Skip to main content
Log in

Cortical voluntary activation testing methodology impacts central fatigue

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Currently, cortical voluntary activation (VATMS) is assessed by superimposing transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on a maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), 75% MVC and 50% MVC, each contraction being interspersed with 5–10 s of relaxation. Here, we assessed whether this traditional approach (TRADI) underestimates central fatigue due to this short recovery compared to a continuous method (CONTI).

Methods

VATMS, motor-evoked potential (MEP), and cortical silent period (CSP) of the vastus lateralis were determined in 12 young healthy adults before and after a 2-min sustained MVC of knee extensors in two randomly assigned sessions. In TRADI, evaluations comprised a 7-s rest between the three contractions (100, 75, and 50% MVC) and evaluation following the 2-min sustained MVC started after a minimal rest (3–4 s). In CONTI, evaluations were performed with no rest allowed between the three levels of contraction, and evaluation after the 2-min sustained MVC commenced without any rest.

Results

MVC was equally depressed at the end of the 2 min in both conditions. Post 2-min sustained MVC, VATMS change was greater in CONTI than in TRADI (−29 (15)% [−42, −17] vs. −9 (4)% [−13, −5], respectively, P < 0.001). Differences were also observed between TRADI and CONTI for MEP and CSP immediately after the fatiguing exercise. All differences between the two methods disappeared after 2 min of recovery.

Conclusion

After a 2-min sustained MVC, a few seconds of recovery change the amount of measured VATMS and associated parameters of central fatigue. The continuous method should be preferred to determine deficits in voluntary activation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BF:

Biceps femoris

CI:

Confidence interval

CONTI:

Continuous method

CSP50–CSP75–CSP100 :

Cortical silent period at 50–75–100% MVC

EMG:

Electromyography

ERT:

Estimated resting twitch

FNES:

Femoral nerve electrical stimulation

MEP50–MEP75–MEP100 :

Motor-evoked potential at 50–75–100% MVC

M-wave:

Muscle compound action potential on the relaxed muscle

Msup:

Muscle compound action potential measured during voluntary contraction (50% MVC)

MVC:

Maximal voluntary contraction

NMF:

Neuromuscular function

POST:

At the end of the 2-min sustained MVC

PRE:

Before the 2-min sustained MVC

Pt:

Peak twitch

R2–R4–R6:

2–4–6 min after the end of the 2-min sustained MVC

RF:

Rectus femoris

RMS:

Root-mean square

SIT:

Superimposed twitch

VA:

Voluntary activation

VATMS :

Cortical voluntary activation

VL:

Vastus lateralis

TMS:

Transcranial magnetic stimulation

TRADI:

Traditional method

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. John Temesi for his valuable comments and revision of the manuscript, and Douglas Doyle-Baker for the English revision.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Rupp.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This work was supported by a doctoral research grant from the University Savoie Mont Blanc.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Communicated by Nicolas Place.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mira, J., Lapole, T., Souron, R. et al. Cortical voluntary activation testing methodology impacts central fatigue. Eur J Appl Physiol 117, 1845–1857 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-017-3678-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-017-3678-x

Keywords

Navigation