Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The genitourinary impacts of electronic cigarette use: a systematic review of the literature

  • Invited Review
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Electronic cigarette (e-cig) use is prevalent. The health implications of e-cig use on the genitourinary (GU) system are uncertain. This systematic review aims to evaluate how e-cig use impacts the GU system.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase and Ovid alongside citation searching. Review articles, non-English papers, animal model/cell line studies or articles only on combustible cigarettes were excluded. Quality assessment was undertaken using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklists. The primary endpoint was the impact of e-cig use on bladder cancer incidence. Secondary outcomes included urinary carcinogens, chronic kidney disease (CKD), reproductive disorders, and other GU diseases.

Results

The search yielded 244 articles, 28 were ultimately included. One study assessed risk of bladder cancer and found the use of e-cig was associated with an increased odds ratio of 1.577 for its diagnosis. Twenty-one articles measured potential urinary carcinogens—including crotonaldehyde and benzene—associated with bladder cancer. Two articles evaluated the association of e-cig use with CKD and reported mixed outcomes. Three articles reported on reproductive disorders, specifically, stuttering priapism and changes to sperm quantity and quality. One study reported on other GU diseases, specifically burns to the GU system. After quality assessment, all articles were deemed to be of acceptable quality for inclusion.

Conclusions

E-cig use was associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer, increased exposure to carcinogenic compounds, mixed evidence on CKD, increased risk of reproductive disorders and burns to the GU system. Further studies are needed to understand long-term GU effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bandara NA, Wanniarachchi S, Mehrnoush V (2020) Evidence-based tobacco-control legislation on e-cigarettes is urgently needed. CMAJ 192:E74–E74. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.73819

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bandara NA, Jhauj R, Fernando J et al (2021) Overlapping public health crises during the coronavirus disease pandemic. World J Emerg Med 12:151–153. https://doi.org/10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2021.02.011

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bandara NA, Herath J, Mehrnoush V (2021) Addressing e-cigarette health claims made on social media amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. World J Pediatr 17:3–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-021-00410-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bourke L, Bauld L, Bullen C et al (2017) E-cigarettes and urologic health: a collaborative review of toxicology, epidemiology, and potential risks. Eur Urol 71:915–923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.12.022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang T, Richards EM, Pepine CJ, Raizada MK (2018) The gut microbiota and the brain-gut-kidney axis in hypertension and chronic kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol 14:442–456. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-018-0018-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Bjurlin MA, Matulewicz RS, Roberts TR et al (2021) Carcinogen biomarkers in the urine of electronic cigarette users and implications for the development of bladder cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol Oncol 4:766–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2020.02.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Goniewicz ML, Gawron M, Smith DM et al (2017) Exposure to nicotine and selected toxicants in cigarette smokers who switched to electronic cigarettes: a longitudinal within-subjects observational study. Nicotine Tob Res Off J Soc Res Nicotine Tob 19:160–167. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntw160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hecht SS, Carmella SG, Kotandeniya D et al (2015) Evaluation of toxicant and carcinogen metabolites in the urine of e-cigarette users versus cigarette smokers. Nicotine Tob Res Off J Soc Res Nicotine Tob 17:704–709. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntu218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bjurlin MA, Kamecki H, Gordon T et al (2021) Alternative tobacco products use and its impact on urologic health—will the lesser evil still be evil? A commentary and review of literature. Cent Eur J Urol 74:152–160. https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2021.0110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamberger ES, Halpern-Felsher B (2020) Vaping in adolescents: epidemiology and respiratory harm. Curr Opin Pediatr 32:378–383. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000000896

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Bandara N, Xuan R, St-Laurent M et al (2023) The urogenital impacts of electronic cigarette use: a systematic review of the literature. In: PROSPERO. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022385600. Accessed 30 Dec 2023

  12. Veritas Health Innovation (2023) Covidence—better systematic review management. In: Covidence. https://www.covidence.org/. Accessed 19 Apr 2023

  13. Herriges M, Shaprio O, Jacob J et al (2022) Are e-Cigarette users at an increased risk of bladder and lung cancer? https://www.researchsquare.com. Accessed 7 May 2023

  14. Lestari KS, Humairo MV, Agustina U (2018) Formaldehyde vapor concentration in electronic cigarettes and health complaints of electronic cigarettes smokers in Indonesia. J Environ Public Health 2018:9013430. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9013430

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Aherrera A, Olmedo P, Grau-Perez M et al (2017) The association of e-cigarette use with exposure to nickel and chromium: a preliminary study of non-invasive biomarkers. Environ Res 159:313–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dawkins L, Cox S, Goniewicz M et al (2018) “Real-world” compensatory behaviour with low nicotine concentration e-liquid: subjective effects and nicotine, acrolein and formaldehyde exposure. Addict Abingdon Engl 113:1874–1882. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fuller TW, Acharya AP, Meyyappan T et al (2018) Comparison of bladder carcinogens in the urine of e-cigarette users versus non e-cigarette using controls. Sci Rep 8:507. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-19030-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Rubinstein ML, Delucchi K, Benowitz NL, Ramo DE (2018) Adolescent exposure to toxic volatile organic chemicals from e-cigarettes. Pediatrics 141:e20173557. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-3557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wagener TL, Floyd EL, Stepanov I et al (2017) Have combustible cigarettes met their match? The nicotine delivery profiles and harmful constituent exposures of second-generation and third-generation electronic cigarette users. Tob Control 26:e23–e28. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lorkiewicz P, Riggs DW, Keith RJ et al (2019) Comparison of urinary biomarkers of exposure in humans using electronic cigarettes, combustible cigarettes, and smokeless tobacco. Nicotine Tob Res Off J Soc Res Nicotine Tob 21:1228–1238. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/nty089

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kotandeniya D, Carmella SG, Pillsbury ME, Hecht SS (2015) Combined analysis of N′-nitrosonornicotine and 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol in the urine of cigarette smokers and e-cigarette users. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 1007:121–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2015.10.012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang Y, Wong L-Y, Meng L et al (2019) Urinary concentrations of monohydroxylated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in adults from the U.S. Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study Wave 1 (2013–2014). Environ Int 123:201–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.11.068

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Goniewicz ML, Smith DM, Edwards KC et al (2018) Comparison of nicotine and toxicant exposure in users of electronic cigarettes and combustible cigarettes. JAMA Netw Open 1:e185937. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5937

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Shahab L, Goniewicz ML, Blount BC et al (2017) Nicotine, carcinogen, and toxin exposure in long-term e-cigarette and nicotine replacement therapy users: a cross-sectional study. Ann Intern Med 166:390–400. https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-1107

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Wei B, Goniewicz ML, O’Connor RJ et al (2018) Urinary metabolite levels of flame retardants in electronic cigarette users: a study using the data from NHANES 2013–2014. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15:201. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15020201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Göney G, Çok İ, Tamer U et al (2016) Urinary cotinine levels of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) users. Toxicol Mech Methods 26:414–418. https://doi.org/10.3109/15376516.2016.1144127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. McRobbie H, Phillips A, Goniewicz ML et al (2015) Effects of switching to electronic cigarettes with and without concurrent smoking on exposure to nicotine, carbon monoxide, and acrolein. Cancer Prev Res Phila Pa 8:873–878. https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-15-0058

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. D’Ruiz CD, Graff DW, Robinson E (2016) Reductions in biomarkers of exposure, impacts on smoking urge and assessment of product use and tolerability in adult smokers following partial or complete substitution of cigarettes with electronic cigarettes. BMC Public Health 16:543. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3236-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. O’Connell G, Graff DW, D’Ruiz CD (2016) Reductions in biomarkers of exposure (BoE) to harmful or potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs) following partial or complete substitution of cigarettes with electronic cigarettes in adult smokers. Toxicol Mech Methods 26:443–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376516.2016.1196282

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Czoli CD, Fong GT, Goniewicz ML, Hammond D (2019) biomarkers of exposure among “dual users” of tobacco cigarettes and electronic cigarettes in Canada. Nicotine Tob Res Off J Soc Res Nicotine Tob 21:1259–1266. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/nty174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Cravo AS, Bush J, Sharma G et al (2016) A randomised, parallel group study to evaluate the safety profile of an electronic vapour product over 12 weeks. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol RTP 81(Suppl 1):S1–S14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.10.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pulvers K, Emami AS, Nollen NL et al (2018) Tobacco consumption and toxicant exposure of cigarette smokers using electronic cigarettes. Nicotine Tob Res Off J Soc Res Nicotine Tob 20:206–214. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntw333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Round EK, Chen P, Taylor AK, Schmidt E (2019) biomarkers of tobacco exposure decrease after smokers switch to an e-cigarette or nicotine gum. Nicotine Tob Res Off J Soc Res Nicotine Tob 21:1239–1247. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/nty140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2021) 2-Naphthylamine. https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/sites/default/files/ntp/roc/content/profiles/naphthylamine.pdf

  35. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) (1990) Preventing bladder cancer from exposure to o-toluidine and aniline. https://doi.org/10.26616/NIOSHPUB90116

  36. Daniels RD, Bertke SJ (2020) Exposure–response assessment of cancer mortality in styrene-exposed boatbuilders. Occup Environ Med 77:706–712. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2020-106445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Koutros S, Lubin JH, Graubard BI et al (2019) Extended mortality follow-up of a cohort of 25,460 workers exposed to acrylonitrile. Am J Epidemiol 188:1484–1492. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwz086

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. McCune WJ, Gonzalez-Rivera T (2013) Chapter 50—immunosuppressive drug therapy. In: Wallace DJ, Hahn BH (eds) dubois’ lupus erythematosus and related syndromes, 8th edn. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 609–625

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Tseng M-F, Huang C-C, Tsai SC-S et al (2022) Promotion of smoking cessation using the transtheoretical model: short-term and long-term effectiveness for workers in coastal central Taiwan. Tob Use Insights 15:1179173X221104410. https://doi.org/10.1177/1179173X221104410

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. United Nations Environment Programme, International Labour Organisation, World Health Organization, International Program on Chemical Safety (1985) Propylene oxide. World Health Organization ; WHO Publications Center USA [distributor], Geneva

  41. Steineck G, Hagman U, Gerhardsson M, Norell SE (1990) Vitamin A supplements, fried foods, fat and urothelial cancer. A case-referent study in Stockholm in 1985–87. Int J Cancer 45:1006–1011. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.2910450604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Chung F-L, Tanaka T, Hecht SS (1986) Induction of liver tumors in F344 rats by crotonaldehyde. Cancer Res 46:1285–1289

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (2010) Toxicological profile for ethylbenzene. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2014-03/documents/ethylbenzene_toxicological_profile_tp110_3v.pdf

  44. Xie S, Friesen M, Barus D et al (2023) Mp22–13 occupational exposure to organic solvents and risk of bladder cancer. J Urol 209:e301. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003247.13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Boada LD, Henríquez-Hernández LA, Navarro P et al (2015) Exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and bladder cancer: evaluation from a gene-environment perspective in a hospital-based case-control study in the Canary Islands (Spain). Int J Occup Environ Health 21:23–30. https://doi.org/10.1179/2049396714Y.0000000085

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. King WD, Marrett LD (1996) Case-control study of bladder cancer and chlorination by-products in treated water (Ontario, Canada). Cancer Causes Control 7:596–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051702

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Yu K, Du Z, Xuan H, Chen Q (2022) Comprehensive analysis based in silico study of organophosphate flame retardants—environmental explanation of bladder cancer progression. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 92:103851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2022.103851

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Podzolkov VI, Bragina AE, Druzhinina NA et al (2020) Relation between tobacco smoking/electronic smoking and albuminuria/vascular stiffness in young people without cardiovascular diseases. Kidney Blood Press Res 45:467–476. https://doi.org/10.1159/000507510

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Molino AR, Jerry-Fluker J, Atkinson MA et al (2021) The association of alcohol, cigarette, e-cigarette, and marijuana use with disease severity in adolescents and young adults with pediatric chronic kidney disease. Pediatr Nephrol 36:2493–2497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-021-05044-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Holmboe SA, Priskorn L, Jensen TK et al (2020) Use of e-cigarettes associated with lower sperm counts in a cross-sectional study of young men from the general population. Hum Reprod 35:1693–1701. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa089

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. O’Neill H (2017) Effect of Electronic-cigarette flavourings on (I) human sperm motility, chromatin integrity in vitro and (II) mice testicular function in vivo. http://srf-reproduction.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Fertility-2017-Final-Programme-and-Abstracts.pdf

  52. Alzahrani AM, Basalelah JH, Alarifi MS, Alsuhaibani SS (2021) Electronic cigarettes as a cause of stuttering priapism: a case report. Am J Case Rep 22:e935716. https://doi.org/10.12659/AJCR.935716

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Maraqa T, Mohamed MAT, Salib M et al (2018) Too hot for your pocket! burns from e-cigarette lithium battery explosions: a case series. J Burn Care Res 39:1043–1047. https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irx015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Molony RD, Wu C-H, Lee Y-F (2023) E-liquid exposure induces bladder cancer cells to release extracellular vesicles that promote non-malignant urothelial cell transformation. Sci Rep 13:142. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27165-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Zhang T, Bai X-Y, Lu S-Y et al (2018) Urinary metabolites of organophosphate flame retardants in China: health risk from tris(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP) exposure. Environ Int 121:1363–1371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.11.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. New York TCEP Law (2011) NEW YORK TCEP (TRIS) LAW. https://cga.ct.gov/2011/rpt/2011-R-0298.htm. Accessed 27 Apr 2023

  57. Government of Canada H (2017) Ethanol, 2-chloro-, phosphate (3:1) (Tris(2-chloroethyl)phosphate) (TCEP). https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/chemical-substances/challenge/batch-5/tcep.html. Accessed 27 Apr 2023

  58. Szumilas K, Szumilas P, Grzywacz A, Wilk A (2020) The Effects of E-Cigarette Vapor Components on the Morphology and Function of the Male and Female Reproductive Systems: A Systematic Review. Int J Env Res Public Health 17:25. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Abdeen BM, Leslie SW (2023) Stuttering priapism. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island

    Google Scholar 

  60. El-Shahawy O, Shah T, Obisesan OH et al (2022) Association of e-cigarettes with erectile dysfunction: the population assessment of tobacco and health study. Am J Prev Med 62:26–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2021.08.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. García-Gómez L, Hernández-Pérez A, Noé-Díaz V et al (2019) Smoking cessation treatments: current psychological and pharmacological options. Rev Investig Clin Organo Hosp Enfermedades Nutr 71:7–16. https://doi.org/10.24875/RIC.18002629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Formanek P, Salisbury-Afshar E, Afshar M (2018) Helping patients with ESRD and earlier stages of CKD to quit smoking. Am J Kidney Dis Off J Natl Kidney Found 72:255–266. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.01.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Freedman ND, Silverman DT, Hollenbeck AR et al (2011) Association between smoking and risk of bladder cancer among men and women. JAMA J Am Med Assoc 306:737–745. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.1142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

NAB: protocol/project development, data collection, data analysis, and manuscript writing/editing. XRZ: protocol/project development, data collection, data analysis, and manuscript writing/editing. AA: manuscript writing/editing, data analysis, and supervision. PCB: manuscript writing/editing, data analysis, and supervision. MPS: protocol/project development, data analysis, supervision, and manuscript writing/editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie-Pier St-Laurent.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Ethical approval

This is a systematic review using data from the academic literature that is publicly available; therefore, no ethical approval was sought.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 14 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bandara, N.A., Zhou, X.R., Alhamam, A. et al. The genitourinary impacts of electronic cigarette use: a systematic review of the literature. World J Urol 41, 2637–2646 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04546-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04546-1

Keywords

Navigation