Abstract
The introduction of species outside their native range is an insidious form of human-induced environmental change, with mounting evidence that behaviour, either through plastic behavioural responses or adaptive changes, can play a vital role in mediating invasion success. In particular, when species invade non-native habitats, they often leave behind native predators. Altered predator assemblages may then result in changes to antipredator responses overtime. Here, we capitalise on the well-characterised invasion history of an Australian reptile, the delicate skink, Lampropholis delicata, to investigate differences in antipredator responses between an invasive island population (Lord Howe Island) and its original mainland source (Coffs Harbour) following 40 generations of isolation. Specifically, we examined the responses of invasive and native skinks to scent cues taken from huntsman spiders, Heteropoda sp., a predator present in both populations, and red-bellied black snakes, Pseudechis porphyriacus, a predator absent from the invasive range. We measured the time skinks took to emerge from a shelter site and subsequent basking and foraging behaviours in the absence and presence of each predator scent. We did not detect any differences in responses between native and invasive skinks, although predator scent affected foraging behaviour. In a separate experiment, lizards were faced with a simulated bird strike and had the choice of retreating under a snake-scented or unscented shelter. When faced with such a threat, we found that skinks did not avoid snake-scented shelters. We also measured the activity and exploratory behaviour of each skink prior to exposure to predator cues, finding that increased activity and exploration appears to be linked to reduced antipredator behaviour for invasive but not native skinks. Contrary to our initial predictions, our results suggest that the relaxation of pressure from native predators may not necessarily translate to changes in key antipredator responses in invasive species, even after 40 generations of isolation.
Significance statement
Human movement introduce species into novel areas, where they are confronted with a suite of ecological challenges that must be navigated, including changes to predator assemblages, in order to successfully establish and become invasive. Altered predator assemblages encountered by invasive species may, in turn, result in changes to, or loss of, antipredator responses over time. We studied such a scenario in the delicate skink, an Australian lizard that has been repeatedly introduced to new areas. We compared the antipredator behaviour of skinks from an invasive island population to skinks from their original mainland source. We found that despite 40 generations of isolation, invasive skinks do not differ from native skinks in their antipredator behaviour. However, we found that greater activity and exploration levels had become linked to reduced antipredator behaviour in invasive but not native skinks.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data
All data are available via FigShare (https://doi.org/10.26180/14451129.v2).
Code availability
All code is available via FigShare (https://doi.org/10.26180/14451129.v2).
References
Adler GH, Levins R (1994) The island syndrome in rodent populations. Q Rev Biol 69:473–490
Atkins JL, Long RA, Pansu J, Daskin JH, Potter AB, Stalmans ME, Tarnita CE, Pringle RM (2019) Cascading impacts of large-carnivore extirpation in an African ecosystem. Science 364:173–177
Bates D, Machler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effect models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48
Bell AM, Sih A (2007) Exposure to predation generates personality in threespined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Ecol Lett 10:828–834
Blumstein DT (2006) The multipredator hypothesis and the evolutionary persistence of antipredator behavior. Ethology 112:209–217
Blumstein DT, Daniel JC, Springett BP (2004) A test of the multi-predator hypothesis: rapid loss of antipredator behavior after 130 years of isolation. Ethology 110:919–934
Carthey AJ, Blumstein DT (2018) Predicting predator recognition in a changing world. Trends Ecol Evol 33:106–115
Chapple DG, Simmonds SM, Wong BBM (2012) Can behavioral and personality traits influence the success of unintentional species introductions? Trends Ecol Evol 27:57–64
Chapple DG, Miller KA, Kraus F, Thompson MB (2013) Divergent introduction histories among invasive populations of the delicate skink (Lampropholis delicata): has the importance of genetic admixture in the success of biological invasions been overemphasized? Divers Distrib 19:134–146
Chapple DG, Miller KA, Chaplin K, Barnett L, Thompson MB, Bray RD (2014) Biology of the invasive delicate skink (Lampropholis delicata) on Lord Howe Island. Aust J Zool 62:498–506
Cogger H (2014) Reptiles and amphibians of Australia. CSIRO Publishing Melbourne
Cresswell W, Quinn JL, Whittingham MJ, Butler S (2003) Good foragers can also be good at detecting predators. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:1069–1076
Damas-Moreira I, Riley JL, Harris DJ, Whiting MJ (2019) Can behaviour explain invasion success? A comparison between sympatric invasive and native lizards. Anim Behav 151:195–202
D’Amore DM, Popescu VD, Morris MR (2019) The influence of the invasive process on behaviours in an intentionally introduced hybrid, Xiphophorus helleri–maculatus. Anim Behav 156:79–85
Dillon KG, Conway CJ (2018) Nest predation risk explains variation in avian clutch size. Behav Ecol 29:301–311
Dingemanse NJ, de Goede P (2004) The relation between dominance and exploratory behavior is context-dependent in wild great tits. Behav Ecol 15:1023–1030
Dingemanse NJ, Wolf M (2013) Between-individual differences in behavioural plasticity within populations: causes and consequences. Anim Behav 85:1031–1039
Dingemanse NJ, Wright J, Kazem AJ, Thomas DK, Hickling R, Dawnay N (2007) Behavioural syndromes differ predictably between 12 populations of three-spined stickleback. J Anim Ecol 76:1128–1138
Downes S (2001) Trading heat and food for safety: costs of predator avoidance in a lizard. Ecology 82:2870–2881
Downes SJ (2002) Does responsiveness to predator scents affect lizard survivorship? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:38–42
Downes SJ, Adams M (2001) Geographic variation in antisnake tactics: the evolution of scent-mediated behavior in a lizard. Evolution 55:605–615
Downes S, Hoefer AM (2004) Antipredatory behaviour in lizards: Interactions between group size and predation risk. Anim Behav 67(3):485–492
Downes SJ, Shine R (1999) Do incubation-induced changes in a lizard’s phenotype influence its vulnerability to predators? Oecologia 120:9–18
Downes SJ, Shine R (2001) Why does tail loss increase a lizard’s later vulnerability to snake predators? Ecology 82:1293–1303
Dulude-de Broin F, Hamel S, Mastromonaco GF, Côté SD (2020) Predation risk and mountain goat reproduction: evidence for stress-induced breeding suppression in a wild ungulate. Funct Ecol 34:1003–1014
Durand J, Legrand A, Tort M, Thiney A, Michniewicz RJ, Coulon A, Aubret F (2012) Effects of geographic isolation on anti-snakes responses in the wall lizard, Podarcis muralis. Amphibia-Reptilia 33:199–206
Elgar MA (1989) Predator vigilance and group size in mammals and birds: a critical review of the empirical evidence. Biol Rev 64:13–33
Friard O, Gamba M (2016) BORIS: a free, versatile open-source event-logging software for video/audio coding and live observations. Methods Ecol Evol 7:1325–1330
Gaynor KM, Brown JS, Middleton AD, Power ME, Brashares JS (2019) Landscapes of fear: spatial patterns of risk perception and response. Trends Ecol Evol 34:355–368
Goulet CT, Thompson MB, Michelangeli M, Wong BBM, Chapple DG (2017) Thermal physiology: a new dimension of the pace-of-life syndrome. J Anim Ecol 86:1269–1280
Gruber J, Brown G, Whiting MJ, Shine R (2017) Geographic divergence in dispersal-related behaviour in cane toads from range-front versus range-core populations in Australia. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 71:38
Head ML, Keogh JS, Doughty P (2002) Experimental evidence of an age-specific shift in chemical detection of predators in a lizard. J Chem Ecol 28:541–554
Hua F, Sieving KE, Fletcher RJ Jr, Wright CA (2014) Increased perception of predation risk to adults and offspring alters avian reproductive strategy and performance. Behav Ecol 25:509–519
Jolly CJ, Smart AS, Moreen J, Webb JK, Gillespie GR, Phillips BL (2021) Trophic cascade driven by behavioural fine-tuning as naïve prey rapidly adjust to a novel predator. Ecology 102:e03363
Jones KA, Godin J-GJ (2010) Are fast explorers slow reactors? Linking personality type and anti-predator behaviour. Proc R Soc Lond B 277:625–632
Lahti DC, Johnson NA, Ajie BC, Otto SP, Hendry AP, Blumstein DT, Coss RG, Donohue K, Foster SA (2009) Relaxed selection in the wild. Trends Ecol Evol 24:487–496
Lapiedra O, Chejanovski Z, Kolbe JJ (2017) Urbanization and biological invasion shape animal personalities. Glob Change Biol 23:592–603
Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640
Marchant S, Higgins PJ, Ambrose SJ, Steele WK (2006) Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic birds. Oxford University Press, Melbourne
McCormick S, Polis GA (1982) Arthropods that prey on vertebrates. Biol Rev 57:29–58
Mettke-Hofmann C, Winkler H, Leisler B (2002) The significance of ecological factors for exploration and neophobia in parrots. Ethology 108:249–272
Michelangeli M, Wong BBM, Chapple DG (2016) It’s a trap: sampling bias due to animal personality is not always inevitable. Behav Ecol 27:62–67
Michelangeli M, Chapple DG, Goulet CT, Bertram MG, Wong BBM (2019) Behavioral syndromes vary among geographically distinct populations in a reptile. Behav Ecol 30:393–401
Michelangeli M, Melki-Wegner B, Laskowski K, Wong BBM, Chapple DG (2020) Impacts of caudal autotomy on personality. Anim Behav 162:67–78
Miller KA, Duran A, Melville J, Thompson MB, Chapple DG (2017) Sex-specific shifts in morphology and colour pattern polymorphism during range expansion of an invasive lizard. J Biogeogr 44:2778–2788
Monks JM, Nelson NJ, Daugherty CH, Brunton DH, Shine R (2019) Does evolution in isolation from mammalian predators have behavioural and chemosensory consequences for New Zealand lizards? NZ J Ecol 43:3359
Moule H, Chaplin K, Bray RD, Miller KA, Thompson MB, Chapple DG (2015) A matter of time: temporal variation in the introduction history and population genetic structuring of an invasive lizard. Curr Zool 61:456–464
Mueller JC, Edelaar P, Baños-Villalba A, Carrete M, Potti J, Blas J, Tella JL, Kempenaers B (2017) Selection on a behaviour-related gene during the first stages of the biological invasion pathway. Mol Ecol 26:6110–6121
Muralidhar A, Moore FL, Easton LJ, Jamieson IG, Seddon PJ, van Heezik Y (2019) Know your enemy? Conservation management causes loss of antipredator behaviour to novel predators in New Zealand robins. Anim Behav 149:135–142
Roff DA (1990) The evolution of flightlessness in insects. Ecol Monogr 60:389–421
Stapley J (2003) Differential avoidance of snake odours by a lizard: evidence for prioritized avoidance based on risk. Ethology 109:785–796
Stapley J (2004) Do mountain log skinks (Pseudemoia entrecasteauxii) modify their behaviour in the presence of two predators? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:185–189
Stapley J, Keogh JS (2004) Exploratory and antipredator behaviours differ between territorial and nonterritorial male lizards. Anim Behav 68:841–846
Therneau T, Grambsch P, Pankratz VS (2003) Penalized survival models and frailty. J Comput Graph Stat 12:156–175
Tingley R, Thompson M, Hartley S, Chapple DG (2016) Patterns of niche filling and expansion across the invaded ranges of an Australian lizard. Ecography 39:270–280
van Oers K, Klunder M, Drent PJ (2005) Context dependence of personalities: risk-taking behavior in a social and a nonsocial situation. Behav Ecol 16:716–723
Wright NA, Steadman DW, Witt CC (2016) Predictable evolution toward flightlessness in volant island birds. PNAS 113:4765–4770
Zanette LY, Clinchy M (2020) Ecology and neurobiology of fear in free-living wildlife. Ann Rev Ecol Evol S 51:297–318
Acknowledgements
We thank two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on the earlier version of this manuscript.
Funding
This study was conducted with funding support from the Australian Research Council (DP170100684, to DGC and BBMW), National Science Foundation Graduate Research Opportunities Worldwide Program (to CJ), and Australian Government Research Training Program (to ACN).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Animal collection, data collection, and analysis were performed by ACN and CJ. The first draft of the manuscript was written by ACN, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was conducted with animal ethics approval from Monash University (approval number 16736), and New South Wales (LHIB 09/18) and Victorian (permit number 10008946) scientific research permits. All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the use of animals were followed.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Communicated by C. R Gabor.
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
David G. Chapple and Bob B. M. Wong joint senior authors
This article is a contribution to the Topical Collection Using behavioral ecology to explore adaptive responses to anthropogenic change – Guest Editors: Jan Lindström, Constantino Macias Garcia, Caitlin Gabor
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Naimo, A.C., Jones, C., Chapple, D.G. et al. Has an invasive lizard lost its antipredator behaviours following 40 generations of isolation from snake predators?. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 75, 131 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-021-03064-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-021-03064-7