Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of clinical outcome between laparoscopic and open hepatectomy of high difficulty score for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score analysis

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) of high difficulty score is technically challenging. There is a lack of clinical evidence to support its applicability in terms of the long-term survival benefits. This study aims to compare clinical outcomes between LLR and the open liver resection of high difficulty score for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Materials and Methods

From 2010 to 2020, using Iwate criteria, 424 patients underwent liver resection of high difficulty score by the laparoscopic (n = 65) or open (n = 359) approach. Propensity score (PS) matching was performed between the two groups. Short-term and long-term outcomes were compared between PS-matched groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors affecting survival.

Results

The laparoscopic group had significantly fewer severe complications (3% vs. 10.8%), and shorter median hospital stays (6 days vs. 8 days) than the open group. Meanwhile, the long-term oncological outcomes were comparable between the two groups, in terms of the tumor recurrence rate (40% vs. 46.1%), the 5-year overall survival rate (75.4% vs. 76.2%), and the 5-year recurrence-free survival rate (50.3% vs. 53.5%). The high preoperative serum alpha-fetoprotein level, multiple tumors, and severe postoperative complications were the independent poor prognostic factors associated with worse overall survival. The surgical approach (Laparoscopic vs. Open) did not influence the survival.

Conclusion

LLR of high difficulty score for selected patients with HCC has better short-term outcomes than the open approach. More importantly, it can achieve similar long-term survival outcomes as the open approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: Cancer J Clin 68:394–424

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Galle Peter R, Forner Alejandro, Llovet Josep M, Mazzaferro Vincenzo, Piscaglia Fabio, Raoul Jean-Luc, Schirmacher Peter, Vilgrain Valérie (2018) EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 69:182–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Heimbach JK, Kulik LM, Finn RS, Sirlin CB, Abecassis MM, Roberts LR, Zhu AX, Murad MH, Marrero JA (2018) AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 67:358–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vogel A, Cervantes A, Chau I, Daniele B, Llovet JM, Meyer T, Nault JC, Neumann U, Ricke J, Sangro B, Schirmacher P, Verslype C, Zech CJ, Arnold D, Martinelli E (2018) Hepatocellular carcinoma: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 29(Suppl 4):iv238–iv255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yoon YI, Kim KH, Kang SH, Kim WJ, Shin MH, Lee SK, Jung DH, Park GC, Ahn CS, Moon DB, Ha TY, Song GW, Hwang S, Lee SG (2016) Pure laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a propensity score matched analysis. Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Morise Z (2019) Developments and perspectives of laparoscopic liver resection in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Today 49:649–655

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I, Koffron AJ, Thomas M, Gayet B, Han HS, Wakabayashi G, Belli G, Kaneko H, Ker CG, Scatton O, Laurent A, Abdalla EK, Chaudhury P, Dutson E, Gamblin C, D’Angelica M, Nagorney D, Testa G, Labow D, Manas D, Poon RT, Nelson H, Martin R, Clary B, Pinson WC, Martinie J, Vauthey JN, Goldstein R, Roayaie S, Barlet D, Espat J, Abecassis M, Rees M, Fong Y, McMasters KM, Broelsch C, Busuttil R, Belghiti J, Strasberg S, Chari RS (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250:825–830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Buell JF, Kaneko H, Han HS, Asbun H, O’Rourke N, Tanabe M, Koffron AJ, Tsung A, Soubrane O, Machado MA, Gayet B, Troisi RI, Pessaux P, Van Dam RM, Scatton O, Abu Hilal M, Belli G, Kwon CH, Edwin B, Choi GH, Aldrighetti LA, Cai X, Cleary S, Chen KH, Schön MR, Sugioka A, Tang CN, Herman P, Pekolj J, Chen XP, Dagher I, Jarnagin W, Yamamoto M, Strong R, Jagannath P, Lo CM, Clavien PA, Kokudo N, Barkun J, Strasberg SM (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 261:619–629

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ban D, Tanabe M, Ito H, Otsuka Y, Nitta H, Abe Y, Hasegawa Y, Katagiri T, Takagi C, Itano O, Kaneko H, Wakabayashi G (2014) A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21:745–753

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wakabayashi G (2016) What has changed after the Morioka consensus conference 2014 on laparoscopic liver resection? Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 5:281–289

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Tanaka S, Kubo S, Kanazawa A, Takeda Y, Hirokawa F, Nitta H, Nakajima T, Kaizu T, Kaneko H, Wakabayashi G (2017) Validation of a difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection: a multicenter analysis by the endoscopic liver surgery study group in Japan. J Am Coll Surg 225(249–258):e241

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chong CCN, Lok HT, Fung AKY, Fong AKW, Cheung YS, Wong J, Lee KF, Lai PBS (2020) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: application of the difficulty scoring system. Surg Endosc 34:2000–2006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cipriani F, Fiorentini G, Magistri P, Fontani A, Menonna F, Annecchiarico M, Lauterio A, De Carlis L, Coratti A, Boggi U, Ceccarelli G, Di Benedetto F, Aldrighetti L (2021) Pure laparoscopic versus robotic liver resections: multicentric propensity score-based analysis with stratification according to difficulty scores. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2021.08.123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ng KK, Vauthey JN, Pawlik TM, Lauwers GY, Regimbeau JM, Belghiti J, Ikai I, Yamaoka Y, Curley SA, Nagorney DM, Ng IO, Fan ST, Poon RT, International Cooperative Study Group on Hepatocellular C (2005) Is hepatic resection for large or multinodular hepatocellular carcinoma justified? Results from a multi-institutional database. Ann Surg Oncol 12:364–373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee KF, Cheung YS, Wong J, Chong CC, Wong JS, Lai PB (2012) Randomized clinical trial of open hepatectomy with or without intermittent Pringle manoeuvre. Br J Surg 99:1203–1209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ng KKC, Chok KSH, Chan ACY, Cheung TT, Wong TCL, Fung JYY, Yuen J, Poon RTP, Fan ST, Lo CM (2017) Randomized clinical trial of hepatic resection versus radiofrequency ablation for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg 104:1775–1784

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Couinaud C (1999) Liver anatomy: portal (and suprahepatic) or biliary segmentation. Dig Surg 16:459–467

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lang H, de Santibañes E, Schlitt HJ, Malagó M, van Gulik T, Machado MA, Jovine E, Heinrich S, Ettorre GM, Chan A, Hernandez-Alejandro R, Robles Campos R, Sandström P, Linecker M, Clavien PA (2019) 10th anniversary of ALPPS-lessons learned and quo vadis. Ann Surg 269:114–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang X, Teh CSC, Ishizawa T, Aoki T, Cavallucci D, Lee SY, Panganiban KM, Perini MV, Shah SR, Wang H, Xu Y, Suh KS, Kokudo N (2021) Consensus guidelines for the use of fluorescence imaging in hepatobiliary surgery. Ann Surg 274:97–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Choi SH, Choi GH, Han DH, Choi JS (2015) Laparoscopic liver resection using a rubber band retraction technique: usefulness and perioperative outcome in 100 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 29:387–397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu CL, Fan ST, Cheung ST, Lo CM, Ng IO, Wong J (2006) Anterior approach versus conventional approach right hepatic resection for large hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled study. Ann Surg 244:194–203

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Sugioka A, Kato Y, Tanahashi Y (2017) Systematic extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle isolation for anatomical liver resection based on Laennec’s capsule: proposal of a novel comprehensive surgical anatomy of the liver. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 24:17–23

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Shirata C, Kokudo T, Gillet M, Uldry E, Demartines N, Kokudo N, Hasegawa K, Halkic N (2020) Reappraisal of Laennec’s capsule. Surg Oncol 33:222–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ng KKC, Cheng NMY, Huang J, Liao M, Chong CCN, Lee KF, Wong J, Cheung SYS, Lok HT, Fung AKY, Wong GLH, Wong VWS, Lai PBS (2021) Development and validation of a novel nomogram predicting 10-year actual survival after curative hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Surgeon 19:329–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Brooke-Smith M, Crawford M, Adam R, Koch M, Makuuchi M, Dematteo RP, Christophi C, Banting S, Usatoff V, Nagino M, Maddern G, Hugh TJ, Vauthey JN, Greig P, Rees M, Yokoyama Y, Fan ST, Nimura Y, Figueras J, Capussotti L, Buchler MW, Weitz J (2011) Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International study group of liver surgery (ISGLS). Surgery 149:713–724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Reich H, McGlynn F, DeCaprio J, Budin R (1991) Laparoscopic excision of benign liver lesions. Obstet Gynecol 78:956–958

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann Surg 250:831–841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Berardi G, Van Cleven S, Fretland ÅA, Barkhatov L, Halls M, Cipriani F, Aldrighetti L, Abu Hilal M, Edwin B, Troisi RI (2017) Evolution of laparoscopic liver surgery from innovation to implementation to mastery: perioperative and oncologic outcomes of 2,238 patients from 4 European specialized centers. J Am Coll Surg 225:639–649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hasegawa Y, Wakabayashi G, Nitta H, Takahara T, Katagiri H, Umemura A, Makabe K, Sasaki A (2017) A novel model for prediction of pure laparoscopic liver resection surgical difficulty. Surg Endosc 31:5356–5363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Halls MC, Berardi G, Cipriani F, Barkhatov L, Lainas P, Harris S, D’Hondt M, Rotellar F, Dagher I, Aldrighetti L, Troisi RI, Edwin B, Abu Hilal M (2018) Development and validation of a difficulty score to predict intraoperative complications during laparoscopic liver resection. Brit J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kawaguchi Y, Fuks D, Kokudo N, Gayet B (2018) Difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection: proposal for a new classification. Ann Surg 267:13–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lin H, Bai Y, Yin M, Chen Z, Yu S (2022) External validation of different difficulty scoring systems of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Endosc 36:3732–3749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Barron JO, Orabi D, Moro A, Quintini C, Berber E, Aucejo FN, Sasaki K, Kwon C-HD (2022) Validation of the IWATE criteria as a laparoscopic liver resection difficulty score in a single North American cohort. Surg Endosc 36:3601–3609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Choi SH, Chen KH, Syn NL, Cipriani F, Cheung TT, Chiow AKH, Choi GH, Siow TF, Sucandy I, Marino MV, Gastaca M, Chong CC, Lee JH, Ivanecz A, Mazzaferro V, Lopez-Ben S, Fondevila C, Rotellar F, Campos RR, Efanov M, Kingham TP, Sutcliffe RP, Troisi RI, Pratschke J, Wang X, D’Hondt M, Yong CC, Levi Sandri GB, Tang CN, Ruzzenente A, Cherqui D, Ferrero A, Wakabayashi G, Scatton O, Aghayan D, Edwin B, Coelho FF, Giuliante F, Liu R, Sijberden J, Abu Hilal M, Sugioka A, Long TCD, Fuks D, Aldrighetti L, Han HS, Goh BKP (2022) Utility of the Iwate difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy: do surgical outcomes differ for tumors in segments VI and VII? Surg Endosc 36:9204–9214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tanaka S, Kawaguchi Y, Kubo S, Kanazawa A, Takeda Y, Hirokawa F, Nitta H, Nakajima T, Kaizu T, Kaibori M, Kojima T, Otsuka Y, Fuks D, Hasegawa K, Kokudo N, Kaneko H, Gayet B, Wakabayashi G (2019) Validation of index-based IWATE criteria as an improved difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. Surgery 165:731–740

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tang Z, Tang Y, Liu T, Liu R, Xie S, Xie D, Yang J, Tang Y (2021) Clinical study on the efficacy of laparoscopic hepatectomy and its influence on the expression of serum VEGF, FGF, and immune function. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2021:4432022

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Li W, Zhou X, Huang Z, Zhang H, Zhang L, Shang C, Chen Y (2015) Laparoscopic surgery minimizes the release of circulating tumor cells compared to open surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Endosc 29:3146–3153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ibuki S, Hibi T, Tanabe M, Geller DA, Cherqui D, Wakabayashi G (2022) Short-term outcomes of “Difficult” laparoscopic liver resection at specialized centers: report from INSTALL (International survey on technical aspects of laparoscopic liver resection)-2 on 4478 patients. Ann Surg 275:940–946

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lv X, Zhang L, Yu X, Yu H (2023) The difficulty grade of laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma correlates with long-term outcomes. Updates Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01452-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Moris D, Tsilimigras DI, Kostakis ID, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Shah KN, Felekouras E, Pawlik TM (2018) Anatomic versus non-anatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 44:927–938

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Cipriani F, Alzoubi M, Fuks D, Ratti F, Kawai T, Berardi G, Barkhatov L, Lainas P, Van der Poel M, Faoury M, Besselink MG, D’Hondt M, Dagher I, Edwin B, Troisi RI, Scatton O, Gayet B, Aldrighetti L, Abu Hilal M (2020) Pure laparoscopic versus open hemihepatectomy: a critical assessment and realistic expectations—a propensity score-based analysis of right and left hemihepatectomies from nine European tertiary referral centers. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 27:3–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kong J, Li G, Chai J, Yu G, Liu Y, Liu J (2021) Impact of postoperative complications on long-term survival after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 28:8221–8233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ng KKC, Chong CCN, Lee KF, Lai PBS, Cheng TKC, Chen HW, Yi B, Huang JW (2023) Asia-Pacific multicentre randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (AP-LAPO trial). BJS Open. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac166

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Vigano L, Laurent A, Tayar C, Tomatis M, Ponti A, Cherqui D (2009) The learning curve in laparoscopic liver resection: improved feasibility and reproducibility. Ann Surg 250:772–782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Nomi T, Fuks D, Kawaguchi Y, Mal F, Nakajima Y, Gayet B (2015) Learning curve for laparoscopic major hepatectomy. Br J Surg 102:796–804

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would gratefully thank Mr. Philip Ip (Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong) for his excellent help with the data collection and analysis.

Funding

The present study receives no funding from any organization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelvin K. C. Ng.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Prof. Kelvin K.C. Ng, Dr. Kai-Chi Cheng, Dr. Janet W.C. Kung, Dr. Kit-Man Ho, Dr. Hon-Ting Lok, Dr. Andrew K.Y. Fung, Dr. Charing C.N. Chong, Dr. Sunny Y.S. Cheung, Dr. Kit-Fai Lee, Dr. John Wong, and Prof. Paul B.S. Lai have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ng, K.K.C., Cheng, KC., Kung, J.W.C. et al. Comparison of clinical outcome between laparoscopic and open hepatectomy of high difficulty score for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score analysis. Surg Endosc 38, 857–871 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10634-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10634-5

Keywords

Navigation