Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Local palliative therapies for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction: radiofrequency ablation combined with stent or biliary stent alone? An updated meta-analysis of nineteen trials

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Recently, there has been a burgeoning interest in radiofrequency ablation combined with stent (RFA + Stent) for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). This study aimed to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RFA + Stent compared with biliary stent alone.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases from their inception dates to June 20, 2021, for studies that compared RFA + Stent and stent alone for unresectable MBO. The main outcomes were survival, patency, and adverse effects. All meta-analyses were calculated using the random-effects model.

Results

A total of 19 studies involving 1946 patients were included in this study. Compared with stent alone, RFA + Stent was significantly associated with better overall survival (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.48, 0.63; P < 0.00001), longer mean survival time (SMD 2.20; 95% CI 1.17, 3.22; P < 0.0001), longer mean stent patency time (SMD 1.37; 95% CI 0.47, 2.26; P = 0.003), higher stent patency at 6 months (OR 2.82; 95% CI 1.54, 5.18; P = 0.0008). The two interventions had similar incidence of postoperative abdominal pain (OR 1.29; 95% CI 0.94, 1.78; P = 0.11), mild bleeding (OR 1.28; 95% CI 0.65, 2.54; P = 0.48), cholangitis (OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.76, 1.55; P = 0.65), pancreatitis (OR 1.39; 95% CI 0.82, 2.38; P = 0.22). Furthermore, the serum bilirubin levels and stricture diameter after operations were significantly alleviated than before operations, but the degree of alleviation between the two groups were not significantly different (all P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Although the alleviation of serum bilirubin and stricture diameter did not differ between the two interventions, RFA + Stent can significantly improve the survival and stent patency with comparable procedure-related adverse events than stent alone. Thus, RFA + Stent should be recommended as an attractive alternative to biliary stent alone for patients with unresectable MBO.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CI:

Confidence interval

GRADE:

Grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation

HR:

Hazard ratio

I 2 :

I-Squared

MBO:

Malignant biliary obstruction

NOS:

Newcastle–Ottawa Scale

OR:

Odds ratio

PRISMA:

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis

RCTs:

Randomized controlled studies

RFA + Stent:

Radiofrequency ablation combined with stent

ROB-2:

The revised cochrane risk of bias tool

SMD:

Standardized mean differences

References

  1. Banales JM, Marin JJG, Lamarca A et al (2020) Cholangiocarcinoma 2020: the next horizon in mechanisms and management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 17(9):557–588

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Gupta N, Yelamanchi R (2021) Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a review of recent paradigms and advances in epidemiology, clinical diagnosis and management. World J Gastroenterol 27(23):3158–3181

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Rizvi S, Khan SA, Hallemeier CL et al (2018) Cholangiocarcinoma—evolving concepts and therapeutic strategies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 15(2):95–111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Abraham NS, Barkun JS, Barkun AN (2002) Palliation of malignant biliary obstruction: a prospective trial examining impact on quality of life. Gastrointest Endosc 56(6):835–841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Khoo S, Do NDT, Kongkam P (2020) Efficacy and safety of EUS biliary drainage in malignant distal and hilar biliary obstruction: a comprehensive review of literature and algorithm. Endosc Ultrasound 9(6):369–379

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Monkemuller K, Popa D, Wilcox CM (2014) Endoscopic treatment options for cholangiocarcinomas. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 14(4):407–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamada T, Nakai Y, Isayama H et al (2021) Antireflux metal stent for biliary obstruction: any benefits? Dig Endosc 33(3):310–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhu HD, Guo JH, Huang M et al (2018) Irradiation stents vs. conventional metal stents for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction: a multicenter trial. J Hepatol 68(5):970–977

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gao DJ, Yang JF, Ma SR et al (2020) Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation plus plastic stent placement versus stent placement alone for unresectable extrahepatic biliary cancer: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.12.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Inoue T, Yoneda M (2021) Updated evidence on the clinical impact of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction. Dig Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.14059

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang J, Wang J, Zhou H et al (2018) Efficacy and safety of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized trial. Endoscopy 50(8):751–760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kang H, Chung MJ, Cho IR et al (2021) Efficacy and safety of palliative endobiliary radiofrequency ablation using a novel temperature-controlled catheter for malignant biliary stricture: a single-center prospective randomized phase II TRIAL. Surg Endosc 35(1):63–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cho JH, Jeong S, Kim EJ et al (2018) Long-term results of temperature-controlled endobiliary radiofrequency ablation in a normal swine model. Gastrointest Endosc 87(4):1147–1150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Habert P, Di Bisceglie M, Bartoli A et al (2021) Description of morphological evolution of lung tumors treated by percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: long term follow-up of 100 lesions with chest CT. Int J Hyperth 38(1):786–794

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang Y, Yu H, Tan X et al (2021) Liver resection versus radiofrequency ablation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Hyperth 38(1):875–886

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Laquiere A, Boustiere C, Leblanc S et al (2016) Safety and feasibility of endoscopic biliary radiofrequency ablation treatment of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 30(3):1242–1248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang KH, Li XX, Bai Z (2018) Research methods of evidence-based social science: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lanzhou University Press, Lanzhou

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sofi AA, Khan MA, Das A et al (2018) Radiofrequency ablation combined with biliary stent placement versus stent placement alone for malignant biliary strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 87(4):944-951.e1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.2 (2021). Cochrane, 2021. [EB/OL]. www.training.cochrane.org/handbook

  20. Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M et al (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ 350:g7647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sterne JC, Savovic J, Page MJ et al (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ-Br Med J. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Stang A (2010) Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 25(9):603–605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang Q, Wang J, Pan B et al (2020) Advance in the GRADE approach to rate the quality of evidence from a network meta-analysis. Chin J Evid Based Med 20(7):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  24. Liu Q, Ding L (2019) Accessibility and validation of survival data in survival curve for meta-analysis. Chin J Evid Based Med 19(9):1124–1130

    Google Scholar 

  25. Luo D, Wan X, Liu J et al (2018) Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and/or mid-quartile range. Stat Methods Med Res 27(6):1785–1805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wan X, Wang W, Liu J et al (2014) Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-135

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Uyanık SA, Öğüşlü U, Çevik H et al (2021) Percutaneous endobiliary ablation of malignant biliary strictures with a novel temperature-controlled radiofrequency ablation device. Diagn Interv Radiol 27(1):102–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sharaiha RZ, Natov N, Glockenberg KS et al (2014) Comparison of metal stenting with radiofrequency ablation versus stenting alone for treating malignant biliary strictures: is there an added benefit? Dig Dis Sci 59(12):3099–3102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kallis Y, Phillips N, Steel A et al (2015) Analysis of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation of biliary malignant strictures in pancreatic cancer suggests potential survival benefit. Dig Dis Sci 60(11):3449–3455

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Li TF, Huang GH, Li Z et al (2015) Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and intraductal radiofrequency ablation combined with biliary stent placement for malignant biliary obstruction. J Vasc Interv Radiol 26(5):715–721

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Liang H, Peng Z, Cao L et al (2015) Metal stenting with or without endobiliary radiofrequency ablation for unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Cancer Ther 06(11):981–992

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kadayifci A, Atar M, Forcione DG et al (2016) Radiofrequency ablation for the management of occluded biliary metal stents. Endoscopy 48(12):1096–1101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Liu J, Di K, Xu S et al (2016) Radiofrequency ablation combined with stent implantation in treatment of malignant biliary obstruction. Chin J Interv Imaging Ther 13(10):587–591

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wang J, Zhao L, Zhou C et al (2016) Percutaneous Intraductal radiofrequency ablation combined with biliary stent placement for nonresectable malignant biliary obstruction improves stent patency but not survival. Medicine (Baltimore) 95(15):e3329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Cui W, Wang Y, Fan WZ et al (2017) Comparison of intraluminal radiofrequency ablation and stents vs. stents alone in the management of malignant biliary obstruction. Int J Hyperth 33(7):853–861

    Google Scholar 

  36. Dutta AK, Basavaraju U, Sales L et al (2017) Radiofrequency ablation for management of malignant biliary obstruction: a single-center experience and review of the literature. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 11(8):779–784

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wu TT, Li WM, Li HC et al (2017) Percutaneous intraductal radiofrequency ablation for extrahepatic distal cholangiocarcinoma: a method for prolonging stent patency and achieving better functional status and quality of life. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 40(2):260–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bokemeyer A, Matern P, Bettenworth D et al (2019) Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation prolongs survival of patients with unresectable hilar cholangiocellular carcinoma—a case-control study. Sci Rep 9(1):13685

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Orozco MCG, Guerrero AH, Larraga JOA et al (2020) Efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation in patients with unresectable malignant biliary strictures. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. https://doi.org/10.17235/reed.2020.7023/2020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yu TZ, Zhang W, Li CY et al (2020) Percutaneous intraductal radiofrequency ablation combined with biliary stent placement for treatment of malignant biliary obstruction. Abdom Radiol 45(11):3690–3697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kong YL, Zhang HY, Liu CL et al (2021) Improving biliary stent patency for malignant obstructive jaundice using endobiliary radiofrequency ablation: experience in 150 patients. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08457-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Xia MX, Wang SP, Yuan JG et al (2021) Effect of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation on the survival of patients with inoperable malignant biliary strictures: a large cohort study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.960

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Zheng X, Bo ZY, Wan W et al (2016) Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation may be preferable in the management of malignant biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dig Dis 17(11):716–724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Yang J, Wang J, Zhou H et al (2020) Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation plus a novel oral 5-fluorouracil compound versus radiofrequency ablation alone for unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 92(6):1204–1212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.04.075

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Yang Q, Liu J, Ma W et al (2019) Efficacy of different endoscopic stents in the management of postoperative biliary strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 53(6):418–426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Tal AO, Vermehren J, Friedrich-Rust M et al (2014) Intraductal endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of hilar non-resectable malignant bile duct obstruction. World J Gastrointest Endosc 6(1):13–19

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research is supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant Nos. 2020jbkyzx001, lzujbky-2020-kb20); the Key Laboratory of Evidence-Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation Foundation of Gansu Province (Grant No. GSEBMKT-2021KFKT03); Key Laboratory of Molecular Diagnosis and Precision Therapy of Surgical Tumors of Gansu Province, Grant Number 2019GSZDSYS06.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All patients participated in the interpretation of study results and approved the final version of the manuscript. TG and KY contributed to studying concepts and design. SS, HJ, and QC, contributed to data collection, statistical analysis, data interpretation, and the paper's drafting. SG, KL, WY, CL, TL, HT, and XL contributed to data collection.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kehu Yang or Tiankang Guo.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Shaoming Song, Haojie Jin, Qinghao Cheng, Shiyi Gong, Kun Lv, Wenwen Yang, Caining Lei, Ting Lei, Hongwei Tian, Xiaofei Li, Kehu Yang, and Tiankang Guo have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 27 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 28 KB)

Figure S1

Forest plot of subgroup analysis illustrating the mean stent patency based on metal or plastic stent (PNG 19 KB)

Figure S2

Funnel plots. A: overall survival; B: mean survival time; C: mean stent patency time; D: abdominal pain; E: cholangitis (PNG 417 KB)

Supplementary file5 (DOC 49 KB)

Supplementary file6 (DOC 66 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, S., Jin, H., Cheng, Q. et al. Local palliative therapies for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction: radiofrequency ablation combined with stent or biliary stent alone? An updated meta-analysis of nineteen trials. Surg Endosc 36, 5559–5570 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09181-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09181-2

Keywords

Navigation