Investigation of microstructure, mechanical and machinability properties of Mo-added steel produced by powder metallurgy method

This study presents the impact of molybdenum (Mo) inclusion on microstructure, mechanical, and machinability behavior of steels manufactured with powder metallurgy (PM) approach. PM steel samples with different molybdenum ratios were pressed at 750-MPa pressing pressure and sintered in the atmosphere-controlled tube furnace at 1400°C for 1 h. While particle size and distribution of phases of PM steels with different molybdenum ratios were determined by optical microscope, mechanical properties were determined by applying tensile test. The results were observed that 3% Mo weight-added steel displayed the maximum yield and tensile strength. In addition, the machinability properties of 3% Mo-added steel, which has the highest yield and tensile strength, were investigated. In this work, we researched the thrust force and surface roughness as machinability output, and drilling parameters on the output were determined by utilizing analysis of variance. Finally, SEM images were taken from the inner surfaces of the machined holes and the fractured surfaces from tensile test, and information about the machinability of this alloy produced with PM was presented. As a result, an increase in yield and tensile strength and a reduction in strain were identified with the increase in Mo content. Moreover, the coated cutting tools are better on the machining output than the uncoated cutting tools in terms of green environment. The most important factors on the Fz and Ra are the coating condition and the feed rate with 56.53% and 43.62% PCR, respectively.


Introduction
The steels are sensitive to heat treatment. In addition to the chemical elements, the ideal hardness; physical, mechanical, and electrical properties; and corrosion and high resistance to heat can be achieved as an outcome of the applied heat treatments [1,2]. Alloy steels continue to develop with dayto-day innovations in steel classes such as structural steels, tool steels, cold-hot work steels, speed steels, spring steels, stainless steels, and heat-resistant steels. With every new research and innovations, alloy steels continue to meet the needs. The alloy steel is commonly employed in several sectors, namely, aircraft industry, auto industry, and structures (bridges, buildings) [3][4][5][6].
In unalloyed and low alloy steels, high alloy steels are used if the desired properties are not available or insufficient. In addition to increasing the mechanical strength at normal temperatures, this type of alloying aims to obtain some desired properties such as heat, scaling, corrosion resistance, temperature hardness, and non-magnetization. Molybdenum is used to counteract the temper brittleness tendency in low nickelchromium steels. The inclusion of around 0.3% molybdenum offers this. The impact strength of nickel and chromium steels with molybdenum added after tempering also increases significantly. It also increases the tensile and yield strength. Molybdenum possesses positive impact to avert grain development, increasing the hardening ability. It eliminates temper brittleness. During slow cooling from tempering temperature, carbide precipitation occurs at the grain boundaries of some alloys, which causes brittleness. Molybdenum eliminates this negative effect. Likewise, it rises the creep and wear resistance of molybdenum steels [7,8].
Molybdenum applications have revealed the suitability of steel structures to work in knocking places. It is frequently preferred in aircraft and ground vehicle engines and manufacturing sector steels. Molybdenum can also be used as a flame-resistant coating for other metals. It was reported from Hossam et al. [9] that Mo in small amount increase the hardenability of steels when it was dissolved in austenite. Lee et al. [10] showed that molybdenum raised the impact of precipitation hardening in Nb-added HSLA steels. Junhua et al. [11] researched the outcome of Mo constituent on the mechanical and microstructure properties of high strength pipeline steel X80. It was reasoned that the volume fractions of acicular ferrite raised as the measure of increase in Mo content, which brought about an addition in yield strength and rigidity.
PM is the process of breaking metal and alloy powders into pieces without melting them under certain pressure and temperature. The prepared powders are bonded to each other by diffusion through sintering heat treatment, increasing the strength of the material [12,13]. Despite the fact that the present steels are created as flat and tubular items, the making of forged steels has also accelerated in recent years. In addition, steel production is carried out by powder metallurgy method, although it is not sufficient today [14][15][16]. In the literature, there are some studies about PM steel production and microstructure mechanical property relationship. For example, Erden et al. [17] created V and Ti micro-alloyed steel with PM technique. They explored the sintering process by keeping it for 60 min. at 1150°C and found that the yield and tensile properties increased as Ti and V ratio (0.1-0.2%) increased. It can be attributed to the precipitation forming in particular TiC (N) and VC (N) during sintering and during cooling subsequent to sintering.
The elimination of machining is one of the ongoing goals of the PM industry. One of the major advantages of the PM process is that it requires very little secondary processing. Many parts are still used for close tolerance, better surface finish, and some post-production to create some geometric elements on the part which need secondary processing. PM market reviews have shown that around 60% of all parts require one of the machining operations [18]. Numerous parts have openings opposite to the pressing direction, narrow and long grooves, screw threads, etc. It requires additional machining operations to create geometric features and precise size and surface finish. With the widespread use of PM parts recently, more complex shapes are produced, which increases the need for secondary processing. PM parts have gained acceptability in recent years, as they increase the processing cost due to their poorer machinability and different machining difficulties compared to forged and cast parts [18]. This is due to the different material structure resulting from different production technique of PM materials. Therefore, when machining PM parts, it is initially performed with lower feeds and revolutions than forged materials of similar composition. Despite the poor machinability of PM materials, an advantage in processing is that the material that has to be removed in the form of chips is usually in smaller quantities than forged and bulk materials [19].
It is anticipated that the production of alloy steels will become even more important in the future, as small and complex parts, which are difficult to produce with conventional production methods, can be produced by powder metallurgy method. Although there are not enough studies in the literature on the machinability and development of steel materials produced by powder metallurgy method, there are a few studies. Since the machinability of PM steels is influenced by more variables than forged steels, their machining ability is less than wrought materials. For this reason, in the processing of PM steels, even for parts with similar chemical composition or mechanical properties with wrought steels, the processing conditions cannot be used exactly. In the machinability of PM workpieces, due to the porous structure, excessive tool wear often results in high cost and poor surface finish [18][19][20]. The processing of sintered compacts presents unique problems that are often not predetermined and whose examination is limited only by its quantity. The main factors affecting the machinability of PM products are given below: PM process characterization, material characterization, and machining parameters [21,22]. Although the machinability ability is low, some researchers have still examined the machinability of the materials produced by PM [19,21,[23][24][25][26]. The common point in these studies is to perform machinability tests as well as to evaluate the performances of cutting tools for one PM material produced with a certain chemical composition without mechanical properties. These machining studies were also performed by either coated or uncoated cutting tools. In the path of filling the gap in research, in this work, the production of a new type steel in the desired composition was manufactured by adding different proportions of molybdenum powder into Fe powders. The particle size and distribution of the phases of the alloy steels produced were determined by optical microscope. The shape, distribution, and type of sediments were analyzed with the help of SEM and EDS. Tensile test and hardness test were applied to alloy steel samples with different chemical composition prepared in tensile sample sizes after microstructure analysis. The % elongation, yield-tensile properties, and measured hardness values of the specimens are explained depending on the microstructural changes. The fracture type was determined by examining the fracture surface images obtained from the fractured tensile samples with the help of SEM. In addition, the machinability properties of 3% Mo-added steel, which has the highest mechanical properties among the manufactured samples, were investigated with coated and uncoated cutting tools.

Production of Mo-added PM steel
The mechanical, microstructure, and machinability properties of Fe-C and Fe-C-Mo alloy including various Mo ratios manufactured by PM were examined in this study. The dimensions of graphite, iron, niobium vanadium, and nickel powders used in the study are <20 μm, ≤180 μm, and <150 μm, and 96.5%, 99.9%, and 99.9%, respectively (Fig. 1).
Steel was produced by mixing in the chemical elements displayed in Table 1. The powders were evaluated in RADWAG AS-60-220 C/2 brand digital accurate scales with 0.0001 sensitivity at the rates given in Table 1, before the mixing process. The weighed powders were mixed without balls for 1 h with a triaxial mixer of TURBULA T2F tool.
The mixed powders were made into blocks by unidirectional compression in a 100-ton capacity press (Hidroliksan, Konya, Turkey) at a pressing pressure of 750 MPa in the form of a tensile sample in agreement with ASTM (E 8M) powder metal material standards. Sintering process is done to the sintering temperature of the samples at 5°C/min started with the rapid heating. After the temperature reaches the sintering temperature of 1400°C, the samples were remained at the temperature for one hour and transferred to room temperature by 5°C/min quickly cooled down and finally sintered. The manufacturing process of PM test samples is given in Fig. 2.
Sintered tensile samples are examined at 1 mm/min in the SHIMADZU (50 kN) tensile test setup. Flow stress graphs were achieved from each test. From these graphs, the yield strength (0.2%), tensile strength, and strain values of the samples were measured and the variation in mechanical properties due to the change in the molybdenum ratio in the chemical  Figure 3 presents the image of the tensile samples after pressing.

Microstructural preparation
Microstructural inspections were established with ×50-×1000 magnification Nikon Epiphot 200 optical microscope using 2% nital solution by taking images of different sizes. Densities of the samples were made as specified by Archimets principle with Radwag density kit (Bruker Alpha, Bursa, Turkey) brand density measurement kit. Ferrite and pearlite ratios of powder metal steels were made using the metalographic point count technique described by Gladman and Woodhead [8]. Hardness measurements were applied for all samples of unalloyed and alloyed steel by applying HV0.5 (0.5 kg) load in SHIMADZU hardness test setup. The hardness value was determined by taking the average of 5 hardness measurements from each sample. Spectral analysis studies were carried out with GNR Atlantis Optical Emission Spectrometer.

Machinability process
It has been employed to discover the elemental composition of alloyed PM steels produced in different chemical compositions. The chemical composition values aimed and obtained by this method were compared. According to the results, because the alloy with 0.55Fe-3Mo is the most durable, the machinability properties of this alloy were examined. Drilling process was chosen as the machining method and the cutting was explored with carbide drills (uncoated and coated). In the experiments, 3 different feeds and cutting speeds were used, and a total of 18 experiments were made, 9 tests for each tool. A fixed-point angle of 120 has been selected for coated and uncoated Carbide drills. Drilling trials were performed in the Johnford VMC-550 machining center located in the laboratory of Gazi University, Faculty of Technology, Manufacturing Engineering Department (Fig. 4).
Uncoated and PVD-coated high-speed steel (HSS) drill bits with a 5-mm diameter which are used in the experiments were supplied from KYOCERA cutting tool company. The drills have a helix angle of 30°and drill point angle of 120°. The factors for the experiment design were selected as the drill quality (T), the cutting speed (V), and the feed rate ( f ) in the drilling of Mo alloyed steels. The process parameters' levels   Table 2.
A clamping mold was designed and manufactured to carry out the experiments and to connect the samples to be drilled to the dynamometer. The measurements of shear forces and moments were carried out using Kistler 9257 A type dynamometer connected to the vertical machining center bench in the CNC machine tools. Experiments were done by taking the average value by repeating three times to obtain the best values. KISTLER 5070-A type amplifier (multi-channel) was employed to transfer signals from the four-axis piezoelectric dynamometer to the data reading card, which is used to obtain optimum results from the drilling tests, and KISTLER Dynoware software (2825A-02-01) was utilized to take the measurements.
The other purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of cutting tools (uncoated HSS and PVD-coated HSS) and machining variables on the surface quality of the hole in the drilling process and to reveal the most suitable machining conditions. The roughness values of the experiments conducted within the scope of the study were calculated in the Marsurf M 300 type surface roughness device of "Mahr" brand. Probe suitable for hole diameter is used to make surface roughness measurements. Surface roughness data were evaluated by five different measurements for each hole and determined by taking their arithmetic mean. Measurements were taken at the same distance (hole center) for individual hole, corresponding to the hole axis. For each measurement, the part was rotated at an equal angle. Hole measurement distance is taken as 1.75 mm. According to the drilling test results, the effect levels of the factors on the feed force (Fz), torque (T), and mean surface roughness (Ra) were estimated by applying analysis of variance (ANOVA) at 95% confidence interval. Experimental design and analysis of variance were carried out with the help of Minitab17 package program. In addition, SEM images were taken from the inner surfaces of the machined holes and the fractured surfaces from tensile test, and a comment will be made on the machinability of this alloy produced with PM.

Microstructure and mechanical properties of Mo-added PM steel
The microstructure analysis of sintered PM steels at 1400°C in argon atmosphere is given in Fig. 5. The images proved that the unalloyed PM steel is formed in ferrite and perlite phases. In addition, with the addition of Mo, it was observed that the  amount of perlite in the structure increased and with the addition of 2% Mo in weight, there were bainitic phases in the structure. In the addition of 4% and 5% Mo, a rise in number of pores and fall in the bainite phase was detected as a result of the excessive formation of MoC (N) deposits in the grain boundaries of Mo in the structure, and it is thought to affect the mechanical properties. Though porosity is not good for strength [14][15][16][17][18][19], the current study got small and spherical pores which are not adversarial to the strength of the current material. As seen in Table 3, the theoretical density before sintering, density and porosity after sintering were calculated. It is observed that the amount of porosity generally increases when the powder increases with the alloy on the metal steels [27]. During sintering, the powder grains fused together. After sintering, the density of the samples naturally increased. The mechanical properties of components formed by PM are related to the pore ratio. While pores act as centers where stress is concentrated, they also contribute to crack propagation [28].
Tensile test results obtained from samples with different alloy ratios are shown in Fig. 6.
Additionally, the tensile strength and strain values of PM steel samples are displayed in Table 4.
As seen in Fig. 6 and Table 4 rate and caused it to decrease after a particular value. This event is clearly seen in Fig. 6. While an increase in strength was observed in the additions up to 3% molybdenum by weight, this increase started to decrease linearly. Up to 3% Mo by weight, the development of precipitates such as MoC, MoN, and MoC (N) throughout and after sintering at the matrix and grain boundaries increased the strength by means of precipitation hardening, aggregation hardening, dispersion hardening, and grain size reduction strength enhancing mechanisms [29].  In addition, it was stated from Özdemirler et al. [5] that these precipitates caused an increase in strength by precipitation hardening, dispersion hardening, and grain size reduction mechanisms. Furthermore, the reason for the decrease in mechanical properties can be attributed to the addition of 4 and 5% Mo to unalloyed steel. It is seen that MoC (N) precipitates agglomerate excessively in the grain boundaries and the precipitates decrease the mechanical properties. As a matter of fact, Özdemirler et al. [5] observed in their study, the average particle dimensions increased a little with the increment of NbC ratio from 0.2 to 2% by weight. The reason for this was expressed as the excessive formation of large NbC deposits at the grain boundaries.
SEM microstructure and EDS analysis results of steel samples produced by PM method are shown in Fig. 7. The SEM microstructure in which Fe, C, and Mo are present in steel and carbide, nitride or carbonitride precipitates such as MoC (N) and Fe3C have been determined as a result of EDS examinations. It has been reported that these precipitates limit the growth of austenite grain and also increase the strength of the material by precipitation hardening [30].
The effect of alloying elements in solution on recrystallization of austenite is not strong. The inhibition of grain boundary progression by precipitated particles is substantially more than the impact of dissolved atoms [31][32][33][34]. From the SEM, EDS, and microstructure results, it was determined that the element Mo was present in solution and as a precipitated particle.
The EDS analysis results found in this study were compared with previous literatures; it shows that precipitates such as MoC (N) are formed in alloyed PM steels. In Fig. 7, it is found that MoC, MoN, and MoCN deposits are formed in the microstructure by adding Mo to unalloyed steel. SEM EDSs taken from the microstructure support this. As seen in Fig. 7, C amount in spectrum 1 taken from the precipitate is 3.12% by mass and Mo amount is 0.86, while C amount in spectrum 2 taken from matrix is 2.97, Mo amount is 0.65. The increase in the amount of C and Mo in the spectrum no. 1 indicates that this precipitate is MoC. Likewise, similar studies support this finding [35]. After the tensile test of the PM steel sample sintered at 1400°C, broken surface images were taken at ×250 and ×1000. When the SEM images of the alloy steel samples containing different Mo are examined (Fig. 8), the fractured surfaces displayed partially ductile (honeycomb structure) and partially brittle (separation planes) behavior. It was obviously observed that there are pores on all the broken surfaces. It can be attributed to the fracture occurred by the combination and advancement of micro spaces. Though, it is seen that the separation planes are an indicator of brittle fracture, which are most in alloy steels including 5% Mo, medium  in alloy steels containing 3% Mo, and the least in alloy steels containing 1% Mo. Furthermore, the large voids were detected in the PM steels. The existence of the gaps reveals that the precipitates like MoC (N) detach from the surface during the tensile test [36]. Shanmugasundaram et al. [37] in their study observed that these larger voids were created on the examined surfaces of PM steels including Cr, Ni, and Mo, and attributed this situation to the separation of carbide, nitride, and carbonitrides from the surface in the tensile tests. In consequence of the tensile tests, a rise in yield and tensile strength and a reduction in strain were detected with the increase in Mo, Cr, and Ni substance. The values obtained because of the tensile test show compatibility with the broken surface pictures.
Results from some samples are given in Table 5. Spectral analysis results show that the chemical composition planned before production and the chemical composition values obtained after production are compatible with each other.

Machinability results of 3% Mo-added PM steel
Quite possibly the main cost factor in machining is energy utilization. The power consumed during machining is one of the elements that decide the energy utilization [38]. In drilling operations, high thrust forces negatively affect the hole quality and tool reliability, while unnecessary (insufficient) forces affect the productivity negatively. In addition, surface roughness in machining is immensely significant in terms of providing the desired surface quality in the final product. Correctly determined cutting tools, cutting parameters and cutting conditions have a noteworthy consequence on the desired surface quality [39,40]. In this investigation, the effects a b c d of these variables on the thrust force (Fz) and surface roughness (Ra), which are an important machinability output in terms of surface quality, were analyzed. Figure 9 presents the Fz changes obtained by using different cutting parameters with uncoated HSS carbide, and HSS PVD-coated cutting tools. When the graphs are analyzed, it is seen that there is a decreasing trend in the thrust forces (Fz) in both tools due to the increases in cutting speed at the feed rates of 0.05-0.15 mm/rev. It can be said that this decrease on Fz with a rise in cutting speed is related to the reduction in the tool-chip contact region, and partly to the decrease in the yield strength of the material due to high heat with the increase in cutting speed [41,42]. Considering all the levels of the feed rate, by increasing the speed from 15 to 20 m/min, the decrease rate for coated and uncoated tools was estimated as 4.5% and 11.2%, respectively. This trend is 6.6% in the increase of the cutting speed from 20 to 25 m/min in the feed rate of 0.05mm/rev. However, in the same cutting speed increments, there is a slight increase in the feed rates from 0.1 to 0.15 mm/rev. These increases can be attributed to possible tool wear as a result of upsurge in heat at the cutting region and increased loads on the cutting tool at high speed-feed combination [43]. In addition, it is a b

Assessment of experimental thrust force
c d e f  appreciated that the negativities such as the fact that the drilling process is performed in a closed area and the chip evacuation becomes difficult due to the increased chip volume may be effective on this situation [44]. In all variables of cutting speed (15-25 m/min), depending on the increase in the feed rate, there is a rise in Fz values for both cutting tools. The volume of chip removed can be explained with the increase in Fz and feed rate [45][46][47][48][49][50]. For each cutting speed, it has been calculated by an average of 74.6% and 30% for uncoated and coated cutting inserts by increasing the feed rate from 0.05mm/rev by 100%. This increase was obtained by 200% of the feed rate for the same variables and 121.3% and 57.3%, respectively. In the light of all these results, it is conceivable to tell that the feed rate is more effective on the modification of Fz than the cutting speed. From the plotted graphs, it is clear that the outcomes obtained with coated cutting tools are lower than the uncoated cutting tools. When the Fz results were evaluated with regard to all speedfeed combinations, an average of 49.6% lower results were obtained for coated tools in comparison with uncoated tools. The lowest Fz value was obtained as 248 N at 0.05 mm/rev feed rate and 25 m/min cutting speed. Result attained for uncoated tools with the same parameters is 425 N. It can be explained by the fact that the changes obtained with coated cutting tools are better on the machining output than uncoated cutting tools in terms of efficiency, and this situation can be explained by the low friction coefficient of coated cutting tools and the effect of reducing the thrust forces by reducing the friction at the tool-chip junction [50][51][52][53]. Considering the energy consumption effects on costs, it can be said that coated cutting tools can be preferred over uncoated tools as they will be more efficient.
A statistical method, i.e., analysis of variance, was employed to determine the effect of tool coating, speed-feed combination on Fz and Ra. This analysis was performed at the 95% confidence level. ANOVA results for Fz are presented in Table 6. To communicate the impact of control factors on output statistically, the F values are taken into account in deciding the significance level (P) and the contribution rate. For the control factors to be statistically significant on the output, the P value must be less than 0.05, and the control factor with high F value is acknowledged in determining the factor that affects the most [54,55]. The effects of the drilling parameters in the study on the Fz are displayed as percentage contribution ratio (PCR) in Table 6.  According to Table 6, the utmost dominant factor on the Fz was the coating condition with 56.53% PCR followed by coating condition with 31.22% and 9.38% additive rates, respectively; the feed rate and coating condition * feed rate followed the interaction.

Assessment of surface roughness and chip formation
The changes in surface roughness obtained as an outcome of drilling with uncoated and PVD-coated drills are given in Fig. 10.
With increasing cutting speeds, the quality of the surface improved. This may be attributed to decreasing friction due to the decreasing of the material yield strength [56][57][58][59][60] by the temperature increase by increasing speed [61,62]. When the Ra value is examined in the given graphics; in all variables of the feed rate (0.05-0.15mm/rev), there is a reduction in Ra as a reason of increasing in cutting speed. In all values of the feed, the rise in cutting speed is observed to decrease the surface roughness by 10.6% and 15.2% on average for uncoated and coated tools, respectively. In the rise of cutting speed from 15 to 25m/min, Ra change was obtained as 19.8% and 36.6%, respectively.
According to the results of ANOVA accomplished at 95% confidence level, the effects of drilling parameters on Ra are displayed in Table 7.
According to Table 7, the effective factor on Ra was feed rate of PCR with 43.62%. The feed rate with the contribution rates of 36.75% and 17.02%, respectively, followed by cutting speed and coating condition.
Surface and chip images at increasing cutting speed variables are given in Fig. 11. There are no observable changes in the chip samples taken with the rise in cutting speed. It is visible that at high speed, burnt chips were formed as a result of more heat.
The volume of chip removed with the increase in feed rate, resist chip breaking, causes to increase the Fz [63] and indirectly the cutting temperature [64]. Reliant to cutting speed variables (15-25 m/min), the Ra rises with the increase in feed rate. It is understood from the plots that the mechanical loads that increase on the cutting tool negatively affect the surface quality [65]. In all cutting speed variables, from an increase of 100% (0.05-0.1mm/rev), an average increase of 14.5% and 35.1% was obtained for uncoated and coated tools,   Fig. 12. Furthermore, the chip formation becomes irregular and interrupted at higher feed rate. This phenomenon explains the reason for the increase on Ra.
Lowest Ra value for the coated tool was found as 1.51 μm at 25 m/min cutting speed and 0.05 mm/rev feed rate. The result obtained with the uncoated cutting tool was measured as 2.27 μm. When the Ra measurements are inspected according to all cutting parameters, the results obtained with coated cutting tools are on average 20.4% lower than the uncoated tools. The surface images obtained with both sets in these parameters are given in Fig. 13. In addition, the highest Ra  (Fig. 14). Moreover, the chip images obtained with uncoated and coated cutting tools are given in Fig. 15. The chips obtained with coated cutting tools are in the form of a more regular and smaller step helical chip form. This fact explains the better surface quality achieved with coated tools. Considering that it is one of the most vital criteria used in estimating the machinability of the material, it is possible to claim that coated cutting tools can be preferred over uncoated tools in terms of machined surface quality.

Conclusions
This investigation consists of the formation of a new type steel in the ideal structure was made by adding various extents of molybdenum powder into Fe powders. Tensile test and hardness test were applied to alloy steel samples with different chemical compositions to determine the strain, stress, and hardness values. Furthermore, the machinability properties of 3% Mo-added steel having the highest mechanical properties among the other manufactured samples were examined. The important results that are obtained from the study are summarized below. & Perlite ratio of powder metal steel with Fe-C composition sintered at 1400°C increased with the addition of alloying element. At the same time, the perlite ratio increased while the ferrite ratio decreased. & Generally, it has been observed that the tensile and yield strength increases, and the percent elongation decreases with the increase in the amount of molybdenum up to a certain level. The reason for the rise in strength is attributed to the increase of perlite amount of nickel in the microstructure and also to the bainite and martensite phases formed in the structure. & EDS analysis of PM steels reveals that Mo, C, and N elements and precipitates such as CrC (N) and MoC (N) formed by these elements are in the iron matrix. & It has been observed that steels with alloying element added have superior mechanical properties compared to PM steels that are not added. The reason for this is presumed to be related to the strong carbide builder of alloying elements or to transform the microstructure into a harder phase. Refining of grain size and precipitation hardening during sintering or cooling after sintering increase the strength of steel. & For each cutting speed, the increase of thrust force was calculated by an average of 74.6% and 30% for uncoated and coated cutting inserts, respectively, by increasing the feed rate from 0.05 to 0.1 mm/rev. & In the increase of cutting speed from 15 to 25m/min, decrease of Ra was obtained as 19.8% and 36.6%, respectively. & The most important factors on the Fz and Ra are the coating condition and the feed rate with 56.53% and 43.62% PCR, respectively. & The chip shape becomes erratic due to the increase in the feed rate and it is evident that the form of the chip is disrupted while no observable change with the rise in speed. The explanation for the increase of Ra is clarified by this circumstance.

Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate Not applicable Consent for publication The consent to submit this paper has been received explicitly from all co-authors.

Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.