Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Production of malachite green oxalate and leucomalachite green reference materials certified for purity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Malachite green oxalate (MG oxalate) and leucomalachite green (LMG) have been prepared and certified as pure reference materials. The purities of MG oxalate and LMG were assessed by high-performance liquid chromatography–diode array detection (HPLC–DAD), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Karl Fischer titration, ashing and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). MG oxalate was purified by supercritical fluid extraction (SFE). Prior to purification, commercial MG oxalate purity was estimated to be about 90%. The main impurities present in SFE-purified MG oxalate were identified and quantified using HPLC–DAD. The main impurities were found to be monode-MG (monodemethylated MG oxalate synthesis impurity), 4-(dimethylamino)benzophenone (4-DMABP), MG-carbinol and LMG. The homogeneity of both reference materials was also determined. Issues associated with the stability of LMG and MG oxalate in solution forced an extensive study investigating different parameters i.e. solvent, acid, analyte concentration and temperature. MG oxalate (100 μg/mL) was found to be stable in acetonitrile containing 1% v/v glacial acetic acid for at least 155 days and LMG (100 μg/mL) was stable in acetonitrile for at least 133 days. The final purity value for MG oxalate was 94.3 ± 1.4% m/m at the 95% confidence interval (or 67% m/m if MG cation is reported). For LMG, the certified purity was found to be 98.8 ± 0.8% m/m at the 95% confidence interval.

Calibration reference materials for malachite green and leucomalachite green, certified for purity, are essential in characterising these key analytes in a fish matrix reference material

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Srivastava S, Sinha R, Roy D (2004) Aquatic Toxicology 66:319–329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pointing SB, Vrijmoed LLP (2000) World J Microbiol Biotechnol 16:317–322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Plakas SM, El Said KR, Stehly GR, Gingerich and Allen J L (1996) Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53:1427–1433

  4. Goldacre RJ, Phillips JN (1949) J Chem Soc 1724–1732

  5. EU Commission Decision (2004) 2004/25/EC, amending Council Directive 96/23/EC

  6. Andersen CA, Royal JE, Turnispeed SB (2005) J AOAC Int 88(5):1292–1298

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Scherpenisse P, Bergwerff AA (2005) Anal Chim Acta 529:173–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Turnipseed SB, Andersen WC, Roybal JE (2005) J AOAC Int 88(5):1312–1317

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Halme K, Lindfors E, Peltonen K (2004) Food Addit Contam 21:641–648

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. FAPAS (2004) Veterinary drug residue, FAPAS® Series 2 Round 59, November–December 2004. FAPAS report No0259

  11. Hall Z, Hopley C, Le Goff T, O’Connor G (2008) J Chromatogr B (in preparation)

  12. Bergwerff AA, Scherpenisse P (2003) J Chromatogr B 788:351–359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cho BP, Yang BP, Blankenship LR, Moody JD, Churchwell M, Beland FA, Culp SJ (2003) Chem Res Toxicol 16:285–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) (1995) Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement: G.4 Effective degree of freedom. ISO, Geneva

  15. International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) (2000) ISO guide 34: general requirements for the competence of reference material producers: 5.15 assignment of property values and their uncertainties. ISO, Geneva

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Chemical and Biological Metrology Knowledge Base Programme, which is funded by the UK Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills. The authors would also like to thank Nick Bosley, Mike Ludlow and Ben Joseph of LGC for their work on respectively TGA, NMR and moisture, and Andrew Busby of QinetiQ (Sevenoaks, Kent, UK) for his work on the SFE extraction.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Le Goff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Le Goff, T., Wood, S. Production of malachite green oxalate and leucomalachite green reference materials certified for purity. Anal Bioanal Chem 391, 2035–2045 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-008-2048-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-008-2048-2

Keywords

Navigation