Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Histological and imaging features of myoepithelial carcinoma of the bone and soft tissue

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To depict histological and imaging features of myoepithelial carcinoma of the bone and soft tissue.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively examined histological features in 22 patients with myoepithelial carcinoma of the bone (4 patients) and soft tissue (18 patients) at a single institution. Imaging analysis of 15 patients (bone, 3 patients; soft tissue, 12 patients;) with preoperative images involved classifying lytic bone lesions via the modified Lodwick–Madewell classification; the growth patterns of soft tissue lesions were classified as well-defined, focally invasive, or diffusely invasive.

Results

Local recurrence occurred in eight out of 22 patients (36.3%). Four of 22 patients (18.2%) had metastasis at presentation, whereas 11 of 22 patients (50.0%) had distant metastasis during follow-up. Severe cytological pleomorphism was observed in 14 of 22 patients (63.6%), and 10 of 22 tumors (45.5%) showed ≥ 10 mitoses/10 high-power fields. Vascular invasion was observed in 10 of 22 patients (45.5%). Extracapsular/extraskeletal infiltration into the surrounding tissues was assessed in 20 patients, with 14 of them (70%) showing infiltration beyond the tumor border. Regarding imaging of bone lesions, two patients had Ludwick type IIIB, whereas one patient had type II. The growth pattern of soft tissue lesions was well-defined in two patients (16.7%), focally invasive in seven patients (58.3%), and diffusely invasive in three (25.0%) out of 12 patients.

Conclusion

Myoepithelial carcinoma of the bone and soft tissue presents high risk of local recurrence and distant metastasis. Histological and imaging features might be important to understand the aggressive behavior of the tumor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

In safeguarding privacy, providing the data is withheld. Requisite details are furnished within the supplementary table.

References

  1. Kong M, Drill EN, Morris L, et al. Prognostic factors in myoepithelial carcinoma of salivary glands: a clinicopathologic study of 48 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015;39(7):931–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Soft tissue and bone tumours. WHO Classification of Tumours. 5th ed. World Health Organization; 2020.

  3. Lavareze L, Scarini JF, de Lima-Souza RA, et al. Clinicopathological and survival profile of patients with salivary gland myoepithelial carcinoma: A systematic review. J Oral Pathol Med. 2023;52(2):101–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Savera AT, Sloman A, Huvos AG, Klimstra DS. Myoepithelial carcinoma of the salivary glands: a clinicopathologic study of 25 patients. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000;24(6):761–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hornick JL, Fletcher CD. Myoepithelial tumors of soft tissue: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 101 cases with evaluation of prognostic parameters. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27(9):1183–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Righi A, Cocchi S, Benini S, et al. Primary myoepithelioma of bone: a monocentric retrospective analysis of 8 patients with molecular confirmation. USCAP 2023 Abstr 75: Lab Investig. 2023;24–93.

  7. Suurmeijer AJH, Dickson BC, Swanson D, et al. A morphologic and molecular reappraisal of myoepithelial tumors of soft tissue, bone, and viscera with EWSR1 and FUS gene rearrangements. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2020;59(6):348–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Caracciolo JT, Temple HT, Letson GD, Kransdorf MJ. A modified Lodwick-Madewell grading system for the evaluation of lytic bone lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;207(1):150–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Benndorf M, Bamberg F, Jungmann PM. The Lodwick classification for grading growth rate of lytic bone tumors: a decision tree approach. Skelet Radiol. 2022;51(4):737–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Enneking WF, Spanier SS, Goodman MA. A system for the surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;153:106–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bisogno G, Tagarelli A, Schiavetti A, et al. Myoepithelial carcinoma treatment in children: a report from the TREP project. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014;61(4):643–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Manoso MW, Pratt J, Healey JH, Boland PJ, Athanasian EA. Infiltrative MRI pattern and incomplete initial surgery compromise local control of myxofibrosarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;450:89–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Aiba H, Ikuta K, Asanuma K, et al. Effect of neoadjuvant therapies on soft tissue sarcomas with tail-like lesions: a multicenter retrospective study. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(15):3901.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Giridhar P, Gupta P, Mallick S, Upadhyay AD, Rath GK. Impact of adjuvant therapy on survival in patients with myoepithelial carcinoma: A systematic review and individual patient data analysis of 691 patients. Radiother Oncol. 2019;140:125–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Aiba H, Errani C, Ciani G, et al. Myoepithelial carcinoma of soft tissues and bone. Eur J Cancer. 2023;194:113353.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chamberlain F, Cojocaru E, Scaranti M, et al. Adult soft tissue myoepithelial carcinoma: treatment outcomes and efficacy of chemotherapy. Med Oncol. 2019;37(2):13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hisaki Aiba.

Ethics declarations

Ethics statement

All procedures involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (approval number: CE-AVEC 642/2023/Oss/IOR). The requirement for informed consent was waived for this study due to its retrospective nature.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 18.7 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aiba, H., Righi, A., Spinnato, P. et al. Histological and imaging features of myoepithelial carcinoma of the bone and soft tissue. Skeletal Radiol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-024-04693-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-024-04693-5

Keywords

Navigation