Abstract
Introduction
Since FDA approval for contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), clinical applications have increased to include diagnostic imaging of hepatic, renal, and other abdominal lesions. The modality has also demonstrated utility in certain image-guided procedures. Intravascular ultrasound contrast agents use microbubbles to improve visibility of solid tumors. Lesions not well seen on grayscale or Doppler ultrasound may become amenable to CEUS-guided biopsy or ablation.
Materials and Methods
This pictorial essay provides eleven examples to illustrate the current use of CEUS in a variety of abdominal image-guided procedures. Hepatic, renal, peritoneal, and soft tissue cases are presented.
Conclusion
CEUS can improve visualization and targeting in abdominal image-guided procedures, without nephrotoxicity or radiation exposure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gramiak R, Shah PM (1968) Echocardiography of the aortic root. Investigative Radiology 3(5): 356–366. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-196809000-00011
Brannigan M, Burns PN, Wilson SR (2004) Blood flow patterns in focal liver lesions at microbubble-enhanced US. RadioGraphics 24(4):921–935. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.244035158
Gulati M, King KG, Gill IS, Pham V, Grant E, Duddalwar VA (2015) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of cystic and solid renal lesions: a review. Abdom Imaging 40(6):1982–1996. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0348-5
Dietrich CF, Averkiou M, Nielsen MB et al. (2017) How to perform contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Ultrasound Int Open 4(1):E2–E15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-123931
Lorentzen T, Nolsoe CP (2019) The role of US contrast agents in US-guided biopsy of focal liver lesions: a pictorial review. Ultrasound Int Open 5(1):E11–E19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0770-4237
Huang DY, Yusuf GT, Daneshi M, Ramnarine R, Deganello A, Sellars ME, Sidhu PS (2018) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in abdominal intervention. Abdom Radiol 43:960–976. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1473-8
Lorentzen T, Nolsøe C, Ewertsen C et al. (2015) EFSUMB guidelines on interventional ultrasound (INVUS), part I – general aspects (long version). Ultraschall Med 36(05): E1–E14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1553593
Sidhu PS, Brabrand K, Cantisani V et al. (2015) EFSUMB guidelines on interventional ultrasound (INVUS), part II – diagnostic ultrasound-guided interventional procedures (long version). Ultraschall Med 36(06): E15–E35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1554036
Burak KW, Sherman M (2015) Hepatocellular carcinoma: Consensus, controversies and future directions. A report from the Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver Hepatocellular Carcinoma Meeting. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 29(4):178–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/824263
Omata M, Lesmana LA, Tateishi R et al. (2010) Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver consensus recommendations on hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Int. 18;4(2):439–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-010-9165-7
Chen C, Liang P, Yu J, Yu X, Cheng Z, Han Z, Liu F, Li X (2016) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation of renal cell carcinoma that is inconspicuous on conventional ultrasound. International Journal of Hyperthermia, 32:6, 607–613, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/02656736.2016.1172118
Emanuel AL, Meijer RI, Van Poelgeest E, Spoor P, Serné EH, Eringa EC (2020) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for quantification of tissue perfusion in humans. Microcirculation 27(1):e12588. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/micc.12588
Shakeri S, Afshari Mirak S, Mohammadian Bajgiran A et al. (2019) The effect of tumor size and location on efficacy and safety of US- and CT- guided percutaneous microwave ablation in renal cell carcinomas. Abdom Radiol 44, 2308–2315. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-01967-8
Jenssen C, Hocke M, Fusaroli P et al. (2015) EFSUMB guidelines on interventional ultrasound (INVUS), Part IV – EUS-guided interventions: General aspects and EUS-guided sampling (long version). Ultraschall Med 37(02): E33–E76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1553785
Piscaglia F, Nolsøe C, Dietrich CF et al. (2011) The EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical practice of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS): Update 2011 on non-hepatic applications. Ultraschall Med 33(1): 33–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1281676
Eisenbrey JR, Sridharan A, Machado P et al. (2012) 3D subharmonic ultrasound imaging in vitro and in vivo. Acad Radiol. 19(6): 732–739. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2012.02.015
Bracco Diagnostic, Inc. (2022) Lumason datasheet. https://imaging.bracco.com/us-en/products/contrast-enhanced-ultrasound/lumason. Accessed 26 February 2022
General Electric Healthcare (2022) Optison datasheet. https://www.gehealthcare.com/products/contrast-media/optison. Accessed 26 February 2022
Lantheus Medical Imaging, Inc. (2022) Definity datasheet. https://www.lantheus.com/products/overview/definity-3/. Accessed 26 February 2022
Claudon M, Dietrich CF, Choi BI et al. (2013) Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver - update 2012: a WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS and ICUS. Ultraschall Med 34:11–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1325499
Lindner JR, Belcik T, Main ML et al. (2021) Expert Consensus Statement from the American Society of Echocardiography on Hypersensitivity Reactions to Ultrasound Enhancing Agents in Patients with Allergy to Polyethylene Glycol (PEG). American Society of Echocardiography, April 2021. https://www.asecho.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/ASE-2526_FDA-EDC-Document_p5.pdf. Accessed 17 May 2022
Dietrich CF, Nolsøe CP, Barr RG et al. (2020) Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver-update 2020 WFUMB in cooperation with EFSUMB, AFSUMB, AIUM, and FLAUS. Ultrasound Med Biol. 46(10):2579–2604. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.04.030
D’Onofrio M, Crosara S, De Robertis R, Canestrini S, Mucelli RP (2015) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of focal liver lesions. Am J Roentgenol 205:W56–W66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.14.14203
Yoon SH, Lee KH, Kim SY, Kim YH, Kim JH, Lee SH, Kim TK (2010) Real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided biopsy of focal hepatic lesions not localised on B-mode ultrasound. Eur Radiol 20:2047–2056. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1757-z
Francica G, De Sio I, Meloni MF et al. (2018) Biopsy of liver target lesions under contrast-enhanced ultrasound guidance. A multicenter study. Ultraschall Med. 39(4): 448–453. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-122496.
Lekht I, Gulati M, Nayyar M, Katz MD, Ter-Oganesyan R, Marx M, Cen SY, Grant E (2016) Role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in evaluation of thermal ablation zone. Abdom Radiol 41(8):1511–1521. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0700-4
Catalano O, Sandomenico F, Raso MM, Siani A (2005) Real-time, contrast-enhanced sonography: a new tool for detecting active bleeding. J Trauma 59(4):933–939 doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000188129.91271.ab
Tagliati C, Argalia G, Polonara G et al. (2019) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in delayed splenic vascular injury and active extravasation diagnosis. Radiol Med 124:170–175 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-018-0961-9
Rafailidis V, Fang C, Yusuf GT et al. (2018) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of the abdominal vasculature. Abdom Radiol 43, 934–947. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1329-7
Helck A. Hoffmann RT, Sommer WH et al. (2010) Diagnosis, therapy monitoring and follow up of renal artery pseudoaneurysm with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in three cases.” Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation 46(2–3):127–137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/CH-2010-1339
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
Not applicable since no research involving human participants and/or animals was performed.
Informed consent
Not applicable since the manuscript contains no patient-identifiable data.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wilsen, C.B., Patel, M.K., Douek, M.L. et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for abdominal image-guided procedures. Abdom Radiol 48, 1438–1453 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-03804-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-03804-5