Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Postoperative Complications Following Prepectoral Versus Partial Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using ADM: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Zhu L, Liu C (2023) Postoperative complications following prepectoral versus partial subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction using ADM: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthet Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00266-023-03296-0/FIGURES/10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ribuffo D, Berna G, De Vita R et al (2020) Dual-plane retro-pectoral versus pre-pectoral DTI breast reconstruction: an Italian multicenter experience. Aesthet Plast Surg 45:51–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01892-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boers N, Bleys RL, Schellekens PP (2022) The nerve supply to the pectoralis major: an anatomical study and clinical application of the denervation in subpectoral breast implant surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 75:415–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2021.05.055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bernini M, Casella D, Mariotti C (2017) Selective pectoralis major muscle denervation in breast reconstruction: a technical modification for more effective and cosmetic results. Gland Surg 6:74550–74750. https://doi.org/10.21037/GS.2017.10.05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sbitany H (2017) Important considerations for performing prepectoral breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 140:7S-13S. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004045

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cuomo R (2020) Submuscular and pre-pectoral ADM assisted immediate breast reconstruction: a literature review. Medicina (Kaunas). https://doi.org/10.3390/MEDICINA56060256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cuomo R, Giardino FR, Neri A et al (2021) Optimization of prepectoral breast reconstruction. Breast Care 16:36. https://doi.org/10.1159/000506347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim JYS, Khavanin N, Jordan SW et al (2014) Individualized risk of surgical-site infection: an application of the breast reconstruction risk assessment score. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:351e–362e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000439

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Casella D, Kaciulyte J, Lo Torto F et al (2021) To pre or not to pre: introduction of a prepectoral breast reconstruction assessment score to help surgeons solving the decision-making dilemma. Retrospective results of a multicenter experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 147:1278–1286. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000008120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Oleck NC, Biswas S, Shammas RL et al (2022) An ounce of prediction is worth a pound of cure: risk calculators in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 10:e4324. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004324

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Nothing to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Strada delle Scotte, 4, 53100, Siena, Italy

    Daniele Fusario & Donato Casella

Authors
  1. Daniele Fusario
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Donato Casella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniele Fusario.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fusario, D., Casella, D. Postoperative Complications Following Prepectoral Versus Partial Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using ADM: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Aesth Plast Surg 48, 13–14 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03370-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03370-7

Search

Navigation