Abstract
Purpose
Breast cancer patients receiving radiotherapy (RT) commonly report pain, contributing to physical and emotional distress, and potentially resulting in poor quality of life. This study prospectively identified trends and risk factors in patient-reported pain associated with breast irradiation using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) and a study-specific Skin Symptom Assessment (SSA).
Methods
Before RT and once per week during RT, patients completed the ESAS and SSA. Upon RT completion, patients were contacted via telephone to complete both assessments weekly for 6 weeks, and a final assessment was conducted 1–3 months post-RT. Only data from patients who had completed both assessments before, at least once during, and at least once after RT were included in our analysis.
Results
A total of 426 patients provided data for the analysis. Overall acute pain increased significantly at week 1–2 (p < 0.0001), week 5 (p = 0.0011), and at 1–3 months (p < 0.0001) post-RT compared with baseline, and acute breast pain increased significantly at week 1 (p < 0.001) and week 2 (p = 0.0002) post-RT compared with baseline. Previous chemotherapy (adjuvant or neoadjuvant) in mastectomy patients was associated with increased overall pain compared with mastectomy patients without previous chemotherapy (p = 0.017). Younger patients (40–49 or 50–59 years of age) reported more overall pain (p = 0.0001, p = 0.038) and breast pain (p = 0.0003, p = 0.0038) compared with patients ≥ 60 years of age.
Conclusions
Patient-reported pain associated with breast irradiation peaked 1 week after RT completion. Our findings provide support for closer monitoring of acute pain associated with breast RT in younger patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Juhl AA, Christiansen P, Damsgaard TE (2016) Persistent pain after breast cancer treatment: a questionnaire-based study on the prevalence, associated treatment variables, and pain type. J Breast Cancer 19(4):447–454
Wang K, Yee C, Tam S, Drost L, Chan S, Zaki P, Rico V, Ariello K, Dasios M, Lam H, DeAngelis C, Chow E (2018) Prevalence of pain in patients with breast cancer post-treatment: a systematic review. Breast 42:113–127
Belfer I, Schreiber KL, Shaffer JR, Shnol H, Blaney K, Morando A, Englert D, Greco C, Brufsky A, Ahrendt G, Kehlet H, Edwards RR, Bovbjerg DH (2013) Persistent postmastectomy pain in breast cancer survivors: analysis of clinical, demographic, and psychosocial factors. J Pain 14(10):1185–1195
Chow S, Wan BA, Pidduck W, Zhang L, DeAngelis C, Chan S, Yee C, Drost L, Leung E, Sousa P, Lewis D, Lam H, Chow R, Lock M, Chow E (2019) Symptom clusters in patients with breast cancer receiving radiation therapy. Eur J Oncol Nurs 42:14–20
Langford DJ, Paul SM, West C, Levine JD, Hamolsky D, Elboim C, Schmidt BL, Cooper BA, Abrams G, Aouizerat BE, Miaskowski C (2014) Persistent breast pain following breast cancer surgery is associated with persistent sensory changes, pain interference, and functional impairments. J Pain 15(12):1227–1237
Jagsi R, Griffith KA, Boike TP, Walker E, Nurushev T, Grills IS, Moran JM, Feng M, Hayman J, Pierce LJ (2015) Differences in the acute toxic effects of breast radiotherapy by fractionation schedule. JAMA Oncol 1(7):918
Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S, Davies C, Elphinstone P, Evans V, Godwin J, Gray R, Hicks C, James S, MacKinnon E, McGale P, McHugh T, Peto R, Taylor C, Wang Y, Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2005) Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 366(9503):2087–2106
Bartelink H, Horiot JC, Poortmans P, Struikmans H, van den Bogaert W, Barillot I, Fourquet A, Borger J, Jager J, Hoogenraad W, Collette L, Pierart M, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Radiotherapy and Breast Cancer Groups (2001) Recurrence rates after treatment of breast cancer with standard radiotherapy with or without additional radiation. N Engl J Med 345(19):1378–1387
Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer (1998) Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer. CMAJ 158(Suppl):S35–S42
Smith HS, Wu SX (2012) Persistent pain after breast cancer treatment. Ann Palliat Med 1(3):182–194
Lundstedt D, Gustafsson M, Steineck G, Malmström P, Alsadius D, Sundberg A, Wilderäng U, Holmberg E, Johansson KA, Karlsson P (2012) Risk factors of developing long-lasting breast pain after breast cancer radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 83(1):71–78
Hui D, Bruera E (2017) The Edmonton symptom assessment system 25 years later: past, present, and future developments. J Pain Symptom Manag 53(3):630–643
Szumacher E, Wighton A, Franssen E, Chow E, Tsao M, Ackerman I, Andersson L, Kim J, Wojcicka A, Ung Y, Sixel K, Hayter C (2001) Phase II study assessing the effectiveness of Biafine cream as a prophylactic agent for radiation-induced acute skin toxicity to the breast in women undergoing radiotherapy with concomitant CMF chemotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 51(1):81–86
Whelan T, Mackenzie R, Julian J et al (2002) Randomized trial of breast irradiation schedules after lumpectomy for women with lymph node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 94(15):1143–1150
Selby D, Cascella A, Gardiner K, Do R, Moravan V, Myers J, Chow E (2010) A single set of numerical cutpoints to define moderate and severe symptoms for the Edmonton symptom assessment system. J Pain Symptom Manag 39:241–249
Drost L, Li N, Vesprini D et al (2018) Prospective study of breast radiation dermatitis. Clin Breast Cancer 18(5):789–795
Pignol J-P, Trinh Thuc Vu T, Mitera G, Bosnic S, Verkooijen HM, Truong P (2015) Prospective evaluation of severe skin toxicity and pain during postmastectomy radiation therapy radiation oncology. Radiat Oncol Biol 91(1):157–164
Wengström Y, Häggmark C, Strander H, Forsberg C (2000) Perceived symptoms and quality of life in women with breast cancer receiving radiation therapy. Eur J Oncol Nurs 4(2):78–88
Shaitelman SF, Schlembach PJ, Arzu I, Ballo M, Bloom ES, Buchholz D, Chronowski GM, Dvorak T, Grade E, Hoffman KE, Kelly P, Ludwig M, Perkins GH, Reed V, Shah S, Stauder MC, Strom EA, Tereffe W, Woodward WA, Ensor J, Baumann D, Thompson AM, Amaya D, Davis T, Guerra W, Hamblin L, Hortobagyi G, Hunt KK, Buchholz TA, Smith BD (2015) Acute and short-term toxic effects of conventionally fractionated vs hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation. JAMA Oncol 1(7):931–941
Fernando IN, Ford HT, Powles TJ, Ashley S, Glees JP, Torr M, Grafton D, Harmer CL (1996) Factors affecting acute skin toxicity in patients having breast irradiation after conservative surgery: a prospective study of treatment practice at the Royal Marsden Hospital. Clin Oncol 8(4):226–233
Sheridan D, Foo I, Gillanders D, Williams L, Fallon M, Colvin L (2012) Long-term follow-up of pain and emotional characteristics of women after surgery for breast cancer. J Pain Symptom Manag 44(4):608–614
Wolf S, Barton D, Kottschade L, Grothey A, Loprinzi C (2008) Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: prevention and treatment strategies. Eur J Cancer 44(11):1507–1515
Jung BF, Herrmann D, Griggs J, Oaklander AL, Dworkin RH (2005) Neuropathic pain associated with non-surgical treatment of breast cancer. Pain 118(1):10–14
Tasmuth T, Von Smitten K, Hietanen P, Kataja M, Kalso E (1995) Pain and other symptoms after different treatment modalities of breast cancer. Ann Oncol 6(5):453–459
Meijuan Y, Zhiyou P, Yuwen T, Ying F, Xinzhong C (2013) A retrospective study of postmastectomy pain syndrome: incidence, characteristics, risk factors, and influence on quality of life. Sci World J 2013:159732
Gartner R, Jensen MB, Nielsen J, Ewertz M, Kroman N, Kehlet H (2009) Prevalence of and factors associated with persistent pain following breast cancer surgery. JAMA Oncol 302(18):1985–1992
Andersen KG, Kehlet H (2011) Persistent pain after breast cancer treatment: a critical review of risk factors and strategies for prevention. J Pain 12(7):725–746
Poleshuck EL, Katz J, Andrus CH, Hogan LA, Jung BF, Kulick DI, Dworkin RH (2006) Risk factors for chronic pain following breast cancer surgery: a prospective study. J Pain 7(9):626–634
Ashcroft GS, Dodsworth J, Van Boxtel E et al (1997) Estrogen accelerates cutaneous wound healing associated with an increase in TGF-β1 levels. Nat Med 3(11):1209–1215
Bentzen SM (2006) Preventing or reducing late side effects of radiation therapy: radiobiology meets molecular pathology. Nat Rev Cancer 6(9):702–713
Heidrich SM, Egan JJ, Hengudomsub P, Randolph SM (2006) Symptoms, symptom beliefs, and quality of life of older breast cancer survivors: a comparative study. Oncol Nurs Forum 33(2):315–322
Yancik R, Wesley MN, Ries LAG, Havlik RJ, Edwards BK, Yates JW (2001) Effect of age and comorbidity in postmenopausal breast cancer patients aged 55 years and older. J Am Med Assoc 285(7):885–892
Interactive Symptom Assessment and Collection (ISAAC) Tool. http://ocp.cancercare.on.ca/cms/One.aspx?portalId=77515&pageId=57699. Accessed 15 December 2019
Barbera L, Sutradhar R, Howell D, Sussman J, Seow H, Dudgeon D, Atzema C, Earle C, Husain A, Liu Y, Krzyzanowska MK (2015) Does routine symptom screening with ESAS decrease ED visits in breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy? Support Care Cancer 23(10):3025–3032
Funding
We thank the generous support of Bratty Family Fund, Michael and Karyn Goldstein Cancer Research Fund, Joey and Mary Furfari Cancer Research Fund, Pulenzas Cancer Research Fund, Joseph and Silvana Melara Cancer Research Fund, and Ofelia Cancer Research Fund.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
This study was approved by the research ethics board at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre. Informed consent was obtained prior to the first RT treatment.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1 Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale
Appendix 2 Skin Symptom Assessment
Appendix 3 ESAS and SSA pain severities
Time point | None | Mild | Moderate | Severe | Any paina | p valueb |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | ||
ESAS pain severity | ||||||
Baseline (N = 426) | 244 (57.28%) | 110 (25.82%) | 50 (11.74%) | 22 (5.16%) | 182 (42.72%) | Ref |
During RT week 1 (N = 321) | 162 (50.47%) | 113 (35.20%) | 33 (10.28%) | 13 (4.05%) | 159 (49.53%) | 0.0232 |
During RT week 2 (N = 358) | 168 (46.93%) | 131 (36.59%) | 44 (12.29%) | 15 (4.19%) | 190 (53.07%) | 0.0004 |
During RT week 3 (N = 327) | 113 (34.56%) | 142 (43.43%) | 54 (16.51%) | 18 (5.50%) | 214 (65.44%) | < 0.0001 |
During RT week 4 (N = 189) | 54 (28.57%) | 90 (47.62%) | 28 (14.81%) | 17 (8.99%) | 135 (71.43%) | < 0.0001 |
Post-RT week 1 (N = 165) | 35 (21.21%) | 63 (38.18%) | 45 (27.27%) | 22 (13.33%) | 130 (78.79%) | < 0.0001 |
Post-RT week 2 (N = 215) | 79 (36.74%) | 80 (37.21%) | 38 (17.67%) | 18 (8.37%) | 136 (63.26%) | < 0.0001 |
Post-RT week 3 (N = 202) | 95 (47.03%) | 60 (29.70%) | 34 (16.83%) | 13 (6.44%) | 107 (52.97%) | 0.0057 |
Post-RT week 4 (N = 215) | 104 (48.37%) | 74 (34.42%) | 24 (11.16%) | 13 (6.05%) | 111 (51.63%) | 0.0139 |
Post-RT week 5 (N = 187) | 84 (44.92%) | 71 (37.97%) | 20 (10.70%) | 12 (6.42%) | 103 (55.08%) | 0.0011 |
Post-RT week 6 (N = 191) | 90 (47.12%) | 67 (35.08%) | 26 (13.61%) | 8 (4.19%) | 101 (52.88%) | 0.0080 |
FU Appt (N = 272) | 119 (43.75%) | 102 (37.50%) | 36 (13.24%) | 15 (5.51%) | 153 (56.25%) | < 0.0001 |
SSA breast pain severity | ||||||
Baseline (N = 426) | 211 (49.53%) | 185 (43.43%) | 27 (6.34%) | 3 (0.70%) | 215 (50.47%) | Ref |
During RT week 1 (N = 327) | 205 (62.69%) | 105 (32.11%) | 15 (4.59%) | 2 (0.61%) | 122 (37.31%) | <0 .0001 |
During RT week 2 (N = 353) | 172 (48.73%) | 151 (42.78%) | 29 (8.22%) | 1 (0.28%) | 181 (51.27%) | 0.7995 |
During RT week 3 (N = 330) | 133 (40.30%) | 148 (44.85%) | 41 (12.42%) | 8 (2.42%) | 197 (59.70%) | 0.0041 |
During RT week 4 (N = 178) | 50 (28.09%) | 94 (52.81%) | 24 (13.48%) | 10 (5.62%) | 128 (71.91%) | < 0.0001 |
Post-RT week 1 (N = 160) | 39 (24.38%) | 71 (44.38%) | 36 (22.50%) | 14 (8.75%) | 121 (75.63%) | < 0.0001 |
Post-RT week 2 (N = 209) | 73 (34.93%) | 85 (40.67%) | 38 (18.18%) | 13 (6.22%) | 136 (65.07%) | 0.0002 |
Post-RT week 3 (N = 198) | 91 (45.96%) | 79 (39.90%) | 22 (11.11%) | 6 (3.03%) | 107 (54.04%) | 0.3652 |
Post-RT week 4 (N = 220) | 112 (50.91%) | 88 (40.00%) | 15 (6.82%) | 5 (2.27%) | 108 (49.09%) | 0.7218 |
Post-RT week 5 (N = 186) | 99 (53.23%) | 73 (39.25%) | 11 (5.91%) | 3 (1.61%) | 87 (46.77%) | 0.3634 |
Post-RT week 6 (N = 186) | 100 (53.76%) | 75 (40.32%) | 7 (3.76%) | 4 (2.15%) | 86 (46.24%) | 0.2857 |
FU Appt (N = 290) | 137 (47.24%) | 110 (37.93%) | 38 (13.10%) | 5 (1.72%) | 153 (52.76%) | 0.5125 |
Appendix 4 ESAS pain score in all patients and in subgroups of patients over time
Radiotherapy 5000/25 | Radiotherapy 4256/16 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time point | Alone N (mean ± SD) | Plus boost N (mean ± SD) | p valuea | Alone N (mean ± SD) | Plus boost N (mean ± SD) | p valuea |
Baseline | 45 (1.84 ± 2.06) | 19 (1.37 ± 1.86) | 0.3654 | 203 (1.45 ± 2.26) | 154 (1.36 ± 2.14) | 0.8318 |
During RT (1) | 35 (1.31 ± 1.75) | 14 (1.14 ± 1.17) | 0.9133 | 152 (1.39 ± 2.07) | 115 (1.50 ± 2.17) | 0.7183 |
During RT (2) | 36 (1.89 ± 2.01) | 16 (1.13 ± 1.26) | 0.3358 | 169 (1.67 ± 2.37) | 133 (1.45 ± 1.90) | 0.8051 |
During RT (3) | 34 (1.47 ± 1.58) | 16 (1.44 ± 1.46) | 0.9305 | 154 (2.08 ± 2.48) | 118 (1.95 ± 2.02) | 0.8442 |
During RT (4) | 35 (2.03 ± 2.01) | 17 (2.18 ± 2.19) | 0.9574 | 36 (3.00 ± 2.95) | 96 (2.18 ± 2.27) | 0.1992 |
Post-RT (1) | 12 (3.92 ± 2.47) | 6 (3.00 ± 3.10) | 0.3260 | 72 (3.04 ± 2.81) | 70 (3.23 ± 2.59) | 0.4329 |
Post-RT (2) | 17 (2.18 ± 1.70) | 8 (2.38 ± 2.13) | 0.9746 | 103 (2.22 ± 2.58) | 82 (2.27 ± 2.47) | 0.7229 |
Post-RT (3) | 15 (2.13 ± 2.23) | 9 (1.44 ± 1.59) | 0.5180 | 95 (2.04 ± 2.42) | 80 (1.63 ± 2.44) | 0.1369 |
Post-RT (4) | 23 (2.09 ± 2.41) | 11 (1.64 ± 2.42) | 0.4989 | 105 (1.79 ± 2.43) | 71 (1.34 ± 2.03) | 0.2116 |
Post-RT (5) | 19 (2.79 ± 2.80) | 8 (1.75 ± 2.38) | 0.3475 | 92 (1.29 ± 1.99) | 64 (1.81 ± 2.22) | 0.0632 |
Post-RT (6) | 19 (1.84 ± 2.41) | 8 (1.13 ± 1.81) | 0.4207 | 89 (1.88 ± 2.59) | 71 (1.27 ± 1.64) | 0.3136 |
FU Appt | 25 (1.88 ± 2.45) | 7 (0.86 ± 1.07) | 0.3280 | 134 (1.84 ± 2.21) | 102 (1.71 ± 2.25) | 0.5171 |
Tangents technique | Locoregional technique | |||||
Time point | Alone N (mean ± SD) | Plus boost N (mean ± SD) | p valueb | Alone N (mean ± SD) | Plus boost N (mean ± SD) | p valueb |
Baseline | 153 (1.43 ± 2.30) | 122 (1.31 ± 2.19) | 0.6942 | 99 (1.61 ± 2.08) | 51 (1.49 ± 1.90) | 0.8456 |
During RT (1) | 119 (1.39 ± 2.16) | 95 (1.61 ± 2.30) | 0.4674 | 72 (1.28 ± 1.71) | 34 (1.03 ± 1.22) | 0.6956 |
During RT (2) | 125 (1.70 ± 2.42) | 105 (1.54 ± 2.03) | 0.9724 | 84 (1.65 ± 2.12) | 44 (1.11 ± 1.28) | 0.3630 |
During RT (3) | 118 (1.95 ± 2.51) | 95 (1.98 ± 2.10) | 0.4922 | 74 (1.93 ± 2.04) | 39 (1.67 ± 1.59) | 0.6842 |
During RT (4) | 33 (2.91 ± 2.74) | 75 (2.31 ± 2.38) | 0.2636 | 42 (2.02 ± 2.32) | 38 (1.92 ± 1.96) | 0.9280 |
Post-RT (1) | 53 (3.02 ± 2.69) | 55 (3.13 ± 2.70) | 0.7949 | 35 (3.14 ± 2.87) | 21 (3.43 ± 2.40) | 0.4721 |
Post-RT (2) | 78 (2.00 ± 2.43) | 60 (2.20 ± 2.55) | 0.6873 | 46 (2.52 ± 2.45) | 30 (2.43 ± 2.22) | 0.9901 |
Post-RT (3) | 73 (2.00 ± 2.35) | 62 (1.60 ± 2.25) | 0.2426 | 39 (2.13 ± 2.46) | 27 (1.63 ± 2.65) | 0.2441 |
Post-RT (4) | 77 (1.51 ± 2.11) | 51 (1.35 ± 2.05) | 0.6662 | 55 (2.29 ± 2.70) | 31 (1.42 ± 2.14) | 0.1011 |
Post-RT (5) | 64 (1.30 ± 1.95) | 46 (1.98 ± 2.32) | 0.0611 | 50 (1.88 ± 2.45) | 26 (1.50 ± 2.02) | 0.6401 |
Post-RT (6) | 66 (2.00 ± 2.69) | 59 (1.14 ± 1.54) | 0.1281 | 45 (1.62 ± 2.28) | 20 (1.60 ± 1.93) | 0.8613 |
FU Appt | 106 (1.92 ± 2.17) | 77 (1.73 ± 2.34) | 0.3515 | 56 (1.75 ± 2.41) | 32 (1.47 ± 1.83) | 0.7520 |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lam, E., Wong, G., Zhang, L. et al. Self-reported pain in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy. Support Care Cancer 29, 155–167 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05462-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05462-5