Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The difference in Ezrin–pAkt signaling axis between lepidic and papillary predominant invasive adenocarcinomas of the lung

  • Original Article – Cancer Research
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Histologic classification of invasive lung adenocarcinomas by predominant subtype has prognostic value. Papillary predominant adenocarcinoma (PPA) reportedly shows poorer prognosis than lepidic predominant adenocarcinoma (LPA); however, biological differences between PPA and LPA are unclear. The purpose of this study was to clarify biological differences between PPA and LPA.

Methods

Clinicopathological characteristics of invasive 62 PPAs and 117 LPAs smaller than 30 mm were investigated. Furthermore, we compared immunochemical staining scores of 9 molecular markers (E-cadherin, S100A4, fibronectin, integrinβ1, ezrin, GLUT1, ALDH1, SOX2 and Nanog) between PPA and LPA. We performed Western blot analysis using ezrin shRNA-knockdown lung adenocarcinoma cell lines to examine whether molecules that are highly expressed in PPA, such as ezrin, affect pAkt. Finally, we performed immunochemical staining to compare pAkt expression level in PPA and LPA.

Results

Lymphovascular and pleural invasion and lymph node metastasis were significantly more often detected in PPA than in LPA (lymphatic permeation: 31 vs 3 %, vascular invasion: 35 vs 3 %, pleural invasion: 29 vs 5 %, lymph node metastasis: 18 vs 1 %; all P < 0.01). Immunohistochemical (IHC) study revealed that expression score of ezrin was significantly higher in PPA than in LPA (38.3 vs 15.0; P < 0.01). The level of pAkt decreased in shEzrin-induced PC-9 and A549 cancer cells. Moreover, the IHC staining score of pAkt was significantly higher in PPA than in LPA (13.3 vs 0.0; P < 0.01).

Conclusions

Our results show that the activation of the ezrin–pAkt signaling axis is associated with the more aggressive clinicopathological features of PPA compared with LPA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ALDH1:

Aldehyde dehydrogenase-1

EGFR:

Epidermal growth factor receptor

EMT:

Epithelial–mesenchymal transition

GLUT1:

Glucose transporter-1

IHC:

Immunohistochemical

LPA:

Lepidic predominant adenocarcinoma

mTOR:

Mammalian target of rapamycin

pAkt:

Phospho-Akt

PI3K:

Phosphoinositide 3-kinase

PPA:

Papillary predominant adenocarcinoma

RNA:

Ribo nucleic acid

shRNA:

Short hairpin RNA

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund (23-A-16). We are grateful to Ms. Yuka Nakamura for her technical support.

Author contribution

KH, JY and GI conceived the study. KH, GI, HU and HH carried out the experiments. KH and GI analyzed the data. KH, JY and GI were involved in writing the paper. All authors had final approval of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Genichiro Ishii.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interests to disclose.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 Figure S1: Patient selection for clinicopathological study and IHC study (DOCX 58 kb)

432_2016_2154_MOESM2_ESM.docx

Supplementary material 2 Figure S2: IHC staining for GLUT1 of LPA and PPA. Upper panel: LPA cancer cells show negative staining for GLUT1, while PPA cancer cells show positive staining for GLUT1 in both periphery and center of the tumor; lower panel: summary of GLUT1 staining scores for LPA and PPA (DOCX 857 kb)

432_2016_2154_MOESM3_ESM.docx

Supplementary material 3 Figure S3: Correlation between ezrin and pAkt expressions in each cases. Ezrin and pAkt expressions in each case tend to have positive correlation by using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients (DOCX 94 kb)

Supplementary material 4 (DOCX 56 kb)

Supplementary material 5 (DOCX 58 kb)

Supplementary material 6 (DOCX 62 kb)

Supplementary material 7 (DOCX 32 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hata, K., Yoshida, J., Udagawa, H. et al. The difference in Ezrin–pAkt signaling axis between lepidic and papillary predominant invasive adenocarcinomas of the lung. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 142, 1421–1430 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-016-2154-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-016-2154-z

Keywords

Navigation