Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Generalized neck analysis of harmonic maps from surfaces

  • Published:
Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we study the behavior of a sequence of harmonic maps from surfaces with uniformly bounded energy on the generalized neck domain. The generalized neck domain is a union of ghost bubbles and annular neck domains, which connects non-trivial bubbles. An upper bound of the energy density is proved and we use it to study the limit of the nullity and index of the sequence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ai, W., Yin, H.: Neck analysis of extrinsic polyharmonic maps. Ann. Global Anal. Geom. 52(2), 129–156 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Colding, T.H., Minicozzi, W.P.: A Course in Minimal Surfaces, vol. 121. American Mathematical Soc (2011)

  3. Chen, B., Song, C.: Isolated Singularities of Yang–Mills–Higgs fields on surfaces (2019). arXiv:1907.07092

  4. Ding, W., Tian, G.: Energy identity for a class of approximate harmonic maps from surfaces. Commun. Anal. Geom. 3(4), 543–554 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Lin, F., Wang, C.: Energy identity of harmonic map flows from surfaces at finite singular time. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 6(4), 369–380 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu, L., Yin, H.: Neck analysis for biharmonic maps. Math. Z. 283(3–4), 807–834 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Parker, T.H.: Bubble tree convergence for harmonic maps. J. Differ. Geom. 44(3), 595–633 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Qing, J., Tian, G.: Bubbling of the heat flows for harmonic maps from surfaces. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 50(4), 295–310 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Rade, J.: Decay estimates for yang-mills fields: two new proofs. In: Global Analysis in Modern Mathematics (Orono, 1991, Waltham, 1992), Publish or Perish, Houston, pp. 91–105 (1993)

  10. Sampson, J.H.: Some properties and applications of harmonic mappings. Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. 11(4), 211–228 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Simon, L.: Asymptotics for a class of nonlinear evolution equations, with applications to geometric problems. Ann. Math. 118(3), 525–571 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Yin, H.: Higher order neck analysis of harmonic maps and its applications (2019). arXiv:1904.07354

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Professor Yuxiang Li for numerous discussions on conformal immersion and its relation to harmonic maps. This research is supported by NSFC11971451.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hao Yin.

Additional information

Communicated by J. Jost.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A. Some properties of an ODE solution

Appendix A. Some properties of an ODE solution

In this appendix, we show some elementary properties of the solution g(t) to the ordinary differential equation with boundary values

$$\begin{aligned} g''(t)=\gamma ^2 g(t),\qquad g(0)=a \quad \text {and} \quad g(T)=b. \end{aligned}$$

We assume that \(\gamma >1/2\) and \(T>5\). They are not essential and we assume these for simplicity.

Lemma A.1

There is a universal constant \({\tilde{c}}\) such that for any positive constants a and b with \(b\ge a\), we have

$$\begin{aligned} \sup _{[1,T]}\left| (\log g)'\right| \le {\tilde{c}} \end{aligned}$$
(67)

and

$$\begin{aligned} a\le {\tilde{c}} \inf _{[0,1]} g. \end{aligned}$$
(68)

Remark A.2

In general, since b may be very large, even a lot larger than \(e^{\gamma T}a\), we can not expect an upper bound of \((\log g)'\) over [0, T]. The observation is that such an upper bound holds for [1, T] regardless of the size of a, b and T.

The proof follows from explicit computation, since we have the following formula for the solution

$$\begin{aligned} g(t)=\frac{a e^{2\gamma T}- be^{\gamma T}}{e^{2\gamma T}-1} e^{-\gamma t} + \frac{b e^{\gamma T}-a}{e^{2\gamma T}-1} e^{\gamma t}. \end{aligned}$$
(69)

Direct computation shows

$$\begin{aligned} g'(t)=- \gamma \frac{a e^{2\gamma T}- be^{\gamma T}}{e^{2\gamma T}-1} e^{-\gamma t} + \gamma \frac{b e^{\gamma T}-a}{e^{2\gamma T}-1} e^{\gamma t} \end{aligned}$$
(70)

and

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{g'(t)}{g(t)}= \gamma \frac{(be^{\gamma T}-a) e^{\gamma t} - (a e^{2\gamma T}-b e^{\gamma T}) e^{-\gamma t}}{(be^{\gamma T}-a) e^{\gamma t} + (a e^{2\gamma T}-b e^{\gamma T}) e^{-\gamma t}}. \end{aligned}$$
(71)

Taking one more derivative, we get

$$\begin{aligned} \left( \frac{g'}{g} \right) ' = \gamma ^2 \frac{4 (be^{\gamma T}-a)(a e^{2\gamma T}-b e^{\gamma T})}{((be^{\gamma T}-a) e^{\gamma t} + (a e^{2\gamma T}-b e^{\gamma T}) e^{-\gamma t})^2}. \end{aligned}$$
(72)
  1. (i)

    If a and b are comparable in the sense that \(a\le b\le e^{\gamma T}a\), the lemma holds with \({\tilde{c}}=\gamma \). To see this, we notice that in this case

    $$\begin{aligned} {a e^{2\gamma T}- be^{\gamma T}}, {b e^{\gamma T}-a}\ge 0. \end{aligned}$$

    Hence, by (71), we have \(\left| (\log g)'\right| \le \gamma \) for all \(t\in [0,T]\), from which both (67) and (68) follow.

  2. (ii)

    If \(b\ge e^{\gamma T}a\), (70) implies that \(g'\ge 0\). Hence, g is increasing and (68) follows.

Moreover, (72) implies that \((\log g)''\le 0\). Together with the observation

$$\begin{aligned} (\log g)' (T) = \gamma \frac{b(e^{2\gamma T}+1)-2ae^{\gamma T}}{b(e^{2\gamma T}-1)} \in (0,2\gamma ), \end{aligned}$$

it suffices to bound \((\log g)'(1)\), which we compute

$$\begin{aligned} (\log g)'(1)= & {} \gamma \frac{(b e^{\gamma T}-a) e^\gamma - (a e^{2\gamma T}-b e^{\gamma T})e^{-\gamma }}{(b e^{\gamma T}-a) e^\gamma + (a e^{2\gamma T}-b e^{\gamma T})e^{-\gamma }} \\= & {} \gamma \frac{b e^{\gamma (T+1)} + b e^{\gamma (T-1)} - a e^\gamma - ae^{\gamma (2T-1)}}{b e^{\gamma (T+1)} - b e^{\gamma (T-1)} - a e^\gamma + a e^{\gamma (2T-1)}}\\\le & {} \gamma \frac{b e^{\gamma (T+1)} + b e^{\gamma (T-1)}}{b e^{\gamma (T+1)} - b e^{\gamma (T-1)} - a e^\gamma }. \end{aligned}$$

Finally, we notice that

$$\begin{aligned} a e^\gamma \le b e^{-\gamma T + \gamma }, \end{aligned}$$

which implies that

$$\begin{aligned} (\log g)'(1) \le \frac{2 \gamma }{1- e^{-2\gamma }- e^{-2\gamma T}} \le 4\gamma . \end{aligned}$$

This concludes the proof of the lemma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yin, H. Generalized neck analysis of harmonic maps from surfaces. Calc. Var. 60, 117 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-021-01978-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-021-01978-8

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation