The pathogenic relevance of the prognostic markers CD38 and CD49d in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

The interactions of chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells with the microenvironment in secondary lymphoid tissues and the bone marrow are known to promote CLL cell survival and proliferation. CD38 and CD49d are both independent prognostic risk parameters in CLL with important roles in shaping these interactions. Both are reported to influence CLL cell trafficking between blood and lymphoid organs as well as their survival and proliferation within the lymphoid organs, thereby impacting the pathophysiology of the disease. The expression of CD38 and CD49d is associated in the majority of cases, and they exist as part of macromolecular complexes. Here, we review the current evidence for the individual and associated contributions of these molecules to CLL pathophysiology.

and bone marrow is thus considered a major therapeutic goal for achieving permanent remission.
As dissected in the following chapters, the prognostic markers CD49d and CD38 have been reported to be involved in various cellular functions relevant to CLL pathogenesis: CLL cell homing to lymphoid organs, survival, and proliferation. However, CD49d and CD38 expression is associated in about 80 % of CLL patients, and these molecules are reported to physically interact within multi-protein complexes. Because of this, it is difficult to gauge the individual contribution of each molecule to key pathogenic functions in CLL. In light of the high heterogeneity of reports dealing with either molecule and the fact that CD49d is still a newcomer among the prognostic factors, we review the current evidence for the individual and associated contributions of these molecules to CLL pathophysiology.

CD38
CD38 is a highly conserved 45 kDa transmembrane type II glycoprotein with a short cytoplasmatic tail, a single-spanning transmembrane domain, and a large extracellular domain (257 aa) [28,29]. CD38 can be localized on the plasma membrane, in the cytoplasm, and in the inner nuclear membrane of cells [30,31]. It is expressed in numerous cells types of the hematopoietic system, such as lymphocytes, myeloid cells, natural killer (NK) cells, platelets, and erythrocytes, as well as in solid tissues, including various cell types of the brain, the eye, in pancreatic islet cells, smooth muscle cells, and osteoclasts and osteoblasts [31]. CD38 is an important enzyme for the regulation of calcium signaling and the cell's energy transfer homeostasis [29]. The products of the enzymatic reactions catalyzed by CD38 are all involved in the release of different intracellular calcium stores, mostly independent of the traditional inositol triphosphate (IP3) pathway [32][33][34][35][36][37]. As such, CD38 has been shown to play a critical role in diverse immune functions: in T cell activation [34], neutrophil chemotaxis [38], dendritic cell migration [39], and monocyte chemokine production [40]. Furthermore, CD38-mediated calcium control has also been implicated in various other functions of different cell types: in the insulin secretion of pancreatic beta cells [41,42], in the oxytocin production of neurons [43][44][45], in bone resorption of osteoclasts [46], as well as the responsiveness of airway smooth muscle cells [47].
In addition to these enzymatic functions, CD38 is a wellknown lymphocyte differentiation antigen with proposed receptor and adhesion molecule functions. This versatility of CD38 and its characteristic to function as dimers, multimers, or as part of multi-protein complexes makes it difficult to fully comprehend its biology. The proposed functions of CD38 as a receptor vary greatly and depend on its association with other surface molecules. CD38 is laterally associated with the main signaling complexes of lymphocytes that are organized in lipid rafts. In T cells, CD38 is capable of interacting with the T cell receptor (TCR)/CD3 complex; in B cells, with the BCR/ CD19 complex; and in NK cells, with the CD16/CD81 complex [31]. CD31 (PECAM-1), expressed by, e.g., endothelial cells has been described as a CD38 ligand [48]. CD38+ lymphocytes show a weak, selectin-like adhesion to endothelial cells [49], which appears to be mediated by CD38-CD31 interactions [48].
In B cells, ligation of CD38 by agonistic antibodies triggers different in vitro responses depending on the differentiation stage of the cells. In immature B cell precursors, CD38 ligation inhibited DNA synthesis and induced apoptosis, thereby blocking B cell hematopoiesis [50]. In tonsillar germinal center B cells, CD38 mediated pro-survival signaling [51]. In mature circulating B cells, CD38 ligation induced proliferation by promoting the expression of CD25, MHC-II, and certain cytokines [31,52].
In summary, CD38 is a widely expressed enzyme and receptor, involved in various cellular functions, making it difficult to pinpoint one particular function that would most critically impact CLL pathobiology.

CD49d
CD49d belongs to the family of integrin alpha subunits. Integrins are heterodimers of non-covalently linked alpha and beta subunits. The human CD49d (alpha4 integrin) subunit can associate with either CD29 (beta1 integrin) or with beta7 integrin [53,54]. The combination of CD49d with beta7 mediates lymphocyte binding to mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1, and its expression defines lymphocytes capable of trafficking through the intestines and the intestinal lymphoid tissues [55,56]. In contrast, very late antigen-4 (VLA-4) is formed by the combination CD49d/CD29 [53] and is expressed on leukocytes, including B and T cells, and on CD34+ hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs). VLA-4 is the major CD49d-containing combination found in resting CLL cells [57]. VLA-4 has two major ligands: VCAM-1 [58], expressed on endothelial cells and bone marrow stromal cells [59], and the extracellular matrix molecule fibronectin [60].
The use of mouse models has proved fundamental in revealing the essential role of VLA-4 in fetal and adult hematopoiesis (reviewed in [56,61]). Germline deletion of either VLA-4 subunit, CD49d or CD29, resulted in embryonic lethality in mice. Chimeric mouse models generated with CD29 integrin-expressing or CD29 integrin-deficient embryonic stem (ES) cells indicated that loss of CD29 does not impact haematopoietic stem cell formation or their differentiation into different lineages but severely compromises their ability to colonize the fetal liver [62,63]. Adult murine hematopoiesis, however, did not seem to rely on CD29 [64]. Similar chimeric models generated with CD49d-positive or CD49dnegative ES cells demonstrated that this integrin subunit is critical for proper lineage differentiation and maturation of the hematopoietic system [65,66]. Later, more refined inducible knockout models revealed that CD49d is essential for bone marrow homing and retention of progenitor cells [67,68]. Moreover, absence of CD49d in HSPCs hindered both their self-renewal capacity and their ability to reconstitute hematopoiesis [69].
Homing is a rapid process that describes the active migration of cells from the blood, through the vascular endothelium, into lymphoid organs. It differs from engraftment, for which cell proliferation within the lymphoid tissue environment is essential [70]. Using adoptive transfers of human cells into immune-deficient mice, VLA-4 was identified as a key molecule for both the bone marrow homing and the engraftment of normal and leukemic human HSPCs [71,72]. VLA-4 exists in multiple conformational states, including high-affinityactivated but also low-affinity-extended states [73]. These specific conformations allow VLA-4, in contrast to other integrins, to support not only firm adhesion but also rolling of lymphocytes on VCAM-1 displaying endothelial cells. Chemokine-induced inside-out activation of VLA-4, e.g., by the bone marrow chemokine CXCL12, induces an upregulation of its adhesive properties to VCAM-1. This mediates the arrest of HSPCs on the BM vessels, which is a prerequisite for their BM homing [72]. Functional VLA-4 expression is also indispensable for retention of normal HSPCs as well as leukemic blasts in bone marrow [74,75]. Consequently, targeted disruption of VLA-4 function by anti-CD49d antibodies or small-molecular-weight VLA-4 antagonists is known to result in rapid release of HSPCs into the peripheral circulation and to act synergistically or additive with conventional mobilization regimes (for review, see [61]).
Thus, in contrast to CD38, the biological functions of CD49d and the CD49d/CD29 integrin combination VLA-4 are well defined, with a principal involvement in bone marrow homing and retention of hematopoietic cells, processes important to CLL pathophysiology.

CD38 and CD49d as prognostic markers in CLL
The prognostic role of CD38 in CLL was first proposed on the basis of an immunophenotypic study of CLL cases with known IGHV sequences [6]. CD38 predicted shorter overall survival rates when expressed on 30 % or more CLL cells [6]. Since this first report in 1999, CD38 expression has been well established as an independent prognostic factor in CLL by numerous reports, however, with various cut-off levels. While Hamblin et al. [76] and Del Poeta et al. [77] concur with 30 % as the best cut-off, others proposed 20 % [78,79] or even 7 % [80,81]. Further studies are still necessary to define a common cut-off level (reviewed in [82,83]).
In 2008, two studies concluded that high expression of CD49d is a robust adverse prognostic marker in CLL [10,11]. When analyzed retrospectively, CLL patients with ≥30 % CD49d-positive tumor cells revealed significantly shorter treatment-free and overall survival than patients with <30 % CD49d positivity [10]. A prospective analysis indicated that an alternative cut-off level of 45 % CD49d expression might be superior to the 30 % level [11]. Following these first reports, the prognostic relevance of increased CD49d expression was rapidly and unequivocally confirmed by several groups, using the 30 % cut-off level [84][85][86][87][88] (Table 1). Comparative analyses of CD49d mRNA and protein levels demonstrated its transcriptional-translational consistency [57,84] which allows its determination by flow cytometry as well as PCR-based assays for risk categorization. As with CD38, high CD49d expression acts as an independent prognostic marker but is highly associated with other risk parameters such as IGHV, ZAP70, CD38, and the presence of chromosomal aberrations [10,11].
Remarkably, the finding of differential CD49d expression in CLL is an older discovery than anticipated. In 1996, it had already been demonstrated that CD49d expression in CLL is variable, with higher expression of CLL samples of advanced (Rai III, IV) than early stages [89]. Zucchetto and colleagues were the first in 2006 that reported the strong association of CD38 and CD49d expression on CLL cells using both parameters as categorical variables [90]. Comparing overall survival rates, a combined CD38 low/CD49d low phenotype was attributed to the best prognosis. Out of the 115 investigated samples, 27 cases (23 %), however, displayed a discordant CD38 low/CD49d high or CD38 high/CD49d low phenotype. Patients with this discordant phenotype showed better overall survival rates compared with the combined CD38 high/ CD49d high phenotype. Recently, we found a comparable 21.5 % rate of discordant cases when analyzing 144 samples [86]. In our analysis, both a CD38 high or CD49d high phenotype were sufficient to predict shortened time to first treatment, even when the presence of the second marker was low. This implies that a relevant proportion of our patients would be misclassified with regards to risk if we were to base our stratification solely on CD38 expression. Our data thus support the previous suggestion of a scoring system based on several antigens, including CD38 and CD49d, as an additional tool for accurate risk categorization in CLL [91].

CD38 and CD49d in CLL cell migration and homing
In light of the current evidence that suggests that CLL localization within supportive lymphoid niches is critical to disease progression, it seems logical that at least a part of the peripheral blood CLL pool constantly recirculates into bone marrow and secondary lymphoid organs (Scheme 1). Nevertheless, compared with healthy B lymphocytes, CLL cells display an impaired in vitro transendothelial migratory (TEM) capacity over human umbilical vein endothelial cells [92], a widely accepted endothelial model. These data are in line with the early in vivo observation that 51 Crlabeled CLL cells of a CLL patient left the circulation at a dramatically diminished degree compared with healthy lymphocytes [93].
This transmigratory defect was firstly attributed to low Lselection expression [94], which is a major mediator of lymphocyte tethering on endothelial cells. Subsequently, it became clear that the transmigratory capacity of CLL cells varied between patients, with CLL cells from patients with advanced disease and bearing lymph node enlargement displaying increased TEM rates [95]. CCR7 and VLA-4 were identified as key factors in this process and a correlation between high CD49d expression and lymphadenopathy was demonstrated [95]. In these patients, high CD49d levels appear to overcome some of the migratory defects of the CLL cells [96]. While entry of normal B lymphocytes into lymph nodes is dependent on LFA-1, CLL cells with reduced LFA-1 levels (compared with normal B lymphocytes) were able to cross human umbilical vein endothelial cells in vitro by a mechanism that required an interplay between VLA-4 and LFA-1 [57,96]. CD49d expression was decisive for in vivo homing of human CLL cells into the bone marrow of immunedeficient mice [57,86]. Moreover, analyzing human bone marrow CLL specimens, we also observed an association of CD49d expression and high leukemic BM infiltration [86]. The association of CD49d and MMP9 (see in more detail in chapters below) may further contribute to invasiveness of CLL cells in the dense BM environment.
CD38 expression was also described to define CLL cells with an increased migratory potential as tested by transwell chemotaxis assays [97]. In addition, lentiviral transfection of TFS treatment-free survival, OS overall survival, n.a. not available CLL cells with CD38 resulted in their enhanced motility to CXCL12 [98]. By using an inhibitory anti-CD38 antibody (clone: SUN-4B7), the authors uncovered a CD38 contribution to BM homing of CLL cells. In light of the expression of CD31, reported to be a ligand of CD38, in the endothelium, a role of CD38 in CLL cell extravasation appears logical. However, when comparing the integrin expression on CD38 high or low CLL cells, increased VLA-4 (CD49d subunit) and LFA-1 (CD18 subunit) expression was found in the CD38 high subtype [99], making it difficult to ascribe enhanced migration functions solely to CD38. In short-term homing assays wherein CLL cells from discordant CD38+/VLA-4− and CD38-/VLA-4+ cases were transplanted into NOD/SCID mice, only cells expressing VLA-4 were capable of entering the BM [86]. Importantly, the enhanced engraftment of CD38 positive samples in NOD/SCID mice and the higher proliferation rates in the spleens of these xenogeneic animals have been attributed to CD38-dependent proliferation rather than homing of the CLL cells [100].
Thus, the evidence indisputably demonstrates that CLL cells require a functional VLA-4 to enter the bone marrow. Additionally, VLA-4 potentially compensates for CLLassociated LFA-1 defects during lymph node entry. While the role for CD38 in homing is still ambiguous, CD38associated proliferation (discussed in more detail below) may play a role in the successful engraftment of the tumor cells within these lymphoid tissues.

CD38 and CD49d in CLL cell survival
Both, CD38 and CD49d have been described to contribute to CLL survival, in a direct or indirect manner. A direct contribution would involve the induction of anti-apoptotic signaling cascades upon ligand binding, whereas an indirect contribution would be to ensure that the tumor cells are in the right place at the right time in order to avail of the favorable signals emanating from the microenvironment. Ligation of CD38 in IL-2-treated CLL cells led to an increase in long-term survival [101]. Whether engagement of CD38 by its supposed ligand CD31 induces direct prosurvival signals in CLL is still controversially discussed. Co-culture of CD38 expressing CLL cells with CD31transfected murine cell lines or CD31+ nurse like cells enhanced survival of CLL cells and induced their proliferation [102,103]. The CD31-specificity of these results could be demonstrated by addition of an antagonistic anti-CD31 mAb that abrogated the effects [102]. Other authors, however, have reported that they found no increase in cell survival or proliferation of either CD38 high or low expressing CLL cells cocultured with endothelial cells or CD31-transfected fibroblasts in the presence or absence of either anti-CD31 or anti-CD38 blocking mAbs [104]. Discordant results were also obtained when studying the modulation of apoptosis regulators upon incubation of CLL cells from CD38 high-risk patients with CD31-transfected fibroblasts [104,105]. Whether these findings reflect the in vivo situation remains to be confirmed.
Similarly, a direct ligand-triggered survival function of VLA-4 was suggested in CLL, as tumor cells could be rescued from spontaneous or drug-induced in vitro apoptosis by direct cell-cell contact with stromal cells [19,106]. These studies suggested that beta1 integrins contribute to this protective adhesion [106]. Furthermore, another series of studies reported that culturing CLL cells on fibronectin-or VCAM-1-coated plates increased their in vitro viability and chemoresistance, which was accompanied by an increased Bcl-2/Bax ratio and elevated Bcl-xL levels [107,108]. The authors also suggested that a general chemoresistant phenotype is related to high VLA-4 expression of CLL cells. However, Majid and colleagues [85] did not find a correlation between CD49d expression and in vitro resistance to fludarabine in liquid cultures albeit they still observed a protective adhesion of CD49d high cells to fibronectin-coated plates. Similarly, we confirmed higher adhesion rates of VLA-4+ CLL cells to protective stromal cells than of VLA-4− CLL cells [86]. Nevertheless, VLA-4 low CLL cells were still protected from spontaneous apoptosis to a similar extent by the presence of stroma, suggesting that this CLL subgroup uses alternative viability signals. In line with these observations, cell adhesion-mediated drug resistance, induced by culturing CLL cells on a follicular dendritic cell line, was shown to be independent of VCAM-1 [109] but dependent on other signals, e.g., CD44. One possible explanation for these divergent findings is that different groups investigated the protective effects of VLA-4-mediated cell adhesion over different lengths of time. Of note, Zucchetto et al. [110] found that protective VLA-4/VCAM-1 interactions between CLL cells and VCAM-1-transfected fibroblasts first become apparent after 7 days of co-culture and continuously increased with the most dramatic effects being observed after 21 days, a much longer time period than studied in most previous reports.
As we found VLA-4/CD38 low-risk samples to be less sensitive towards spontaneous apoptosis ex vivo [86], they appear less dependent on continuous external stimulation. Hypothetically, they are in a more quiescent mitotic state, based on their lower basal Ki-67 expression. Our data are consistent with the report by Coscia and colleagues [111] who observed that high-risk CLL cells with unmutated IGHV genes were extremely vulnerable when removed from the microenvironmental signals that induce supportive NF-kB signaling in these cells. Furthermore, NF-kB signaling via its transcriptional target TAp63 has been shown to result in increased VLA-4 expression on high-risk samples [112], thus potentially creating a positive feedback loop leading to the accumulation of survival signals in the tumor cells. Of note, other intercellular interactions leading to the activation of CLL cells, such as their interaction with vascular endothelium or CD40L-transfected fibroblasts, also result in the upregulation of VLA-4 expression on the tumor cells [103,113]. Whether these interactions result in the concomitant increase of the ligands VCAM-1 and fibronectin has not been investigated yet. However, the implication of these findings is that VLA-4mediated adhesion may help to strengthen the intercellular contacts, thereby allowing stable and long-term bi-directional signaling between the tumor cells and the microenvironment. VLA-4 may also support survival of CLL cells as part of a larger protein complex including MMP9 and CD44v [114,115]. In this setting, VLA-4 supports the adhesion of CLL cells to proMMP9, which results in pro-survival signals towards the CLL cells via the hemopexin domain of MMP9 [115]. Intriguingly, proMMP9 hereby acts as a non-canonical ligand for VLA-4 inducing a Lyn-Stat3-Mcl-1 pro-survival signaling cascade distinct from VCAM-1 induced survival signals.

CD38 and CD49d in CLL cell proliferation
An enormous amount of effort has been put into defining the link between CD38 and CLL cell proliferation and determining whether CD38 plays an active or passive role in this process. The most recent findings suggest that CD38 expression marks an activated and recently born CLL cell subset [116][117][118]. The proliferation marker Ki-67 that characterizes cell cycle entry and the mitosis regulating anaphasepromoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) are significantly increased in CLL cells of CD38 high-risk patients compared with low-risk samples [86,118] [99]. Moreover, CD38+ CLL subclones within individual patient samples express increased expression of the early activation marker CD69, the B cell activation marker CD27, and of Ki-67 [118][119][120]. Elegant in vivo labeling studies verified that the CD38+ peripheral blood CLL cell pool comprises more newly proliferated CLL cells than the CD38-pool [116]. Consistently, Ki-67 positive cells were frequently positive for CD38 in CLL proliferation centers in lymph nodes [15]. In vitro, CLL cell proliferation can be induced by activation of T lymphocytes or CD40 ligand stimulation, and this is accompanied by an increase in CD38 expression on the CLL cell [15,121]. These observations, however, are correlative rather than proof of a direct functional role for CD38 in this cellular function. A single study implicated an active role for CD38 in CLL proliferation: CD38 ligation on CLL cells by an agonistic antibody in the presence of IL-2 provoked intracellular calcium signals and proliferation of the tumor cells [101]. What is clear, however, is that CD38 expression can be regulated by the microenvironment and can serve as a marker for an activated or recently activated CLL phenotype [15,99,101,122]. It is likely that CD38 expression within the CLL clone is transient and CD38positive tumor cells eventually become CD38-negative, as proposed by Calissano et al. [116]. This is supported by the fact that CD38+ and CD38− subclones do not show any difference in telomere length [118,119] and that there is no clonal evolution of the CD38+ subclone [119]. This would also imply that a CD38− subclone could become CD38+ given the proper stimuli. Whether the upregulation of CD38 is a prerequisite to proliferation remains to be determined and is hindered by the lack of small molecule specific inhibitors of CD38, as well as difficulties in achieving stable and long-term knockdowns in CLL cells.
In contrast to CD38, there is much less data linking VLA-4 to CLL proliferation. We recently demonstrated that, similar to CD38, VLA-4 expression of bone marrow-derived CLL cells is higher than that of peripheral blood CLL cells and that the proliferating CLL cell fraction was enriched in the VLA-4+ subclone [86]. Notably, VLA-4 high-risk CLL cells also displayed increased in vitro proliferation rates upon coculture with CD40L-transfected fibroblasts [121]. How VLA-4 impacts CLL cell proliferation remains to be elucidated.

Challenges in separating individual and shared contributions of VLA-4 and CD38 in CLL pathophysiology
A possible molecular basis for the high correlation of CD49d and CD38 expression in CLL could be their physical association in multi-protein-complexes. Recent reports suggest a variety of possible protein combinations [98,110,114,115,123,124]. Two recent reports demonstrate a colocalization and physical association of CD38 and CD49d/CD29 by a combination of immunofluorescence and immunoprecipitation approaches [110,123]. Whether this interaction occurs via the CD49d or the CD29d subunit of the VLA-4 integrin could not unequivocally be clarified [110,123]. Interpatient variability, which is usually high in CLL, adds further complexity: Buggins et al. reported [123] a multimercomplex involving CD38, CD49d, MMP9, and CD44 and observed a co-immunoprecipitation of CD38 with CD49d in the majority, but of CD38 with MMP9 in only about half of the investigated samples. Redondo-Munoz et al. reported the association of CD49d and MMP9 particularly with CD44 variant forms instead of pan CD44 [124]. All the reported complex structures may represent novel CLL high-risk-specific therapeutic targets as they do not appear to form in normal B cells or in low-risk cases. Notably, besides direct interactions, CD38 and CD49d may also indirectly influence each other as parts of a consecutive chain of events [125].
Given this complexity, it is difficult to separate associationintrinsic from molecule-specific functions, particularly when interpreting correlative analyses. In addition, the use of blocking antibodies in functional studies bears the risk of cocapping, crosslinking, or steric hindrance of the partner molecule, which could be overcome by the use of small molecule inhibitors, which are increasingly being developed. Furthermore, a genetic modulation of CD38 and VLA-4 expression could help to correctly define their individual contributions. The successful lentiviral introduction of CD38 in CD38negative CLL cells has only recently been achieved [126] and contributes to a better understanding of the molecule. Furthermore, introduction of CD38 into cells of the CLLderived prolymphocytic leukemia cell line MEC1 increased their adhesion to VLA-4 ligands, indicating functional CD38-VLA-4 interaction [110]. Conversely, lentiviral transfer of short hairpin RNA (shRNA) could be used for stable and specific reduction of CD38 expression in high-risk CLL. However, genetic manipulations of the cell cycle-arrested primary peripheral blood CLL cells are still a challenge. To achieve an efficient knockdown, it would likely be necessary to combine shRNA approaches with long-term culture and cell cycle induction of CLL cells. To this end, co-culture techniques that mimic the proliferative and supportive microenvironment in CLL are continuously being improved [121].
An alternative approach to separate the functions of CD38 and VLA-4, feasible in the absence of efficient knockdown techniques, is the analysis of discordant cases. Notably, the correlation of risk factors in CLL samples is not absolute with a considerable rate of discordancy. Functional analyses using these discordant samples are useful to define the dispensability or compensation of a specific molecule in a cellular function. Taking this road, we have been able to demonstrate that CD38 is not required for BM homing of CLL cells while VLA-4 is indispensable. However, in light of the potential enzymatic function of CD38, it is still conceivable that in CD38/VLA-4 double-positive cases CD38 can exert a supportive function in energy-dependent VLA-4 activation. The basis of this crosstalk remains to be elucidated.

Therapeutic implications
Collectively, the data demonstrate that CLL cells with highrisk features are in fact those that are most exquisitely dependent on microenvironmental stimuli for their survival and proliferation. Notably, the pathophysiological and prognostic importance of this crosstalk bears therapeutical consequences. Finding a therapeutic means of interfering with the bidirectional communication between CLL cells and the supportive microenvironment would go a long way to finding a definite cure for this disease. Besides single targeting of CD38 or VLA-4, disrupting the macromolecular complexes housing these proteins, or inhibiting downstream signaling, are all conceivable strategies. Additionally, immunomodulatory drugs such as lenalidomide, whose molecular mechanism of action is still unclear, may indirectly impact CD38 and VLA-4 expression and function, and this should be further investigated.
The ubiquitous expression of CD38 in many different cell types and tissues obviously raises concerns regarding the safety of widespread inhibition of CD38 function. Currently, there are three different anti-CD38 antibodies under evaluation for safety in clinical trials ( Table 2). Two monoclonal antibodies are being tested in multiple myeloma (daratumumab, identifier: NCT00574288 and MOR03087, identifier: NCT01421186; http://clinicaltrials.gov) and a third in selected CD38+ hematological malignancies including CLL (SAR650984, identifier: NCT01084252; http://clinicaltrials.gov). These antibodies are supposed to bind to CD38+ tumor cells and trigger antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity rather than inhibit the biological CD38 functions.
Treatment strategies using VLA-4 inhibitors supposedly interfere with the recirculation of CLL cells into bone marrow and lymph nodes. Recently, the recombinant anti-VLA-4 antibody natalizumab demonstrated the potential to overcome stromal cell-induced resistance of B cell lymphoma cells against cytotoxic drugs and rituximab in vitro [127]. Natalizumab is already approved as an anti-inflammatory drug, and a number of small molecule inhibitors for VLA-4 have been developed [61], primarily for use in multiple sclerosis or asthma. However, most of the clinical trials using these small-molecular-weight antagonists for VLA-4 have been terminated due to low efficacy or side effects of the substances. A new generation of currently developed VLA-4 inhibitors might overcome the previous problems and widen the therapeutic spectrum of VLA-4 antagonism towards tumor therapy. In fact, VLA-4 antagonizing nanoparticles recently demonstrated adhesion-inhibitory and cytotoxic effects that resulted in reduced tumor growth in a multiple myeloma mouse model [128].
Moreover, targeting of VLA-4 downstream signals might provide an alternative approach. VLA-4 antagonism is known to mobilize stem and progenitor cells from bone marrow [61], and its ligand VCAM-1 is highly expressed in both CLL BM and lymph nodes (unpublished observation). It is therefore expected that VLA-4 targeting will not only impede CLL cell recirculation to these lymphoid niches, but additionally mobilize tumor cells from lymphoid organs, similar to the effects seen with novel small molecule inhibitors. Notably, ibrutinib, the clinically active BTK inhibitor PCI-32765, was recently shown to impair VLA-4-mediated adhesion of CLL cells [129]. This is consistent with the clinical observation of a transient lymphocytosis of ibrutinib-treated patients due to mobilization of CLL cells from lymphoid organs into the peripheral blood [130]. Other small molecule antagonists used in clinical trials for treatment of CLL, e.g., the phos- MM multiple myeloma, AML acute myeloid leukemia, ALL acute lymphoblastic leukemia a All trials: refractory/relapsed patients phatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor CAL-101 [131], might also affect VLA-4-mediated cellular functions in CLL. Conclusively, it is evident that CD38 and VLA-4 are more than just markers of an aggressive CLL cell type and that they play functional roles in the pathobiology of the disease. As such, they represent therapeutic targets that may be exploited in addition to, or in combination with, the currently developed novel approaches of interfering with CLL cell-tumor host interactions. Targeting these molecules should also be tested for its potential in avoiding the frequent relapses and development of chemoresistance in CLL. marrow stromal cells protect CLL cells from spontaneous and druginduced apoptosis: development of a reliable and reproducible system to assess stromal cell adhesion-mediated drug resistance. Blood 114 (20)