Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Anxiety and pain perception using a speculum-free eyelid retraction technique for intravitreal injection

  • Medical Ophthalmology
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study compared pain and anxiety levels in individuals receiving intravitreal injections (IVIs) using a speculum-free injection technique, the lid splinting eyelid retraction technique, or using a speculum.

Methods

This was a prospective study of individuals receiving IVI at a single tertiary care medical center who responded to a questionnaire and visual analog scale (VAS) between December 2019 and January 2020. In one group, a speculum was used prior to injection, whereas in the other group, a speculum-free injection technique was used.

Results

A total of 108 individuals were included in this study: 54 received IVI with the speculum-free lid splinting eyelid retraction technique and 54 received IVI with a speculum. A correlation between pain and anxiety was demonstrated in the control group (p-value < 0.01); however, in the speculum-free group, this correlation was lower and not significant. When comparing pain and anxiety between the study groups, lower median pain (Mood’s: Z = 5.378, p-value < 0.001) and lower anxiety (Mood’s: Z = 2.108, p-value = 0.035) scores were demonstrated in the speculum-free group than in the control group. The distribution of pain scores was significantly different between the study groups (Kolmogorov–Smirnov: D = 0.518, p-value < 0.001), and trending differences in anxiety between the groups were observed (Kolmogorov–Smirnov: D = 0.259, p-value = 0.053).

Conclusion

The lid splinting eyelid retraction technique, a speculum-free technique, was associated with less anxiety and pain in patients than the use of a speculum. As IVI often involves repeated treatment, identifying modifiable factors that may relieve anxiety and pain is of utmost importance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Code availability

Not relevant.

References

  1. Grzybowski A, Told R, Sacu S et al (2018) 2018 update on intravitreal injections: euretina expert consensus recommendations. Ophthalmologica 239(4):181–193. https://doi.org/10.1159/000486145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wykoff CC, Flynn HW Jr (2011) Endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection: prevention and management. Retina 31(4):633–635. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e31821504f2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Munro M, Williams GR, Ells A et al (2018) Lid splinting eyelid retraction technique: a minimised sterile approach for intravitreal injections. Br J Ophthalmol 102(9):1254–1258. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fineman MS, Hsu J, Spirn MJ et al (2013) Bimanual assisted eyelid retraction technique for intravitreal injections. Retina 33(9):1968–1970. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e318287da92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tailor R, Beasley R, Yang Y et al (2011) Evaluation of patients’ experiences at different stages of the intravitreal injection procedure - what can be improved? Clin Ophthalmol 5:1499–1502. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S24358

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Chaturvedi R, Wannamaker KW, Riviere PJ et al (2019) Real-world trends in intravitreal injection practices among American retina specialists. Ophthalmol Retina 3(8):656–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2019.03.023

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Green-Simms AE, Ekdawi NS, Bakri SJ (2011) Survey of intravitreal injection techniques among retinal specialists in the United States. Am J Ophthalmol 151(2):329–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2010.08.039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Facco E, Zanette G, Favero L et al (2011) Toward the validation of visual analogue scale for anxiety. Anesth Prog 58(1):8–13. https://doi.org/10.2344/0003-3006-58.1.8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Santos KOCA, Dias EMF, Santos MdS et al (2021) Pain management during intravitreal injection: integrative review. BrJP 3:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moisseiev E, Regenbogen M, Bartfeld Y et al (2012) Evaluation of pain in intravitreal bevacizumab injections. Curr Eye Res 37(9):813–817

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Karimi S, Mosavi SA, Jadidi K et al (2019) Which quadrant is less painful for intravitreal injection? A prospective study. Eye 33(2):304–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Theunissen M, Peters ML, Bruce J et al (2012) Preoperative anxiety and catastrophizing: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the association with chronic postsurgical pain. Clin J Pain 28(9):819–841. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0b013e31824549d6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Miller B, Shapira Y, Flores V et al (2019) Reducing perceived pain intensity during intravitreal injections by patient handholding. Ophthalmol Retina 3(5):451–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2018.12.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Socea SD, Abualhasan H, Magen O et al (2020) Preoperative anxiety levels and pain during cataract surgery. Curr Eye Res 45(4):471–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilde C, Awad M, Ross A et al (2018) Optimisation of intravitreal injection technique using a Barraquer speculum with solid flat blade and finger stabilisation. Eye 32(8):1413–1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Miller B, Shapira Y, Flores V et al (2019) Reducing perceived pain intensity during intravitreal injections by patient handholding. Ophthalmology Retina 3(5):451–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Segal O, Segal-Trivitz Y, Nemet AY et al (2016) Anxiety levels and perceived pain intensity during intravitreal injections. Acta Ophthalmol 94(2):203–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.12802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the work of Sondra Turjeman, PhD, for her expert statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lauren M. Wasser.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (MP4 116413 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wasser, L.M., Roditi, E., Weiss, A.R. et al. Anxiety and pain perception using a speculum-free eyelid retraction technique for intravitreal injection. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 260, 2023–2028 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-021-05422-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-021-05422-7

Keywords

Navigation