Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The potential impact of future climate on the distribution of European yew (Taxus baccata L.) in the Hyrcanian Forest region (Iran)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Biometeorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Hyrcanian Forest region is rich in relict species, and endemic and endangered species. Although there are concerns about climate change, its influence on tree species in the Hyrcanian forests in the north of Iran is still unidentified. Taxus baccata is among the few conifer species found in the region, and the present study aims to evaluate the potential impact of climate change on the distribution of T. baccata. For this purpose, we used ensemble species distribution modeling with ten algorithms and based on two geographic extents (global and regional) and climate data for different climate change scenarios. For the regional extent, we calibrated the models in Hyrcanian forests including the three provinces in the north of Iran. For the global extent, we calibrated the models on the whole range distribution of T. baccata. In both cases, we applied the models to predict the distribution of T. baccata in northern Iran under current, 2050, and 2070 climates. In regional extent modeling, precipitation of coldest quarter and in global extent modeling temperature seasonality emerged as the most important variables. Present environmental suitability estimates indicated that the suitable area for T. baccata in Hyrcanian forests is 5.89 × 103 km2 (regional modeling) to 9.74 × 103 km2 (global modeling). The modeling suggests that climate change under representative concentration pathways (RCP) 8.5 is likely to lead to strong suitability reductions in the region, with just between 0.63 × 103 km2 (regional modeling) and 0.57 × 103 km2 (global modeling) suitable area in 2070. Hence, T. baccata risks losing most currently suitable areas in the Hyrcanian forests under climate change. The results of the present study suggest there should be focus on conservation of areas predicted to remain suitable through near-future climate change and provide an estimate of the availability of suitable areas for the regeneration of T. baccata and its use in reforestation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmadi K, Alavi SJ, Zahedi Amiri G, Hosseini SM, Serra-Diaz JM, Svenning JC (2020) Patterns of density and structure of natural populations of Taxus baccata in the Hyrcanian forests of Iran. Nord J Bot 38(3):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiello-Lammens ME, Boria RA, Radosavljevic A, Vilela B, Anderson RP (2015) spThin: an R package for spatial thinning of species occurrence records for use in ecological niche models. Ecography 38:541–545

    Google Scholar 

  • Alavi SJ, Ahmadi K, Hosseini SM, Tabari M, Nouri Z (2020) The importance of climatic, topographic and edaphic variables in the distribution of yew species (Taxus baccata L.) and prioritization of areas for conservation and restoration in the north of Iran. Iranian Journal of Forest 11(4):477–492

  • Allouche O, Tsoar A, Kadmon R (2006) Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). J Appl Ecol 43:1223–1232

    Google Scholar 

  • Araújo MB, New M (2007) Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends Ecol Evol 22:42–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Araújo MB, Alagador D, Cabeza M, Nogués-Bravo D, Thuiller W (2011) Climate change threatens European conservation areas. Ecol Lett 14:484–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakkenes M, Alkemade J, Ihle F, Leemans R, Latour J (2002) Assessing effects of forecasted climate change on the diversity and distribution of European higher plants for 2050. Glob Chang Biol 8:390–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckage B, Osborne B, Gavin DG, Pucko C, Siccama T, Perkins T (2008) A rapid upward shift of a forest ecotone during 40 years of warming in the Green Mountains of Vermont. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:4197–4202

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Braunisch V, Bollmann K, Graf RF, Hirzel AH (2008) Living on the edge—modelling habitat suitability for species at the edge of their fundamental niche. Ecol Model 214:153–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Broennimann O, Thuiller W, Hughes G, Midgley GF, Alkemade JR, Guisan A (2006) Do geographic distribution, niche property and life form explain plants’ vulnerability to global change? Glob Chang Biol 12:1079–1093

    Google Scholar 

  • Crimmins SM, Dobrowski SZ, Greenberg JA, Abatzoglou JT, Mynsberge AR (2011) Changes in climatic water balance drive downhill shifts in plant species’ optimum elevations. Science 331:324–327

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S, Buchmann C, Carl G, Carré G, Marquéz JRG, Gruber B, Lafourcade B, Leitão PJ, Münkemüller T, McClean C, Osborne PE, Reineking B, Schröder B, Skidmore AK, Zurell D, Lautenbach S (2013) Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36:27–46

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Gabbas A, Dormann CF (2018) Improved species-occurrence predictions in data-poor regions: using large-scale data and bias correction with down-weighted Poisson regression and Maxent. Ecography 41:1161–1172

    Google Scholar 

  • Elith J, Leathwick JR (2009) Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:677–697

    Google Scholar 

  • Fourcade Y et al (2014) Mapping species distributions with MAXENT using a geographically biased sample of presence data: a performance assessment of methods for correcting sampling bias. PLoS One 9: e97122

  • Franklin J (2010) Moving beyond static species distribution models in support of conservation biogeography. Divers Distrib 16(3):321–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A, Thuiller W (2005) Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol Lett 8:993–1009

    Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol Model 135:147–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A, Graham CH, Elith J, Huettmann F, Group NSDM (2007) Sensitivity of predictive species distribution models to change in grain size. Divers Distrib 13:332–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A, Tingley R, Baumgartner JB, Naujokaitis-Lewis I, Sutcliffe PR, Tulloch AI, Regan TJ, Brotons L, McDonald-Madden E, Mantyka-Pringle C, Martin TG (2013) Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions. Ecol Lett 16:1424–1435

    Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A, Thuiller W, Zimmermann NE (2017) Habitat suitability and distribution models: with applications in R. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison PA, Berry PM, Dawson TE (2001) Climate Change and Nature Conservation in Britain and Ireland: Modelling Natural Resource Responses to Climate Change (the MONARCH Project). Technical Report. UK Climate Impacts Programme, Oxford, UK.

  • Hesabi A, Alavi SJ, Esmailzadeh O (2019) Studying the interaction between English yew (Taxus baccata L.) adult trees and its regeneration in Afratakhteh Forest reserve, Golestan province. Iranian J Forest 11(2):165–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes L (2000) Biological consequences of global warming: is the signal already apparent? Trends Ecol Evol 15:56–61

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme PE (1996) Natural regeneration of yew (Taxus baccata L.): microsite, seed or herbivore limitation? J Ecol 1:853–861

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core writing team, RK Pachauri and LA Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland.

  • Iszkuło G, Jasińska AK, Giertych MJ, Boratyński A (2009) Do secondary sexual dimorphism and female intolerance to drought influence the sex ratio and extinction risk of Taxus baccata? Plant Ecol 200:229–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen DA, Ma K, Svenning JC (2020) Steep topography buffers threatened gymnosperm species against anthropogenic pressures in China. Ecol Evol 10(4):1–18

  • Lessani M (1999) Yew Taxus baccata L. Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands. Technical Publication No. 210-1999:71–73

  • Linares JC (2013) Shifting limiting factors for population dynamics and conservation status of the endangered English yew (Taxus baccata L., Taxaceae). For Ecol Manag 291:119–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyet A, Thuiller W, Cheylan M, Besnard A (2013) Fine-scale regional distribution modelling of rare and threatened species: bridging GIS tools and conservation in practice. Divers Distrib 19:651–663

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Freiría F, Tarroso P, Rebelo H, Brito JC (2016) Contemporary niche contraction affects climate change predictions for elephants and giraffes. Divers Distrib 22: 432–444

  • McCarty JP (2001) Ecological consequences of recent climate change. Conserv Biol 15:320–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley G, Hannah L, Millar D, Rutherford M, Powrie L (2002) Assessing the vulnerability of species richness to anthropogenic climate change in a biodiversity hotspot. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 11:445–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Naimi B (2015) usdm: Uncertainty analysis for species distribution models R package version:1.1–12

  • Naqinezhad A, Zare-Maivan H, Gholizadeh H (2015) A floristic survey of the Hyrcanian forests in northern Iran, using two lowland-mountain transects. J For Res 26:187–199

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nogués-Bravo D, Araújo MB, Errea M, Martinez-Rica J (2007) Exposure of global mountain systems to climate warming during the 21st century. Glob Environ Chang 17:420–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Nüchel J, Bøcher PK, Svenning JC (2019) Topographic slope steepness and anthropogenic pressure interact to shape the distribution of tree cover in China. Appl Geogr 103:40–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Parad GA, Ghobad-Nejhad M, Tabari M, Yousefzadeh H, Esmaeilzadeh O, Tedersoo L, Buyck B (2018) Cantharellus alborufescens and C. ferruginascens (Cantharellaceae, Basidiomycota) new to Iran Cryptogamie. Mycologie 39(3):299–310

  • Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson RG, Dawson TP (2003) Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12:361–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson RG, Dawson TP, Liu C (2004) Modelling species distributions in Britain: a hierarchical integration of climate and land-cover data. Ecography 27:285–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez JP, Brotons L, Bustamante J, Seoane J (2007) The application of predictive modelling of species distribution to biodiversity conservation. Divers Distrib 13:243–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Fernández D, Lobo JM, Hernández-Manrique OL (2011) Species distribution models that do not incorporate global data misrepresent potential distributions: a case study using Iberian diving beetles. Divers Distrib 17:163–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz MW, Deiner C, Forrester T, Grof-Tisza P, Matthew J, Santos M, et al. (2012) Perspectives on the open standards for the practice of conservation. Biol. Conserv 155:169–177

  • Sandel B, Svenning JC (2013) Human impacts drive a global topographic signature in tree cover. Nat Commun 4:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Serra-Diaz JM, Enquist BJ, Maitner B, Merow C, Svennin JC (2017) Big data of tree species distributions: how big and how good? For Ecosyst 4(1):30

    Google Scholar 

  • Svenning J-C, Magård E (1999) Population ecology and conservation status of the last natural population of English yew Taxus baccata in Denmark. Biol Conserv 88:173–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Svenning JC, Skov F (2004) Limited filling of the potential range in European tree species. Ecol Lett 7(7):565–573

    Google Scholar 

  • Talebi KS, Sajedi T, Pourhashemi M (2013) Forests of Iran: a treasure from the past, a hope for the future vol 10. Springer Science and Business Media, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Team RC (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria 2013

  • Thomas PA, Garcia-Martí X (2015) Response of European yews to climate change: a review. For Syst 24:1–11. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2015243-07465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas P, Polwart A (2003) Taxus baccata L. J Ecol 91:489–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CD, Cameron A, Green RE, Bakkenes M, Beaumont LJ, Collingham YC, Erasmus BF, De Siqueira MF, Grainger A, Hannah L, Hughes L (2004) Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427:145–148

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thuiller W, Lavorel S, Araújo MB, Sykes MT, Prentice IC (2005) Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102:8245–8250

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thuiller W, Lafourcade B, Engler R, Araújo MB (2009) BIOMOD–a platform for ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Ecography 32:369–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Titeux N, Henle K, Mihoub JB, Regos A, Geijzendorffer IR, Cramer W, Verburg PH, Brotons L (2017) Global scenarios for biodiversity need to better integrate climate and land use change. Divers Distrib 23:1231–1234

    Google Scholar 

  • Vale CG, Tarroso P, Brito JC (2014) Predicting species distribution at range margins: testing the effects of study area extent, resolution and threshold selection in the Sahara–Sahel transition zone. Divers Distrib 20:20–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Valladares F, Matesanz S, Guilhaumon F, Araújo MB, Balaguer L, Benito-Garzón M, Will Cornwell W, Gianoli E, van Kleunen M, Naya DE, Nicotra AB, Poorter H, Zavala MA (2014) The effects of phenotypic plasticity and local adaptation on forecasts of species range shifts under climate change. Ecol Lett 17:1351–1364

    Google Scholar 

  • Walther GR, Post E, Convey P, Menzel A, Parmesan C, Beebee TJ, Fromentin JM, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Bairlein F (2002) Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416:389–395

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zare H (2001) Introduced and native conifers in Iran. Publication of Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Tehran, No. 271, p 498 (In Persian)

  • Zhang J, Nielsen SE, Stolar J, Chen Y, Thuiller W (2015) Gains and losses of plant species and phylogenetic diversity for a northern high-latitude region. Divers Distrib 21(12):1441–1454

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang K, Yao L, Meng J, Tao J (2018) Maxent modeling for predicting the potential geographical distribution of two peony species under climate change. Sci Total Environ 634:1326–1334

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We appreciate Ghasemali Parad, Younos Geravand, Salman Zalekani, and Kambiz Ahmadi for field data sampling. JCS considers this work a contribution to his VILLUM Investigator project “Biodiversity Dynamics in a Changing World” funded by VILLUM FONDEN (grant 16549) and his Independent Research Fund Denmark | Natural Sciences project TREECHANGE (grant 6108-00078B).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyed Jalil Alavi.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmadi, K., Alavi, S.J., Amiri, G.Z. et al. The potential impact of future climate on the distribution of European yew (Taxus baccata L.) in the Hyrcanian Forest region (Iran). Int J Biometeorol 64, 1451–1462 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-020-01922-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-020-01922-z

Keywords

Navigation