Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients with Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: Cross-Sectional Study to Compare Active Surveillance and Immediate Surgery

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This cross-sectional study compared patient-reported outcomes of low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC, T1N0M0) between patients who underwent active surveillance (AS) and those who received immediate surgery,

Methods

Using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Short-Form 36 version 2, and a visual analog scale for neck symptoms, 249 patients under AS and 32 patients underwent immediate surgery were compared. To match the difference in time from the onset of treatment to the survey, we conducted propensity score matching. We also investigated factors affecting anxiety in patients under AS in multiple linear regression analysis.

Results

In the entire group, patients under AS had significantly longer time from the onset to the survey than patients underwent immediate surgery (7.9 vs. 4.0 years). After matching, AS group showed significantly better trait anxiety and mental component summary (MCS) compared to surgery group, while surgery group showed better role-social component summary. AS group also had significantly better MCS than the Japanese norm-based score. Surgery group displayed worse neck symptoms than AS group. Among AS group, trait anxiety and time from the onset were significant predictors of state anxiety. Compared with the group with < 5 years since starting AS, the group with ≥ 5 years of follow-up showed a significantly better state anxiety only in patients with better trait anxiety.

Conclusions

Low-risk PTC patients under AS showed better trait anxiety and mental health than surgery group. After a certain period, the anxiety of patients under AS seems to be improved, especially in patients with better trait anxiety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davies L, Welch HG (2006) Increasing incidence of thyroid cancer in the United States, 1973–2002. JAMA 295:2164–2167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Davies L, Welch HG (2014) Current thyroid cancer trends in the United States. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 140:317–322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahn HS, Kim HJ, Welch HG (2014) Korea’s thyroid-cancer “epidemic”—screening and overdiagnosis. N Engl J Med 371:1765–1767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sugitani I, Toda K, Yamada K et al (2010) Three distinctly different kinds of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma should be recognized: our treatment strategies and outcomes. World J Surg 34:1222–1231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ito Y, Miyauchi A, Kihara M et al (2014) Patient age is significantly related to the progression of papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid under observation. Thyroid 24:27–34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Takami H, Ito Y, Okamoto T et al (2011) Therapeutic strategy for differentiated thyroid carcinoma in Japan based on a newly established guideline managed by Japanese Society of Thyroid Surgeons and Japanese Association of Endocrine Surgeons. World J Surg 35:111–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC et al (2016) 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American thyroid association guidelines task force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 26:1–133

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Horiguchi K, Yoshida Y, Iwaku K et al (2021) Position paper from the Japan Thyroid Association task force on the management of low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (T1aN0M0) in adults. Endocr J 68:763–780

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sugitani I, Ito Y, Takeuchi D et al (2021) Indications and strategy for active surveillance of adult low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: consensus statements from the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgery task force on management for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Thyroid 31:183–192

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Jeon MJ, Lee YM, Sung TY et al (2019) Quality of life in patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma managed by active surveillance or lobectomy: a cross-sectional study. Thyroid 29:956–962

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yoshida Y, Horiuchi K, Okamoto T (2020) Patients’ view on the management of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: active surveillance or surgery. Thyroid 30:681–687

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Nakamura T, Miyauchi A, Ito Y et al (2020) Quality of life in patients with low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: active surveillance versus immediate surgery. Endocr Pract 26:1451–1457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kong SH, Ryu J, Kim MJ et al (2019) Longitudinal assessment of quality of life according to treatment options in low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma patients: active surveillance or immediate surgery (Interim Analysis of MAeSTro). Thyroid 29:1089–1096

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Moon JH, Ryu CH, Cho SW et al (2021) Effect of initial treatment choice on 2-year quality of life in patients with low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 106:724–735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nagaoka R, Ebina A, Toda K et al (2021) Multifocality and progression of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma during active surveillance. World J Surg 45:2769–2776

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sakai T, Sugitani I, Ebina A et al (2019) Active surveillance for T1bN0M0 papillary thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid 29:59–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hidano N, Fukuhara M, Iwawaki M et al (2000) Manual for the State-trait anxiety inventory-form JYZ [in Japanese]. Jitsumu Kyoiku-Shuppan, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  18. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene R et al (1983) Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y). Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto

    Google Scholar 

  19. Julian LJ (2011) Measures of anxiety: state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI), beck anxiety inventory (BAI), and hospital anxiety and depression scale-anxiety (HADS-A). Arthritis Care Res 63(Suppl 11):S467-472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Suzukamo Y, Fukuhara S, Green J et al (2011) Validation testing of a three-component model of Short Form-36 scores. J Clin Epidemiol 64:301–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Maruish M, Kosinski M, Bjorner J et al (2011) User’s manual for the SF-36v2 health survey, 3rd edn. QualityMetric Incorporated, Lincoln

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fukuhara S, Suzukamo Y (2004) Manual of SF-36v2 Japanese version. Institute for Health Outcomes & Process Evaluation Research, Kyoto

    Google Scholar 

  24. Husson O, Haak HR, Mols F et al (2013) Development of a disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire (THYCA-QoL) for thyroid cancer survivors. Acta Oncol 52:447–454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ellis PD (2010) The essential guide to effect sizes: statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW (2003) Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 41:582–592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sugitani I, Ito Y, Miyauchi A et al (2019) Active surveillance versus immediate surgery: questionnaire survey on the current treatment strategy for adult patients with low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma in Japan. Thyroid 29:1563–1571

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Sasaki T, Miyauchi A, Ito Y et al (2021) Marked decrease over time in conversion surgery after active surveillance of low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Thyroid 31:217–223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Menger F, Mohammed Halim NA, Rimmer B et al (2021) Post-traumatic growth after cancer: a scoping review of qualitative research. Support Care Cancer 29:7013–7027

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Davies L, Roman BR, Fukushima M et al (2019) Patient experience of thyroid cancer active surveillance in Japan. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 145:363–370

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to acknowledge and thank Dr. Toshiaki Otsuka, Department of Hygiene and Public Health, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan, for assistance with statistical analysis.

Funding

This work was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 20K08995.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HK, IS, and YY contributed to study concept, design, statistical data analysis, interpretation and writing; HK, IS, KT, MS, MS, and RN carried out acquisition of the data; IS and YY performed supervision and project administration; and IS performed fund acquisition. All authors contributed to drafting of the manuscript and critical revisions and agreed to publication of the submitted version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroko Kazusaka.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Consent participation

Written consent for participation was obtained after agreement based on the informed decision of the patient. This institutional review board of Nippon Medical School also approved this retrospective study using the prospectively collected database in 2019.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the ethics committee at Nippon Medical School Hospital (Approval No. R1-06-1153).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kazusaka, H., Sugitani, I., Toda, K. et al. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients with Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: Cross-Sectional Study to Compare Active Surveillance and Immediate Surgery. World J Surg 47, 1190–1198 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-022-06786-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-022-06786-5

Navigation