Skip to main content
Log in

Atmospheric modelling in GPS analysis and its effect on the estimated geodetic parameters

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Permanently operating Global Positioning System (GPS) receivers are used today, for example, in precise positioning and determination of atmospheric water vapour content. The GPS signals are delayed by various gases when traversing the atmosphere. The delay due to water vapour, the wet delay, is difficult to model using ground surface data and is thus often estimated from the GPS data. In order to obtain the most accurate results from the GPS processing, a modelling of the horizontal distribution of the wet delay may be necessary. Through simulations, three such models are evaluated, one of which is developed in this paper. In the first model the water vapour is assumed to be horizontally stratified, thus the wet delay can be described by only one zenith parameter. The second model gives the wet delay with one zenith and two horizontal gradient parameters. The third model uses the correlation between the wet-delay values in different directions. It is found that for large gradients and strong turbulence the two latter models yield lower errors in the estimated vertical coordinate and wet-delay parameters. For large gradients this improvement is up to 7 mm in the zenith wet-delay parameter, from 9 mm down to 2 and 4 mm for the second and third models, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 7 May 1998 / Accepted: 1 March 1999

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Emardson, T., Jarlemark, P. Atmospheric modelling in GPS analysis and its effect on the estimated geodetic parameters. Journal of Geodesy 73, 322–331 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001900050249

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001900050249

Navigation