Skip to main content
Log in

Cytogenetic and molecular evidence for an additional new species within the taxon Anopheles barbirostris (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Parasitology Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

ITS2 DNA sequences of 42 isoline colonies of Anopheles barbirostris species A1 and A2 were analyzed and a new genetic species, temporarily designated as species A4 (Chiang Mai), was revealed. The large sequence divergences of the ITS2 (0.116-0.615), COI (0.023–0.048), and COII (0.030–0.040) genes between A. barbirostris species A4/A1 (Chiang Mai), A4/A2 (Phetchaburi), A4/A3 (Kanchanaburi), and A4/Anopheles campestris-like Form E (Chiang Mai) provided good supporting evidence. Species A1, A2, A3, and A4 share a mitotic karyotype of Form A (X1, X2, Y1). Crossing experiments between species A4 and the other four species yielded strong reproductive isolation producing few and/or non-hatched eggs and inviable and/or abnormal development of the reproductive system of F1 progenies. Moreover, available F1 hybrid larvae showed asynaptic polytene chromosome arms. Hence, molecular and cytogenetic evidence strongly support the existence of A. barbirostris species A4, which is more closely related to A. campestris-like Form E than to species A1, A2, and A3. Additionally, crossing experiments among 12 and seven isolines of different cytological forms of species A1 (A, B, C, D) and A2 (A, B), respectively, yielded fertile and viable F1 progenies. Thus, different karyotypic forms occurring in natural populations of species A1 and A2 merely represent intraspecies variation of sex chromosomes due to the extra blocks of heterochromatin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baimai V (1988) Population cytogenetics of the malaria vector Anopheles leucosphyrus group. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 19:667–680

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baimai V (1998) Heterochromatin accumulation and karyotypic evolution in some dipteran insects. Zool Stud 37:75–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Baimai V, Rattanarithikul R, Kijchalao U (1995) Metaphase karyotypes of Anopheles of Thailand and Southeast Asia: IV. The barbirostris and umbrosus species groups, subgenus Anopheles (Diptera: Culicidae). J Am Mosq Control Assoc 11:323–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Choochote W, Sucharit S, Abeywickreme W (1983) Experiments in crossing two strains of Anopheles barbirostris Van der Wulp 1884 (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 14:204–209

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Green CA, Baimai V, Harrison BA, Andre RG (1985) Cytogenetic evidence for a complex of species within the taxon Anopheles maculatus (Diptera: Culicidae). Biol J Linn Soc 24:321–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim SJ, Choochote W, Jitpakdi A, Junkum A, Park SJ, Min GS (2003) Establishment of a self-mating mosquito colony of Anopheles sinensis from Korea. Korean J Entomol 33:267–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitution through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M (2004) MEGA 3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform 5:150–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saeung A, Otsuka Y, Baimai V, Somboon P, Pitasawat B, Tuetun B, Junkum A, Takaoka H, Choochote W (2007) Cytogenetic and molecular evidence for two species in the Anopheles barbirostris complex (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand. Parasitol Res 101:1337–1344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saeung A, Baimai V, Otsuka Y, Rattanarithikul R, Somboon P, Junkum A, Tuetun B, Takaoka H, Choochote W (2008) Molecular and cytogenetic evidence of three sibling species of the Anopheles barbirostris Form A (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand. Parasitol Res 102:499–507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, positions-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673–4680

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Dr. J. Milne for valuable comments on the draft manuscript. We sincerely thank the Biodiversity Research and Training Program (grant no. BRT_250009), the Thailand Research Fund through the Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D Program (grant no. PHD/0031/2550), and the Faculty of Medicine Endowment Fund for financially supporting this research project and Dr. Niwes Nantachit, Dean of the Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University for his interest in this research project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wej Choochote.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suwannamit, S., Baimai, V., Otsuka, Y. et al. Cytogenetic and molecular evidence for an additional new species within the taxon Anopheles barbirostris (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand. Parasitol Res 104, 905–918 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-008-1272-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-008-1272-1

Keywords

Navigation