Abstract
In this paper, a cross-section contribution analysis (CSCA) method is proposed to optimize the size of a truss frame. A finite element model of the initial truss frame was established to analyze the static-dynamic stiffness and the full load strength. The reliability of the model was then verified by experiments. An improved wireframe model was obtained from the secondary design of the topological conceptual model, and the contribution rate (CR) of each tube to the performance was analyzed. A “modular line” was defined to modularize the frame tubes based on the cross-section CR (CSCR). The performance and light weight of the modular frames (MFs) with different tube layout schemes were studied. The results of modular size optimization show that the optimized truss frame for small electric vehicles (EVs) reduces the weight and improves the performance significantly. In addition, this method can have better results in continuous variable optimization (with non-standard tube size) as a reference for industry. In discrete variable optimization (with standard tube size for manufacturing feasibility), the method could greatly shorten the development cycle and lead to production rapidly.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aulig N, Nutwell E, Menzel S, Detwiler D (2018) Preference-based topology optimization for vehicle concept design with concurrent static and crash load cases. Struct Multidisc Optim 57(1):251–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1751-z
Bendsoe MP, Kikuchi N (1988) Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 71:197–224
Cavazzuti M, Baldini A, Bertocchi E, Costi D, Torricelli E, Moruzzi P (2011) High performance automotive chassis design: a topology optimization based approach. Struct Multidisc Optim 44(1):45–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-010-0578-7
Chen W, Zuo W (2014) Component sensitivity analysis of conceptual vehicle body for lightweight design under static and dynamic stiffness demands. Int J Veh Des 66(2):107–123. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVD.2014.064546
Donders S, Takahashi Y, Hadjit R, Van Langenhove T, Brughmans M, Van Genechten B, Desmet W (2009) A reduced beam and joint concept modeling approach to optimize global vehicle body dynamics. Finite Elem Anal Des 45(6–7):439–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2008.12.004
Fukushima J, Suzuki K, Kikuchi N (1992) Shape and topology optimization of a car body with multiple loading conditions. SAE Technical Papers. https://doi.org/10.4271/920777
Jin DF, Chen XQ (2014) A lightweight body frame conceptual design of a mini electric vehicle. Adv Mat Res 952:223–226
Jin D, Chen J, Qiao W (2011) Three-phase optimisation design of an electric car body at conceptual design stage. Int J Veh Des 57(2–3):196–211. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVD.2011.044721
Liu Y, Liu Z, Zhong H, Qin H, Lv C (2019) Gauge sensitivity analysis and optimization of the modular automotive body with different loadings. Struct Multidisc Optim 60(1):363–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02202-0
Qiao J, Xu F, Wu K, Zhang S, Liu Y (2020) Multi-objective topological optimization of an electric truck frame based on orthogonal design and analytic hierarchy process. IEEE Access 8:140923–140935. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3012878
Qin H, Liu Z, Liu Y, Zhong H (2017) An object-oriented MATLAB toolbox for automotive body conceptual design using distributed parallel optimization. Adv Eng Softw 106:19–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.01.003
Qin H, Guo Y, Liu Z, Liu Y, Zhong H (2018) Shape optimization of automotive body frame using an improved genetic algorithm optimizer. Adv Eng Softw 121(March):235–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2018.03.015
Skarka W, Pabian T, Sosnowski M (2019) Comparison of unibody and frame body versions of ultra efficient electric vehicle. SN Appl Sci 1(7):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0733-8
Sun W, Zhou J, Gong D, You T (2016) Analysis of modal frequency optimization of railway vehicle car body. Adv Mech Eng 8(4):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814016643640
Sun G, Tan D, Lv X, Yan X, Li Q, Huang X (2018) Multi-objective topology optimization of a vehicle door using multiple material tailor-welded blank (TWB) technology. Adv Eng Softw 124(June):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2018.06.014
Sun X, Li Z, Wang X, Li C (2019) Technology development of electric vehicles: a review. Energies 13(1):1–29. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13010090
Thomas H, Zhou M, Schramm U (2002) Issues of commercial optimization software development. Struct Multidisc Optim 23(2):97–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-002-0170-x
Tian L, Gao Y (2016) Crashworthiness design of automotive body in white using topology optimization. SAE Tech Papers. https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-1535
Wang D, Cai K (2018a) Multi-objective crashworthiness optimization of vehicle body using particle swarm algorithm coupled with bacterial foraging algorithm. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part d: J Automobile Eng 232(8):1003–1018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954407017724636
Wang D, Cai K (2018b) Optimizing the static–dynamic performance of the body-in-white using a modified non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm coupled with grey relational analysis. Eng Optim 50(4):615–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2017.1330888
Wang CQ, Wang DF, Zhang S (2016a) Design and application of lightweight multi-objective collaborative optimization for a parametric body-in-white structure. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part d: J Automobile Eng 230(2):273–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954407015581937
Wang L, Chen XK, Zhao QH (2016b) Muti-objective topology optimization of an electric vehicle’s traction battery enclosure. Energy Procedia 88:874–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.06.103
Xiao D, Zhang H, Liu X, He T, Shan Y (2014) Novel steel wheel design based on multi-objective topology optimization. J Mech Sci Technol 28(3):1007–1016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-013-1174-8
Xiong F, Wang D, Chen S, Gao Q, Tian S (2018a) Multi-objective lightweight and crashworthiness optimization for the side structure of an automobile body. Struct Multidisc Optim 58(4):1823–1843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-1986-3
Xiong F, Wang D, Ma Z, Chen S, Lv T, Lu F (2018b) Structure-material integrated multi-objective lightweight design of the front end structure of automobile body. Struct Multidisc Optim 57(2):829–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1778-1
Xiong F, Wang D, Zhang S, Cai K, Wang S, Lu F (2018c) Lightweight optimization of the side structure of automobile body using combined grey relational and principal component analysis. Struct Multidisc Optim 57(1):441–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1749-6
Yang RJ, Chahande AI (1995) Automotive applications of topology optimization. Structural Optimization 9(3–4):245–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01743977
Zhang J, Ning L, Hao Y, Sang T (2020) Topology optimization for crashworthiness and structural design of a battery electric vehicle. Int J Crashworthiness. https://doi.org/10.1080/13588265.2020.1766644
Zhong W, Su R, Gui L, Fan Z (2016) Multi-objective topology and sizing optimization of bus body frame. Struct Multidisc Optim 54(3):701–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1431-4
Zuo W (2013) An object-oriented graphics interface design and optimization software for cross-sectional shape of automobile body. Adv Eng Softw 64:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.04.003
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the 2021 Yeungnam University research grant.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Replication of results
The FE model using in this paper cannot be supplied because it includes the property of the company. However, the detail process for conducting optimization process is described in the Sect. 3.4.5. The tube group size and performance indicators of the optimized modular frames are given in Tables 5 and 6, and the data in Sect. 4 have been included in the supplementary file.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Shikui Chen
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, J., Kwak, Y., Xu, M. et al. Topology and modular size optimization of small electric vehicle frame based on cross-section contribution analysis. Struct Multidisc Optim 64, 4287–4304 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-03075-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-03075-y