Skip to main content
Log in

What’s new in the hot gallbladder: the evolving radiologic diagnosis and management of acute cholecystitis

  • Review
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Acute cholecystitis (AC) is a common condition and its incidence is rising. New technologies have advanced the imaging diagnosis of AC, providing more structural and functional information as well as allowing the radiologist to distinguish AC from mimics and identify complications from both the disease and its management. Dual energy CT aids in detecting gallstones and gallbladder wall enhancement, which helps to diagnose AC and identify its complications. Similarly, contrast-enhanced and non-contrast perfusion ultrasound techniques improve detection of abnormal gallbladder wall enhancement. Advances in MR imaging including hepatobiliary contrast agents aid in characterizing post-cholecystectomy complications such as bile leaks. Newer interventional techniques have also expanded the suite of options for minimally invasive management. Lumen apposing metal stents provide more options for conservative treatment in non-surgical candidates and are compared to a standard percutaneous cholecystostomy. Radiologists should be familiar with these advanced imaging methods and intervention techniques and the value they can bring to the diagnosis and management of AC.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. [1] Stoker J, van Randen A, Laméris W, Boermeester MA (2009) Imaging patients with acute abdominal pain. Radiology 253:31-46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2531090302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. [2] Wadhwa V, Jobanputra Y, Garg SK et al (2017) Nationwide trends of hospital admissions for acute cholecystitis in the United States. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 5:36-42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/gastro/gow015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. [3] Huang J, Chang CH, Wang JL et al (2009) Nationwide epidemiological study of severe gallstone disease in Taiwan. BMC Gastroenterol 9:63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-9-63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. [4] Hanbidge AE, Buckler PM, O’Malley ME, Wilson SR (2004) Imaging evaluation for acute pain in the right upper quadrant. Radiographics 24:1117-1135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.244035149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. [5] Yokoe M, Hata J, Takada T et al (2018) Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 25:41-54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. [6] Pisano M, Allievi N, Gurusamy K et al (2020) 2020 World Society of Emergency Surgery updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute calculus cholecystitis. World J Emerg Surg 15:61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-020-00336-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. [7] Peterson CM, McNamara MM, Kamel IR et al (2019) ACR Appropriateness Criteria((R)) Right Upper Quadrant Pain. J Am Coll Radiol 16:S235-S243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2019.02.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. [8] Scheirey CD, Fowler KJ, Therrien JA et al (2018) ACR Appropriateness Criteria((R)) Acute Nonlocalized Abdominal Pain. J Am Coll Radiol 15:S217-S231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2018.09.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. [9] Chan WC, Joe BN, Coakley FV et al (2006) Gallstone detection at CT in vitro: effect of peak voltage setting. Radiology 241:546-553. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2412050947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. [10] Anderson SW, Lucey BC, Varghese JC, Soto JA (2006) Accuracy of MDCT in the Diagnosis of Choledocholithiasis. American Journal of Roentgenology 187:174-180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.05.0459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. [11] Harvey RT, Miller WT (1999) Acute biliary disease: initial CT and follow-up US versus initial US and follow-up CT. Radiology 213:831-836. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.213.3.r99dc17831

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. [12] Kiewiet JJ, Leeuwenburg MM, Bipat S et al (2012) A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of imaging in acute cholecystitis. Radiology 264:708-720. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12111561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. [13] Wertz JR, Lopez JM, Olson D, Thompson WM (2018) Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and CT in evaluating acute cholecystitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 211:W92-W97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.17.18884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. [14] Lopes Vendrami C, Magnetta MJ, Mittal PK et al (2021) Gallbladder carcinoma and its differential diagnosis at MRI: what radiologists should know. Radiographics 41:78-95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2021200087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. [15] Ng YS, Ananthakrishnan L (2018) Imaging of the gallbladder with multi-energy CT. Current Radiology Reports 6:46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40134-018-0305-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. [16] Silva AC, Morse BG, Hara AK et al (2011) Dual-energy (spectral) CT: applications in abdominal imaging. Radiographics 31:1031-1046. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.314105159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Uyeda J, Trinh T, Wortman J, Sodickson A (2016) The dual energy hot gallbladder and hot rim signs: evaluation of DECT iodine content in acute cholecystitis [abstr]. In: Radiology Society of North American Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting Program:132

  18. [18] Huda F, LeBedis CA, Qureshi MM et al (2021) Acute cholecystitis: diagnostic value of dual-energy CT-derived iodine map and low-keV virtual monoenergetic images. Abdom Radiol (NY) https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03202-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. [19] Uyeda JW, Richardson IJ, Sodickson AD (2017) Making the invisible visible: improving conspicuity of noncalcified gallstones using dual-energy CT. Abdom Radiol (NY) 42:2933-2939. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1229-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. [20] Chen AL, Liu AL, Wang S et al (2015) Detection of gallbladder stones by dual-energy spectral computed tomography imaging. World J Gastroenterol 21:9993-8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i34.9993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. [21] Yang CB, Zhang S, Jia YJ et al (2017) Clinical Application of Dual-Energy Spectral Computed Tomography in Detecting Cholesterol Gallstones From Surrounding Bile. Acad Radiol 24:478-482. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2016.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. [22] Li H, He D, Lao Q et al (2015) Clinical value of spectral CT in diagnosis of negative gallstones and common bile duct stones. Abdom Imaging 40:1587-94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0387-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. [23] Soesbe TC, Lewis MA, Xi Y et al (2019) A Technique to Identify Isoattenuating Gallstones with Dual-Layer Spectral CT: An ex Vivo Phantom Study. Radiology 292:400-406. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019190083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. [24] Gerstenmaier JF, Hoang KN, Gibson RN (2016) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in gallbladder disease: a pictorial review. Abdom Radiol (NY) 41:1640-52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0729-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. [25] Sidhu PS, Cantisani V, Dietrich CF et al (2018) The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in Non-Hepatic Applications: Update 2017 (Long Version). Ultraschall Med 39:e2-e44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0586-1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. [26] Meacock LM, Sellars ME, Sidhu PS (2010) Evaluation of gallbladder and biliary duct disease using microbubble contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Br J Radiol 83:615-27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/60619911

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. [27] Sagrini E, Pecorelli A, Pettinari I et al (2016) Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography to diagnose complicated acute cholecystitis. Intern Emerg Med 11:19-30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-015-1263-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. [28] Han H, Ding H, Ji Z et al (2019) Primary Application of Micro-Flow Imaging Technology in the Diagnosis of Hepatic Tumors. Ultrasound Med Biol 45:395-401. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.09.025

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. [29] Aziz MU, Robbin ML (2022) Improved Detection of Gallbladder Perforation Using Ultrasound Small Vessel Slow Flow "Perfusion" Imaging. J Ultrasound Med 41:511-518. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.15729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. [30] Krishnan P, Gupta RT, Boll DT et al (2012) Functional evaluation of cystic duct patency with Gd-EOB-DTPA MR imaging: an alternative to hepatobiliary scintigraphy for diagnosis of acute cholecystitis? Abdom Imaging 37:457-464. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-011-9785-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. [31] Ringe KI, Husarik DB, Gupta RT et al (2011) Hepatobiliary transit times of gadoxetate disodium (Primovist(R)) for protocol optimization of comprehensive MR imaging of the biliary system--what is normal? Eur J Radiol 79:201-5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. [32] Kang TW, Kim SH, Park HJ et al (2013) Differentiating xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis from wall-thickening type of gallbladder cancer: added value of diffusion-weighted MRI. Clin Radiol 68:992-1001. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2013.03.022

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. [33] Wang A, Shanbhogue AK, Dunst D et al (2016) Utility of diffusion-weighted MRI for differentiating acute from chronic cholecystitis. J Magn Reson Imaging 44:89-97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. [34] Beyazal M, Avcu S, Celiker FB et al (2014) The efficiency of apparent diffusion coefficient quantification in diagnosis of acute cholecystitis and in differentiation of cholecystitis from extrinsic benign gallbladder wall thickening. Jpn J Radiol 32:545-51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-014-0343-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. [35] Reilly DJ, Kalogeropoulos G, Thiruchelvam D (2012) Torsion of the gallbladder: a systematic review. HPB (Oxford) 14:669-72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00513.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. [36] Altun E, Semelka RC, Elias J, Jr. et al (2007) Acute cholecystitis: MR findings and differentiation from chronic cholecystitis. Radiology 244:174-183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2441060920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. [37] Kalloo AN, Kantsevoy SV (2001) Gallstones and biliary diseases. Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice 28:591-606. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4543(05)70055-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. [38] Yeo DM, Jung SE (2018) Differentiation of acute cholecystitis from chronic cholecystitis: Determination of useful multidetector computed tomography findings. Medicine (Baltimore) 97:e11851. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. [39] Smith EA, Dillman JR, Elsayes KM et al (2009) Cross-sectional imaging of acute and chronic gallbladder inflammatory disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:188-96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. [40] Yu JQ, Kung JW, Potenta S et al (2004) Chronic cholecystitis detected by FDG-PET. Clin Nucl Med 29:496-7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/01.rlu.0000132952.14515.9c

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. [41] Levy AD, Murakata LA, Rohrmann CA (2001) Gallbladder carcinoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 21:295-314. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.21.2.g01mr16295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. [42] Yin SN, Chi J, Liu L et al (2021) Dual-energy CT to differentiate gallbladder polyps: cholesterol versus adenomatous. Acta Radiol 62:147-154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185120916202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. [43] Sebastian S, Araujo C, Neitlich JD, Berland LL (2013) Managing incidental findings on abdominal and pelvic CT and MRI, Part 4: white paper of the ACR Incidental Findings Committee II on gallbladder and biliary findings. J Am Coll Radiol 10:953-6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2013.05.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. [44] Foley KG, Lahaye MJ, Thoeni RF et al (2021) Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps: updated joint guidelines between the ESGAR, EAES, EFISDS and ESGE. Eur Radiol https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08384-w

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. [45] Fei X, Lu WP, Luo YK et al (2015) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound may distinguish gallbladder adenoma from cholesterol polyps: a prospective case-control study. Abdom Imaging 40:2355-63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0485-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. [46] Boddapati SB, Lal A, Gupta P et al (2021) Contrast enhanced ultrasound versus multiphasic contrast enhanced computed tomography in evaluation of gallbladder lesions. Abdom Radiol (NY) https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03364-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. [47] Liu LN, Xu HX, Lu MD et al (2012) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of gallbladder diseases: a multi-center experience. PLoS One 7:e48371. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. [48] Hickman L, Contreras C (2019) Gallbladder cancer: diagnosis, surgical management, and adjuvant therapies. Surg Clin North Am 99:337-355. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2018.12.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. [49] Achong DM (2010) Pericholecystic rim sign on PET/CT secondary to locally invasive gallbladder carcinoma. Clin Nucl Med 35:720-721. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0b013e3181ea33a8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. [50] Bennett GL, Balthazar EJ (2003) Ultrasound and CT evaluation of emergent gallbladder pathology. Radiologic Clinics of North America 41:1203-1216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/s0033-8389(03)00097-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. [51] Katabathina VS, Zafar AM, Suri R (2015) Clinical presentation, imaging, and management of acute cholecystitis. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 18:256-265. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1053/j.tvir.2015.07.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. [52] Revzin MV, Scoutt L, Smitaman E, Israel GM (2015) The gallbladder: uncommon gallbladder conditions and unusual presentations of the common gallbladder pathological processes. Abdom Imaging 40:385-399. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0203-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. [53] Kim PN, Lee KS, Kim IY et al (1994) Gallbladder perforation: comparison of US findings with CT. Abdom Imaging 19:239-242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00203516

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. [54] Collins C, Maguire D, Ireland A et al (2004) A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited. Ann Surg 239:28-33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000103069.00170.9c

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. [55] Csendes A, Carlos Días J, Burdiles P et al (1989) Mirizzi syndrome and cholecystobiliary fistula: a unifying classification. Br J Surg 76:1139-1143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800761110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. [56] Hague J, Brennand D, Raja J, Amin Z (2010) Cystic artery pseudoaneurysms in hemorrhagic acute cholecystitis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 33:1287-1290. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-010-9861-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. [57] Chinn D, Miller EI, Piper N (1987) Hemorrhagic cholecystitis: sonographic appearance and clinical presentation. J Ultrasound Med 6:313-317. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.1987.6.6.313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. [58] Gutt CN, Encke J, Koninger J et al (2013) Acute cholecystitis: early versus delayed cholecystectomy, a multicenter randomized trial (ACDC study, NCT00447304). Ann Surg 258:385-393. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a1599b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. [59] Virzi V, Ognibene NMG, Sciortino AS et al (2018) Routine MRCP in the management of patients with gallbladder stones awaiting cholecystectomy: a single-centre experience. Insights Imaging 9:653-659. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-018-0640-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. [60] Noh SY, Gwon DI, Ko GY et al (2018) Role of percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute acalculous cholecystitis: clinical outcomes of 271 patients. Eur Radiol 28:1449-1455. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5112-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. [61] Kim D, Iqbal SI, Ahari HK et al (2018) Expanding role of percutaneous cholecystostomy and interventional radiology for the management of acute cholecystitis: An analysis of 144 patients. Diagn Interv Imaging 99:15-21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2017.04.006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. [62] Han D, Inamdar S, Lee CW et al (2018) Lumen apposing metal stents (LAMSs) for drainage of pancreatic and gallbladder collections: a meta-analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 52:835-844. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000000934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. [63] Lyu Y, Li T, Wang B et al (2021) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage versus percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis with high surgical risk: an up-to-date meta-analysis and systematic review. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A Online ahead of print Jan 5 2021 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2020.0786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. [64] Sureka B, Bansal K, Patidar Y, Arora A (2016) Magnetic resonance cholangiographic evaluation of intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct variations. Indian J of Radiol Imaging 26:22-32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.178283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. [65] Mungai F, Berti V, Colagrande S (2013) Bile leak after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: role of MR imaging. J Radiol Case Rep 7:25-32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3941/jrcr.v7i1.1261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. [66] Tewani SK, Turner BG, Chuttani R et al (2013) Location of bile leak predicts the success of ERCP performed for postoperative bile leaks. Gastrointest Endosc 77:601-608. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2012.11.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. [67] Aduna M, Larena JA, Martin D et al (2005) Bile duct leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: value of contrast-enhanced MRCP. Abdom Imaging 30:480-487. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-004-0276-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. [68] Chong VH, Chong CF (2010) Biliary complications secondary to post-cholecystectomy clip migration: a review of 69 cases. J Gastrointest Surg 14:688-696. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-1131-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. [69] Beldi G, Glattli A (2003) Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy for severe cholecystitis. Surg Endosc 17:1437-9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-9128-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. [70] Tumer AR, Yuksek YN, Yasti AC et al (2005) Dropped gallstones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the consequences. World J Surg 29:437-440. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-004-7588-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. [71] Lionberg A, Tullius T, Jiang T et al (2021) Comparing outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomy drain placement between patients within and outside of Tokyo guidelines diagnostic criteria for acute cholecystitis. Abdom Radiol 46:1188-1193. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02767-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. [72] Siddiqui A, Kunda R, Tyberg A et al (2019) Three-way comparative study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural gallbladder drainage using lumen-apposing metal stents versus endoscopic transpapillary drainage versus percutaneous cholecystostomy for gallbladder drainage in high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis: clinical outcomes and success in an international, multicenter study. Surg Endosc 33:1260-1270. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6406-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James P. Nugent.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work. The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Ethical approval

As this is a review paper, no ethical board approval or patient consent was required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nugent, J.P., Li, J., Pang, E. et al. What’s new in the hot gallbladder: the evolving radiologic diagnosis and management of acute cholecystitis. Abdom Radiol 48, 31–46 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03451-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03451-2

Keywords

Navigation