Abstract
Background
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is one of the safest, most commonly performed surgical procedures, but postoperative complications including bile leak, retained stone, cholangitis, and gallstone pancreatitis following LC occur in up to 2.6% of cases and may require readmission with possible endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) intervention. There is a paucity of literature on factors predictive of need for ERCP following LC. The goal of this study is to describe the prevalence and risk factors for readmission with indication for ERCP.
Methods
We queried the ACS/NSQIP 2012–2017 Participant User Files for patients who underwent LC. Patient demographics, comorbidities, operative characteristics, and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for readmission with indication for ERCP intervention.
Results
Of 275,570 patients, 11,010 (4.00%) were readmitted within the 30-day postoperative period. Among these, 930 (8.44%) were admitted with indication for ERCP intervention. On multivariate regression, readmissions were more likely in older patients, inpatients, and patients with baseline comorbidities, acute preoperative morbidity, and those discharged to care facilities. The use of intraoperative cholangiogram was associated with lower odds of readmission. Less than 10% of readmitted patients had an indication for ERCP. Those who were readmitted with an indication for ERCP were more likely to have undergone emergency surgery, experienced longer operative times, and had elevated preoperative LFTs or gallstone pancreatitis prior to surgery. The risk of 30-day mortality was significantly higher among patients who experienced any complications after their surgery (OR 13.03, 95% CI 10.57–16.07, p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Older patients, patients with greater preoperative morbidity, and those discharged to care facilities were more likely to be readmitted for any reason following laparoscopic cholecystectomy, whereas patients with evidence of complicated gallstone disease were more likely to be readmitted with an indication for ERCP, even when controlling for the use of intraoperative cholangiogram. Initiatives aimed at reducing readmission with indication for ERCP should focus on these patient subgroups.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fong ZV, Pitt HA, Strasberg SM, Loehrer AP, Sicklick JK, Talamini MA, Lillemoe KD, Chang DC, California Cholecystectomy Group (2018) Diminished survival in patients with bile leak and ductal injury: management strategy and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 226:568–576.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.12.023
Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180:101–125
Sandblom G, Videhult P, Crona Guterstam Y, Svenner A, Sadr-Azodi O (2015) Mortality after a cholecystectomy: a population-based study. HPB 17:239–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12356
Manuel-Vázquez A, Latorre-Fragua R, Ramiro-Pérez C, López-Marcano A, Al-Shwely F, De la Plaza-Llamas R, Ramia JM (2017) Ninety-day readmissions after inpatient cholecystectomy: a 5-year analysis. World J Gastroenterol 23:2972–2977. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i16.2972
Rana G, Bhullar JS, Subhas G, Kolachalam RB, Mittal VK (2016) Thirty-day readmissions after inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: factors and outcomes. Am J Surg 211:626–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.12.007
Fuchshuber PR, Greif W, Tidwell CR, Klemm MS, Frydel C, Wali A, Rosas E, Clopp MP (2012) The power of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program—achieving a zero pneumonia rate in general surgery patients. Perm J 16:39–45
Simopoulos C, Polychronidis A, Botaitis S, Perente S, Pitiakoudis M (2005) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in obese patients. Obes Surg 15:243–246. https://doi.org/10.1381/0960892053268516
Aziz Z, Abu SF, Chong NJ (2012) A systematic review of silver-containing dressings and topical silver agents (used with dressings) for burn wounds. Burns 38:307–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2011.09.020
Tiong L, Oh J (2015) Safety and efficacy of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the morbid and super obese patients. HPB 17:600–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12415
Sidhu RS, Raj PK, Treat RC, Scarcipino MA, Tarr SM (2007) Obesity as a factor in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 21:774–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9096-5
Merkow RP, Ju MH, Chung JW, Hall BL, Cohen ME, Williams MV, Tsai TC, Ko CY, Bilimoria KY (2015) Underlying reasons associated with hospital readmission following surgery in the United States. JAMA 313:483–495. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.18614
FY 2018 Final Rule and Correction Notice Data Files | CMS. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/AcuteInpatientPPS/FY2018-IPPS-Final-Rule-Home-Page-Items/FY2018-IPPS-Final-Rule-Data-Files?DLPage=1&DLEntries=10&DLSort=0&DLSortDir=ascending. Accessed 25 Jan 2020
Nickkholgh A, Soltaniyekta S, Kalbasi H (2006) Routine versus selective intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc Interv Tech 20:868–874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0425-x
Buddingh KT, Weersma RK, Savenije RAJ, van Dam GM, Nieuwenhuijs VB (2011) Lower rate of major bile duct injury and increased intraoperative management of common bile duct stones after implementation of routine intraoperative cholangiography. J Am Coll Surg 213:267–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.03.004
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
Joy Zhou and Sivamainthan Vithiananthan have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, J., Vithiananthan, S. Risk factors for 30-day readmission and indication for ERCP following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective NSQIP cohort study. Surg Endosc 35, 2286–2296 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07642-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07642-0