Roy EA, Square PA (1985) Common considerations in the study of limb, verbal, and oral apraxia. In: Roy EA (ed) Neuropsychological studies of apraxia and related disorders. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  47. Sarva H, Deik A, Severt WL (2014) Pathophysiology and treatment of alien hand syndrome. Tremor Hyperkinetic Mov N Y N 4:241

    Google Scholar 

  48. Sperry RW, Gazzaniga MS, Bogen JE (1969) Interhemispheric relationships: the neocortical commissures; syndromes of hemispheric disconnection. Disord. Speech Percept. Symb. Behav. Handb. Clin. Neurol. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, pp 273–290

    Google Scholar 

  49. Storch E (1902) Versuch einer psycho-physiologischen Darstellung des Bewusstseins, zugleich ein Beitrag zur Lehre von der Function der Grosshirnrinde. S. Karger, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  50. Surbeck W, Killeen T, Vetter J, Hildebrandt G (2018) Sigmund Freud-early network theories of the brain. Acta Neurochir 160(6):1235–1242

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Van Wagenen WP (1940) Surgical division of commissural pathways in the corpus callosum: relation to spread of an epileptic attack. Arch Neurol Psychiatr 44(4):740–759

    Google Scholar 

  52. Vergani F, Lacerda L, Martino J, Attems J, Morris C, Mitchell P, Thiebaut de Schotten M, Dell’Acqua F (2014) White matter connections of the supplementary motor area in humans. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 85(12):1377–1385

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Watson RT, Fleet WS, Gonzalez-Rothi L, Heilman KM (1986) Apraxia and the supplementary motor area. Arch Neurol 43(8):787–792

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This contribution is presented on behalf of the 50th anniversary of the founding of the Department of Neurosurgery at the Cantonal Hospital Gallen, Switzerland. The authors thank Dr. Laura A. Kampf for proofreading the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Holger Joswig.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Holger Joswig received speaker honoraria from UCB Canada and travel grants from Medtronic. The other authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Informed consent and ethical approval

For this type of study, ethical approval and formal consent are not required.

Studies of human and animal participants

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on History of Neurosurgery

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Joswig, H., Surbeck, W., Scholtes, F. et al. The debate on apraxia and the supplementary motor area in the twentieth century. Acta Neurochir 163, 1247–1255 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04509-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04509-0

Keywords

Navigation