Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Minimal-invasive stabilization and circumferential spinal cord decompression in metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC)

  • Open Operating Theatre (OOT)
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Falicov A, Fisher CG, Sparkes J, Boyd MC, Wing PC, Dvorak MF (2006) Impact of surgical intervention on quality of life in patients with spinal metastases. Spine 31:2849–2856

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gejo R, Matsui H, Kawaguchi Y, Ishihara H, Tsuji H (1999) Serial changes in trunk muscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery. Spine 24:1023–1028

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hu SS (2004) Blood loss in adult spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 13(Suppl 1):S3–S5. doi:10.1007/s00586-004-0753-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jonsson B, Sjostrom L, Olerud C, Andreasson I, Bring J, Rauschning W (1996) Outcome after limited posterior surgery for thoracic and lumbar spine metastases. Eur Spine J 5:36–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Karikari IO, Isaacs RE (2010) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of techniques and outcomes. Spine 35:S294–S301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim DY, Lee SH, Chung SK, Lee HY (2005) Comparison of multifidus muscle atrophy and trunk extension muscle strength: percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation. Spine 30:123–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Klimo P Jr, Kestle JR, Schmidt MH (2003) Treatment of metastatic spinal epidural disease: a review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus 15(5):E1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee BH, Kim TH, Chong HS, Moon ES, Park JO, Kim HS, Kim SH, Lee HM, Cho YJ, Kim KN, Moon SH (2013) Prognostic factor analysis in patients with metastatic spine disease depending on surgery and conservative treatment: review of 577 cases. Ann Surg Oncol 20(1):40–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Molina CA, Gokaslan ZL, Sciubba DM (2011) A systematic review of the current role of minimally invasive spine surgery in the management of metastatic spine disease. Int J Surg Oncol. doi:10.1155/2011/598148

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Park Y, Ha JW (2007) Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach. Spine 32:537–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Patchell RA, Tibbs PA, Regine WF, Payne R, Saris S, Kryscio RJ, Mohiuddin M, Young B (2005) Direct decompressive surgical resection in the treatment of spinal cord compression caused by metastatic cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 366:643–648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pointillart V, Vital JM, Salmi R, Diallo A, Quan GM (2011) Survival prognostic factors and clinical outcomes in patients with spinal metastases. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 137:849–856

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Quan GM, Vital JM, Aurouer N, Obeid I, Palussiere J, Diallo A, Pointillart V (2011) Surgery improves pain, function and quality of life in patients with spinal metastases: a prospective study on 118 patients. Eur Spine J 20:1970–1978

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang MY, Cummock MD, Yu Y, Trivedi RA (2010) An analysis of the differences in the acute hospitalization charges following minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 12:694–699

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Weigel B, Maghsudi M, Neumann C, Kretschmer R, Muller FJ, Nerlich M (1999) Surgical management of symptomatic spinal metastases. Postoperative outcome and quality of life. Spine 24:2240–2246

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wibmer C, Leithner A, Hofmann G, Clar H, Kapitan M, Berghold A, Windhager R (2011) Survival analysis of 254 patients after manifestation of spinal metastases: evaluation of seven preoperative scoring systems. Spine 36:1977–1986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wiesner L, Kothe R, Ruther W (1999) Anatomic evaluation of two different techniques for the percutaneous insertion of pedicle screws in the lumbar spine. Spine 24:1599–1603

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wise JJ, Fischgrund JS, Herkowitz HN, Montgomery D, Kurz LT (1999) Complication, survival rates, and risk factors of surgery for metastatic disease of the spine. Spine 24:1943–1951

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

N. Hansen-Algenstaedt is working as a consultant for Stryker, DepuySynthes and SpineArt. He receives royalties on implants from Stryker and Globus Medical.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nils Hansen-Algenstaedt.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (WMV 244585 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hansen-Algenstaedt, N., Knight, R., Beyerlein, J. et al. Minimal-invasive stabilization and circumferential spinal cord decompression in metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC). Eur Spine J 22, 2142–2144 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2959-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2959-2

Keywords

Navigation