Skip to main content
Log in

Frailty as a predictor of all-cause mortality and readmission in older patients with acute coronary syndrome

A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • review article
  • Published:
Wiener klinische Wochenschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Background

Evidence from longitudinal studies linking frailty and outcome after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is mixed. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine whether frailty is a predictor of all-cause mortality and hospital readmission in older patients with ACS.

Methods

A systematic search was carried out in PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases for studies evaluating the association between frailty and outcomes in older patients with ACS. A meta-analysis was performed to determine the pooled effect estimate for the association between frailty and mortality and hospital readmission, respectively.

Results

A total of 1459 articles were retrieved based on our search strategy. Fifteen studies involving 10,245 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of frailty was 32% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 25–39%), and the pooled prevalence of pre-frailty was 33% (95% CI: 26–40%) in elderly patients with ACS. Pooled analyses showed that frailty was associated with significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality and readmission (hazard ratios [HRs] = 2.43 and 2.32, respectively). Pre-frailty was also associated with significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality and readmission, respectively (HRs = 1.55 and 1.34, respectively).

Conclusions

Both frailty and pre-frailty are risk factors for all-cause mortality and readmission in older patients with ACS. Therefore, frailty assessment should be given sufficient attention in the management of older patients with ACS to help improve survival and reduce readmission rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cesari M, Calvani R, Marzetti E. Frailty in Older Persons. Clin Geriatr Med. 2017;33(3):293–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Leong DP, Joseph PG, McKee M, et al. Reducing the global burden of cardiovascular disease, Part 2: Prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease. Circ Res. 2017;121(6):695–710.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gale CP, Cattle BA, Woolston A, et al. Resolving inequalities in care? Reduced mortality in the elderly after acute coronary syndromes. The Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project 2003–2010. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(5):630–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Campbell AJ, Buchner DM. Unstable disability and the fluctuations of frailty. Age Ageing. 1997;26(4):315–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Song X, Mitnitski A, Rockwood K. Prevalence and 10-year outcomes of frailty in older adults in relation to deficit accumulation. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58(4):681–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Alegre O, Formiga F, Lopez-Palop R, et al. An easy assessment of frailty at baseline independently predicts prognosis in very elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018;19(4):296–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Alonso Salinas GL, Sanmartin Fernandez M, Pascual Izco M, et al. Frailty predicts major bleeding within 30days in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome. Int J Cardiol. 2016;222:590–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Alonso Salinas GL, Sanmartin M, Pascual Izco M, et al. Frailty is an independent prognostic marker in elderly patients with myocardial infarction. Clin Cardiol. 2017;40(10):925–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Batty J, Qiu W, Gu S, et al. One-year clinical outcomes in older patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing coronary angiography: An analysis of the ICON1 study. Int J Cardiol. 2019;274:45–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ganga HV, Jantz J. Identifying frailty in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome. Can J Cardiol. 2016;32(10):1261.e15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015; https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25(9):603–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ades AE, Lu G, Higgins JP. The interpretation of random-effects meta-analysis in decision models. Med Decis Making. 2005;25(6):646–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315(7109):629–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50(4):1088–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Searle SD, Mitnitski A, Gahbauer EA, et al. A standard procedure for creating a frailty index. BMC Geriatr. 2008; https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-8-24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(3):M146–M56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Morley JE, Malmstrom TK, Miller DK. A simple frailty questionnaire (FRAIL) predicts outcomes in middle aged African Americans. J Nutr Health Aging. 2012;16(7):601–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, et al. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly peop. CMAJ. 2005;173(5):489–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gobbens RJ, Van Assen MA, Luijkx KG, et al. The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: psychometric properties. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2010;11(5):344–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rodriguez-Pascual C, Paredes-Galan E, Ferrero-Martinez AI, et al. The frailty syndrome is associated with adverse health outcomes in very old patients with stable heart failure: A prospective study in six Spanish hospitals. Int J Cardiol. 2017;236:296–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Odden MC, Peralta CA, Haan MN, et al. Rethinking the association of high blood pressure with mortality in elderly adults: the impact of frailty. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(15):1162–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li CL, Stanaway FF, Lin JD, et al. Frailty and health care use among community-dwelling older adults with diabetes: a population-based study. Clin Interv Aging. 2018;13:2295–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nunez J, Ruiz V, Bonanad C, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention and recurrent hospitalizations in elderly patients with non ST-segment acute coronary syndrome: The role of frailty. Int J Cardiol. 2017;228:456–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Theou O, Cann L, Blodgett J, et al. Modifications to the frailty phenotype criteria: Systematic review of the current literature and investigation of 262 frailty phenotypes in the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe. Ageing Res Rev. 2015;21:78–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Inthout J, Ioannidis JP, Rovers MM, et al. Plea for routinely presenting prediction intervals in meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6(7):e10247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Vicent L, Ariza-Sole A, Alegre O, et al. Octogenarian women with acute coronary syndrome present frailty and readmissions more frequently than men. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872618798226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Blanco S, Ferrieres J, Bongard V, et al. Prognosis impact of frailty assessed by the Edmonton frail scale in the setting of acute coronary syndrome in the elderly. Can J Cardiol. 2017;33(7):933–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sanchis J, Ruiz V, Bonanad C, et al. Prognostic value of geriatric conditions beyond age after acute coronary syndrome. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92(6):934–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kuang Y, Li X, Chen X, et al. Higher prevalence of elevated LDL‑C than non-HDL‑C and low statin treatment rate in elderly community-dwelling Chinese with high cardiovascular risk. Sci Rep. 2016;6:34268.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Alonso Salinas GL, Sanmartin Fernandez M, Pascual Izco M, et al. Frailty is a short-term prognostic marker in acute coronary syndrome of elderly patients. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2016;5(5):434–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kang L, Zhang SY, Zhu WL, et al. Is frailty associated with short-term outcomes for elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome? J Geriatr Cardiol. 2015;12(6):662–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. White HD, Westerhout CM, Alexander KP, et al. Frailty is associated with worse outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: Insights from the TaRgeted platelet Inhibition to cLarify the Optimal strateGy to medicallY manage Acute Coronary Syndromes (TRILOGY ACS) trial. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2016;5(3):231–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Myers V, Drory Y, Gerber Y, et al. Clinical relevance of frailty trajectory post myocardial infarction. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014;21(6):758–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sujino Y, Tanno J, Nakano S, et al. Impact of hypoalbuminemia, frailty, and body mass index on early prognosis in older patients (〉/=85 years) with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J Cardiol. 2015;66(3):263–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ekerstad N, Swahn E, Janzon M, et al. Frailty is independently associated with 1‑year mortality for elderly patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014;21(10):1216–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Graham MM, Galbraith PD, O’Neill D, et al. Frailty and outcome in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome. Can J Cardiol. 2013;29(12):1610–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Matsuzawa Y, Konishi M, Akiyama E, et al. Association between gait speed as a measure of frailty and risk of cardiovascular events after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(19):1964–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hongbin Liu, Li Fan or Chenkai Wu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

W. Xu, Y. Cai, H. Liu, L. Fan, and C. Wu declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Weihao Xu and Yulun Cai contributed equally to the manuscript.

Caption Electronic Supplementary Material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, W., Cai, Y., Liu, H. et al. Frailty as a predictor of all-cause mortality and readmission in older patients with acute coronary syndrome. Wien Klin Wochenschr 132, 301–309 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-020-01650-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-020-01650-9

Keywords

Navigation