Skip to main content
Log in

Biotechnological processes for conversion of corn into ethanol

  • Mini-Review
  • Published:
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ethanol has been utilized as a fuel source in the United States since the turn of the century. However, it has repeatedly faced significant commercial viability obstacles relative to petroleum. Renewed interest exists in ethanol as a fuel source today owing to its positive impact on rural America, the environment and United States energy security. Today, most fuel ethanol is produced by either the dry grind or the wet mill process. Current technologies allow for 2.5 gallons (wet mill process) to 2.8 gallons (dry grind process) of ethanol (1 gallon = 3.785 l) per bushel of corn. Valuable co-products, distillers dried grains with solubles (dry grind) and corn gluten meal and feed (wet mill), are also generated in the production of ethanol. While current supplies are generated from both processes, the majority of the growth in the industry is from dry grind plant construction in rural communities across the corn belt. While fuel ethanol production is an energy-efficient process today, additional research is occurring to improve its long-term economic viability. Three of the most significant areas of research are in the production of hybrids with a higher starch content or a higher extractable starch content, in the conversion of the corn kernel fiber fraction to ethanol, and in the identification and development of new and higher-value co-products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson B (2003) Targeting total growth. Ethanol Prod Mag 2003:38–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1981) Fuel alcohol: an energy alternative for the 1980s. National Alcohol Fuels Commission, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1999) Ethanol industry outlook 1999 and beyond. Renewable Fuels Association, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bothast RJ, Nichols NN, Dien BS (1999) Fermentations with new recombinant organisms. Biotechnol Prog 15:867–875

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan T (2003a) DDGS standardization: smart idea futile idealism. Ethanol Prod Mag 2003:24–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryan T (2003b) Pioneer ‘rapid assay’ identifies hybrids for above-average ethanol production potential. Ethanol Prod Mag 2003:36–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Butzen S, Haefele D, Hillard P (2003) Corn processing II: dry grind ethanol production, 13. Pioneer Hybrid International, Johnston

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheryan M (2002) Corn oil and protein extraction method. US Patent 6433146

  • Craig JA, Batie J, Chen W, Freeland SB, Kinkima M, Lanahan MB (2004) Expression of starch hydrolyzing enzymes in corn. In: Tumbleson M (ed) Corn: feedstock of the future. (Corn utilization and technology conference proceedings) Corn Utilization and Technology, Indianapolis

  • DiPardo J (2000) Outlook for biomass ethanol production and demand. Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.

  • Grohmann K, Bothast RJ (1997) Saccharification of corn fiber by combined treatment with dilute sulphuric acid and enzymes. Process Biochem 32:405–415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati M, Kohlmann K, Ladisch MR, Hespell RB, Bothast RJ (1996) Assessment of ethanol production options for corn products. Bioresour Technol 58:253–264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hespell RB, O’Bryan PJ, Moniruzzaman M, Bothast RJ (1997) Hydrolysis by commercial enzyme mixtures of AFEX-treated corn fiber and isolated xylans. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 62:87–97

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt DV (1981) The gasohol handbook, Industrial, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston DB, Singh V, Eckhoff SR (2003) Use of enzymes to reduce steep time and SO2 requirements in a maize wet milling process. US patent 6566125

  • Kovarik B (1998) Henry Ford, Charles F. Kettering and the fuel of the future. Automot Hist Rev 32:7–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Leathers TD (1998) Upgrading fuel ethanol coproducts. SIM News 48:210–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Merino ST, Cherry JR (2004) Summary of progress on DOE-supported cellulose research for the production of glucose from cellulosic biomass. In: Tumbleson M (ed) Corn: feedstock of the future. (Corn utilization and technology conference proceedings) Corn Utilization and Technology, Indianapolis

  • O’Bryan K (2004) Agronomic management of corn grain starch for ethanol and high extractable starch production. American Society of Agronomy, Moline

  • Shapouri HJ, Duffield A, Graboski MS (1996) Energy balance of corn ethanol revisited. In: ASAE (ed) Conference proceedings liquid fuel conference. ASAE, St. Joseph, pp 253–259

  • Shapouri HJ, Duffield J, McAloon A, Wang M (2004) The 2001 Net Energy Balance of Corn-Ethanol. In: Tumbleson M (ed) Corn: feedstock of the future. (Corn utilization and technology conference proceedings) Corn Utilization and Technology, Indianapolis

  • Singh V, Eckhoff SR (1996) Effect of soak time, soak temperature and lactic acid on germ recovery parameters. Cereal Chem 73:716–720

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh V, Moreau RA, Doner LW, Eckhoff SR, Hicks KB (1999) Recovery of fiber in the corn dry grind ethanol process: a feedstock for valuable coproducts. Cereal Chem 76:868–872

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Saricks C, Wu M (1997) Fuel-cycle fossil energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of fuel ethanol produced from U.S. midwest corn. Argonne National Laboratory for Illinois Department of Commerce and Community Affairs, Argonne

  • Wyman CE (2003) Applications of corn stover and fiber. In: White PJ, Johnson LA (eds) Corn chemistry and technology. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul, pp723–750

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. J. Bothast.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bothast, R.J., Schlicher, M.A. Biotechnological processes for conversion of corn into ethanol. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 67, 19–25 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-004-1819-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-004-1819-8

Keywords

Navigation