Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A sandwiching method that simplifies hepatic left lateral segment inversion to secure an optimal surgical view around the esophageal hiatus in laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy for upper gastric and esophagogastric junction cancers

  • Brief report
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In laparoscopic surgery for upper gastric and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer, it is important to achieve optimal exposure of the esophageal hiatus to secure an appropriate workspace. In recent years, hepatic left lateral segment (HLLS) inversion has been used to achieve an optimal surgical field. We present a simple technique to perform a modified HLLS inversion.

Methods

As a simple modified method, suturing a 2-0 straight needle to the peritoneum of the round ligament and pulling it to the outside of the abdominal cavity, the falciform, left triangular, and coronary ligaments were dissected. The HLLS was inverted by moving it to the right through the space of the transected falciform ligament. By ligating the thread through the round ligament, the HLLS was sandwiched between the rest of the liver and abdominal wall. The short-term surgical outcomes of patient who underwent simple modified HLLS inversion were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

This study investigated consecutive 24 patients who underwent laparoscopic proximal and total gastrectomies using the simple modified HLLS inversion technique between June 2021 and April 2022. This series of procedures could be completed in approximately 16 min. A Nathanson liver retractor was used in three patients due to difficulties in completing the HLLS inversion in our institution. Postoperative serum liver enzyme levels indicated there was a small effect on the liver.

Conclusions

The simple modified HLLS inversion technique may be a safe and useful procedure and can provide an enhanced surgical field during laparoscopic surgery for upper gastric and EGJ cancers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Yamashita H, Seto Y, Sano T et al (2017) Results of a nation-wide retrospective study of lymphadenectomy for esophagogastric junction carcinoma. Gastric Cancer 20:69–83

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2021) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition). Gastric Cancer 24:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sano T, Sasako M, Mizusawa J et al (2017) Randomized controlled trial to evaluate splenectomy in total gastrectomy for proximal gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg 265(2):277–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kawaguchi Y, Shiraishi K, Akaike H, Ichikawa D (2018) Current status of laparoscopic total gastrectomy. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 3:14–23

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Nunobe S, Ida S (2020) Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: a review. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 4:498–504

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Nakamura K, Suda K, Shibasaki S et al (2020) The hepatic left lateral segment inverting method offering a wider operative field of view during laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 24:2395–2403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shabbir A, Lee JH, Lee MS et al (2010) Combined suture retraction of the falciform ligament and the left lobe of the liver during laparoscopic total gastrectomy. Surg Endsc 24:3237–3240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hiramatsu K, Aoda T, Kamiya T et al (2020) Novel use of the Nathanson liver retractor to prevent postoperative transient liver dysfunction during laparoscopic gastrectomy. Asian J Endsc Surg 13:293–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shinohara T, Kanaya S, Yoshimura F et al (2011) A protective technique for retraction of the liver during laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma: using a Penrose drain. J Gastrointest Surg 15:1043–1048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gojayev A, Yuksel C, Mercan U et al (2022) The effect and clinical significance of using Nathanson liver retractor on liver function tests in laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery. Pol Przegl Chir 94:54–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kinjo Y, Okabe H, Obama K et al (2011) Elevation of liver function tests after laparoscopic gastrectomy using a Nathanson liver retractor. World J Surg 35:2730–2738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Luketich JD, Raja S, Fernando HC et al (2000) Laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernia: 100 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 232:608–618

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Madnani MA, Patel TJ, Gupta AK et al (2015) Novel trocarless, scarless technique for left lobe liver retraction in laparoscopic upper gastrointestinal surgeries: simple, cost-effective and with better cosmesis. Indian J Surg 77:1441–1443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu S, Yu H, Fan Y et al (2014) Liver retraction using n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate glue during single-incision laparoscopic upper abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 101:546–549

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ri M, Kumagai K, Namikawa K et al (2021) Is proximal gastrectomy indicated for locally advanced cancer in the upper third of the stomach? Ann Gastroenterol 5:767–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kurokawa Y, Takeuchi H, Doki Y et al (2021) Mapping of lymph node metastasis from esophagogastric junction tumors: a prospective nationwide multicenter study. Ann Surg 274:120–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Muneoka Y, Ohashi M, Makuuchi R et al (2021) Advantageous short-term outcomes of esophagojejunostomy using a linear stapler following open total gastrectomy compared with a circular stapler. World J Surg 45:2501–2509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hayami M, Hiki N, Nunobe S et al (2017) Clinical outcomes and evaluation of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-flap technique for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Ann Surg Oncol 24:1635–1642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shoji Y, Nunobe S, Ida S et al (2019) Surgical outcomes and risk assessment for anastomotic complications after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-flap technique for upper-third gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 22:1036–1043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kuroda S, Choda Y, Otsuka S et al (2018) Multicenter retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the double-flap technique as antireflux esophagogastrostomy after proximal gastrectomy (rD-FLAP study). Ann Gastroenterol Surg 3:96–103

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. You J, Wu S, Fu Y et al (2022) Wrapping of the hepatic artery using the round ligament during laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy to prevent postpancreatectomy haemorrhage. Br J Surg 109:882–883

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zheng K, He D, Liao A et al (2022) Laparoscopic segmentectomy IV using hepatic round ligament approach combined with fluorescent negative staining method. Ann Surg Oncol 29:2980–2981

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yamao T, Tamura Y, Hayashi H et al (2021) Novel approach via the round ligament in portal vein embolization. World J Surg 45:2878–2885

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study’s conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by HH. The first draft of the manuscript was written by HH and MH and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Souya Nunobe.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All the procedures were followed by the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and its later versions. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Cancer Institute Hospital (number 2022-GB-050).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(TIF 2745 kb)

High resolution image (PNG 2137 kb)

ESM 2

(TIF 2415 kb)

High resolution image (PNG 1798 kb)

(MP4 10215 kb)

ESM 4

(DOCX 17 kb)

(MP4 9323 kb)

(MP4 10215 kb)

(MP4 241719 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harada, H., Hayami, M., Makuuchi, R. et al. A sandwiching method that simplifies hepatic left lateral segment inversion to secure an optimal surgical view around the esophageal hiatus in laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy for upper gastric and esophagogastric junction cancers. Langenbecks Arch Surg 408, 159 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-02901-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-02901-9

Keywords

Navigation