Skip to main content
Log in

Continuous glucose monitoring with structured education in adults with type 2 diabetes managed by multiple daily insulin injections: a multicentre randomised controlled trial

  • Article
  • Published:
Diabetologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of stand-alone intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) with or without a structured education programme and blood glucose monitoring (BGM) in adults with type 2 diabetes on multiple daily insulin injections (MDI).

Methods

In this 24 week randomised open-label multicentre trial, adults with type 2 diabetes on intensive insulin therapy with HbA1c levels of 58–108 mmol/mol (7.5–12.0%) were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to isCGM with a structured education programme on adjusting insulin dose and timing according to graphical patterns in CGM (intervention group), isCGM with conventional education (control group 1) or BGM with conventional education (control group 2). Block randomisation was conducted by an independent statistician. Due to the nature of the intervention, blinding of participants and investigators was not possible. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c from baseline at 24 weeks, assessed using ANCOVA with the baseline value as a covariate.

Results

A total of 159 individuals were randomised (n=53 for each group); 148 were included in the full analysis set, with 52 in the intervention group, 49 in control group 1 and 47 in control group 2. The mean (± SD) HbA1c level at baseline was 68.19±10.94 mmol/mol (8.39±1.00%). The least squares mean change (± SEM) from baseline HbA1c at 24 weeks was −10.96±1.35 mmol/mol (−1.00±0.12%) in the intervention group, −6.87±1.39 mmol/mol (−0.63±0.13%) in control group 1 (p=0.0367 vs intervention group) and −6.32±1.42 mmol/mol (−0.58±0.13%) in control group 2 (p=0.0193 vs intervention group). Adverse events occurred in 28.85% (15/52) of individuals in the intervention group, 26.42% (14/53) in control group 1 and 48.08% (25/52) in control group 2.

Conclusions/interpretation

Stand-alone isCGM offers a greater reduction in HbA1c in adults with type 2 diabetes on MDI when education on the interpretation of graphical patterns in CGM is provided.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04926623.

Funding

This study was supported by Daewoong Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BGM:

Blood glucose monitoring

CGM:

Continuous glucose monitoring

DTSQ:

Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire

FA:

Full analysis

FreEdoM-2:

Freestyle Libre-based Education on MDI in type 2 diabetes

isCGM:

Intermittently scanned CGM

LS:

Least squares

MDI:

Multiple daily insulin injections

TAR:

Time above range

TBR:

Time below range

TIR:

Time in range

References

  1. ElSayed NA, Aleppo G, Aroda VR et al (2023) 6. Glycemic targets: standards of care in diabetes-2023. Diabetes Care 46(Suppl 1):S97–S110. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc23-S006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yoo JH, Kim JH (2020) Time in range from continuous glucose monitoring: a novel metric for glycemic control. Diabetes Metab J 44(6):828–839. https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2020.0257

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Yoo JH, Kim JH (2023) Advances in continuous glucose monitoring and integrated devices for management of diabetes with insulin-based therapy: improvement in glycemic control. Diabetes Metab J 47(1):27–41. https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2022.0271

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Aleppo G, Ruedy KJ, Riddlesworth TD et al (2017) REPLACE-BG: a randomized trial comparing continuous glucose monitoring with and without routine blood glucose monitoring in adults with well-controlled type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 40(4):538–545. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-2482

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Haak T, Hanaire H, Ajjan R, Hermanns N, Riveline JP, Rayman G (2017) Flash glucose-sensing technology as a replacement for blood glucose monitoring for the management of insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Ther 8(1):55–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-016-0223-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cappon G, Vettoretti M, Sparacino G, Facchinetti A (2019) Continuous glucose monitoring sensors for diabetes management: a review of technologies and applications. Diabetes Metab J 43(4):383–397. https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2019.0121

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Beck RW, Riddlesworth T, Ruedy K et al (2017) Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes using insulin injections: the DIAMOND randomized clinical trial. JAMA 317(4):371–378. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.19975

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lind M, Polonsky W, Hirsch IB et al (2017) Continuous glucose monitoring vs conventional therapy for glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes treated with multiple daily insulin injections: the GOLD randomized clinical trial. JAMA 317(4):379–387. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.19976

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tumminia A, Crimi S, Sciacca L et al (2015) Efficacy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring on glycaemic control and glucose variability in type 1 diabetic patients treated with either insulin pumps or multiple insulin injection therapy: a randomized controlled crossover trial. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 31(1):61–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.2557

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group, Tamborlane WV, Beck RW et al (2008) Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 359(14):1464–1476. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0805017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Battelino T, Conget I, Olsen B et al (2012) The use and efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes treated with insulin pump therapy: a randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia 55(12):3155–3162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-012-2708-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Deiss D, Bolinder J, Riveline JP et al (2006) Improved glycemic control in poorly controlled patients with type 1 diabetes using real-time continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Care 29(12):2730–2732. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc06-1134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Connell MA, Donath S, O’Neal DN et al (2009) Glycaemic impact of patient-led use of sensor-guided pump therapy in type 1 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia 52(7):1250–1257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-009-1365-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bolinder J, Antuna R, Geelhoed-Duijvestijn P, Kroger J, Weitgasser R (2016) Novel glucose-sensing technology and hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, non-masked, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 388(10057):2254–2263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31535-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hermanns N, Schumann B, Kulzer B, Haak T (2014) The impact of continuous glucose monitoring on low interstitial glucose values and low blood glucose values assessed by point-of-care blood glucose meters: results of a crossover trial. J Diabetes Sci Technol 8(3):516–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296814524105

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. van Beers CA, DeVries JH, Kleijer SJ et al (2016) Continuous glucose monitoring for patients with type 1 diabetes and impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IN CONTROL): a randomised, open-label, crossover trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 4(11):893–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30193-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Heinemann L, Freckmann G, Ehrmann D et al (2018) Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes and impaired hypoglycaemia awareness or severe hypoglycaemia treated with multiple daily insulin injections (HypoDE): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 391(10128):1367–1377. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30297-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group, Beck RW, Hirsch IB et al (2009) The effect of continuous glucose monitoring in well-controlled type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 32(8):1378–1383. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-0108

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Battelino T, Phillip M, Bratina N, Nimri R, Oskarsson P, Bolinder J (2011) Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 34(4):795–800. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc10-1989

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Seyed Ahmadi S, Westman K, Pivodic A et al (2020) The association between HbA1c and time in hypoglycemia during CGM and self-monitoring of blood glucose in people with type 1 diabetes and multiple daily insulin injections: a randomized clinical trial (GOLD-4). Diabetes Care 43(9):2017–2024. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-2606

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Sequeira PA, Montoya L, Ruelas V et al (2013) Continuous glucose monitoring pilot in low-income type 1 diabetes patients. Diabetes Technol Ther 15(10):855–858. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2013.0072

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Beck RW, Riddlesworth TD, Ruedy K et al (2017) Continuous glucose monitoring versus usual care in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving multiple daily insulin injections: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 167(6):365–374. https://doi.org/10.7326/m16-2855

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hermanns N, Ehrmann D, Schipfer M, Kröger J, Haak T, Kulzer B (2019) The impact of a structured education and treatment programme (FLASH) for people with diabetes using a flash sensor-based glucose monitoring system: results of a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 150:111–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2019.03.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yoo JH, Kim G, Lee HJ, Sim KH, Jin SM, Kim JH (2022) Effect of structured individualized education on continuous glucose monitoring use in poorly controlled patients with type 1 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 184:109209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2022.109209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Martens T, Beck RW, Bailey R et al (2021) Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 325(22):2262–2272. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.7444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Baek JH, Lee WJ, Lee BW et al (2021) Age at diagnosis and the risk of diabetic nephropathy in young patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab J 45(1):46–54. https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2019.0134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ajjan RA, Cummings MH, Jennings P, Leelarathna L, Rayman G, Wilmot EG (2019) Optimising use of rate-of-change trend arrows for insulin dosing decisions using the FreeStyle Libre flash glucose monitoring system. Diab Vasc Dis Res 16(1):3–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1479164118795252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yoo HJ, An HG, Park SY et al (2008) Use of a real time continuous glucose monitoring system as a motivational device for poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 82(1):73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2008.06.015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ehrhardt NM, Chellappa M, Walker MS, Fonda SJ, Vigersky RA (2011) The effect of real-time continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Sci Technol 5(3):668–675. https://doi.org/10.1177/193229681100500320

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Yaron M, Roitman E, Aharon-Hananel G et al (2019) Effect of flash glucose monitoring technology on glycemic control and treatment satisfaction in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 42(7):1178–1184. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-0166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ong WM, Chua SS, Ng CJ (2014) Barriers and facilitators to self-monitoring of blood glucose in people with type 2 diabetes using insulin: a qualitative study. Patient Prefer Adherence 8:237–246. https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.S57567

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Pemberton JS, Kershaw M, Dias R et al (2021) DYNAMIC: dynamic glucose management strategies delivered through a structured education program improves time in range in a socioeconomically deprived cohort of children and young people with type 1 diabetes with a history of hypoglycemia. Pediatr Diabetes 22(2):249–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/pedi.13155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schlüter S, Freckmann G, Heinemann L, Wintergerst P, Lange K (2021) Evaluation of the SPECTRUM training programme for real-time continuous glucose monitoring: a real-world multicentre prospective study in 120 adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med 38(2):e14467. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.14467

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Slattery D, Amiel SA, Choudhary P (2018) Optimal prandial timing of bolus insulin in diabetes management: a review. Diabet Med 35(3):306–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.13525

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Maiorino MI, Signoriello S, Maio A et al (2020) Effects of continuous glucose monitoring on metrics of glycemic control in diabetes: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care 43(5):1146–1156. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-1459

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Vigersky RA, Fonda SJ, Chellappa M, Walker MS, Ehrhardt NM (2012) Short- and long-term effects of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 35(1):32–38. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc11-1438

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae Hyeon Kim.

Ethics declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the healthcare professionals at each centre who provided education, including J. H. Kim of The Catholic Smart Healthcare Center, Seoul St Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea (Seoul, Republic of Korea), S. Park of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine (Seongnam, Republic of Korea), H. Ju and Y. Hyun of Diabetes Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine (Seoul, Republic of Korea), J. M. Kim of Diabetes Center, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (Seoul, Republic of Korea) and M. Yoon, H. Kim and K. Kim of Diabetes Center, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine (Seoul, Republic of Korea).

Data availability

Data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Funding

This study was supported by Daewoong Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data; preparation, review or approval of the manuscript; or decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Author’s relationships and activities

The authors declare that there are no relationships or activities that might bias, or be perceived to bias, their work.

Contribution statement

S-MJ and JHK contributed to the conception and design of the study. JYK, S-MJ, KHS, B-YK, JHC, JSM, SL, ESK, C-YP, SGK and JHK conducted data collection. JYK, S-MJ and JHK interpreted the results. JYK and S-MJ wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. JYK, S-MJ, KHS, B-YK, JHC, JSM, SL, ESK, C-YP, SGK and JHK contributed to reviewing the work critically for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final version to be published. JHK is the guarantor of this work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM (PDF 1.04 MB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, J.Y., Jin, SM., Sim, K.H. et al. Continuous glucose monitoring with structured education in adults with type 2 diabetes managed by multiple daily insulin injections: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-024-06152-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-024-06152-1

Keywords

Navigation