Abstract
Most studies that have set out to quantify the test–retest reliability of the multi-stage shuttle run test (MSSRT) have typically used inappropriate statistics (correlation coefficients) and/or one of two possible calculation methods for deriving predictions of maximal oxygen uptake \( (\ifmmode\expandafter\dot\else\expandafter\.\fi{V}{\text{O}}_{{2\max }} ), \) and have not considered the impact of habituation on performance in the MSSRT and whether its reliability improves beyond a single repeat trial. In this context, the aim of this study was to assess the reliability of the MSSRT over three trials. Thirty-five healthy and active university games players (22 males and 13 females) performed the MSSRT on three occasions, 1 week apart. Individual total numbers of completed shuttles were recorded and estimated \( \ifmmode\expandafter\dot\else\expandafter\.\fi{V}{\text{O}}_{{2\max }} \) values were derived via established equation and table methods. Analysis revealed that the overall mean \( \ifmmode\expandafter\dot\else\expandafter\.\fi{V}{\text{O}}_{{2\max }} \) score from the equation method (52.5 ± 7.8 ml kg−1 min−1) was significantly higher than that for the table (46.9 ± 8.9 ml kg−1 min−1), whilst the mean trial 2 and trial 3 scores were significantly higher than that for trial 1, but not different to each other. The Limits of Agreement for the table method were −1.4 ± 5.0 (trial 1–trial 2) and 0.0 ± 5.5 ml kg−1 min−1 (trial 2–trial 3), and for the equation method −1.1 ± 4.7 (trial 1–trial 2) and 0.0 ± 5.0 ml kg−1 min−1 (trial 2–trial 3). These results suggest that systematic bias is eliminated after the first trial (due to habituation), but a considerable amount of random error remains, regardless of the type of score calculated. Hence, among our sample, the MSSRT does not appear to be reliable enough for the purpose of monitoring changes in \( \ifmmode\expandafter\dot\else\expandafter\.\fi{V}{\text{O}}_{{2\max }} \) due to non-random reasons.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkinson G (1995) A comparison of statistical methods for assessing measurement repeatability in ergonomics research. In: Atkinson G, Reilly T (eds) Sport, leisure and ergonomics. E & FN Spon, London, pp 218–222
Atkinson G, Nevill AM (1998) Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med 26:217–238
Aziz AR, Chia MYH, Teh KC (2005a) Measured maximal oxygen uptake in a multi-stage shuttle test and treadmill-run test in trained athletes. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 45:306–314
Aziz AR, Tan FHY, Teh KC (2005b) A pilot study comparing two field tests with the treadmill run test in soccer players. J Sports Sci Med 4:105–112
Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet i:307–310
Brewer J, Ramsbottom R, Williams C (1988) Multistage fitness test. National Coaching Foundation, Loughborough
Cooper SM, Baker JS, Tong RJ, Roberts E, Hanford M (2005) The repeatability and criterion validity of the 20 m multistage fitness test as a predictor of maximal oxygen uptake in active young men. Br J Sports Med 39:e19
Fairbrother A, Jones MA, Hitchen PJ (2005) Reliability and concurrent validity of the multistage shuttle run test in adolescent athletes. J Sport Sci 23:196
Foss ML, Keteyian SJ (1998) Fox’s physiological basis for exercise and sport. WCB McGraw-Hill, Boston
Grant S, Corbett K, Amjad AM, Wilson J, Aitchison T (1995) A comparison of methods of predicting maximum oxygen uptake. Br J Sports Med 29:147–152
Hopkins WG (2000) Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med 30:1–15
Lamb KL (1998) Test–retest reliability analysis in quantitative physical education research: a commentary. Eur Phys Ed Rev 4:145–152
Lamb KL, Humphreys L (2003) The test–retest reliability and method comparison validity of the 20 m multi-stage shuttle run and the 12-minute Cooper run/walk estimates of maximal aerobic capacity. In: Muller E, Schwameder H, Zallinger G, Fastenbauer V (eds) Proceedings of the 8th annual congress of the European College of Sport Science, Salzburg, 9th, 12th July. Institute of Sport Science, University of Salzburg, p 449
Léger L, Gadoury C (1989) Validity of the 20 m shuttle run test with 1 min stages to predict V02 max in adults. Can J Sport Sci 14:21–26
Léger LA, Lambert JA (1982) A maximal multistage 20 meter shuttle run test to predict V02 max. Eur J App Phys 49:1–12
Léger LA, Mercier D, Gadoury C, Lambert J (1988) The multistage 20 meter shuttle run test for aerobic fitness. J Sports Sci 6:93–101
Lemmink KAPM, Verheijen R, Visscher C (2004a) The discriminative power of the Interval Shuttle Run Test and the Maximal Multistage Shuttle Run Test for playing level of soccer. J Sport Med Phys Fitness 43:233–239
Lemmink KA, Visscher C, Lambert MI, Lamberts RP (2004b) The interval shuttle run test for intermittent sport players: evaluation of reliability. J Strength Cond Res 18:821–827
Mahoney C (1992) 20-MST and PWC170 validity in non-Caucasian children in the UK. Br J Sports Med 26:45–47
McNaughton L, Hall P, Cooley D (1998) Validation of several methods of estimating maximal oxygen uptake in young men. Percept Mot Skills 87:575–584
McVeigh SK, Payne AC, Scott S (1995) The reliability and validity of the 20-Meter Shuttle Test as a predictor of peak oxygen uptake in Edinburgh school children, age 13 to 14 years. Pediatr Exerc Sci 7:69–70
O’Gorman D, Hunter A, McDonnacha C, Kirwan JP (2000) Validity of field tests for evaluating endurance capacity in competitive and international level sports participants. J Strength Cond Res 14:62–67
Paliczka VJ, Nichols AK, Boreham AC (1987) A multi-stage run as a predictor of running performance and maximal oxygen uptake in adults. Br J Sports Med 21:163–165
Ramsbottom R, Brewer J, Williams C (1988) A progressive shuttle run test to estimate maximal oxygen uptake. Br J Sports Med 22:141–144
Sproule J, Kunalan C, McNeill M, Wright H (1993) Validity of 20-MST for predicting V02 max of adult Singaporean athletes. Br J Sports Med 27:202–203
St Clair Gibson A, Lambert MI, Hawley JA, Broomhead S, Noakes TD (1998) Measurement of maximal oxygen uptake from two different laboratory protocols in runners and squash players. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31:1226–1229
Strickland MK, Petersen SR, Bouffard M (2003) Prediction of maximal aerobic power from the 20-m multi-stage shuttle run. Can J App Physiol 28:272–282
Sunderland C, Nevill ME (2005) High-intensity intermittent running and field hockey skill performance in the heat. J Sports Sci 23:531–540
Vincent SD, Barker R, Clarke M, Harrison J (1999) A comparison of peak heart rates elicited by the 1-Mile Run/Walk and the progressive aerobic cardiovascular endurance run. Res Quart Exerc Sport 70:75–78
Wilkinson DM, Fallowfield JL, Myers SD (1999) A modified incremental shuttle run test for the determination of peak shuttle running speed and the prediction of maximal oxygen uptake. J Sports Sci 17:413–419
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lamb, K.L., Rogers, L. A re-appraisal of the reliability of the 20 m multi-stage shuttle run test. Eur J Appl Physiol 100, 287–292 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-007-0432-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-007-0432-9