Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Cell-Assisted and Conventional Lipotransfer in Facial Filling: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Review
  • Non-Surgical Aesthetic
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We aim to compare the efficacy and safety of cell-assisted lipotransfer (CAL) and conventional lipotransfer (CLT) in facial filling.

Methods

The PubMed and Embase databases were searched for relevant publications until February 2023. All studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of cell-assisted and conventional lipotransfer in facial filling were included. We calculated pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% CIs for continuous outcomes and pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% CIs for binary outcomes. The Cochrane's Risk of Bias Tool and the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) were used to evaluate the quality of studies.

Results

A total of 15 studies with 737 patients were included in this analysis. The fat survival rate and patient satisfaction rate were significantly higher in the CAL group compared to the CLT group (SMD: 3.04, 95% CI 2.09–3.99; RR: 1.34, 95% CI 1.08–1.67). However, no significant difference in complication rates (RR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.50–1.81) and a lower secondary operation rate in the CAL group (RR: 0.52, 95% CI 0.03–0.82) were observed. No obvious publication bias was observed in the funnel plot (Egger’s P values = 0.084 and 0.403).

Conclusions

Based on the pooled results, we tentatively conclude that CAL may have superior fat survival rate and satisfaction rate compared to CLT in facial filling, without compromising patient safety. However, the majority of the included studies were observational studies with small sample sizes. Future research should focus on investigating the long-term efficacy and safety of these techniques.

No Level Assigned

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The original findings detailed in this study can be found within the article. For additional inquiries, please contact the corresponding authors.

References

  1. Wetterau M, Szpalski C, Hazen A, Warren SM (2012) Autologous fat grafting and facial reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg 23(1):315–318. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e318241e1de

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bellini E, Grieco MP, Raposio E (2017) The science behind autologous fat grafting. Ann Med Surg 24:65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2017.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sommer B, Sattler G (2000) Current concepts of fat graft survival: histology of aspirated adipose tissue and review of the literature. Dermatol Surg 26(12):1159–1166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang Y, Wu Y (2017) Assessment of the clinical efficacy of cell-assisted lipotransfer and conventional fat graft: a meta-analysis based on case-control studies. J Orthop Surg Res 12(1):155. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-017-0645-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Laloze J, Varin A, Gilhodes J et al (2018) Cell-assisted lipotransfer: Friend or foe in fat grafting? Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 12(2):e1237–e1250. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2524

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Grabin S, Antes G, Stark GB et al (2015) Cell-assisted lipotransfer. Dtsch Arztebl Int 112(15):255–261. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2015.0255

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Sterodimas A, de Faria J, Nicaretta B et al (2010) Cell-assisted lipotransfer. Aesthet Surg J 30(1):78–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820x10362730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bertheuil N, Chaput B, Ménard C et al (2019) Adipose mesenchymal stromal cells: Definition, immunomodulatory properties, mechanical isolation and interest for plastic surgery. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 64(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anplas.2018.07.005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang C, Long X, Si L et al (2021) A pilot study on ex vivo expanded autologous adipose-derived stem cells of improving fat retention in localized scleroderma patients. Stem Cells Transl Med 10(8):1148–1156. https://doi.org/10.1002/sctm.20-0419

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Yin Y, Li J, Li Q, Zhang A, Jin P (2020) Autologous fat graft assisted by stromal vascular fraction improves facial skin quality: a randomized controlled trial. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 73(6):1166–1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2019.11.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Peltoniemi HH, Salmi A, Miettinen S et al (2013) Stem cell enrichment does not warrant a higher graft survival in lipofilling of the breast: a prospective comparative study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66(11):1494–1503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2013.06.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tissiani LA, Alonso N (2016) A prospective and controlled clinical trial on stromal vascular fraction enriched fat grafts in secondary breast reconstruction. Stem Cells Int. 2016:2636454. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2636454

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chiu CH (2019) Does stromal vascular fraction ensure a higher survival in autologous fat grafting for breast augmentation? A volumetric study using 3-dimensional laser scanning. Aesthet Surg J 39(1):41–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjy030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Stang A (2010) Critical evaluation of the Newcastle–Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 25(9):603–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC et al (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327(7414):557–560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315(7109):629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Chang Q, Li J, Dong Z, Liu L, Lu F (2013) Quantitative volumetric analysis of progressive hemifacial atrophy corrected using stromal vascular fraction-supplemented autologous fat grafts. Dermatol Surg 39(10):1465–1473. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsu.12310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gentile P, De Angelis B, Pasin M et al (2014) Adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction cells and platelet-rich plasma: basic and clinical evaluation for cell-based therapies in patients with scars on the face. J Craniofac Surg 25(1):267–272. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.scs.0000436746.21031.ba

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gentile P, Sterodimas A, Calabrese C et al (2020) Regenerative application of stromal vascular fraction cells enhanced fat graft maintenance: clinical assessment in face rejuvenation. Expert Opin Biol Ther 20(12):1503–1513. https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2020.1815703

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gontijo-de-Amorim NF, Charles-de-Sá L, Rigotti G (2017) Mechanical supplementation with the stromal vascular fraction yields improved volume retention in facial lipotransfer: a 1-year comparative study. Aesthet Surg J 37(9):975–985. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjx115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Koh KS, Oh TS, Kim H et al (2012) Clinical application of human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells in progressive hemifacial atrophy with microfat grafting techniques using 3-dimensional computed tomography and 3-dimensional camera. Ann Plast Surg 69(3):331–337. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e31826239f0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Li J, Gao J, Cha P et al (2013) Supplementing fat grafts with adipose stromal cells for cosmetic facial contouring. Dermatol Surg 39(3 Part 1):449–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsu.12058

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Onesti MG, Fioramonti P, Carella S et al (2016) Improvement of mouth functional disability in systemic sclerosis patients over one year in a trial of fat transplantation versus adipose-derived stromal cells. Stem Cells Int. 2016:2416192. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2416192

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Sasaki GH (2015) The safety and efficacy of cell-assisted fat grafting to traditional fat grafting in the anterior mid-face: an indirect assessment by 3D imaging. Aesthet Plast Surg 39(6):833–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-015-0533-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sterodimas A, de Faria J, Nicaretta B, Boriani F (2011) Autologous fat transplantation versus adipose-derived stem cell-enriched lipografts: a study. Aesthet Surg J 31(6):682–693. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820x11415976

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tanikawa DYS, Aguena M, Bueno DF, Passos-Bueno MR, Alonso N (2013) Fat grafts supplemented with adipose-derived stromal cells in the rehabilitation of patients with craniofacial microsomia. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(1):141–152. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182910a82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wei H, Gu SX, Liang YD et al (2017) Nanofat-derived stem cells with platelet-rich fibrin improve facial contour remodeling and skin rejuvenation after autologous structural fat transplantation. Oncotarget 8(40):68542–68556. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19721

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Yao Y, Cai J, Zhang P et al (2018) Adipose stromal vascular fraction gel grafting: a new method for tissue volumization and rejuvenation. Dermatol Surg 44(10):1278–1286. https://doi.org/10.1097/dss.0000000000001556

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yoshimura K, Sato K, Aoi N et al (2008) Cell-assisted lipotransfer for facial lipoatrophy: efficacy of clinical use of adipose-derived stem cells. Dermatol Surg 34(9):1178–1185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34256.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Toyserkani NM, Quaade ML, Sørensen JA (2016) Cell-assisted lipotransfer: a systematic review of its efficacy. Aesthetic Plast Surg 40(2):309–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-016-0613-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Rasmussen BS, Lykke Sørensen C, Vester-Glowinski PV et al (2017) Effect, feasibility, and clinical relevance of cell enrichment in large volume fat grafting: a systematic review. Aesthet Surg J 37(suppl_3):S46-s58. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjx008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ito S, Kai Y, Masuda T et al (2017) Long-term outcome of adipose-derived regenerative cell-enriched autologous fat transplantation for reconstruction after breast-conserving surgery for Japanese women with breast cancer. Surg Today 47(12):1500–1511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-017-1544-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tiryaki T, Findikli N, Tiryaki D (2011) Staged stem cell-enriched tissue (SET) injections for soft tissue augmentation in hostile recipient areas: a preliminary report. Aesthet Plast Surg 35(6):965–971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-011-9716-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hsu VM, Stransky CA, Bucky LP, Percec I (2012) Fat grafting’s past, present, and future: why adipose tissue is emerging as a critical link to the advancement of regenerative medicine. Aesthet Surg J 32(7):892–899. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820x12455658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhao J, Chen J, Xu C et al (2023) The efficacy of cell-assisted versus conventional lipotransfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Surg 46(1):35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.04.031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Tonnard P, Verpaele A, Peeters G et al (2013) Nanofat grafting: basic research and clinical applications. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(4):1017–1026. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829fe1b0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Aronowitz JA, Ellenhorn JDI (2013) Adipose stromal vascular fraction isolation: a head-to-head comparison of four commercial cell separation systems. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(6):932e-e939. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a80652

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Chaput B, Bertheuil N, Escubes M et al (2016) Mechanically isolated stromal vascular fraction provides a valid and useful collagenase-free alternative technique: a comparative study. Plast Reconstr Surg 138(4):807–819. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000002494

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Girard P, Dulong J, Duisit J et al (2022) Modified nanofat grafting: Stromal vascular fraction simple and efficient mechanical isolation technique and perspectives in clinical recellularization applications. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 10:895735. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.895735

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SS and YS conceived and designed the study. SS, HH and HR were responsible for data collection and analysis, and SS wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the final submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ying Shao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors confirm that this study was conducted without any commercial or financial affiliations that could be perceived as a potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 254 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shen, S., Huo, H., Ren, H. et al. Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Cell-Assisted and Conventional Lipotransfer in Facial Filling: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Aesth Plast Surg 48, 1444–1456 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03650-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03650-2

Keywords

Navigation