Skip to main content
Log in

An application for modular capability-based ERP software selection using AHP method

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Enterprise resource planning (ERP) system selection is very important for a company as it completely affects production and service methodology of enterprises. Moreover, ERP selection is getting increasingly difficult because of a large variety of ERP software solutions available. The current study aims to select the most appropriate software between two elected candidates after some analysis for the final decision by using a technique with analytic hierarchy process (AHP) support in a factory which is planning to use ERP software that fits its functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Teltumbde A (2000) A framework for evaluating ERP projects. Int J Prod Res 38(17):4507–4520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Umble EJ, Haft RR, Umble MM (2003) Enterprise resource planning: Implementation procedures and critical success factors. Eur J Oper Res 146:241–257

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Yusuf Y, Gunasekaran A, Abthorpe MS (2004) Enterprise information systems project implementation: a case study of ERP in Rolls-Royce. Int J Prod Econ 87:251–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. James S (1996) A renaissance for process manufacturers. APICS. The Performance Advantage 45-61

  5. Davenport TH (2000) Mission critical: realizing the promise of enterprise systems. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  6. Verville J, Hallingten A (2001) Acquiring enterprise software: beating the vendor at their own game. Prentice-Hall, Englewod Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kvavik RB, Katz RN, Beecher K, Caruso J, King P, Voloudakis J, Williams L (2002) The promise and performance of enterprise systems for higher education. Research Study from the EDUCASE Center for Applied Research, Volume 4.

  8. Verville J, Halingten A (2003) The effect of team composition and group role definition on ERP acquisition decisions. Team Perform Manag 9(5/6):115–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Farbey B, Land F, Targett D (1994) Matching an IT project with an appropriate method of evaluation: a research note on evaluating investment in IT. J Inf Technol 9:239–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hall Z, Ezingeard JN, Grieve RJ (1997) Integrating the cost of a manufacturing IT/IS infrastructure into the investment decision making process. Technovation 17:11-12, 695-706

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar V, Maheshwari B, Kumar U (2003) An investigation of critical management issues in ERP implementation: empirical evidence from Canadian organizations. Technovation 23:793–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Verville J, Halingten A (2002) An investigation of the decision process for selecting an ERP software: the case of ESC. Manage Decis 40(3):206–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Clemons EK (1991) Making the investment decision: evaluating strategic opportunities in information technology. Commun ACM 34:22–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Anandarajan A, Wen HJ (1999) Evaluation of information technology investment. Manage Decis 37(4):329–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Maiden N, Ncube C (1998) Acquiring COTS software selection requirements. IEEE Softw 15, No.2, March/April

  16. Kontio J (1995) OTSO: a systematic process for reusable software component selection. Univ. Of Maryland Research Report CS-TR-3478 UMIASC-TR-95-63

  17. Sistach F, Pastor JA, Fernandez LF (1999) Towards to methodological acquisition of ERP solutions for SME, keynote paper in Proc. Of The First Int. Workshop on Enterprise Management and Resource Planning:Methods, Tools and Architectures (EMRPS’99), Venice, Italy.

  18. Wei CC, Chien C, Wang MJ (2005) An AHP-based approach to ERP system selection. Int J Prod Econ 96:47–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang T, Kuo CA (2003) A hierarchical AHP/DEA methodology for the facilities layout design problem. Eur J Oper Res 147:128–136

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Barbarosoglu G, Yazgac T (1997) An application oh the analytic hierarchy process to the supplier selection problem. Prod Invent Manage J, First Quarter, 14-21.

  21. Chan FTS (2003) Interactive selection model for supplier selection process: an analytical hierarchy process approach. Int J Prod Res 41(15):3549–3579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Badri MA (2001) A combined AHP-GP model for quality control systems. Int J Prod Econ 72:27–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Udo GG (2000) Using analytic hierarchy process to analyze the information technology outsourcing decision. Ind Manage Data Syst 100(9):421–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vaidya OS, Kumar S (2006) Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. Eur J Oper Res 169(1):1–29

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Zadehi F (1986) The analytic hierarchy process-a survey of method and its applications. Interfaces 16-4:96–108

    Google Scholar 

  26. Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48(1):9-26

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nevin Karaarslan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karaarslan, N., Gundogar, E. An application for modular capability-based ERP software selection using AHP method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 42, 1025–1033 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1522-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1522-5

Keywords

Navigation