Skip to main content
Log in

Monte Carlo simulations to assess the uncertainty of locating and quantifying CO2 leakage flux from deep geological or anthropogenic sources

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accurately locating and quantifying carbon dioxide (CO2) leakage to the atmosphere is important for diffuse degassing studies in volcanic / geothermal areas and for safety monitoring and/or carbon credit auditing of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) sites. This is typically conducted by measuring CO2 flux at numerous points over a large area and applying statistics or geostatistical interpolation. Accuracy of the results will depend on many factors related to survey/data-processing choices and site characteristics, and thus uncertainties can be difficult to quantify. To address this issue, we have developed a Monte Carlo-based program (MC-Flux) that repeatedly subsamples a high-resolution synthetic or real dataset using a choice of different sampling strategies (one random and four grid types) at multiple user-defined sample densities. The program keeps track of the anomalies found and estimates total flux using two statistical and two geostatistical approaches from the literature. This paper describes the use of MC-Flux to assess the potential impact of various sampling and interpretation decisions on the accuracy of the final results. Simulations show that an offset grid sample distribution yields the best results, however relatively dense sampling is required to obtain a high probability of an accurate flux estimate. For the test dataset used, ordinary kriging interpolation produces a range of flux estimates that are centered on the true value while sequential Gaussian simulation tends to slightly overestimate values at intermediate sample spacings and is sensitive to input parameters. These results point to the need for developing new approaches that decrease uncertainty, such as integration with high-resolution co-kriging datasets that complement the more accurate point flux measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The assistance of Pietro Sacco and Davide de Angelis for the collection of the Latera field data is gratefully acknowledged. We also thank three anonymous reviewers for their useful comments and observations that helped us improve the original manuscript.

Funding

The research leading to these results received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 653718.\

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization [SEB], Methodology, Software, Visualization and Writing – Original Draft [SEB]; Formal Analysis [SEB, GC, MGF]; Validation [GC, MGF]; Writing – Review and Editing [GC, MGF, SB]; Supervision [SL]; Project administration and Funding acquisition [SB, SL].

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabina Bigi.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Data availability

Datasets and configuration files used to conduct the reported simulations are available from the Zenodo open-source online repository at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4573725 (Beaubien and Bigi 2021b).

Code availability

The MC-Flux (V1.0) installation package and user’s manual are available from the Zenodo open-source online repository at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4573575 (Beaubien and Bigi 2021a).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 8197 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beaubien, S.E., Ciotoli, G., Finoia, M.G. et al. Monte Carlo simulations to assess the uncertainty of locating and quantifying CO2 leakage flux from deep geological or anthropogenic sources. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 36, 609–627 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-02123-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-02123-9

Keywords

Navigation