Abstract
Duo to fluctuations in atmospheric turbulence and yaw control strategies, wind turbines are often in a yaw state. To predict the far wake velocity field of wind turbines quickly and accurately, a wake velocity model was derived based on the method of momentum conservation considering the wake steering of the wind turbine under yaw conditions. To consider the shear effect of the vertical incoming wind direction, a two-dimensional Gaussian distribution function was introduced to model the velocity loss at different axial positions in the far wake region based on the assumption of nonlinear wake expansion. This work also developed a “prediction-correction” method to solve the wake velocity field, and the accuracy of the model results was verified in wake experiments on the Garrad Hassan wind turbine. Moreover, a 33-kW two-blade horizontal axis wind turbine was simulated using this method, and the results were compared with the classical wake model under the same parameters and the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation results. The results show that the nonlinear wake model well reflected the influence of incoming flow shear and yaw wake steering in the wake velocity field. Finally, computation of the wake flow for the Horns Rev offshore wind farm with 80 wind turbines showed an error within 8% compared to the experimental values. The established wake model is less computationally intensive than other methods, has a faster calculation speed, and can be used for engineering calculations of the wake velocity in the far wakefield of wind turbines.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Barooni M, Ashuri T, Sogut D V et al. 2023. Floating offshore wind turbines: current status and future prospects. Energies, 16(1): 2, https://doi.org/10.3390/en16010002.
Bartl J, Pierella F, Sætrana L. 2012. Wake measurements behind an array of two model wind turbines. Energy Procedia, 24: 305–312, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2012.06.113.
Bastankhah M, Porté-Agel F. 2016. Experimental and theoretical study of wind turbine wakes in yawed conditions. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 806: 506–541, https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2016.595.
Chen X L, Jiang Z Y, Li Q Y et al. 2020. Extended environmental contour methods for long-term extreme response analysis of offshore wind turbines. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering—Transactions of the ASME, 142(5): 052003, https://doi.org/10.1017/10.1115/1.4046772.
Feng D, Li L K B, Gupta V et al. 2022. Componentwise influence of upstream turbulence on the far-wake dynamics of wind turbines. Renewable Energy, 200: 1081–1091, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.10.024.
Frandsen S, Barthelmie R, Pryor S et al. 2006. Analytical modelling of wind speed deficit in large offshore wind farms. Wind Energy, 9(1–2): 39–53, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.189.
Gao X C, Li B B, Wang T Y et al. 2020. Investigation and validation of 3D wake model for horizontal-axis wind turbines based on filed measurements. Applied Energy, 260: 114272, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114272.
Gao Z T, Feng X Y, Zhang Z T et al. 2022. A brief discussion on offshore wind turbine hydrodynamics problem. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 34(1): 15–30, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-022-0002-y.
Gao Z T, Li Y, Wang T G et al. 2021. Modelling the nacelle wake of a horizontal-axis wind turbine under different yaw conditions. Renewable Energy, 172: 263–275, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.02.140.
Ge M, Wu Y, Liu Y et al. 2019. A two-dimensional Jensen model with a Gaussian-shaped velocity deficit. Renewable Energy, 141: 46–56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.03.127.
He R, Yang H, Sun H et al. 2021. A novel three-dimensional wake model based on anisotropic Gaussian distribution for wind turbine wakes. Applied Energy, 296: 117059, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117059.
Hu Q H, Li Y, Di Y J et al. 2017. A large-eddy simulation study of horizontal axis tidal turbine in different inflow conditions. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 9(6): 064501, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5011061.
Jensen N O. 1983. A Note on Wind Generator Interaction. Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde.
Jiménez Á, Crespo A, Migoya E. 2009. Application of a LES technique to characterize the wake deflection of a wind turbine in yaw. Wind Energy, 13(6): 559–572, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.380.
King J, Fleming P, King R et al. 2021. Control-oriented model for secondary effects of wake steering. Wind Energy Science, 6(3): 701–714, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-701-2021.
Li N, Liu Y, Li L et al. 2020. Numerical simulation of wind turbine wake based on extended k-epsilon turbulence model coupling with actuator disc considering nacelle and tower. IET Renewable Power Generation, 14(18): 3834–3842, https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rpg.2020.0416.
Li S, Song J B, He H L. 2014a. Large eddy simulation of the rotation effect on the ocean turbulence kinetic energy budget in the surface mixed layer. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 32(5): 1198–1206, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-014-3188-1.
Li Y, Yi J H, Song H M et al. 2014b. On the natural frequency of tidal current power systems—a discussion of sea testing. Applied Physics Letters, 105(2): 023902, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4886797.
Mirsane R S, Torabi F. 2022. An innovative method of investigating the wind turbine’s inflow speed in a wind farm due to the multiple wake effect issue. Energy Conversion and Management, 269: 116077, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116077.
Qian G W, Ishihara T. 2018. A new analytical wake model for yawed wind turbines. Energies, 11(3): 665, https://doi.org/10.3390/en11030665.
Schlez W, Tindal A, Quarton D. 2003. GH Wind Farmer Validation Report. Garrad Hassan and Partners Ltd.
Schlichting H, Gersten K. 2017. Boundary-Layer Theory. 9th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-52919-5.
Tang X Y, Yang Q M, Stoevesandt B et al. 2022. Optimization of wind farm layout with optimum coordination of turbine cooperations. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 164: 107880, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107880.
Tian L L, Zhao N, Zhong W et al. 2011. Numerical analysis of the wind turbine’s far wake. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 29(6): 805–809, 814. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Tian L, Zhu W, Shen W et al. 2015. Development and validation of a new two-dimensional wake model for wind turbine wakes. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 137: 90–99, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2014.12.001.
Vermeer L J, Sørensen J N, Crespo A. 2003. Wind turbine wake aerodynamics. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 39(6–7): 467–510.
Vogel C R, Willden R H J. 2020. Investigation of wind turbine wake superposition models using Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations. Wind Energy, 23(3): 593–607, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2444.
Wang T, Cai C, Wang X et al. 2023a. A new Gaussian analytical wake model validated by wind tunnel experiment and LiDAR field measurements under different turbulent flow. Energy, 271: 127089, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127089.
Wang X B, Cai C, Cai S G et al. 2023b. A review of aerodynamic and wake characteristics of floating offshore wind turbines. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 175: 113144, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.113144.
Wu Y T, Porté-Agel F. 2015. Modeling turbine wakes and power losses within a wind farm using LES: an application to the Horns Rev offshore wind farm. Renewable Energy, 75: 945–955, https://doi.org/10.1016/10.1016/j.renene.2014.06.019.
Xu W H, Li G H, Zheng X B et al. 2021a. High-resolution numerical simulation of the performance of vertical axis wind turbines in urban area: Part I, wind turbines on the side of single building. Renewable Energy, 177: 461–474, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.05.011.
Xu W H, Li Y, Li G H et al. 2021b. High-resolution numerical simulation of the performance of vertical axis wind turbines in urban area: Part II, array of vertical axis wind turbines between buildings. Renewable Energy, 176: 25–39, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.04.071.
Yuan Y, Ma Q W, Yan S et al. 2023. A hybrid method for modelling wake flow of a wind turbine. Ocean Engineering, 281: 114770, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114770.
Zeng L H, Wang F, Liu D Y. 2011. Research on wind turbine wake model and overlapping in wind farm. Proceedings of the CSEE, 31(19): 37–42, https://doi.org/10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.2011.19.007. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Zhang W, Li Y, Wu X N et al. 2018. Review of the applied mechanical problems in ocean thermal energy conversion. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 93: 231–244, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.048.
Zhang Z, Liu L, Shi Y et al. 2023. Analysis of urban turbulence intensity observed by Beijing 325-m tower and comparison with the IEC turbulence model for small wind turbines. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 241: 105511, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2023.105511.
Zheng X B, Chen G M, Cao W J et al. 2021. On the energy conversion characteristics of a top-mounted pitching absorber by using smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Energy Conversion and Management, 250: 114893, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114893.
Zhou B W, Zhang Z B, Li G D et al. 2023. Review of key technologies for offshore floating wind power generation. Energies, 16(2): 710, https://doi.org/10.3390/en16020710.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Supported by the Key R&D Program of Shandong Province, China (No. 2023ZLYS01), the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2022YFC3104200), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 12302301), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2023M742229), and the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation (ZJNSF) (No. LQ22F030002)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, Y., Gao, Z., Li, S. et al. A nonlinear wake model of a wind turbine considering the yaw wake steering. J. Ocean. Limnol. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-023-3040-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-023-3040-6