Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cardiac point-of-care ultrasound: Practical integration in the pediatric and neonatal intensive care settings

  • REVIEW
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cardiac point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a technology increasingly leveraged at the bedside by pediatric critical care and neonatology providers to identify real-time hemodynamic pathophysiology. We present a framework for (1) identifying the scope of cardiac POCUS within the clinical practice setting, (2) standardizing views for protocolized hemodynamic assessment relevant to pediatric critical illness and (3) integrating POCUS findings for therapeutic guidance. Within the review, we also discuss practical strengths and limitations to image acquisition and interpretation within the varied cardiac POCUS views. Finally, we explore unique considerations within the neonatal population.

    Conclusion: Cardiac POCUS is a technology and tool that reveals important real-time information at the bedside of the critically ill child and infant. Understanding strengths and limitations of cardiac POCUS views and protocolizing an approach to answer focused clinical questions provides a framework for training and translation to clinical care.

What is Known:

• Ultrasound technology is now ubiquitous among pediatric critical care and neonatology settings, and growing literature supports an expanded role in not only procedural but also diagnostic applications.

• Cardiac POCUS influences provider perception of pathophysiology and changes clinical management.

What is New:

• Effective cardiac POCUS training and subsequent translation to clinical practice should improve when clinical questions and protocolized approaches to image acquisition are standardized within a specialty.

• Cardiac POCUS views have strengths and limitations which must be recognized when assessing the hemodynamic profile of a child or neonate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Pershad J, Myers S, Plouman C et al (2004) Bedside limited echocardiography by the emergency physician is accurate during evaluation of the critically ill patient. Pediatrics 114:e667–e671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Longjohn M, Wan J, Joshi V et al (2011) Point-of-care echocardiography by pediatric emergency physicians. Pediatr Emerg Care 27:693–696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Spurney CF, Sable CA, Berger JT et al (2005) Use of hand-carried ultrasound device by critical care physicians for the diagnosis of pericardial effusions, decreased cardiac function, and LV enlargement in pediatric patients. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18:313–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Singh Y, Tissot C, Fraga MV et al (2020) International evidence-based guidelines on Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) for critically ill neonates and children issued by the POCUS Working Group of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC). Crit Care 24:65

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lu JC, Riley A, Conlon T et al (2023) Recommendations for Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound in children: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 36:265–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Weber MD, Lim JKB, Ginsburg S et al (2023) Translating guidelines into practical practice: Point-of-Care Ultrasound for pediatric critical care clinicians. Crit Care Clin 39:385–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kosiak W, Swieton D, Piskunowicz M (2008) Sonographic inferior vena cava/aorta diameter index, a new approach to the body fluid status assessment in children and young adults in emergency ultrasound–preliminary study. Am J Emerg Med 26:320–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gan H, Cannesson M, Chandler JR et al (2013) Predicting fluid responsiveness in children: a systematic review. Anesth Analg 117:1380–1392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Di Nicolò P, Tavazzi G, Nannoni L et al (2023) Inferior vena cava ultrasonography for volume status evaluation: an intriguing promise never fulfilled. J Clin Med 12(6):2217

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Díaz-Gómez JL, Alvarez AB, Danaraj JJ et al (2017) A novel semiquantitative assessment of right ventricular systolic function with a modified subcostal echocardiographic view. Echocardiography 34:44–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Engle SJ, DiSessa TG, Perloff JK, Isabel-Jones J, Leighton J, Gross K, Friedman WF (1983) Mitral valve E point to ventricular septal separation in infants and children. Am J Cardiol 52(8):1084–1087

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gudmundsson P, Rydberg E, Winter R et al (2005) Visually estimated left ventricular ejection fraction by echocardiography is closely correlated with formal quantitative methods. Int J Cardiol 101:209–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lai WW, Geva T, Shirali GS et al (2006) Task Force of the Pediatric Council of the American Society of Echocardiography; Pediatric Council of the American Society of Echocardiography. Guidelines and standards for performance of a pediatric echocardiogram: a report from the Task Force of the Pediatric Council of the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 19:1413–1430

  14. Yenjabog P, Kanchongkittiphon W, Chutipongtanate S et al (2022) Dynamic parameters for fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated children: a systematic review. Front Pediatr 10:1010600

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Jain A, Ruoss JL, Fraga MV et al (2023) Clarification of boundaries and scope of cardiac POCUS vs. targeted neonatal echocardiography. J Perinatol 43:1207–1210

  16. Mertens L, Seri I, Marek J et al (2011) Targeted neonatal echocardiography in the neonatal intensive care unit: practice guidelines and recommendations for training. Writing Group of the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) in collaboration with the European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) and the Association for European Pediatric Cardiologists (AEPC). J Am Soc Echocardiogr 24:1057–1078

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

T.C. wrote the main manuscript text. D.B. edited the text and produced tables and figures. S.B. provided original content to the text, served as an expert reviewer and edited the text.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas W. Conlon.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Communicated by Daniele De Luca

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Conlon, T.W., Baker, D. & Bhombal, S. Cardiac point-of-care ultrasound: Practical integration in the pediatric and neonatal intensive care settings. Eur J Pediatr 183, 1525–1541 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-05409-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-05409-y

Keywords

Navigation