Ultra-long-term efficacy and safety of catheter-based renal denervation in resistant hypertension: 10-year follow-up outcomes

Background Randomized sham-controlled trials have confirmed the efficacy and safety of catheter-based renal denervation in hypertension. Data on the very long-term effects of renal denervation are scarce. Aims This study evaluates the 10-year safety and efficacy of renal denervation in resistant hypertension. Methods This prospective single-center study included patients with resistant hypertension undergoing radio-frequency renal denervation between 2010 and 2012. Office blood pressure, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure, antihypertensive medication, color duplex sonography, and renal function were assessed after 1-, 2- and 10-years. Results Thirty-nine patients completed the 10-year follow-up (mean follow-up duration 9.4 ± 0.7 years). Baseline office and 24-h ambulatory systolic blood pressure were 164 ± 23 mmHg and 153 ± 16 mmHg, respectively. After 10 years, 24-h ambulatory and office systolic blood pressure were reduced by 16 ± 17 mmHg (P < 0.001) and 14 ± 23 mmHg (P = 0.001), respectively. The number of antihypertensive drugs remained unchanged from 4.9 ± 1.4 to 4.5 ± 1.2 drugs (P = 0.087). The estimated glomerular filtration rate declined within the expected range from 69 (95% CI 63 to 74) to 60 mL/min/1.73m2 (95% CI 53 to 68; P < 0.001) through 10-year follow-up. Three renal artery interventions were documented for progression of pre-existing renal artery stenosis in two patients and one patient with new-onset renal artery stenosis. No other adverse events were observed during the follow-up. Conclusion Renal denervation was safe and sustainedly reduced ambulatory and office blood pressure out to 10 years in patients with resistant hypertension. Graphical abstract Left panel, Change in 24-h and office SBP. Right panel, eGFR over time. SBP, systolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-024-02417-2.


Introduction
Despite the availability of various effective treatment modalities such as lifestyle modification and antihypertensive drugs, a significant proportion of patients remains above guideline-recommended blood pressure (BP) treatment targets [1][2][3].The kidneys, with their sympathetic innervation, play a crucial role in BP regulation [4].Against this background, device-based therapies to

Study design
The study design and 24-h ABP outcomes have been published elsewhere [18].Patients with resistant hypertension and with no changes in medication for a minimum of 2 weeks before enrolment were included in this prospective, single-arm, single-center study.
The inclusion criteria were: 1-Adult patients aged ≥ 18 years with resist ant hypertension (office systolic BP (SBP) ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP (DBP) ≥ 90 mmHg, despite treatment with ≥ 3 antihypertensive drugs (including a diuretic) at maximally tolerated doses) [2] 2-Eligibility for RDN as defined by the instructions for use of the Symplicity RDN system (Medtronic, Inc, Santa Rosa, CA) The exclusion criteria were: 1-eGFR of < 45 mL/min/1.73m 2 2-Known secondary cause of hypertension other than sleep apnea or chronic kidney disease (CKD).
All patients gave written informed consent and were treated between August 2010 and October 2012.Optimization of antihypertensive therapy was considered in all patients before RDN.Medical history data was obtained from patient records, and the comorbidities were defined according to current European guidelines.Patients were asked about whether they had taken their medication at defined doses.Treating physicians and patients were instructed not be adjusted without consulting the study center beforehand.The study was performed at the Saarland University Hospital, and the local ethic committee approved the study (Symplicity Extension, NCT01888315).The trial complies with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Procedure and follow-up data
RDN was performed by all patients using the RF-based Symplicity Flex single-electrode catheter system (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) by experienced operators.The RFablations were performed in the main renal artery without branch treatment.Follow-up data were collected for the present study at baseline, after one year, two years, and 10 (±0.5) years post-RDN.At each visit, investigators performed a medical history, physical examination, and documented changes in hypertension therapy.At all study time points, the importance of lifestyle modification and medication adherence was emphasized.The office BP was measured three times using an automated oscillometric device (Omron HEM-705 monitor, Omron Healthcare, Vernon Hills, Illinois, USA) with the patient sitting quietly for at least five minutes with one to two minutes between each measurement.Office BP was considered as the mean of the last two readings.24-h ABP monitoring was performed with an automated oscillometric device (Spacelabs 90207, Spacelabs Healthcare, Snoqualmie, Washington, USA) before the procedure and at each follow-up visit.Duplex sonography was performed to assess renal artery integrity.RRI was also measured via duplex sonography as an estimate of renal perfusion.Intrarenal Doppler spectra were obtained at 6 representative locations (2 in the cranial, 2 in the middle, and 2 in the caudal third of the kidney) of the interlobar arteries along the border of medullary pyramids in each kidney.Peak systolic (V max ) and end-diastolic velocity (V min ) were obtained, and the dimensionless renal resistive index (RRI) was calculated as RRI = (peak systolic velocityend-diastolic velocity) / peak systolic velocity.The mean RRI was calculated using 6 measurements from each kidney.Both velocities in the renal arteries were measured in the origin and the proximal, middle, and distal segments of each renal artery.The eGFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula [19].

Efficacy and safety objectives
This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of RDN through 10 years of follow-up.The outcomes of interest
Although patients were treated with a mean of 4.9 ± 1.4 antihypertensive drugs, 24-h ABP and office BP at baseline were 152 ± 16/85 ± 14 mmHg and 164 ± 23/91 ± 13, respectively, with a mean ambulatory heart rate of 64 ± 9 bpm.The procedural characteristics are depicted in Table 2.

Safety outcomes
At 1 and 2 years, the eGFR remained unchanged compared with baseline but declined significantly between baseline and 10 years from 69 (95% CI 63 to 74.) to 60 (95% CI 53 to 70;) ml/min/1.73m 2 (P < 0.001 for change from baseline to 10 years) (Fig. 3).The proportion of patients with an eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m 2 was 31% at baseline and increased to 56% at long-term follow-up.There were no cases of doubling in serum creatinine or endstage renal disease.RRI declined significantly from 0.71 ± 0.07 to 0.68 ± 0.07 at 1 and 2 years but remained stable at 10 years ( 0.70 ± 0.10 at 10 years (P = 0.186) (Table 3), respectively.No severe peri-procedural adverse events were documented.In one case, renal artery vasospasm occurred during RF-energy delivery, which resolved directly without further sequelae.During long-term follow-up, there was a progression of pre-existing renal artery stenosis in two out of three previously diagnosed patients, which was treated with stent implantation after 1 and 10 years, respectively.New-onset renal artery stenosis was diagnosed in one subject after 1 year, which was treated with a drug-coated balloon.

Discussion
Clinical trials and real-world registries have confirmed a significant BP reduction following RDN out to 3 years [14][15][16][17].Recently, two studies assessed the long-term outcomes of RDN in patients with resistant hypertension and showed sustained reductions in 24-h BP up to 10 years post-RDN [18][19][20].However, further data on the very long-term efficacy and safety, including office BP, BP control rates, utilization of antihypertensive drugs, and RRI, have not yet been reported.Herein we analyzed the efficacy, using both ABP and standardized office BP measurements, and safety following catheter-based RF-RDN using laboratory and sonographic parameters through 10 years of followup.We observed sustained reductions in BP after RDN with a favorable short-and long-term safety profile.RRI decreased significantly, and more importantly, renal function as assessed by eGFR did not decline beyond the expected range for patients with resistant hypertension [21].
Recently published sham-controlled trials using RF [6,7] and ultrasound [8][9][10]17] technologies have proven the efficacy of RDN in patients with and without concomitant antihypertensive medication up to 3 years [6][7][8][9][10]17].These trials allowed up-titration of antihypertensive medications after assessing the primary outcome at 2 [8-10] and 3 months post-RDN [7], which often makes it challenging to attribute the full BP-lowering effect to the RDN procedure or the changes in medication.The efficacy and safety of RDN documented herein adds relevant information about the procedure in real-world patients with resistant hypertension at long-term follow-up, since clinical data on this respect are scarce [14].An analysis of 3.077 patients showed a comparable BP decrease in 24-h ABP and office BP at 3 years of follow-up [14].Herein, 24-h ABP was primarily used to assess the efficacy of RDN, which has been shown to associate stronger with cardiovascular risk than office BP [22,23].Thus, achieving BP control in 24-h ABP reduces mortality and improves cardiovascular outcomes (cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal cardiovascular events, heart failure, and stroke) [22,23].In this cohort with resistant hypertension, the proportion of patients with a 24-h SBP of < 140 mmHg increased from 17.9% at baseline to 56.7%, 66.7%, and 67.7% at 1 year, 2 years, and 10 years, respectively (Fig. 2).Notably, the number of antihypertensive drugs were numerically but insignificantly reduced over the follow-up period indicating that the observed BP changes were unlikely related to increase in drug treatment.Recently, a post-hoc analysis from the SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED Pivotal trial [24] demonstrated that patients in the RDN group were less likely to experience hypertensive urgencies (SBP ≥ 180 mmHg) and other safety concerns that required immediate use of anti-hypertensive medications compared to the sham control group [24].
Preclinical data in normotensive and hypertensive sheep suggest that renal nerves can regrow after RDN with variable restoration of functional responses in long-term follow-up [25,26].The observed BP reductions herein were sustained until ten years after RDN, which indicates that even if a potential structural nerve regrow following the procedure has occurred, as suggested in preclinical studies [27], it may not be relevant for BP control.This is in line with data from the Global Symplicity Registry [14] and clinical trials, [16,17,28,29] which also showed a durable, significant BP reduction out to 36 months.These data are in line with a recently published study showing that RDN resulted in significant and robust reductions in both office and ambulatory systolic and diastolic BP [20].In our study only office DBP reached baseline values at 10 years after a significant reduction at 1 and 2 years.This observation could be a coincidence.Further possible explanations for this observation are the natural progression of hypertension with a progressive increase in BP.
The favorable long-term safety profile post procedure observed herein reiterates the safety outcomes derived from randomized, sham-controlled clinical trials [6-10,  [14,18,20,31].The eGFR remained unchanged in the first 2 years and declined by -9 ml/min/1.73m 2 at the very long-term follow-up.This was associated with an increase in the proportion of patients with CKD stage 3 (from 30.8 to 56.4%).One has to keep in mind that the decline in eGFR with age depends on the level of BP and the presence of comorbidities [32][33][34][35].The annual decline in patients with severe uncontrolled hypertension has been reported to range between -0.5 and -6 mL/min/1.73m 2 [32-35].Thus, the eGFR decline in the population studied herein was less than expected, indicating that RDN did not impair kidney function but, in contrast, might have attenuated the GFR decrease in these patients at high cardiovascular risk.RRI has been associated with progression of renal impairment, as well as morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients [36,37].There was no significant change in RRI through 10 years of follow-up providing further evidence for the safety of RDN at long-term.Except for one case of vasospasm during RDN, there were no periprocedural complications documented.A total of 3 renal artery re-interventions were observed (progression of a pre-existing renal artery stenosis, n = 2; new-onset renal artery stenosis, n = 1).Of note, vascular segments with atherosclerotic plaques were not treated with RF-ablation.Hence, the progression of the pre-existing renal artery stenosis was unlikely related to the RDN procedure.

Limitations
Several limitations of our study must be discussed.Firstly, this is a single-arm, single-center study without a control group.Secondly, adherence and pill-burden to antihypertensive medication were not examined [38].Alterations in adherence might have affected the BP changes as suggested in previous studies [39].However, the mean number of antihypertensive drugs remained stable over time.Thirdly, this study was not a priori powered but designed as a prospective long-term study.Hence, all results should be regarded as hypothesis-generating.Fourthly, in both the Global Symplicity Registry [14] and the present study, the mono-electrode Symplicity Flex RDN catheter system was used with a comparable number of ablations.Whether the same long-term outcomes can also be expected with the other catheter systems remains to be shown.

Conclusion
In patients with resistant hypertension, RF-RDN was associated with significant and durable reductions in 24-h and office BP through 10 years.RF-RDN was associated with a favorable safety profile and may represent an attractive alternative treatment in certain patients with resistant hypertension.

Fig. 1 Fig. 2
Fig. 1 Blood pressure changes.(A) Change in mean 24-h systolic, (B) 24-h diastolic, (C) office systolic and (D) office diastolic blood pressure at 1 year, 2 years, and 10 years follow-up after renal denervation.Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.The p-values were obtained from a repeated measures ANOVA test with a linearmixed model

Table 1
Baseline characteristics : change in mean 24-h ABP, office BP, and the number of antihypertensive drugs.Safety endpoints were incidence of periprocedural and long-term adverse events (i.e.bleeding, dissection, pseudoaneurysm at the femoral access, onset of renal artery stenosis or re-intervention).Changes in renal function were measured by eGFR and RRI.
wereContinuous variables were presented as means ± standard deviation.Categorical variables were presented as counts and percentages and were compared with McNemar's test.Withingroup differences in continuous variables from baseline to follow-up were tested with the paired t-test and repeated measures ANOVA using mixed model.A two-tailed p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Statistical analyses were done with IBM SPSS Statistics (version 27.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA).Missing data were not imputed.

Table 2
Procedural characteristics

Table 3
Changes in blood pressure and estimated glomerular filtration rate from baseline over timeValues are means ± standard deviation.
* Repeated measures ANOVA with linear mixed models.DBP, diastolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; RRI, renal resistive index; SBP, systolic blood pressure