Skip to main content
Log in

Prognostic value of the nodal yield in elective neck dissections in patients with head and neck carcinomas

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of this study is to assess the prognostic capacity of the nodal yield in elective neck dissections performed in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) without clinical or radiological evidence of regional involvement (cN0) at the time of diagnosis.

Methods

Retrospective study including 647 patients with HNSCC treated with an elective neck dissection.

Results

Patients with < 15 dissected nodes (n = 172, 26.6%) had a 5-year disease-specific survival of 64.9% (95% CI: 57.3–72.5%), while for patients with ≥ 15 dissected nodes (n = 475, 73.4%), it was of 81.9% (95% CI: 78.4–85.4%) (P = 0.0001). The nodal yield category had prognostic capacity on the disease-specific survival in patients with tumors located in the oral cavity (P = 0.001), the oropharynx (P = 0.023) and the hypopharynx (P = 0.034), while for patients with tumors located in the larynx, no significant differences appeared (P = 0.779). Differences in regional recurrence-free survival were also observed based on the nodal yield category in patients with extra-laryngeal tumors (5-year regional recurrence-free survival of 81.0% in patients with < 15 dissected nodes vs 89.0% in patients with ≥ 15 dissected nodes; P = 0.046).

Conclusion

The nodal yield in elective neck dissections in patients without evidence of lymph node disease (cN0) had prognostic capacity depending on the location of the primary tumor. For tumors located in the larynx, the number of dissected nodes did not significantly influence the prognosis. For tumors located in the oral cavity, oropharynx or hypopharynx, patients with < 15 dissected nodes had a disease-specific mortality 2.9 times higher than patients with ≥ 15 dissected nodes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data available from the hospital software, SAP.

References

  1. Wright JL, Lin DW, Porter MP (2008) The association between extent of lymphadenectomy and survival among patients with lymph node metastases undergoing radical cystectomy. Cancer 112(11):2401–2408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Weir L, Speers C, D’yachkova Y, Olivotto IA (2002) Prognostic significance of the number of axillary lymph nodes examined in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 20(7):1793–1799

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Skibber JM, Moyer VA (2007) Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst 99(6):433–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Volpe CM, Driscoll DL, Douglass HO (2000) Outcome of patients with proximal gastric cancer depends on extent of resection and number of resected lymph nodes. Ann Surg Oncol 7(2):139–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Greenstein AJ, Litle VR, Swanson SJ, Divino CM, Packer S, Wisnivesky JP (2008) Effect of the number of lymph nodes sampled on postoperative survival of lymph node-negative esophageal cancer. Cancer 112(6):1239–1246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Weiss MH, Harrison LB, Isaacs RS (1994) Use of decision analysis in planning a management strategy for the stage N0 neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 120(7):699–702

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Byers RM, Wolf PFBA (1988) Rationale for elective modified neck dissection. Head Neck Surg 10(3):160–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pou JD, Barton BM, Lawlor CM, Frederick CH, Moore BA, Hasney CP (2017) Minimum lymph node yield in elective level I-III neck dissection. Laryngoscope 127(9):2070–2073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuo P, Mehra S, Sosa JA, Roman SA, Husain ZA, Burtness BA et al (2016) Proposing prognostic thresholds for lymph node yield in clinically lymph node-negative and lymph node-positive cancers of the oral cavity. Cancer 122(23):3624–3631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jaber J, Zender CA, Mehta V, Davis K, Ferris RL, Lavertu P, Rezaee R, Feustel PJ (2014) Multi-institutional investigation of the prognostic value of lymph nodel yield in advancedstage oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 36(10):1446–1452

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ebrahimi A, Clark JR, Amit M, Yen TC, Liao CT, Kowalski LP et al (2014) Minimum nodal yield in oral squamous cell carcinoma: defining the standard of care in a multicenter international pooled validation study. Ann Surg Oncol 21(9):3049–3055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lemieux A, Kedarisetty S, Raju S, Orosco R, Coffey C (2016) Lymph node yield as a predictor of survival in pathologically node negative oral cavity carcinoma. Otolaryngol—Head Neck Surg (United States) 154(3):465–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Divi V, Chen MM, Nussenbaum B, Rhoads KF, Sirjani DB, Holsinger FC et al (2016) Lymph node count from neck dissection predicts mortality in head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol 34(32):3892–3897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tsai CJ, Zheng J, Zhang Z, Riaz N, Baxi SS, Wong RJ et al (2017) Association of number of dissected lymph nodes with survival in clinically node-negative oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma patients undergoing primary surgery: a population-based analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol—Head Neck Surg 143(10):1049–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Safi AF, Kauke M, Grandoch A, Nickenig HJ, Drebber U, Zöller J et al (2017) Clinicopathological parameters affecting nodal yields in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma receiving selective neck dissection. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg 45(12):2092–2096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee S, Kim HJ, Cha IH, Nam W (2018) Prognostic value of lymph node count from selective neck dissection in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47(8):953–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2018.03.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Merz S, Timmesfeld N, Stuck BA, Wiegand S (2018) Impact of lymph node yield on outcome of patients with head and neck cancer and pN0 neck. Anticancer Res 38(9):5347–5350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zenga J, Divi V, Stadler M, Massey B, Campbell B, Shukla M et al (2019) Lymph node yield, depth of invasion, and survival in node-negative oral cavity cancer. Oral Oncol 98(July):125–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ampil FL, Caldito G, Ghali GE, Baluna RG (2009) Does the negative node count affect disease-free survival in early-stage oral cavity cancer? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67(11):2473–2475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Böttcher A, Dommerich S, Sander S, Olze H, Stromberger C, Coordes A et al (2016) Nodal yield of neck dissections and influence on outcome in laryngectomized patients. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 273(10):3321–3329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. León X, Orús C, Quer M (2002) Diseño, mantenimiento y explotación de una base de datos oncológica para pacientes con tumores malignos de cabeza y cuello. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 53(3):185–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lop J, Rigó A, Codina A, de Juan J, Quer M, León X (2018) Prognostic significance of extranodal extension in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cN0 patients with occult metastatic neck nodes. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 69(3):156–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otorri.2017.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bhattacharyya N (1998) The effects of more conservative neck dissections and radiotherapy on nodal yields from the neck. Arch Otolaryngol—Head Neck Surg 124(4):412–416

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cheraghlou S, Otremba M, Kuo YuP, Agogo GO, Hersey D, Judson BL (2018) Prognostic value of lymph node yield and density in head and neck malignancies. Otolaryngol—Head Neck Surg (United States) 158(6):1016–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. de Kort WWB, Maas SLN, Van Es RJJ, Willems SM (2019) Prognostic value of the nodal yield in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review. Head Neck 41(8):2801–2810

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by grants from Plan Estatal de I + D + I of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (FIS PI19/01,661). Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER), A Way to Build Europe.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed in the writing or editing of the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Casasayas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional, regional and national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent to participate

For this type of study, formal consent was not required.

Informed consent for publication

For this type of study, formal consent was not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1099 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

León, X., Venegas, M.P., Casasayas, M. et al. Prognostic value of the nodal yield in elective neck dissections in patients with head and neck carcinomas. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 279, 883–889 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06819-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06819-0

Keywords

Navigation