Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Treatment of grossly dislocated supracondylar humerus fractures after failed closed reduction: a retrospective analysis of different surgical approaches

  • Trauma Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The supracondylar humerus fracture (SCHF) is one of the most common pediatric injuries. Highly displaced fractures can be very challenging. If closed reduction fails, the therapy algorithm remains controversial.

Materials and methods

In total, 41 patients (21 boys and 20 girls) with irreducible Gartland type III SCHF, treated with open reduction through three different approaches and cross-pin fixation, were retrospectively evaluated. The mean follow-up was 46 months (min.: 12, max.: 83, SD: 23.9). The Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) as well as the quick disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand (qDASH) score were used to assess the functional outcome. Baumann’s angle and the anterior humeral line (AHL, Roger’s line) were obtained from follow-up radiographs. Time to surgery, postoperative nerve-palsy, rate of revision surgery, and complication rate were examined.

Results

Two revision surgeries were reported. One due to inadequate reduction and one due to secondary loss of reduction. In this context, the AHL was a sufficient tool to detect unsatisfactory reduction. According to the MEPS the functional outcome was excellent (> 90) in 37/41 patients and good (75–89) in 4/41 at the final visit. Fair or poor results were not documented. The qDASH score was 1.8 (min.: 0, max.: 13.6, SD: 3.4).

There were no significant differences between the utilized surgical approaches. An iatrogenic injury of the ulnar nerve was not reported in any case. Overall, one heterotopic ossification without impairment of the range of motion and one preliminary affection of the radial nerve were documented.

Conclusion

In the rare case of an irreducible SCHF, an anatomical reduction can be achieved by open approaches with excellent functional outcome and a high grade of patient satisfaction. All described open approaches can be utilized with a high safety-level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mangwani J (2006) Supracondylar humeral fractures in children: ten years´ experience in a teaching hospital. J Bone Jt Surg Br 88-B:362–365. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.88B3.16425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Malpuri K, Hosalkar A, Howard A (2012) AAOS clinical practice guideline: the treatment of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 5:328–330. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-20-05-328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sinikumpu J-J, Pokka T, Sirviö M et al (2016) Gartland type II supracondylar humerus fractures, their operative treatment and lateral pinning are increasing: a population-based epidemiologic study of extension-type supracondylar humerus fractures in children. Eur J Pediatr Surg. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1597270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Marquis CP, Cheung G, Dwyer JSM, Emery DFG (2008) Supracondylar fractures of the humerus. Curr Orthop 22:62–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cuor.2007.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Khoshbin A, Leroux T, Wasserstein D et al (2014) The epidemiology of paediatric supracondylar fracture fixation: a population-based study. Injury 45:701–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kraus R, Wessel L (2010) Frakturbehandlung an der oberen extremität bei kindern und jugendlichen. Dtsch Arztebl 107:903–910. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2010.0903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vahvanen V, Aalto K (1978) Supracondylar fracture of the humerus in children: a long-term follow-up study of 107 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 49:225–233. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453677809005756

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Von Laer L, Kraus R, Linhart W (2012). Frakturen und Luxationen im Wachstumsalter. https://doi.org/10.1055/b-002-11351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Randsborg PH (2009) Fractures in children. Acta Orthop 84(350):1–24. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.789731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gartland J (1959) Management of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Surg Gynecol Obs 109:145–154

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Leitch KK, Kay RM, Femino JD et al (2006) Treatment of multidirectionally unstable supracondylar humeral fractures in children. A modified Gartland type-IV fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(5):980–985. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.D.02956

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Edwardson SA, Murray O, Joseph J et al (2013) Paediatric supracondylar fractures: an overview of current management and guide to open approaches. Orthop Trauma 27:303–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mporth.2013.08.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pretell-Mazzini J, Rodriguez-Martin J, Andres-Esteban EM (2010) Does open reduction and pinning affect outcome in severely displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children? A systematic review. Strateg Trauma Limb Reconstr 5:57–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11751-010-0091-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Griffin KJ, Walsh SR, Markar S et al (2008) The pink pulseless hand: a review of the literature regarding management of vascular complications of supracondylar humeral fractures in children. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 36:697–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.08.013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Louahem D, Cottalorda J (2016) Acute ischemia and pink pulseless hand in 68 of 404 gartland type III supracondylar humeral fractures in children: urgent management and therapeutic consensus. Injury 47:848–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.01.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar R, Kiran EK, Malhotra R et al (2002) Surgical management of the severely displaced supracondylar fracture of the humerus in children. Injury 33:517–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(02)00031-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Koudstaal M, De Ridder V, Lange D (2002) Pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: the anterior approach. J Orthop Trauma 16:409–412. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200207000-0000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Uzer G, Yildiz F, Elmadag M et al (2018) Comparison of the lateral and posterior approaches in the treatment of pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures. J Pediatr Orthop B 27:108–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Aktekin C, Toprak A, Özturk A et al (2008) Open reduction via posterior triceps sparing approach in comparison with closed treatment of posteromedial displaced Gartland type III supracondylar humerus fractures. J Pediatr Orthop B 17:171–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Reitmann R, Waters P, Millis M (2001) Open reduction and internal fixation for supracondylar humerus fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop 21:157–161

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kazimoglu C, Cetin M, Sener M et al (2009) Operative management of type III extension supracondylar fractures in children. Int Orthop 33:1089–1094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0605-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaewpornsawan K (2001) Comparison between closed reduction with percutaneous pinning and open reduction with pinning in children with closed totally displaced supracondylar humeral fractures: a randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr Orthop B 10:131–137

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Özkoc G, Gonc U, Kayaalp A et al (2004) Displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children: Open reduction vs. closed reduction and pinning. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:547–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-004-0730-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tadeu I, Rocha S, Faria ADS, at al, (2015) Reproducibility of the AO/ASIF and Gartland classifications for supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Rev Bras Ortop 50:266–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2015.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gustilo RB, Anderson JT (1976) Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58:453–458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yim GH, Hardwicke JT (2018) The evolution and interpretation of the Gustilo and Anderson classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 100:e152–e152. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.18.00342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH et al (2001) Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther 14:128–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Polson K, Reid D, McNair PJ et al (2010) Responsiveness, minimal importance difference and minimal detectable change scores of the shortened disability arm shoulder hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire. Man Ther 15:404–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2010.03.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Turchin DC, Beaton DE, Richards RR (1998) Validity of observer-based aggregate scoring systems as descriptors of elbow pain, function, and disability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:154–162. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199802000-00002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Camp J, Ishizue K, Gomez M et al (1993) Alteration of Baumann’s angle by humeral position: implications for treatment of supracondylar humerus fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 13:521–525. https://doi.org/10.1097/01241398-199307000-00019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kao HK, Lee WC, Yang WE et al (2016) Clinical significance of anterior humeral line in supracondylar humeral fractures in children. Injury 47:2252–2257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.06.037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kumar V, Singh A (2016) Fracture supracondylar humerus: a review. J Clin Diagn Res 10(12):1–6. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/21647.8942

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Yaokreh JB, Gicquel P, Schneider L et al (2012) Compared outcomes after percutaneous pinning versus open reduction in paediatric supracondylar elbow fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98:645–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2012.03.021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bhuyan BK (2012) Close reduction and percutaneous pinning in displaced supracondylar humerus fractures in children. J Clin Orthop Trauma 3:89–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2012.09.004

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Abbott MD, Buchler L, Loder RT et al (2014) Gartland type III supracondylar humerus fractures: outcome and complications as related to operative timing and pin configuration. J Child Orthop 8:473–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-014-0624-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Turhan E, Aksoy C, Ege A et al (2008) Sagittal plane analysis of the open and closed methods in children with displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus (a radiological study). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:739–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0523-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mazda K, Boggione C, Fitoussi C et al (2001) Systematic pinning of displaced extension-type supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. A prospective study of 116 consecutive patients. J Bone Jt Surg Br 83:888–893. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.83b6.11544

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Gosens T, Bongers KJ (2003) Neurovascular complications and functional outcome in displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Injury 34:267–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(02)00312-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Brauer C, Lee B, Bae D et al (2007) A systematic review of medial and lateral entry pinning versus lateral entry pinning for supracondylar fractures of the humerus. J Pediatr Orthop 27:181–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bamrungthin N (2008) Comparison of posterior and lateral surgical approach in management of type III supracondylar fractures of the humerus among the children. J Med Assoc Thai 91:502–506

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kizilay YO, Aktekin CN, Özsoy MH et al (2017) Gartland type 3 supracondylar humeral fractures in children: which open reduction approach should be used after failed closed reduction? J Orthop Trauma 31:e18-23. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kokly S, Castagna A, Arabi M (2019) Triceps-sparing posterior approach for supracondylar humeral fracture in children. Arch Bone Jt Surg 7:416–421

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Mitchell SL, Sullivan BT, Ho CA et al (2019) Pediatric gartland type-iv supracondylar humeral fractures have substantial overlap with flexion-type fractures. J Bone Jt Surg Am 101:1351–1356. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.18.01178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Weinberg AM, Castellani C, Arzdorf M et al (2007) Osteosynthesis of supracondylar humerus fractures in children: a biomechanical comparison of four techniques. Clin Biomech 22:502–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.12.004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Oetgen ME, Mirick GE, Atwater L et al (2015) Complications and predictors of need for return to the operating room in the treatment of supracondylar humerus fractures in children. Open Orthop J 9:139–142. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001509010139

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Joiner ER, Skaggs DL, Arkader A et al (2014) Iatrogenic nerve injuries in the treatment of supracondylar humerus fractures: are we really just missing nerve injuries on preoperative examination? J Pediatr Orthop 34:388–392. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000000171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Frankfurt Am Main, Friedberger Landstr. 430, 60389, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

    Paul Hagebusch, Daniel Anthony Koch, Philipp Faul, Yves Gramlich, Reinhard Hoffmann & Alexander Klug

Authors
  1. Paul Hagebusch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel Anthony Koch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Philipp Faul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yves Gramlich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Reinhard Hoffmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Alexander Klug
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Hagebusch.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 17 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hagebusch, P., Koch, D.A., Faul, P. et al. Treatment of grossly dislocated supracondylar humerus fractures after failed closed reduction: a retrospective analysis of different surgical approaches. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 142, 1933–1940 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03937-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03937-6

Keyword

Search

Navigation