Laser welding of current collector foil stacks in battery production–mechanical properties of joints welded with a green high-power disk laser

The qualification of production systems that enable reliable and stable production processes is a major challenge in manufacturing large-format lithium-ion batteries. During cell assembly, the electrode sheets of the anode and the cathode are stacked, and are electrically contacted by a welding process. It was shown that laser beam welding employing a beam source in the green wavelength range is a promising joining approach in terms of high productivity. Therefore, the influence of the process parameters, such as the laser power, the welding speed, the pulse frequency, and the pulse duration, on the weld seam quality was investigated. Particular emphasis was placed on the mechanical strength of the weld seam. Statistically planned experiments were used to determine feasible parameter sets for welding the most common current collectors of lithium-ion battery electrodes, copper (Cu), and aluminum (Al). The influence of the individual process parameters on the tensile shear force was evaluated. Stacks of 40 metal foils were welded with a thin metal sheet in lap joint configuration. Based on an analysis of the requirements for minimum mechanical seam strengths, this study confirms that laser beam welding using a green high-power disk source is an auspicious process for the internal contacting of lithium-ion batteries.


Introduction
As a result of the transition to renewable energies, the demand for electrical energy storage systems is continuously increasing. Due to their high energy and power densities, lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are used in many applications, e.g., portable electronics, power tools, and electric vehicles (EVs) [1], as preferential battery technology [2]. LIBs are made of multiple electrochemical elementary cells composed of an anode and a cathode, which are electrically isolated by a separator layer [3]. The process chain for manufacturing LIBs consists of a large number of process steps. In the electrode production, electrochemically active materials are mixed with conductive additives as well as binding agents [4] Sophie Grabmann sophie.grabmann@iwb.tum.de 1 Institute for Machine Tools and Industrial Management (iwb), Boltzmannstrasse 15,85748 Garching, Germany and are coated on metallic current collectors to form porous electrode layers [5]. Due to different electrochemical potentials at the two electrodes, copper and aluminum foils are used on the anode and cathode sides as current collectors [6]. Low foil thicknesses (copper thickness: 6-12 μm, aluminum thickness 12-20 μm) are targeted to reduce the proportion of passive components, thus materials that do not contribute to the energy content of the LIBs [7]. For the production of LIBs, the electrode materials are calendered to adjust the porosity [8]. Subsequently, anodes and cathodes are cut out of the electrode coils [9] and are stacked or winded with separator layers [10]. Afterwards, the electrode sheets are mechanically and electrically conductively connected during the cell internal contacting process [11]. For this purpose, the individual uncoated current collector flags of the anodes and the cathodes are welded together and joined to an arrester tab. The tab is used to ensure the electrical current flow from the electrode stack during operation. The cells are finalized by packaging the stacks in a hard-case or pouch cell housing. The cells are filled with liquid electrolyte and the layers are wetted to ensure ionic conductivity [12]. After sealing the housing, the LIBs are electrochemically conditioned and are then ready for operation. During cell lifetime, the mechanical integrity of the weld seams connecting the individual collector foils must be maintained as the total requested power is conducted through the joints. The weld seams are subject to high-quality requirements, in particular, low electrical resistance and high mechanical strength [13]. Thus, a joining process exhibiting high reliability, e.g., avoiding weld spatter, is demanded.
Therefore, a profound understanding of the welding process is necessary. Previous research has shown that laser beam welding (LBW) is a promising joining method for cell internal contacting.

State of the art
Commonly, ultrasonic welding (USW) is used for joining the electrode current collectors [14]. The workpieces are clamped between a sonotrode and an anvil, applying a transversal ultrasonic vibration and a joining pressure [15]. This solid-state welding process is limited with regard to the process stability. High-frequency oscillations are introduced into the electrode sheets, which can mechanically damage the joining partners due to excessive welding energies [16]. Especially thin layers [17] are susceptible to defects, e.g., by cracking or substantial deformation. Besides transverse vibration, excitation of the components was reported to cause structural damage to the cell components [18]. Detaching particles pose a danger of short-circuits within the cell during cell operation [19]. Furthermore, progressing tool wear and poor weld tool alignment can affect the weld quality [20]. The need for accessibility to the joint from two sides is a limiting factor for the cell and the process design.
LBW, a contactless joining process, is a promising alternative alleviating the limitations of USW. Beam deflection using galvanometric scanning optics allows for a welding process with high geometric flexibility and scanning speeds of more than 5 ms −1 [21].
Using an overlap joint with a maximum number of joining partners of n = 2, basic investigations on LBW of metallic foils were carried out [22,23]. Due to the low thickness (< 100 μm) of the individual joining partners, the process is classified as micro-welding [24]. In comparison to macro-welding tasks, other boundary conditions apply due to the high surface-to-volume ratio. For example, thermal distortions by scaled energy input per unit length increase exponentially with decreasing material thicknesses [25] and cause a change in the gap distance of the joining partners. Therefore, the clamping technique is essential for a stable welding process [23].
Regarding the application of LBW for cell internal contacting, different infrared (IR) laser systems and joint configurations were investigated [26]. The most promising seam properties were achieved with an overlap configuration of the joining partners and a single-mode laser system. The better results in comparison to a multi-mode laser system were attributed to the smaller focus diameter, and thus, the higher energy density of the single-mode laser system. The use of support sheets on the top and the bottom of the stack prevented damage to the thin foils. However, in some cases, the seams showed a strong surface roughness. To prevent the detachment of these seam irregularities, a time-consuming smoothing of the weld after joining was necessary [26].
The mechanical loads applied to the joining components during USW were reduced using LBW [27]. Besides the multitude of surface layers between the joining partners, e.g., oxide layers, the air entrapped between the foils posed a major challenge. It remained as pores in the seams. Thus, an increase in the number of foils led to an increased porosity within the weld seams. A reduction of the welding speed caused larger pores and higher overall porosity [27].
With a beam oscillation process strategy applying IR laser radiation, the joining of copper foil stacks with up to n = 30 layers and layer thicknesses of d = 17-100 μm was enabled. Due to the low absorptivity of copper for IR laser radiation, the workpieces were brushed before joining to minimize back reflection of the laser radiation to improve the coupling of the beam. Aluminum foils with a thickness of 100 μm were joined successfully, while foils with a thickness of 20 μm were detached from the weld seam in the area of the heat-affected zone (HAZ) [28].
For the application of LBW in LIB production, it is important to avoid thermal damage to the temperaturesensitive cell components during joining. Another risk is posed by possible short circuits caused by particles or damage to the separator. Commonly used separators are made of polypropylene and have a melting temperature T m of around 135 • C [29]. If this temperature is exceeded, the pores of the separator can clog and block the ion transport within the cell [29]. A widely applied electrode binder (polyvinylidenfluoride (PVDF)) has a melting temperature T m of around 170 • C. Melting of the binder can cause the mechanical integrity of the electrode to be lost and particles to be detached. The heat input was significantly reduced during the LBW of copper foil stacks (n = 15) using millisecond spike pulses [30].
Different approaches are currently being discussed to further improve foil welding. Modern high-power laser beam sources in the visible wavelength range (400-780 nm) open up new opportunities for increasing the process reliability of cell internal contacting [11,31].
The absorption coefficient of copper materials at room temperature for green radiation is about seven times higher compared to IR radiation. Weld spatter and melt pool instabilities, which can occur in material processing with IR radiation, were therefore significantly reduced [32].
The copper material was melted at lower intensities regardless of the surface condition with green laser radiation [33]. The resulting weld seams without melt ejections were characterized by an exceptionally high surface quality [34]. Similar observations were made using a blue laser radiation for welding copper materials [35,36].
Using a green laser radiation, 30 foils were successfully joined in an overlap configuration [11]. Based on the evaluation of cross sections, it was shown that 20 layers of 8 μm thick copper foils can be welded in a overlap configuration using a blue laser radiation [35]. However, the process speeds are limited. In a further study, the maximum joinable number of copper foils was investigated (thickness: 8 μm and 10 μm). With an increasing number of foils, the welding speed had to be reduced successively. Up to 40 foils were joined in a lap joint configuration at a low process speed of 0.5 m min −1 [36].
The described studies proved the basic suitability of using green and blue laser radiation for welding foil stacks. Comparing the blue laser radiation source to the green laser radiation shows that the process speeds are significantly reduced using the blue laser radiation. However, the mechanical and electrical properties of the corresponding joints have not yet been investigated in detail. Furthermore, the effects of process parameters on the seam quality were not examined so far.

Objective and approach
Within this work, LBW as a process for cell internal contacting in LIB production was investigated. As stateof-the-art substrates for LIB anodes and cathodes, copper and aluminum foils were used for the experiments. The relationship between the process parameters and the resulting weld seam properties was examined. Special focus was placed on the mechanical properties of the weld seams since the detachment of foils in battery operation, e.g., due to shocks and vibration, leads to electrical contact loss and battery failure. A millisecond rectangular pulse welding strategy with a beam source emitting in the green wavelength range was used for the micro-welding process. First, suitable parameter windows were determined. Based on that, statistically planned experiments were performed to investigate the influence of the individual process parameters, the laser power, the welding speed, the pulse duration, and the pulse frequency. The tensile shear force F was selected as a quality measure and was quantified.
Last, the determined strengths were evaluated with regard to the requirements for cell operation based on calculated minimum tensile forces F min . For this purpose, different cell sizes with commercially common capacities and standard test specifications were used.

Laser system and welding set-up
The investigations were carried out using a disk laser emitting at a wavelength of λ = 515 nm with a maximum laser power of P max = 1 kW. The characteristics of the laser system are summarized in the Appendix (see Table 3). The minimum adjustable pulse duration t p for the selected laser system is 0.3 ms. To ensure a pulse welding process, the product of the pulse frequency f and the pulse duration t p must be below 1. In terms of technical feasibility, the product of the pulse frequency and the pulse duration was kept below 0.7 in the experiments. The laser beam was focused on the uppermost foil using a galvanometric scanning system. To ensure a gap-free welding configuration of the foil stacks, a clamping device as depicted in Fig. 1 was employed. To account for the production of large-format LIBs, an application-oriented welding task consisting of 40 metal foils and an arrester tab in a lap joint configuration was evaluated. Battery-grade copper (Cu-PHC, Schlenk AG, Germany) and aluminum (EN AW-1050A, Korff AG, Switzerland) foils with thicknesses of 10 μm and 15 μm respectively were connected to a 300 μm thick arrester tab (Cu-OF, Gemmel GmbH, Germany, and EN AW-1050A, Bikar GmbH, Germany). The dimensions and the materials of the test samples are specified in Table 1. To enable clamping for tensile testings, a rectangular geometry of 60 mm × 25 mm was selected for the joining partners. The overlap between the foil stack and the tab was l u = 12.5 mm. Each weld seam was 20 mm long and placed in the center of the overlap area as depicted in Fig. 1

Method for the welding experiments
For the welding tests, millisecond laser pulses with a quasirectangular temporal pulse shape were used. The welding strategies were characterized by the laser power P , the welding speed v, the pulse duration t p , and the pulse frequency f . Experiments with two fixed and two varied parameters each were conducted to define a parameter window. For the copper samples, the laser power and the welding speed were varied in steps of 100 W and 2.5 mms −1 , respectively. To account for industrially relevant processing times, the minimum welding speed was set to For aluminum, the frequency and the pulse duration ranges were chosen identically to the ranges used for copper, as these covered a wide spectrum of the technically feasible parameter room. The parameter ranges for the power and the welding speed were adjusted. The melting point of aluminum (T m = 660 • C [37]) is significantly lower than that of copper (T m = 1084 • C [37]).
Thus, lower power levels and higher welding speeds were selected for aluminum. A welding speed of v = 8 mms −1 was chosen as the lower limit and was varied in steps of 4 mms −1 with regard to the later orthogonal experimental design. The laser power was investigated in steps of 100 W starting at P = 650 W. The obtained weld seams were evaluated by visual inspection. The parameter sets of optically promising seams (see Section 4.3) were subsequently used to produce welds, using a central composite experimental design (CCD), to characterize the tensile shear force F . Each experimental design factor was examined on five levels, resulting in 25 individual parameter sets per block. A factor distance α = 1.4 was chosen to ensure an orthogonal design. The normalized factor values were −1.4, −1.0, 0, +1.0, and +1.4. The natural values of the factor levels for the tensile shear force tests were determined based on the optically inspected weld seams, see  Table 2 lists a summary of the absolute parameter settings for each factor. The complete test plans are summerized in the Appendix in Table 5 for copper and in the Appendix in Table 6 for aluminum. Three welds were produced for each parameter set.

Seam analysis
Visual inspection The welds were categorized into three groups by a visual inspection of the foil stacks from the top view, the arrester tabs from the bottom view, and  metallographic cross-sections of the weld. A weld was classified as under weld, when no complete bonding of the foils and the tab was achieved. Welds showing burns and visible heat penetration on the backside of the tab were assigned to the over weld group. The welded seams were also marked as over weld, if there were strong traces of carbon accumulation on the top of the seam. Welding carbonization must be avoided, as contaminating particles may be introduced into the cell. If none of these errors occurred, the welds were graded as good weld. In Fig. 2 the classification is shown by the example of the three weld types.

Cross-sections
For the metallographic analysis, the seams were cold embedded in epoxy resin to prevent a change of the seam properties and thus to enable a high degree of detection of all seam irregularities. The specimens were ground in three steps to the seam center (280, 600, 1200 grit) and then polished (3 μm, 1 μm, and oxide final polishing suspension (OPS)). As the last preparation step, the copper specimens were treated with an etchant with medium acidity (Klemm II) to prevent damage to the sensitive foils. The aluminum specimens were etched with Kroll reagent. Images of the cross-sections were taken on a reflected light microscope (MM40, Nikon, Japan).   Fig. 3. The upper and lower clamping jaws were offset by the thickness of the tab in order to prevent forces transverse to the direction of tension (z-axis). After applying a preload of 1N to compensate for clamping forces and to ensure a complete extension of the foils, the tensile test was performed at a feed rate of v t = 50 mm min −1 , according to DIN EN ISO 527-3 a standard for tensile testing of single foils. Exemplary test curves of lap shear tests for the copper samples with and without applying a pre-load are shown in the Appendix (see Fig. 10). For evaluating the mechanical strength of the seams, the tensile shear forces F were compared. In Section 5.4, a method is presented to calculate the required minimum tensile forces F min with regard to cell operations. After specimen failure, the fracture pattern was documented to conclude whether the weld seams or the bulk materials failed. The test parameters used for the tensile tests are summarized in Table 4. In addition, tensile tests according to DIN EN ISO 527-3 were performed on single copper (25 x 60 x 0.01mm) and aluminum foils (25 x 60 x 0.15mm) with the same geometry and clamping as used for the foil stacks for material characterization. These tests were performed 25 times each. The average tensile strength R m = F A of one copper foil was R m = 367 MPa ± 38.8 MPa and that of one aluminum foil was R m = 91 MPa ± 1.6 MPa.

Determination of a parameter window
The results of the experiments to identify a suitable parameter window are shown in Fig. 4.
First, the process window was narrowed down concerning both the laser power and the welding speed (see Fig. 4a). The frequency and the pulse duration were kept constant at f = 200 Hz and t p = 2 ms. At a laser power of P = 700W, no sufficient bonding was achieved for any welding speed ranging from v = 5.0 mms −1 to 12.5 mms −1 for copper. With a laser power of P = 1000 W, the weld seams were classified as good welds for v ≥ 10 mms −1 . At lower welding speeds, the increased heat input led to a burning of the upper copper foils. For welding the aluminium specimens (see Fig. 4d), under welds were observed for a laser power of P = 650 W at all investigated welding speeds, as well as for a laser power of P = 750 W at welding speeds of v = 16 mms −1 to 20 mms −1 . Optically promising weld seams (good welds) were achieved for all other investigated variations of the laser power and the welding speed. In general, for both copper and aluminum, the bonding decreased continuously with increasing welding speed v, which is referred to the reduction of the applied energy input per unit length.
At low frequencies, under welds were found for both materials (see Fig. 4b and e). Due to the bad connection for f = 100 Hz, this frequency was excluded for further tests. Using pulse frequencies of f = 250 Hz and higher led to over weld seams for copper. At a pulse frequency of f = 300 Hz an over weld was found for aluminum. Overall, increasing the pulse frequency implies linearly increased welding energies. If the laser power is additionally increased, the energy input per unit length increases quadratically. Therefore, over welds were found for high frequencies and high laser powers. At a pulse duration of t p = 1 ms, good welds were achieved at P ≥ 900 W (see Fig. 4c) for welding the copper foils. Figure 4f shows that all aluminium welds were classified as under weld at a pulse duration of t p = 1 ms. As longer pulse durations lead to a longer interaction time between the laser pulse and the material, more heat is transferred to the workpiece. Thus, good welds were obtained for either low powers and high pulse durations or high powers and low pulse durations. Combinations of high pulse durations and high laser powers led to over welds, while low laser powers together with low pulse durations led to under welds.

Influences of individual parameters on the tensile shear force
Based on the identified parameter windows, the influence of the individual factors and possible interactions with regard to the tensile shear force were investigated. Figure 5 shows the main effect diagrams with the corresponding confidence intervals for each main factor for copper and aluminum. The factor diagrams are based on a multivariate linear regression model. The abscissa is subdivided according to the used factor levels.
For copper, the mechanical strength increased with the factors laser power P , frequency f , and pulse duration t p . An increase of the welding speed v was followed by a decrease in the tensile shear force. Comparing the slope of the individual effect curves shows that the pulse duration had the most and the welding speed the least decisive influence on the tensile shear force. The effect diagrams of the aluminum samples show similar trends compared to the graphs of copper. The factors welding power P , frequency f , and pulse duration t p had a positive effect on the tensile shear force, while an increase in the welding speed v led to a reduction of the mechanical strength. Compared to copper, the confidence intervals were smaller, attributed to the overall lower scatter of the measured tensile shear forces for aluminum. In Section 5.3, this is discussed in more detail. In a direct comparison of the two materials, it must be taken into account that the leverage for increasing the tensile shear forces by adjusting the investigated factors is significantly lower in the case of aluminum.

Characteristics of the mechanical strengths
In Fig. 6 the determined tensile shear forces are shown as a function of the energy input per unit length E l = P · t p · f · v −1 .
Some parameter sets of the experimental plans correspond to the same energy input per unit length E l . Each parameter set is included as a separate data point in Fig. 6. Overall, the tensile shear force increased with the energy input per unit length. For lower line energies, tensile shear forces below 200 N were found for copper. Besides that,  Fig. 6 Mean values of the measured tensile shear forces F over the energy input per unit length E l for the copper samples (a) and the aluminum samples (b); the individual data points at one energy input per unit length correspond to different parameter sets of the CCD test plans (see Table 5 for copper and Table 6 for aluminum) with different combinations of the parameters the measured tensile shear forces scattered more at lower line energies. With increasing energy input per unit length E l , the tensile shear force converged towards 500 N for the copper and 100 N for the aluminum specimens. The standard deviation decreased significantly with an increasing energy input per unit length. The maximum tensile shear force was 514 N at an energy input per unit length of 108J mm −1 (P = 900 W, v = 5 mms −1 , f = 200 Hz, t p = 3 ms) for the copper specimens and 92 N for the aluminum specimens. The respective energy input per unit length was 87 J mm −1 (P = 925 W, v = 8 mms −1 , f = 250 Hz, t p = 3 ms).
These observations correspond with the fracture patterns that occurred (see Fig. 7). Two fracture modes were found. On the one hand, the failure occurred directly in the weld seam, as shown in Fig. 7a. This fracture pattern indicates that the weld was the weak spot and was observed in the specimens with a low tensile shear force and a maximum energy input per unit length of 64 J mm −1 for copper and 30 J mm −1 for aluminum. The second failure pattern detected, as shown in Fig. 7b, was cracking adjacent to the weld. In general, the damage emerged from the HAZ.
More heat is introduced into the workpiece with an increasing energy input per unit length, which correlated with higher tensile shear forces. Regarding the cross sections of the weld seams, an increased bonding between the foils and the arrester tab was observed (see Fig. 8). From Fig. 8a-c and from cross Fig. 8d-f, the energy input per unit length and the measured tensile shear force increased. The cross sections for the copper and the aluminum specimens showed that the total welding depth increased with the increasing energy input. An increased penetration into the arrester tab correlated with higher mechanical seam strength. DAS et al. made similar observations for welding steel foils [39].
At a low energy input per unit length, the lower range of the defined process window, in which a penetration into the tab can be achieved, is reached. Therefore, the welding depth and the weld seam width were small. Besides, the welding depth and the weld seam width were not constant over the entire seam length. As a result, significantly larger Directly next to weld seams, small gaps between the foil stack and the arrester tab were found (see Fig. 8). The clamping device for the welding experiments was designed to ensure a zero gap between the foil stack and the arrester tab. However, for process-related reasons, a welding recess is required in the clamping bridge. Therefore, no clamping force was applied directly next to the welding zone. The gaps between the foil stacks and the arrester tabs occurred due to the thermal expansion of the foils during welding and were mainly visible at high energy inputs per unit length. No direct correlation between the measured tensile shear forces and the gaps was found in the conducted experiments. Since the boundary conditions of the specimen fixation were the same for all parameter sets, the gaps were not evaluated in more detail.
The overall strength of the copper specimens was around five times as high as for the aluminum samples. Regarding the strength of the base materials, this is a significant difference. Based on the strengths of a single foil, determined in preliminary tests, a smaller difference was expected between the two materials. Therefore, it is concluded that the welding process caused a weakening of the aluminum foils. Regarding the cross sections of the aluminum foil stacks (see Fig. 8d-f), detachments of the seam from the foils were visible at the edges of the weld zone. Those seam irregularities were found in all examined specimens. The location of the fracture in the shear tests was congruent with the position of the detachments. Similar seam defects were already observed when welding 15 aluminum foils with a laser beam source emitting in the IR wavelength spectrum [27]. These detachments of the weld seams were weak points of the joint and were the starting point for foil ruptures causing the relatively low tensile strength of the aluminium specimens. In general, aluminum alloys show a high solidification shrinkage due to a high thermal expansion coefficient [40]. The rigid clamping impeded the material to post-flow, and detachments were formed in the weld seam. Besides that, embrittlement of the aluminum in the adjacent seam area can cause a decrease in mechanical strength [41]. A solution to reduce this seam defect may be an improved clamping device, which allows the material to post-flow. Another possibility can be the use of an adapted laser intensity profile to reduce the heat gradient [42].
In addition to the increasing weld depth, another phenomenon was observed. The seam collapse and the number of seam irregularities, like pores, increased with the overall energy input (increase of P , reduction of v). On the one hand, the bonding increased due to a higher welding depth, and on the other hand, the seam strength was reduced by seam defects and notches. Therefore, the tensile shear force converged to the described boundary value. With regard to the application in LIBs, parameter sets leading to strong over welds were excluded in the conducted experiments. Thus, the maximum energy input per unit length was limited. It is expected that with further increasing line energies per unit length, the tensile shear strengths would decrease. Similar observations were made for welding thin steel foils using a pulsed welding strategy. Within the experiments of VENTRELLA et al. the seam strength increased first with an increasing energy input per unit length but decreased after a certain level [43]. Concerning the mechanical seam properties as well as the processing times, parameter sets with high welding speeds resulting in an energy input per unit length above 65 J mm −1 within the pre-defined parameter window are recommended for copper.

Requirements concerning the mechanical strength
Laser beam welding of foil stacks to a conductor tab is a feasible joining process, particularly in the production of pouch and hard-case cells. Regarding the mechanical design of the joint, the determined mechanical seam strengths must be related to the application requirements. Key design criteria for the strength of welded contacts in battery cells are testing standards for the load on battery cells in use [44]. According to [45], there are different authorization standards to perform safety tests for LIBs depending on their application. These tests aim at representing typical loads and at identifying critical points of the cells in laboratory pre-tests. This includes the reproduction of extreme and worst-case scenarios, such as car crashes or a mechanical penetration of the cell. For the application of LIBs in EVs, a crash poses saftey issues on the cell. [45] According to [44], testing standards based on crash scenarios are a key design criterion for the strength of welded contacts in battery cells to account for all requirements of the accreditation process of LIBs.
ISO 6469-1 provides testing methods for examining the occuring loads on LIBs. For vehicles with a total mass below 3500 kg, a maximum longitudinal acceleration of 28 g and a maximum transversal acceleration of 16 g act on the cells during a test cycle as defined in ISO 6469-1. The maximum combined acceleration a max corresponds to a max = 32 · g = 32 · 9.81 ms −2 . According to WISCH et al. the acceleration in real car crashes is below 20 g to 30 g [46]. In the assumed worst-case scenario, the weld between the arrester tab and the stack of current collector foils is completely loaded with the inertial force of the total stack. The minimum strength F min of the joint is then calculated from the acceleration a max and the stack mass m s according to F min = a max · m s . In Fig. 9, the dependency of F min on the mass of the stacks for different acceleration cases is shown. The measured maximum strengths from the experiments of this study are also plotted. Depending on the chosen acceleration, different permissible stack masses result.
The masses of different sample cell-stacks were calculated and are shown in Fig. 9. For the calculation of the cell masses, three different large-format cell sizes (cell scenario I, II, III) with capacities C = 34 Ah, 49 Ah, and 81 Ah, based on commercial common capacities for EV were used as examples [47]. All calculations were performed with a stack configuration of 41 anodes and 40 cathodes. The used cell materials (see Tables 9 and 8 Table 10) and the calculation formulae (see Eqs. 1a to 2) are documented in the Appendix.
The highest measured tensile shear force for copper was 514 N, which exceeds the strength requirements for all listed masses along the entire acceleration range. For aluminum, the seams in the shown set-up only meet the strength requirements up to a stack weight of 293 g. Therefore, for larger masses, contacting via two weld seams on the aluminum side or dividing the cell stack into two thinner stacks is recommended.
The design of the battery cell with regard to the mechanical properties must take into account the loadbearing capacity of the internal contact points. The calculation method shown for the minimum strengths provides a framework on which the length of the seams or the number of contact points can be calculated. It has to be considered that the calculation approach is based on the simplification of possible occurring loads. The method is not recommended to calculate the seam strength under dynamic loads, such as vibrations.

Conclusion and outlook
For the application of LBW for the cell internal contacting of LIBs, it is necessary to understand the process and to analyze the cause-effect relationships with the target variables. One objective is to ensure the mechanical strength of the weld seams, as this, together with a low electrical resistance, is a crucial criterion. In the context of this work, the tensile strength of cell contacts produced using green laser radiation was evaluated. First, parameter windows and different welding regimes for joining stacks of 40 metal foils with an arrester tab were identified. Subsequently, the influences of the individual parameters on the tensile shear force as well as the strength values were examined. The main observations from this work are: 1. The mechanical strength of the copper welds was about five times as high as for the aluminum welds. The maximum mean strength was 514 N for copper and 92 N for aluminum stacks. 2. Within the considered parameter range, the tensile shear force increased for both materials when the power P , the pulse frequency f P , and the pulse duration t P were increased, and the welding speed v was decreased. 3. For both materials, the pulse duration had the most decisive impact on the seam strength. A dependence between the energy input per unit length and the seam strength was found and quantified. 4. The tensile shear force was determined by the welding depth and the seam collapse. These two effects cancel each other out. Overall, the tensile shear force converged towards an upper boundary of the tensile shear force. 5. The mechanical strength of the aluminum joint was reduced by the occurrence of detachments of the weld seams from the foils. 6. The worst-case scenario of a crash can be used to design the cell internal contact point for EV applications. An adjustment of the weld seam geometry or the weld length allows an application-specific modification.
In future investigations, approaches to reduce the detachments of the weld seams from the foils within the aluminum samples should be considered. Further investigations should clarify if other input variables, such as the application of protective gas or the clamping force, cause a significant impact on the mechanical strength of aluminum foil stacks. Besides the mechanical properties, the electrical resistance is an important seam property of the cell internal contact. Therefore, the electrical properties of the welded seams have to be evaluated. The thermal boundary conditions have to be taken into account for a comprehensive joining process design.      lap shear test with a pre-load of F pre = 1 N lap shear test without a pre-load tensile shear force F in N → elongation Δl in mm → foils were straightened by pre-load before testing foils were straightened by initial elongation during testing Fig. 10 Comparison of exemplary test curves of lap shear tests for the copper samples with and without applying a pre-load of F pre = 1 N. The applied pre-load ensured a complete straightening of the foils before testing

Table 10
Dimensions of the cell components (see Fig. 11 for a schematic drawing of the electrode) used to calculate the stack mass m Formulae to calculate the masses of the cell stacks in Table 7 with: volume V i , density ρ i , number of components i n i , porosity φ i , mass fraction w i Formula to calculate the cell capacity in Table 7 Nominal cell capacity C = V active material · c · n c · 2 = t coa · wi e,2 · l e,2 · φ e,2 · w NMC 622 · c NMC 622 · n e,2 · 2 ( 2 ) with: specific capacity c, thickness t, width wi , length l