Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Self-reported pain in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Breast cancer patients receiving radiotherapy (RT) commonly report pain, contributing to physical and emotional distress, and potentially resulting in poor quality of life. This study prospectively identified trends and risk factors in patient-reported pain associated with breast irradiation using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) and a study-specific Skin Symptom Assessment (SSA).

Methods

Before RT and once per week during RT, patients completed the ESAS and SSA. Upon RT completion, patients were contacted via telephone to complete both assessments weekly for 6 weeks, and a final assessment was conducted 1–3 months post-RT. Only data from patients who had completed both assessments before, at least once during, and at least once after RT were included in our analysis.

Results

A total of 426 patients provided data for the analysis. Overall acute pain increased significantly at week 1–2 (p < 0.0001), week 5 (p = 0.0011), and at 1–3 months (p < 0.0001) post-RT compared with baseline, and acute breast pain increased significantly at week 1 (p < 0.001) and week 2 (p = 0.0002) post-RT compared with baseline. Previous chemotherapy (adjuvant or neoadjuvant) in mastectomy patients was associated with increased overall pain compared with mastectomy patients without previous chemotherapy (p = 0.017). Younger patients (40–49 or 50–59 years of age) reported more overall pain (p = 0.0001, p = 0.038) and breast pain (p = 0.0003, p = 0.0038) compared with patients ≥ 60 years of age.

Conclusions

Patient-reported pain associated with breast irradiation peaked 1 week after RT completion. Our findings provide support for closer monitoring of acute pain associated with breast RT in younger patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Juhl AA, Christiansen P, Damsgaard TE (2016) Persistent pain after breast cancer treatment: a questionnaire-based study on the prevalence, associated treatment variables, and pain type. J Breast Cancer 19(4):447–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang K, Yee C, Tam S, Drost L, Chan S, Zaki P, Rico V, Ariello K, Dasios M, Lam H, DeAngelis C, Chow E (2018) Prevalence of pain in patients with breast cancer post-treatment: a systematic review. Breast 42:113–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Belfer I, Schreiber KL, Shaffer JR, Shnol H, Blaney K, Morando A, Englert D, Greco C, Brufsky A, Ahrendt G, Kehlet H, Edwards RR, Bovbjerg DH (2013) Persistent postmastectomy pain in breast cancer survivors: analysis of clinical, demographic, and psychosocial factors. J Pain 14(10):1185–1195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chow S, Wan BA, Pidduck W, Zhang L, DeAngelis C, Chan S, Yee C, Drost L, Leung E, Sousa P, Lewis D, Lam H, Chow R, Lock M, Chow E (2019) Symptom clusters in patients with breast cancer receiving radiation therapy. Eur J Oncol Nurs 42:14–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Langford DJ, Paul SM, West C, Levine JD, Hamolsky D, Elboim C, Schmidt BL, Cooper BA, Abrams G, Aouizerat BE, Miaskowski C (2014) Persistent breast pain following breast cancer surgery is associated with persistent sensory changes, pain interference, and functional impairments. J Pain 15(12):1227–1237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jagsi R, Griffith KA, Boike TP, Walker E, Nurushev T, Grills IS, Moran JM, Feng M, Hayman J, Pierce LJ (2015) Differences in the acute toxic effects of breast radiotherapy by fractionation schedule. JAMA Oncol 1(7):918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S, Davies C, Elphinstone P, Evans V, Godwin J, Gray R, Hicks C, James S, MacKinnon E, McGale P, McHugh T, Peto R, Taylor C, Wang Y, Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2005) Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 366(9503):2087–2106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bartelink H, Horiot JC, Poortmans P, Struikmans H, van den Bogaert W, Barillot I, Fourquet A, Borger J, Jager J, Hoogenraad W, Collette L, Pierart M, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Radiotherapy and Breast Cancer Groups (2001) Recurrence rates after treatment of breast cancer with standard radiotherapy with or without additional radiation. N Engl J Med 345(19):1378–1387

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer (1998) Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer. CMAJ 158(Suppl):S35–S42

    Google Scholar 

  10. Smith HS, Wu SX (2012) Persistent pain after breast cancer treatment. Ann Palliat Med 1(3):182–194

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lundstedt D, Gustafsson M, Steineck G, Malmström P, Alsadius D, Sundberg A, Wilderäng U, Holmberg E, Johansson KA, Karlsson P (2012) Risk factors of developing long-lasting breast pain after breast cancer radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 83(1):71–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hui D, Bruera E (2017) The Edmonton symptom assessment system 25 years later: past, present, and future developments. J Pain Symptom Manag 53(3):630–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Szumacher E, Wighton A, Franssen E, Chow E, Tsao M, Ackerman I, Andersson L, Kim J, Wojcicka A, Ung Y, Sixel K, Hayter C (2001) Phase II study assessing the effectiveness of Biafine cream as a prophylactic agent for radiation-induced acute skin toxicity to the breast in women undergoing radiotherapy with concomitant CMF chemotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 51(1):81–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Whelan T, Mackenzie R, Julian J et al (2002) Randomized trial of breast irradiation schedules after lumpectomy for women with lymph node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 94(15):1143–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Selby D, Cascella A, Gardiner K, Do R, Moravan V, Myers J, Chow E (2010) A single set of numerical cutpoints to define moderate and severe symptoms for the Edmonton symptom assessment system. J Pain Symptom Manag 39:241–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Drost L, Li N, Vesprini D et al (2018) Prospective study of breast radiation dermatitis. Clin Breast Cancer 18(5):789–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pignol J-P, Trinh Thuc Vu T, Mitera G, Bosnic S, Verkooijen HM, Truong P (2015) Prospective evaluation of severe skin toxicity and pain during postmastectomy radiation therapy radiation oncology. Radiat Oncol Biol 91(1):157–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wengström Y, Häggmark C, Strander H, Forsberg C (2000) Perceived symptoms and quality of life in women with breast cancer receiving radiation therapy. Eur J Oncol Nurs 4(2):78–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shaitelman SF, Schlembach PJ, Arzu I, Ballo M, Bloom ES, Buchholz D, Chronowski GM, Dvorak T, Grade E, Hoffman KE, Kelly P, Ludwig M, Perkins GH, Reed V, Shah S, Stauder MC, Strom EA, Tereffe W, Woodward WA, Ensor J, Baumann D, Thompson AM, Amaya D, Davis T, Guerra W, Hamblin L, Hortobagyi G, Hunt KK, Buchholz TA, Smith BD (2015) Acute and short-term toxic effects of conventionally fractionated vs hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation. JAMA Oncol 1(7):931–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fernando IN, Ford HT, Powles TJ, Ashley S, Glees JP, Torr M, Grafton D, Harmer CL (1996) Factors affecting acute skin toxicity in patients having breast irradiation after conservative surgery: a prospective study of treatment practice at the Royal Marsden Hospital. Clin Oncol 8(4):226–233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sheridan D, Foo I, Gillanders D, Williams L, Fallon M, Colvin L (2012) Long-term follow-up of pain and emotional characteristics of women after surgery for breast cancer. J Pain Symptom Manag 44(4):608–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wolf S, Barton D, Kottschade L, Grothey A, Loprinzi C (2008) Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: prevention and treatment strategies. Eur J Cancer 44(11):1507–1515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jung BF, Herrmann D, Griggs J, Oaklander AL, Dworkin RH (2005) Neuropathic pain associated with non-surgical treatment of breast cancer. Pain 118(1):10–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tasmuth T, Von Smitten K, Hietanen P, Kataja M, Kalso E (1995) Pain and other symptoms after different treatment modalities of breast cancer. Ann Oncol 6(5):453–459

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Meijuan Y, Zhiyou P, Yuwen T, Ying F, Xinzhong C (2013) A retrospective study of postmastectomy pain syndrome: incidence, characteristics, risk factors, and influence on quality of life. Sci World J 2013:159732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gartner R, Jensen MB, Nielsen J, Ewertz M, Kroman N, Kehlet H (2009) Prevalence of and factors associated with persistent pain following breast cancer surgery. JAMA Oncol 302(18):1985–1992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Andersen KG, Kehlet H (2011) Persistent pain after breast cancer treatment: a critical review of risk factors and strategies for prevention. J Pain 12(7):725–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Poleshuck EL, Katz J, Andrus CH, Hogan LA, Jung BF, Kulick DI, Dworkin RH (2006) Risk factors for chronic pain following breast cancer surgery: a prospective study. J Pain 7(9):626–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ashcroft GS, Dodsworth J, Van Boxtel E et al (1997) Estrogen accelerates cutaneous wound healing associated with an increase in TGF-β1 levels. Nat Med 3(11):1209–1215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bentzen SM (2006) Preventing or reducing late side effects of radiation therapy: radiobiology meets molecular pathology. Nat Rev Cancer 6(9):702–713

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Heidrich SM, Egan JJ, Hengudomsub P, Randolph SM (2006) Symptoms, symptom beliefs, and quality of life of older breast cancer survivors: a comparative study. Oncol Nurs Forum 33(2):315–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yancik R, Wesley MN, Ries LAG, Havlik RJ, Edwards BK, Yates JW (2001) Effect of age and comorbidity in postmenopausal breast cancer patients aged 55 years and older. J Am Med Assoc 285(7):885–892

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Interactive Symptom Assessment and Collection (ISAAC) Tool. http://ocp.cancercare.on.ca/cms/One.aspx?portalId=77515&pageId=57699. Accessed 15 December 2019

  34. Barbera L, Sutradhar R, Howell D, Sussman J, Seow H, Dudgeon D, Atzema C, Earle C, Husain A, Liu Y, Krzyzanowska MK (2015) Does routine symptom screening with ESAS decrease ED visits in breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy? Support Care Cancer 23(10):3025–3032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

We thank the generous support of Bratty Family Fund, Michael and Karyn Goldstein Cancer Research Fund, Joey and Mary Furfari Cancer Research Fund, Pulenzas Cancer Research Fund, Joseph and Silvana Melara Cancer Research Fund, and Ofelia Cancer Research Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward Chow.

Ethics declarations

This study was approved by the research ethics board at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre. Informed consent was obtained prior to the first RT treatment.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1 Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale

figure a

Appendix 2 Skin Symptom Assessment

figure b

Appendix 3 ESAS and SSA pain severities

Time point

None

Mild

Moderate

Severe

Any paina

p valueb

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

 

ESAS pain severity

Baseline (N = 426)

244 (57.28%)

110 (25.82%)

50 (11.74%)

22 (5.16%)

182 (42.72%)

Ref

During RT week 1 (N = 321)

162 (50.47%)

113 (35.20%)

33 (10.28%)

13 (4.05%)

159 (49.53%)

0.0232

During RT week 2 (N = 358)

168 (46.93%)

131 (36.59%)

44 (12.29%)

15 (4.19%)

190 (53.07%)

0.0004

During RT week 3 (N = 327)

113 (34.56%)

142 (43.43%)

54 (16.51%)

18 (5.50%)

214 (65.44%)

< 0.0001

During RT week 4 (N = 189)

54 (28.57%)

90 (47.62%)

28 (14.81%)

17 (8.99%)

135 (71.43%)

< 0.0001

Post-RT week 1 (N = 165)

35 (21.21%)

63 (38.18%)

45 (27.27%)

22 (13.33%)

130 (78.79%)

< 0.0001

Post-RT week 2 (N = 215)

79 (36.74%)

80 (37.21%)

38 (17.67%)

18 (8.37%)

136 (63.26%)

< 0.0001

Post-RT week 3 (N = 202)

95 (47.03%)

60 (29.70%)

34 (16.83%)

13 (6.44%)

107 (52.97%)

0.0057

Post-RT week 4 (N = 215)

104 (48.37%)

74 (34.42%)

24 (11.16%)

13 (6.05%)

111 (51.63%)

0.0139

Post-RT week 5 (N = 187)

84 (44.92%)

71 (37.97%)

20 (10.70%)

12 (6.42%)

103 (55.08%)

0.0011

Post-RT week 6 (N = 191)

90 (47.12%)

67 (35.08%)

26 (13.61%)

8 (4.19%)

101 (52.88%)

0.0080

FU Appt (N = 272)

119 (43.75%)

102 (37.50%)

36 (13.24%)

15 (5.51%)

153 (56.25%)

< 0.0001

SSA breast pain severity

Baseline (N = 426)

211 (49.53%)

185 (43.43%)

27 (6.34%)

3 (0.70%)

215 (50.47%)

Ref

During RT week 1 (N = 327)

205 (62.69%)

105 (32.11%)

15 (4.59%)

2 (0.61%)

122 (37.31%)

<0 .0001

During RT week 2 (N = 353)

172 (48.73%)

151 (42.78%)

29 (8.22%)

1 (0.28%)

181 (51.27%)

0.7995

During RT week 3 (N = 330)

133 (40.30%)

148 (44.85%)

41 (12.42%)

8 (2.42%)

197 (59.70%)

0.0041

During RT week 4 (N = 178)

50 (28.09%)

94 (52.81%)

24 (13.48%)

10 (5.62%)

128 (71.91%)

< 0.0001

Post-RT week 1 (N = 160)

39 (24.38%)

71 (44.38%)

36 (22.50%)

14 (8.75%)

121 (75.63%)

< 0.0001

Post-RT week 2 (N = 209)

73 (34.93%)

85 (40.67%)

38 (18.18%)

13 (6.22%)

136 (65.07%)

0.0002

Post-RT week 3 (N = 198)

91 (45.96%)

79 (39.90%)

22 (11.11%)

6 (3.03%)

107 (54.04%)

0.3652

Post-RT week 4 (N = 220)

112 (50.91%)

88 (40.00%)

15 (6.82%)

5 (2.27%)

108 (49.09%)

0.7218

Post-RT week 5 (N = 186)

99 (53.23%)

73 (39.25%)

11 (5.91%)

3 (1.61%)

87 (46.77%)

0.3634

Post-RT week 6 (N = 186)

100 (53.76%)

75 (40.32%)

7 (3.76%)

4 (2.15%)

86 (46.24%)

0.2857

FU Appt (N = 290)

137 (47.24%)

110 (37.93%)

38 (13.10%)

5 (1.72%)

153 (52.76%)

0.5125

  1. RT, radiotherapy; ESAS, Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale; SSA, Skin Symptom Assessment; FU Appt, follow-up appointment
  2. aAny pain includes mild, moderate, and sever pain
  3. bBold values indicate statistical significance (Bonferroni adjusted p < 0.005 for multiple comparisons between each time point and baseline visit)

Appendix 4 ESAS pain score in all patients and in subgroups of patients over time

 

Radiotherapy 5000/25

Radiotherapy 4256/16

Time point

Alone N (mean ± SD)

Plus boost N (mean ± SD)

p valuea

Alone N (mean ± SD)

Plus boost N (mean ± SD)

p valuea

Baseline

45 (1.84 ± 2.06)

19 (1.37 ± 1.86)

0.3654

203 (1.45 ± 2.26)

154 (1.36 ± 2.14)

0.8318

During RT (1)

35 (1.31 ± 1.75)

14 (1.14 ± 1.17)

0.9133

152 (1.39 ± 2.07)

115 (1.50 ± 2.17)

0.7183

During RT (2)

36 (1.89 ± 2.01)

16 (1.13 ± 1.26)

0.3358

169 (1.67 ± 2.37)

133 (1.45 ± 1.90)

0.8051

During RT (3)

34 (1.47 ± 1.58)

16 (1.44 ± 1.46)

0.9305

154 (2.08 ± 2.48)

118 (1.95 ± 2.02)

0.8442

During RT (4)

35 (2.03 ± 2.01)

17 (2.18 ± 2.19)

0.9574

36 (3.00 ± 2.95)

96 (2.18 ± 2.27)

0.1992

Post-RT (1)

12 (3.92 ± 2.47)

6 (3.00 ± 3.10)

0.3260

72 (3.04 ± 2.81)

70 (3.23 ± 2.59)

0.4329

Post-RT (2)

17 (2.18 ± 1.70)

8 (2.38 ± 2.13)

0.9746

103 (2.22 ± 2.58)

82 (2.27 ± 2.47)

0.7229

Post-RT (3)

15 (2.13 ± 2.23)

9 (1.44 ± 1.59)

0.5180

95 (2.04 ± 2.42)

80 (1.63 ± 2.44)

0.1369

Post-RT (4)

23 (2.09 ± 2.41)

11 (1.64 ± 2.42)

0.4989

105 (1.79 ± 2.43)

71 (1.34 ± 2.03)

0.2116

Post-RT (5)

19 (2.79 ± 2.80)

8 (1.75 ± 2.38)

0.3475

92 (1.29 ± 1.99)

64 (1.81 ± 2.22)

0.0632

Post-RT (6)

19 (1.84 ± 2.41)

8 (1.13 ± 1.81)

0.4207

89 (1.88 ± 2.59)

71 (1.27 ± 1.64)

0.3136

FU Appt

25 (1.88 ± 2.45)

7 (0.86 ± 1.07)

0.3280

134 (1.84 ± 2.21)

102 (1.71 ± 2.25)

0.5171

 

Tangents technique

Locoregional technique

Time point

Alone N (mean ± SD)

Plus boost N (mean ± SD)

p valueb

Alone N (mean ± SD)

Plus boost N (mean ± SD)

p valueb

Baseline

153 (1.43 ± 2.30)

122 (1.31 ± 2.19)

0.6942

99 (1.61 ± 2.08)

51 (1.49 ± 1.90)

0.8456

During RT (1)

119 (1.39 ± 2.16)

95 (1.61 ± 2.30)

0.4674

72 (1.28 ± 1.71)

34 (1.03 ± 1.22)

0.6956

During RT (2)

125 (1.70 ± 2.42)

105 (1.54 ± 2.03)

0.9724

84 (1.65 ± 2.12)

44 (1.11 ± 1.28)

0.3630

During RT (3)

118 (1.95 ± 2.51)

95 (1.98 ± 2.10)

0.4922

74 (1.93 ± 2.04)

39 (1.67 ± 1.59)

0.6842

During RT (4)

33 (2.91 ± 2.74)

75 (2.31 ± 2.38)

0.2636

42 (2.02 ± 2.32)

38 (1.92 ± 1.96)

0.9280

Post-RT (1)

53 (3.02 ± 2.69)

55 (3.13 ± 2.70)

0.7949

35 (3.14 ± 2.87)

21 (3.43 ± 2.40)

0.4721

Post-RT (2)

78 (2.00 ± 2.43)

60 (2.20 ± 2.55)

0.6873

46 (2.52 ± 2.45)

30 (2.43 ± 2.22)

0.9901

Post-RT (3)

73 (2.00 ± 2.35)

62 (1.60 ± 2.25)

0.2426

39 (2.13 ± 2.46)

27 (1.63 ± 2.65)

0.2441

Post-RT (4)

77 (1.51 ± 2.11)

51 (1.35 ± 2.05)

0.6662

55 (2.29 ± 2.70)

31 (1.42 ± 2.14)

0.1011

Post-RT (5)

64 (1.30 ± 1.95)

46 (1.98 ± 2.32)

0.0611

50 (1.88 ± 2.45)

26 (1.50 ± 2.02)

0.6401

Post-RT (6)

66 (2.00 ± 2.69)

59 (1.14 ± 1.54)

0.1281

45 (1.62 ± 2.28)

20 (1.60 ± 1.93)

0.8613

FU Appt

106 (1.92 ± 2.17)

77 (1.73 ± 2.34)

0.3515

56 (1.75 ± 2.41)

32 (1.47 ± 1.83)

0.7520

  1. RT, radiotherapy; FU Appt, follow-up appointment; ESAS, Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale
  2. aTo compare radiotherapy alone to radiotherapy plus boost, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant
  3. bTo compare tangents technique alone to technique plus boost, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lam, E., Wong, G., Zhang, L. et al. Self-reported pain in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy. Support Care Cancer 29, 155–167 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05462-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05462-5

Keywords

Navigation