Skip to main content
Log in

Contrasting variation patterns in Austroplaca hookeri and Rusavskia elegans (Teloschistaceae, lichenized Ascomycota) in maritime Antarctica

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Polar Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Teloschistaceae is one of the largest lichen-forming fungal lineages, with more than one thousand species worldwide distributed, including areas with extreme environmental conditions, such as Antarctica. Two species of this family, Austroplaca hookeri and Rusavskia elegans were investigated with molecular, morphological, and anatomical data to understand their diversity patterns in maritime Antarctica. These species can be confounded in a superficial identification due to their apparent similarities in color, shape, size, and dispersal mode (spores). Sampling area included the King George Island (South Shetland Islands), James Ross Island, and the Antarctica Peninsula. New nuITS sequences revealed low divergence in A. hookeri (haplotypes with a maximum divergence of 0.8%) and high phylogenetic diversity in R. elegans (haplotypes with up to 5.5% of divergence distributed in three different lineages). The same pattern was found examining the morphological and anatomical features, with phenotypic uniformity in A. hookeri and several variations among the R. elegans specimens (such as the presence and location of the isidioid structures, the margin of the hymenial disc, and the parahimenial tissue thickness). The phenotypic variability found in R. elegans is not linked to the different nuITS lineages or to the geographic origin of the specimens analyzed. These patterns probably reflect the unique evolutionary history of each species and their different pathways in the colonization of Antarctica.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001. It was also supported by the Brazilian “Evolution and Dispersal of Antarctic Bipolar Species of Mosses and Lichens” project (MCTI/CNPq/FNDCT—Ação Transversal n° 64/2013). M.C. Scur and M. J. Kitaura would like to thank the CAPES for Scholarships of Institutional Scholarship Program and National Postdoctoral Program levels. M.J. Kitaura also want to thank the Fundação de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento do Ensino, Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul to Postdoctoral scholarship of the Chamada Fundect/CNPq No. 04/2019—PDCTR. We also want to thank the Helsinki Herbarium that generously sent the isoneotype material and the Instituto Antártico Argentino for the logistic support during the fieldwork on James Ross Island.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AAS designed and coordinated the project. MCS, JBP and MJK conducted experiments. MSC, MJK, and APL analyzed data. MCS, MJK and APL wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mayara Camila Scur.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest at any level for the publication of this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (XLSX 17 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scur, M.C., Kitaura, M.J., de Paula, J.B. et al. Contrasting variation patterns in Austroplaca hookeri and Rusavskia elegans (Teloschistaceae, lichenized Ascomycota) in maritime Antarctica. Polar Biol 45, 101–111 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-021-02976-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-021-02976-4

Keywords

Navigation