Skip to main content
Log in

The fine line between mutualism and parasitism: complex effects in a cleaning symbiosis demonstrated by multiple field experiments

  • Community ecology - Original research
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ecological theory and observational evidence suggest that symbiotic interactions such as cleaning symbioses can shift from mutualism to parasitism. However, field experimental evidence documenting these shifts has never been reported for a cleaning symbiosis. Here, we demonstrate shifts in a freshwater cleaning symbiosis in a system involving crayfish and branchiobdellid annelids. Branchiobdellids have been shown to benefit their hosts under some conditions by cleaning material from host crayfish’s gill filaments. The system is uniquely suited as an experimental model for symbiosis due to ease of manipulation and ubiquity of the organisms. In three field experiments, we manipulated densities of worms on host crayfish and measured host growth in field enclosures. In all cases, the experiments revealed shifts from mutualism to parasitism: host crayfish growth was highest at intermediate densities of branchiobdellid symbionts, while high symbiont densities led to growth that was lower or not significantly different from 0-worm controls. Growth responses were consistent even though the three experiments involved different crayfish and worm species and were performed at different locations. Results also closely conformed to a previous laboratory experiment using the same system. The mechanism for these shifts appears to be that branchiobdellids switched from cleaning host gills at intermediate densities of worms to consuming host gill tissue at high densities. These outcomes clearly demonstrate shifts along a symbiosis continuum with the maximum benefits to the host at intermediate symbiont densities. At high symbiont densities, benefits to the host disappear, and there is some evidence for a weak parasitism. These are the first field experimental results to demonstrate such shifts in a cleaning symbiosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bauer RT (1998) Gill-cleaning mechanisms of the crayfish Procambarus clarkii (astacidea: cambaridae): experimental testing of setobranch function. Invertebr Biol 117:129–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop JE (1968) An ecological study of the branchiobdellid commensals of some mid-western Ontario crayfish. Can J Zool 46:835–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown BL, Creed RP (2004) Host preference by an aquatic ectosymbiotic annelid on 2 sympatric species of host crayfishes. J North Am Benthol Soc 23:90–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown BL, Creed RP, Dobson WE (2002) Branchiobdellid annelids and their crayfish hosts: are they engaged in a cleaning symbiosis? Oecologia 132:250–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bshary R, Grutter AS, Willener AST, Leimar O (2008) Pairs of cooperating cleaner fish provide better service quality than singletons. Nature 455:964–966

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheney KL, Côté IM (2003) The ultimate effect of being cleaned: does ectoparasite removal have reproductive consequences for damselfish clients? Behav Ecol 14:892–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheney KL, Côté IM (2005) Mutualism or parasitism? The variable outcome of cleaning symbioses. Biol Lett 1:162–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Côté IM (2000) Evolution and ecology of cleaning symbioses in the sea. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 38:311–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewald PW (1987) Transmission modes and evolution of the parasitism–mutualism continuum. Ann NY Acad Sci 503:295–306

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gale KSP, Proctor HC (2011) Diets of two congeneric species of crayfish worm (annelida:clitellata:branchiobdellidae) from western Canada. Can J Zool 89:289–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelder SR (1999) Zoogeography of branchiobdellidans (annelida) and temnocephalidans (platyhelminthes) ectosymbiotic on freshwater crustaceans, and their reactions to one another in vitro. Hydrobiologia 406:21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodnight CJ (1940) The branchiobdellidae of North American crayfishes. Ill Biol Monogr 17:5–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Grutter AS, Bshary R (2003) Cleaner wrasse prefer client mucus: support for partner control mechanisms in cleaning interactions. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:S242–S244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt PC (1973a) A free-living branchiobdellid (annelida: clitellata)? Trans Am Micros Soc 92:152–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt PC (1973b) A summary of the branchiobdellid (annelida: clitellata) fauna of Mesoamerica. Smithson Contrib Zool 142:1–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings JB, Gelder SR (1979) Gut structure, feeding and digestion in the branchiobdellid oligochaete Cambarincola macrodonta Ellis 1912, an ectosymbiote of the freshwater crayfish Procambarus clarkii. Biol Bull 156:300–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, Kim T, Choe J (2009) Commensalism or mutualism: conditional outcomes in a branchiobdellid–crayfish symbiosis. Oecologia 159:217–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Limbaugh C (1961) Cleaning symbiosis. Sci Am 205:42–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losey GS (1979) Fish cleaning symbiosis: proximate causes of host behavior. Anim Behav 27:669–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McManus LR (1960) Some ecological studies of the branchiobdellidae. Trans Am Microsc Soc 79:420–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellmyr O, Huth CJ (1994) Evolutionary stability of mutualism between yuccas and yucca moths. Nature 372:257–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poulin R, Grutter AS (1996) Cleaning symbioses: proximate and adaptive explanations. Bioscience 46:512–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quaglio F et al (2006) Preliminary investigations of disease-causing organisms in the white-clawed crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes complex from streams of northern Italy. Bull Fr Pêche Piscic 380–381:1271–1290

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2011) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhead AE (1950) Life history cycle of the giant kidney worm, Dioctophyma renale (nematoda), of man and many other mammals. Trans Am Microsc Soc 69:21–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young W (1966) Ecological studies of the branchiobdellidae (oligochaeta). Ecology 47:571–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Katie Greene, Brett Tornwall, Laura Ammons, Josh Lomonaco, David Young, Adam Speake, Ryan Hassler, Travis Knott, Chelsae Weithman, Patty Whitener, John Brunt, Jon Boroughs, Tim Torongeau, Matt Sanderson, and Brandon Carpenter for help with the experiments. We thank everyone at Boone Ironworks for help in designing and building the cages. Funding for this research was provided by the National Science Foundation (DEB-0949823 to R.P.C. and DEB-0949780 to B.L.B.), a Research Development Award to R.P.C. from the Graduate School at Appalachian State University, and by funds from Clemson University’s University Research Grant Committee to B.L.B. Discussions with Jeff Butts and comments on previous versions on the manuscript by Robert Baldwin, Mathew Turnbull, Julie Ryan and two anonymous reviewers were helpful and greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bryan L. Brown.

Additional information

Communicated by Steven Kohler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, B.L., Creed, R.P., Skelton, J. et al. The fine line between mutualism and parasitism: complex effects in a cleaning symbiosis demonstrated by multiple field experiments. Oecologia 170, 199–207 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2280-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2280-5

Keywords

Navigation