Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The prediction of fluid responsiveness

  • Lasting Legacy in Intensive Care Medicine
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  1. O’Shaughnessy WB (1832) Report on the chemical pathology of the malignant cholera. Highley, S., London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Calvin JE, Driedger AA, Sibbald WJ (1981) The hemodynamic effect of rapid fluid infusion in critically ill patients. Surgery 90:61–76

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R (2013) Does the central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense. Crit Care Med 41:1774–1781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kattan E, Castro R, Miralles-Aguiar F, Hernandez G, Rola P (2022) The emerging concept of fluid tolerance: a position paper. J Crit Care 71:154,070

  5. Pinsky MR, Payen D (2005) Functional hemodynamic monitoring. Crit Care 9:566–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Malbrain M, Martin G, Ostermann M (2022) Everything you need to know about deresuscitation. Intensive Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-022-06761-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vincent JL, Sakr Y, Sprung CL, Ranieri VM, Reinhart K, Gerlach H, Moreno R, Carlet J, Le Gall JR, Payen D (2006) Sepsis in European intensive care units: results of the SOAP study. Crit Care Med 34:344–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, Anguel N, Mercat A, Lecarpentier Y, Richard C, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL (2000) Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162:134–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Monnet X, Shi R, Teboul JL (2022) Prediction of fluid responsiveness. What’s new. Ann Intensive Care 12:46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Barbier C, Loubieres Y, Schmit C, Hayon J, Ricome JL, Jardin F, Vieillard-Baron A (2004) Respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med 30:1740–1746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Feissel M, Michard F, Faller JP, Teboul JL (2004) The respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy. Intensive Care Med 30:1834–1837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vignon P, Repesse X, Begot E, Leger J, Jacob C, Bouferrache K, Slama M, Prat G, Vieillard-Baron A (2017) Comparison of echocardiographic indices used to predict fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 195:1022–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D, Anguel N, Richard C, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL (2006) Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 34:1402–1407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gavelli F, Shi R, Teboul JL, Azzolina D, Monnet X (2020) The end-expiratory occlusion test for detecting preload responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intensive Care 10:65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Myatra SN, Prabu NR, Divatia JV, Monnet X, Kulkarni AP, Teboul JL (2017) The changes in pulse pressure variation or stroke volume variation after a “tidal volume challenge” reliably predict fluid responsiveness during low tidal volume ventilation. Crit Care Med 45:415–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Muller L, Toumi M, Bousquet PJ, Riu-Poulenc B, Louart G, Candela D, Zoric L, Suehs C, de La Coussaye JE, Molinari N, Lefrant JY (2011) An increase in aortic blood flow after an infusion of 100 ml colloid over 1 minute can predict fluid responsiveness: the mini-fluid challenge study. Anesthesiology 115:541–547

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Monnet X, Julien F, Ait-Hamou N, Lequoy M, Gosset C, Jozwiak M, Persichini R, Anguel N, Richard C, Teboul JL (2011) Markers of anaerobic metabolism are better than central venous oxygen saturation for detecting whether hemodynamic resuscitation will reduce tissue hypoxia. Intensive Care Med 37(Supp 1):S282

    Google Scholar 

  18. Aya HD, Ster IC, Fletcher N, Grounds RM, Rhodes A, Cecconi M (2016) Pharmacodynamic analysis of a fluid challenge. Crit Care Med 44:880–891

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kattan E, Ospina-Tascon GA, Teboul JL, Castro R, Cecconi M, Ferri G, Bakker J, Hernandez G, Investigators A-S (2020) Systematic assessment of fluid responsiveness during early septic shock resuscitation: secondary analysis of the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK trial. Crit Care 24:23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vincent JL, Singer M, Einav S, Moreno R, Wendon J, Teboul JL, Bakker J, Hernandez G, Annane D, de Man AME, Monnet X, Ranieri VM, Hamzaoui O, Takala J, Juffermans N, Chiche JD, Myatra SN, De Backer D (2021) Equilibrating SSC guidelines with individualized care. Crit Care 25:397

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. AP-HP, Service de médecine intensive-réanimationHôpital de Bicêtre, DMU 4 CORREVE, Inserm UMR S_999, FHU SEPSIS, CARMAS, Université Paris-Saclay, 78 rue du Général Leclerc, 94270, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France

    Xavier Monnet

  2. First Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland

    Manu L. N. G. Malbrain

  3. International Fluid Academy, Lovenjoel, Belgium

    Manu L. N. G. Malbrain

  4. Medical Data Management, Medaman, Geel, Belgium

    Manu L. N. G. Malbrain

  5. Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

    Michael R. Pinsky

Authors
  1. Xavier Monnet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Manu L. N. G. Malbrain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael R. Pinsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xavier Monnet.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

XM is a member of the medical advisory board of Pulsion Medical Systems-Getinge, received limited research grants from Getinge, received honoraria for scientific lectures from Getinge and Baxter. MLNGM is co-founder, past-President and current Treasurer of WSACS (The Abdominal Compartment Society, http://www.wsacs.org). He is member of the medical advisory Board of Pulsion Medical Systems (part of Getinge group), Serenno Medical, Potrero Medical, Sentinel Medical and Baxter. He consults for BBraun, Becton Dickinson, ConvaTec, Spiegelberg, and Holtech Medical, and received speaker's fees from PeerVoice. He holds stock options for Serenno and Potrero. He is co-founder and President of the International Fluid Academy (IFA). The IFA (http://www.fluidacademy.org) is integrated within the not-for-profit charitable organization iMERiT, International Medical Education and Research Initiative, under Belgian law. MRP received NIH and DoD funding, consultant to Baxter Medical and Edwards Lifesciences.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Monnet, X., Malbrain, M.L.N.G. & Pinsky, M.R. The prediction of fluid responsiveness. Intensive Care Med 49, 83–86 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-022-06900-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-022-06900-0

Search

Navigation