Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Safety and outcomes of endovascular treatment in patients with very severe acute ischemic stroke

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Patients with anterior circulation ischemic strokes due to large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO) and very severe neurological deficits (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score > 25) were under-represented in clinical trials on endovascular treatment (EVT). We aimed to evaluate safety and outcomes of EVT in patients with very severe vs. severe (NIHSS score 15–25) neurological deficits.

Methods

We included consecutive patients undergoing EVT for AIS-LVO between January 2015 and December 2019 at Lille University Hospital. We compared rates of parenchymal hemorrhage (PH), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH), procedural complications, and 90-day mortality between patients with very severe vs. severe neurological deficit using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Functional outcome (90-days modified Rankin Scale) was compared between groups using ordinal logistic regression analysis.

Results

Among 1484 patients treated with EVT, 108 (7%) had pre-treatment NIHSS scores > 25, 873 (59%) with NIHSS scores 15–25 and 503 (34%) with NIHSS scores < 15. Rates of PH, SICH, successful recanalization, and procedural complications were similar in patients with NIHSS scores > 25 and NIHSS 15–25. Patients with NIHSS > 25 had a lower likelihood of improved functional outcome (adjcommon OR 0.31[95% CI 0.21–0.47]) and higher odds of mortality at 90 days (adjOR 2.3 [95% CI 1.5–3.7]) compared to patients with NIHSS 15–25. Successful recanalization was associated with better functional outcome (adjcommon OR 3.8 [95% CI 1.4–10.4]), and lower odds of mortality (adjOR 0.3 [95% CI 0.1–0.9]) in patients with very severe stroke. The therapeutic effect of recanalization on functional outcome and mortality was similar in both groups.

Conclusions

In patients with very severe neurological deficit, EVT was safe and successful recanalization was strongly associated with better functional outcome at 90 days.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Turc G, Bhogal P, Fischer U et al (2019) European Stroke Organisation (ESO)- European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) guidelines on mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg 11:535–538. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Teri A et al (2019) Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 50:e344–e418. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bracard S, Ducrocq X, Mas JL et al (2016) Mechanical thrombectomy after intravenous alteplase versus alteplase alone after stroke (THRACE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 15:1138–1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30177-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A et al (2015) Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med 372:2285–2295. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1415061

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH et al (2016) Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. The Lancet 387:1723–1731. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wahlgren N, Ahmed N, Dávalos A et al (2007) Thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke in the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST): an observational study. Lancet 369:275–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60149-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Whiteley WN, Slot KB, Fernandes P et al (2012) Risk factors for intracranial hemorrhage in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 55 studies. Stroke 43:2904–2909. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.665331

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jiang S, Fei A, Peng Y et al (2015) Predictors of outcome and hemorrhage in patients undergoing endovascular therapy with solitaire stent for acute ischemic stroke. PLoS ONE 10:e0144452. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaesmacher J, Kaesmacher M, Maegerlein C et al (2017) Hemorrhagic transformations after thrombectomy: risk factors and clinical relevance. Cerebrovasc Dis 43:294–304. https://doi.org/10.1159/000460265

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Leys D, Dequatre-Ponchelle N, Ferrigno M et al (2019) Access to mechanical thrombectomy for cerebral ischaemia: a population-based study in the North-of-France. Rev Neurol (Paris) 175:519–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurol.2018.12.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ducroquet A, Leys D, Al Saabi A et al (2013) Influence of chronic ethanol consumption on the neurological severity in patients with acute cerebral ischemia. Stroke 44:2324–2326. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC et al (1988) Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 19:604–607. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.19.5.604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Organisation ES, (ESO) Executive Committee, ESO Writing Committee, (2008) Guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008. Cerebrovasc Dis 25:457–507. https://doi.org/10.1159/000131083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Albers GW, Marks MP, Kemp S et al (2018) Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. N Engl J Med 378:708–718. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1713973

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Nogueira RG, Jadhav AP, Haussen DC et al (2018) Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct. N Engl J Med 378:11–21. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1706442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Adams HP, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ et al (1993) Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke 24:35–41. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.24.1.35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Barber PA, Hill MD, Eliasziw M et al (2005) Imaging of the brain in acute ischaemic stroke: comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76:1528–1533. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2004.059261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. von Kummer R, Broderick JP, Campbell BCV et al (2015) The Heidelberg bleeding classification: classification of bleeding events after ischemic stroke and reperfusion therapy. Stroke 46:2981–2986. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E et al (2008) Thrombolysis with Alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 359:1317–1329. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0804656

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Higashida RT, Furlan AJ (2003) Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 34:e109–e137. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000082721.62796.09

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tomsick T, Broderick J, Carrozella J et al (2008) Revascularization results in the interventional management of stroke II trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29:582–587. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A0843

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Saver JL (2007) Novel end point analytic techniques and interpreting shifts across the entire range of outcome scales in acute stroke trials. Stroke 38:3055–3062. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.488536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Majhadi L, Leys D, Bodenant M et al (2013) Mortality in patients treated by intra-venous thrombolysis for ischaemic stroke. J Neurol 260:1637–1648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-013-6847-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mazya MV, Lees KR, Collas D et al (2015) IV thrombolysis in very severe and severe ischemic stroke: results from the SITS-ISTR Registry. Neurology 85:2098–2106. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Balami JS, White PM, McMeekin PJ et al (2018) Complications of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke: prevention and management. Int J Stroke 13:348–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493017743051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Karen S, Emily A, Marijana L et al (2015) Quality of life and functional outcomes 12 months after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation 131:174–181. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Broderick JP, Berkhemer OA, Palesch YY et al (2015) Endovascular therapy is effective and safe for patients with severe ischemic stroke. Stroke 46:3416–3422. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hilde Henon.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors report no competing interest concerning this manuscript.

Ethical approval

The registry was approved by the relevant ethical committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Nord Ouest IV Lille, France, March 9th, 2010, registration number 10.677). Patients were managed according to local rules without any investigation or treatment specifically performed for the purpose of this study. Patients gave consent themselves or via a close relative for the follow-up.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bala, F., Bricout, N., Nouri, N. et al. Safety and outcomes of endovascular treatment in patients with very severe acute ischemic stroke. J Neurol 269, 2493–2502 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10807-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10807-z

Keywords

Navigation