Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcomes and prognostic factors of placental-site trophoblastic tumor: a retrospective study of 58 cases

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Our goal was to assess the outcomes and explore the prognostic factors for patients with placental-site trophoblastic tumor (PSTT) through this retrospective analysis.

Methods

2043 patients with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) were registered at two tertiary hospitals between January 2003 and March 2021, of whom 58 (2.8%) were diagnosed with PSTT. We retrospectively analyzed the clinico-pathological characteristics, treatments, outcomes and prognostic factors.

Results

Only 4 patients died and 5 patients experienced a recurrence. Patients (n = 49) with stage I disease had a favorable prognosis, surgery with (n = 21) or without (n = 28) chemotherapy made no significant difference in overall survival (OS) (p = 0.251) or disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.425). 3 patients with stage I had fertility preserving surgery and successful pregnancy was achieved in 2 of them. The outcome of patients with advanced disease was poor. Univariate analysis revealed serum β-hCG levels at diagnosis, FIGO stage IV and metastatic disease were significant predictors of both overall survival and disease-free survival. However, multivariate analysis indicated stage IV was the only significant independent predictor of adverse OS, while metastatic disease was the only significant independent predictor of adverse DFS.

Conclusion

Surgery alone is sufficient for patients with stage I disease without high-risk factors. The prognosis of patients with advanced stage disease remains poor. Stage IV and metastatic disease were the most critical risk factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Oldt RJ 3rd, Kurman RJ, Shih IM (2002) Molecular genetic analysis of placental site trophoblastic tumors and epithelioid trophoblastic tumors confirms their trophoblastic origin. Am J Pathol 161(3):1033–1037

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Seckl MJ, Sebire NJ, Fisher RA, Golfier F, Massuger L, Sessa C et al (2013) Gestational trophoblastic disease: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 24:39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Papadopoulos AJ, Foskett M, Seckl MJ, McNeish I, Paradinas FJ, Rees H et al (2002) Twenty-five years’ clinical experience with placental site trophoblastic tumors. J Reprod Med 47(6):460–464

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhao J, Lv WG, Feng FZ, Wan XR, Liu JH, Yi XF et al (2016) Placental site trophoblastic tumor: a review of 108 cases and their implications for prognosis and treatment. Gynecol Oncol 142(1):102–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kurman RJ, Scully RE, Norris HJ (1976) Trophoblastic pseudotumor of uterus–exaggerated form of syncytial endometritis simulating a malignant-tumor. Cancer 38(3):1214–1226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Twiggs LB, Okagaki T, Phillips GL, Stroemer JR, Adcock LL (1981) Trophoblastic pseudotumor-evidence of malignant disease potential. Gynecol Oncol 12(2 Pt 1):238–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Scully RE, Young RH (1981) Trophoblastic pseudotumor: a reappraisal. Am J Surg Pathol 5(1):75–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kohorn EI (2014) Worldwide survey of the results of treating gestational trophoblastic disease. J Reprod Med 59(3–4):145–153

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ngan HYS, Seckl MJ, Berkowitz RS, Xiang Y, Golfier F, Sekharan PK et al (2021) Diagnosis and management of gestational trophoblastic disease: 2021 update. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 155(Suppl 1):86–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schmid P, Nagai Y, Agarwal R, Hancock B, Savage PM, Sebire NJ et al (2009) Prognostic markers and long-term outcome of placental-site trophoblastic tumours: a retrospective observational study. Lancet 374(9683):48–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Baergen RN, Rutgers JL, Young RH, Osann K, Scully RE (2006) Placental site trophoblastic tumor: a study of 55 cases and review of the literature emphasizing factors of prognostic significance. Gynecol Oncol 100(3):511–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Froeling FEM, Ramaswami R, Papanastasopoulos P, Kaur B, Sebire NJ, Short D et al (2019) Intensified therapies improve survival and identification of novel prognostic factors for placental-site and epithelioid trophoblastic tumours. Br J Cancer 120(6):587–594

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Feltmate CM, Genest DR, Wise L, Bernstein MR, Goldstein DP, Berkowitz RS (2001) Placental site trophoblastic tumor: a 17-year experience at the New England Trophoblastic Disease Center. Gynecol Oncol 82(3):415–419

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hyman DM, Bakios L, Gualtiere G, Carr C, Grisham RN, Makker V et al (2013) Placental site trophoblastic tumor: analysis of presentation, treatment, and outcome. Gynecol Oncol 129(1):58–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Horowitz NS, Goldstein DP, Berkowitz RS (2017) Placental site trophoblastic tumors and epithelioid trophoblastic tumors: Biology, natural history, and treatment modalities. Gynecol Oncol 144(1):208–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44(3):837–845

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lybol C, Thomas CM, Bulten J, van Dijck JA, Sweep FC, Massuger LF (2011) Increase in the incidence of gestational trophoblastic disease in The Netherlands. Gynecol Oncol 121(2):334–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nie JC, Chen GH, Yan AQ, Liu XS (2017) Postoperative chemotherapy on placental site trophoblastic tumor in early stage: analysis of 60 cases. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 38(3):431–440

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee HJ, Shin W, Jang YJ, Choi CH, Lee JW, Bae DS et al (2018) Clinical characteristics and outcomes of placental site trophoblastic tumor: experience of single institution in Korea. Obstet Gynecol Sci 61(3):319–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Essel KG, Bruegl A, Gershenson DM, Ramondetta LM, Naumann RW, Brown J (2017) Salvage chemotherapy for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: utility or futility? Gynecol Oncol 146(1):74–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bolze PA, Attia J, Massardier J, Seckl MJ, Massuger L, van Trommel N et al (2015) Formalised consensus of the European Organisation for Treatment of Trophoblastic Diseases on management of gestational trophoblastic diseases. Eur J Cancer 51(13):1725–1731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Seckl MJ, Sebire NJ, Fisher RA, Golfier F, Massuger L, Sessa C et al (2013) Gestational trophoblastic disease: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 24(Suppl 6):vi39-50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kohorn EI, Goldstein DP, Hancock BW, Kim SJ, Lurain JR, Newlands E et al (2000) Workshop report: combining the staging system of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics with the scoring system of the World Heath Organization for Trophoblastic Neoplasia. Report of the Working Committee of the International Society for the Study of Trophoblastic Disease and the International Gynecologic Cancer Society. Int J Gynecol Cancer 10(1):84–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen Y, Zhang X, Xie X (2011) Clinical features of 17 cases of placental site trophoblastic tumor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 115(2):204–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chiofalo B, Palmara V, Lagana AS, Triolo O, Vitale SG, Conway F et al (2017) Fertility sparing strategies in patients affected by placental site trophoblastic tumor. Curr Treat Options Oncol 18(10):58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pfeffer PE, Sebire N, Lindsay I, McIndoe A, Lim A, Seckl MJ (2007) Fertility-sparing partial hysterectomy for placental-site trophoblastic tumour. Lancet Oncol 8(8):744–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shen X, Xiang Y, Guo L, Feng F, Wan X, Xiao Y et al (2012) Fertility-preserving treatment in young patients with placental site trophoblastic tumors. Int J Gynecol Cancer 22(5):869–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tempfer C, Horn LC, Ackermann S, Beckmann MW, Dittrich R, Einenkel J et al (2016) Gestational and non-gestational trophoblastic disease@ guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k Level, AWMF Registry No@ 032/049, December 2015). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 76(2):134–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Saso S, Haddad J, Ellis P, Lindsay I, Sebire NJ, McIndoe A et al (2012) Placental site trophoblastic tumours and the concept of fertility preservation. BJOG 119(3):369–374 (discussion 74)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Taylor JS, Viera L, Caputo TA, Chan J, Frey MK, Gupta D et al (2013) Unsuccessful planned conservative resection of placental site trophoblastic tumor. Obstet Gynecol 121(2 Pt 2 Suppl 1):465–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank all of the doctors and their patients who have taken part in this study. We would also like to thank the expert pathologists from the two hospitals (Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University; The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University) for their contributions to the diagnosis of PSTT.

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

WL: Project development, data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing. WZ: project development, data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing. XH: project development, manuscript editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiufeng Huang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the two hospitals: Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University (No. 20210203) and The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University (No. 20210486).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, W., Zhao, W. & Huang, X. Outcomes and prognostic factors of placental-site trophoblastic tumor: a retrospective study of 58 cases. Arch Gynecol Obstet 306, 1633–1641 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06502-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06502-7

Keywords

Navigation