Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Platelet-Poor Plasma for Treating Facial Photoaging: a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Splitting Face Study

  • Original Articles
  • Non-Surgical Aesthetic
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

As the demand for non-invasive esthetic procedures to maintain a youthful appearance increases, there has been growing interest in the use of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-poor plasma (PPP) for the treatment of facial aging. However, there are few studies directly comparing the efficacy of PRP and PPP for facial rejuvenation.

Objectives

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of PRP and PPP for facial rejuvenation.

Methods

This single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted from January 1, 2022, to July 31, 2022, and included ten participants who completed the follow-up. The participants were randomly assigned to receive 2.5-mL injections of PRP and PPP on different sides of the face in three sessions with 1-month intervals. The outcome was primarily determined by blinded photographic assessments and secondly by scores of the VISIA® system during the follow-up.

Results

Both PRP and PPP treatments resulted in significant improvement in the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scales and Modified Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Scale for periocular Powered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation wrinkles, with no significant difference between the two groups. However, no improvement was observed in the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scales for nasolabial folds in either the PRP- or PPP-treated groups. Furthermore, no severe adverse events were reported.

Conclusions

Both PRP and PPP are effective in treating facial photoaging. PRP exhibited slightly superior efficacy in enhancing overall skin condition, while PPP was slightly more effective in improving shallow wrinkles. This study provides valuable evidence for the use of PRP and PPP in facial rejuvenation procedures.

Level of Evidence I

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hesseler MJ, Shyam N (2019) Platelet-rich plasma and its utility in medical dermatology: a systematic review. J Am Acad Dermatol 81(3):834–846

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang M, Park G, Zhou B, Luo D (2018) Applications and efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in dermatology: a clinical review. J Cosmet Dermatol 17(5):660–665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shahidi M, Vatanmakanian M, Arami MK, Sadeghi Shirazi F, Esmaeili N, Hydarporian S et al (2018) A comparative study between platelet-rich plasma and platelet-poor plasma effects on angiogenesis. Med Mol Morphol 51:21–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Janmey PA, Winer JP, Weisel JW (2009) Fibrin gels and their clinical and bioengineering applications. J R Soc Interface 6(30):1–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dashore S, Dashore A (2021) Platelet-poor plasma-based biofiller: An innovative alternative to expensive hyaluronic acid–based fillers for treatment of chicken pox scars. J Am Acad Dermatol 84(1):e11–e13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Neinaa YMEH, Hodeib AAEH, Morquos MM, Elgarhy LH (2020) Platelet-poor plasma gel vs platelet-rich plasma for infraorbital rejuvenation: A clinical and dermoscopic comparative study. Dermatol Ther 33(6):e14255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Elnehrawy NY, Ibrahim ZA, Eltoukhy AM, Nagy HM (2017) Assessment of the efficacy and safety of single platelet-rich plasma injection on different types and grades of facial wrinkles. J Cosmet Dermatol 16(1):103–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Doghaim NN, El-Tatawy RA, Neinaa YMEH (2019) Assessment of the efficacy and safety of platelet poor plasma gel as autologous dermal filler for facial rejuvenation. J Cosmet Dermatol 18(5):1271–1279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Man D, Plosker H, Winland-Brown JE (2001) The use of autologous platelet-rich plasma (platelet gel) and autologous platelet-poor plasma (fibrin glue) in cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 107(1):229–236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gentile P, Garcovich S (2023) Systematic review: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) use in facial rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000010150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cho EB, Park GS, Park SS, Jang YJ, Kim KH, Kim KJ et al (2019) Effect of platelet-rich plasma on proliferation and migration in human dermal fibroblasts. J Cosmet Dermatol 18(4):1105–1112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Abuaf OK, Yildiz H, Baloglu H, Bilgili ME, Simsek HA, Dogan B (2016) Histologic evidence of new collagen formulation using platelet rich plasma in skin rejuvenation: a prospective controlled clinical study. Ann Dermatol 28(6):718–724

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang HS, Shin J, Bhang SH, Shin J-Y, Park J, Im G-I et al (2011) Enhanced skin wound healing by a sustained release of growth factors contained in platelet-rich plasma. Exp Mol Med 43(11):622–629

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Park G, Qian W, Zhang M-J, Chen Y-H, Ma L-W, Zeng N et al (2021) Platelet-rich plasma regulating the repair of ultraviolet B–induced acute tissue inflammation: adjusting macrophage polarization through the activin receptor–follistatin system. Bioengineered 12(1):3125–3136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu P, Wu Y, Zhou L, Yang Z, Zhang X, Hu X, Yang J, Wang M, Wang B, Luo G, He W (2020) Platelet-rich plasma accelerates skin wound healing by promoting re-epithelialization. Burns Trauma 8:tkaa028

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang G, Li Y, Nishimura EK, Xin H, Zhou A, Guo Y et al (2008) Inhibition of PAX3 by TGF-β modulates melanocyte viability. Mol Cell 32(4):554–563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim D-S, Park S-H, Park K-C (2004) Transforming growth factor-β1 decreases melanin synthesis via delayed extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 36(8):1482–1491

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yun WJ, Bang SH, Min KH, Kim SW, Lee MW, Chang SE (2013) Epidermal growth factor and epidermal growth factor signaling attenuate laser-induced melanogenesis. Dermatol Surg 39(12):1903–1911

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Ya-Wen Tsai, MD and Chun-Yu Cheng contributed equally.

Funding

This study was funded by CMRPG5K0121, CGMH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yau-Li Huang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards (Institutional Review Board: 27 Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; IRB No. 2003120051).

Trial Registration

NCT05096650 [ClinicalTrials.gov].

Informed Consent

Patients signed informed consent regarding participating the study and publishing their data and photographs.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (ZIP 6377 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsai, YW., Cheng, CY., Hu, S. et al. Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Platelet-Poor Plasma for Treating Facial Photoaging: a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Splitting Face Study. Aesth Plast Surg 48, 2162–2170 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03822-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03822-0

Keywords

Navigation