Abstract
Multi-attribute group decision-making is the process of evaluating alternatives or choosing the best alternative based on a number of different factors. Preference relations offer effective techniques to depict the degree of preferences of decision-makers via a comparison of any two alternatives pairwise. By presenting the rough set based on the \(\lambda \)-dominance degree, this research presents a generic framework for the analysis of multi-attribute and multi-decision information systems. There are only a maximum of six sets that can be obtained after applying a rough set technique based on the \(\lambda \)-dominance degree to it for any times. This means that only six sets can adequately approximate all of the universe’s rough sets, with the lower and upper approximations of each set still lying among these six sets. The present study also focuses on the development of the two kinds of approximate precision, rough degree, approximate quality, approximate accuracy, and the relationship between them. Finally, a comparison between our suggested algorithms and Sun’s method is conducted, and the results show that the developed algorithms outperform the other models.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Abo Tabl EA (2011) A comparison of two kinds of definitions of rough approximations based on a similarity relation. Inf Sci 181:2587–2596
Abu-Donia HM (2008) Comparison between different kinds of approximations by using a family of binary relations. Knowl Based Syst 21:911–919
Bartol W, Miro J, Pioro K, Rossello F (2004) On the coverings by tolerance classes. Inform Sci 166:193–211
Bianucci D, Cattaneo G, Ciucci D (2007) Entropies and co-entropies of coverings with application to incomplete information systems. Fundam Inform 75:77–105
Chakhar S, Saad I (2012) Dominance-based rough set approach for groups in multicriteria classification problems. Dec Sup Syst 54(1):372–380
Chen DG, Kwong S, He Q, Wang H (2012) Geometrical interpretation and applications of membership functions with fuzzy rough sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 193:122–135
Dai J, Gao S, Zheng G (2018) Generalized rough set models determined by multiple neighborhoods generated from a similarity relation. Soft Comput 22:2081–2094
Deja R (2002) Conflict analysis. Int J Intell Syst 17:235–253
Dembczynski K, Greco S, Slowinski R (2009) Rough set approach to multiple criteria classification with imprecise evaluations and assignments. Eur J Oper Res 198:626–636
Ejegwa PA, Zuakwagh D (2022) Fermatean fuzzy modified composite relation and its application in pattern recognition. J Fuzzy Ext Appl 3(2):140–151
Greco S, Matarazzo B, Slowinski R (1999) Rough approximation of a preference relation by dominance relations. Eur J Oper Res 117:63–83
Greco S, Slowinski R, Zielniewicz P (2013) Putting dominance-based rough set approach and robust ordinal regression together. Dec Sup Syst 54(2):891–903
Huang H (2011) Graded dominance interval-based fuzzy objective information systems. Knowl Based Syst 24(7):1004–1012
Huang KY, Chang TH, Chang TC (2011) Determination of the threshold value \(\beta \) of variable precision rough set by fuzzy algorithms. Int J Approx Reason 52(7):1056–1072
Huang H, Li HX, Wei DK (2012) Dominance-based rough set model in intuitionistic fuzzy information systems. Knowl Based Syst 28:115–123
Huang H, Li HX, Feng GF, Zhou XZ (2019) Dominance-based rough sets in multi-scale intuitionistic fuzzy decision tables. Appl Math Comput 348:487–512
Huang B, Li H, Feng G, Guo C, Chen D (2021) Double-quantitative rough sets, optimal scale selection and reduction in multi-scale dominance IF decision tables. Int J Approx Reason 130:170–191
Kusunoki Y, Blaszczynski J, Inuiguchi M, Slowinski R (2021) Empirical Risk Minimization for Dominance-based Rough Set Approaches. Inform Sci 567:395–417
Li SY, Li TR (2015) Incremental update of approximations in dominance-based rough sets approach under the variation of attribute values Inform Sci 294:348–361
Li W, Xue X, Xu W, Zhan T, Fan B (2020) Double-quantitative variable consistency dominance-based rough set approach. Int J Approx Reason 124:1–26
Liang JY, Chin KS, Dang C (2002) A new method for measuring uncertainty and fuzziness in rough set theory. Int J Gen Syst 31(4):331–342
Liang JY, Wang JH, Qian YH (2014) A new measure of uncertainty based on knowledge granulation for rough sets. Inform Sci 26(2):294–308
Lingras P, Chen M, Miao DQ (2014) Qualitative and quantitative combinations of crisp and rough clustering schemes using dominance relations. Int J Approx Reason 55:238–258
Ma L (2018) The investigation of covering rough sets by Boolean matrices. Int J Approx Reason 100:69–84
Nguyen NT (2002) Consensus system for solving conflicts in distributed system. Inform Sci 147(147):91–122
Pamucar D, Zizovic M, Djurcic D (2022) Modification of the CRITIC method using fuzzy rough numbers. Decision Making: Applic Manag Eng 5(2):362–371
Patil MV, Kulkarni AJ (2020) Pareto dominance based multiobjective cohort intelligence algorithm. Inform Sci 538:69–118
Pawlak Z (1982) Rough set. Int J Comput Inform Sci 11(1982):341–356
Pawlak Z (2002) An inquiry into anatomy of conflicts. J Inform Sci 109:65–68
Sang B, Yang L, Chen H, Xu W, Guo Y, Yuan Z (2019) Generalized multi-granulation double-quantitative decision-theoretic rough set of multi-source information system. Int J Approx Reason 115:157–179
Sivaprakasam P, Angamuthu M (2023) Generalized Z-fuzzy soft \(\beta \)-covering based rough matrices and its application to MAGDM problem based on AHP method. Decision Making: Applic Manag Eng 6(1):134–152
Slowinski R, Vanderpooten D (2000) A generalized definition of rough approximations based on similarity. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 12(2):331–336
Sun B, Ma WM (2015) Rough approximation of a preference relation by multi-decision dominance for a multi-agent conflict analysis problem. Inform Sci 315:39–53
Sun B, Ma WM (2015) An approach to consensus measurement of linguistic preference relations in multi-attribute group decision making and application. Omega 51:83–92
Uluçay V (2020) A New similarity function of trapezoidal fuzzy multi-numbers based on multi-criteria decision making. J Inst Sci Technol. 10(2):1233–1246
Ulucay V, Deli I, Sahin M (2018) Trapezoidal fuzzy multi-number and its application to multi-criteria decision-making problems. Neural Comput & Applic. 30:1469–1478
Voskoglou M, Broumi S (2022) A hybrid method for the assessment of analogical reasoning skills. J Fuzzy Ext Appl 3(2):152–157
Wang GY, Ma XA, Yu H (2015) Monotonic uncertainty measures for attribute reduction in probabilistic rough set model. Int J Approx Reason 59:41–67
Wang W, Zhan J, Zhang C (2021) Three-way decisions based multi-attribute decision making with probabilistic dominance relations Inform Sci 559:75–96
Wang W, Zhan J, Mi J (2022) A three-way decision approach with probabilistic dominance relations under intuitionistic fuzzy information. Inform Sci 582:114–145
Wu WZ, Zhang M, Li HZ, Mi JS (2005) Knowledge reduction in random information systems via Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence. Inform Sci 174(3):143–164
Xue Z, Zeng X, Koehl L, Chen Y (2014) Measuring consistency of two datasets using fuzzy techniques and the concept of indiscernibility: Application to human perceptions on fabrics. Eng Appl Artif Intell 36:54–63
Yang XB, Qi Y, Yu DJ, Yu HL, Yang JY (2015) \(\alpha \)-Dominance relation and rough sets in interval-valued information systems. Inform Sci 294:334–347
Yang DD, Deng TQ, Fujita H (2020) Partial-overall dominance three-way decision models in interval-valued decision systems. Int J Approx Reason 126:308–325
Yao YY (2010) Three-way decisions with probabilistic rough sets. Inform Sci 180(3):341–353
Yao YY (2020) Three-way granular computing, rough sets, and formal concept analysis. Int J Approx Reason 116:106–125
Yu J, Zhang B, Chen M, Xu W (2018) Double-quantitative decision-theoretic approach to multigranulation approximate space. Int J Approx Reason 98:236–258
Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inform. Control 8:333–353
Zaras Z (2004) Rough approximation of a preference relation by a multi-attribute dominance for deterministic, stochastic and fuzzy decision problems stochastic and fuzzy decision problems. Eur J Oper Res 159:196–206
Zhang X, Hou J (2023) A novel rough set method based on adjustable-perspective dominance relations in intuitionistic fuzzy ordered decision tables. Int J Approx Reason 154:218–241
Zhang YL, Li CQ, Lin ML, Lin YJ (2015) Relationships between generalized rough sets based on covering and reflexive neighborhood system. Inform Sci 319:56–67
Zhang QH, Zhang Q, Wang GY (2016) The uncertainty of probabilistic rough sets in multigranulation spaces. Int J Approx Reason 77:38–54
Zhang X, Chen D, Tsang CC (2017) Generalized dominance rough set models for the dominance intuitionistic fuzzy information systems 378:1–25
Zhao Z (2016) On some types of covering rough sets from topological points of view. Int J Approx Reason 68:1–14
Zhao XR, Hu BQ (2016) Fuzzy probabilistic rough sets and their corresponding three-way decisions. Knowl Based Syst 91:126–142
Zhu W (2007) Generalized rough sets based on relations. Inform Sci 177(22):4997–5011
Zhu W (2007) Topological approaches to covering rough sets. Inform Sci 177:1499–1508
Zhu W (2009) Relationship among basic concepts in covering-based rough sets. Inform Sci 179(14):2478–2486
Zhu W, Wang F (2003) Reduction and axiomization of covering generalized rough sets. Inform Sci 152:217–230
Zhu W, Wang SP (2013) Rough matroids based on relations. Inform Sci 232:241–252
Ziarko W (1993) Variable precision rough sets model. J Comput Syst Sci 46:39–59
Funding
This study and all authors have received no funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Rehman, N., Ali, A., Liu, P. et al. Applications of \(\lambda \)-dominance degree-based rough sets in conflict problems. Soft Comput (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-09427-8
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-09427-8